Ford F-250 taken from Hillcrest employee parking garage

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree UC San Diego Police Department is named as the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the UC San Diego Police Department is named as the issuing authority at the top of the message.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as UC San Diego Police Department and the University of California San Diego identify the sender.
  3. present: Counted as present given the branded UC San Diego Police Department header and university signature block.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since the UC San Diego Police Department is the named issuing agency.
  5. present: Coded 1 for the UC San Diego Police Department byline and University of California San Diego footer.
  6. present: I mark present because UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT is named as the issuing authority and University of California San Diego signs the notice.
  7. present: Coding 1 for the branded UC San Diego Police Department as sender of this timely warning.
  8. present: The phrase UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT names the agency issuing the warning to academics, staff, and students.
  9. present: Present given University of California San Diego and its police department as the branded issuing authority.
  10. present: Named here is the UC San Diego Police Department as sender, with University of California San Diego in the closing signature.
  11. present: Present: UC San Diego Police Department is named as the issuing authority and the university identifies itself in the closing.
  12. present: Vote 1: a branded campus police sender appears at the top and University of California San Diego signs the footer.
  13. present: Counts because a named campus police agency issues the timely warning and the university is identified as origin.
  14. present: Present: University of California San Diego and its police department are named as the source of this notice.
  15. present: Vote 1: the issuing authority is the UC San Diego Police Department speaking for the university community.
  16. present: Sender identified as the UC San Diego Police Department in the header and as the University of California San Diego in the closing signature.
  17. present: Sender identified as UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, which names the campus police as the issuing authority.
  18. present: Sender identified as University of California San Diego through its police department letterhead and campus address block.
  19. present: Sender identified as the UC San Diego Police Department, a named agency serving the university.
  20. present: Sender identified as UC San Diego Police Department and the University of California San Diego at 9500 Gilman Drive.
  21. present: Authority line names the UC San Diego Police Department as the issuing sender.
  22. present: The branded header and campus footer identify UC San Diego Police as the source.
  23. present: University of California San Diego and its police department appear as the named issuing body.
  24. present: Source is present because UC San Diego Police Department authors and signs the warning.
  25. present: A named agency, UC San Diego Police Department, is clearly sending this notice.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 is a specific named crime.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the alert specifies motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as the hazard is specifically named as motor vehicle theft.
  3. present: Counted as present given the specific crime of motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since the threat is specified as motor vehicle theft rather than a vague emergency.
  5. present: Coded 1 for identifying motor vehicle theft of a specific Ford F-250 truck as the crime.
  6. present: Coding 1 for the specific threat of motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck.
  7. present: The phrase motor vehicle theft identifies a specific crime rather than a generic emergency.
  8. present: Present given a report of motor vehicle theft involving a Ford F-250 with South Dakota license plates.
  9. present: Named here is motor vehicle theft as the specific hazard.
  10. present: I mark present because the alert specifies motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck.
  11. present: Vote 1: the warning specifies motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck rather than a generic incident.
  12. present: Counts because motor vehicle theft is identified as the specific crime being warned about.
  13. present: Present: the hazard is theft of a motor vehicle, specifically a Ford F-250 with South Dakota plates.
  14. present: Vote 1: the subject line Timely Warning Motor Vehicle Theft names a specific crime type as the threat.
  15. present: Counts because the warning concerns theft of a specific motor vehicle, not an unspecified emergency or situation.
  16. present: Threat named as motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck with South Dakota license plates.
  17. present: Threat named as a Timely Warning for Motor Vehicle Theft involving a stolen Ford F-250.
  18. present: Threat named as motor vehicle theft rather than a vague incident or emergency.
  19. present: Threat named as theft of a motor vehicle, specifically a Ford F-250 flatbed truck.
  20. present: Threat named as Motor Vehicle Theft in the subject line and in the report of a stolen Ford F-250.
  21. present: Crime named is motor vehicle theft of a Ford F-250 flatbed truck.
  22. present: The specific threat is motor vehicle theft, not a generic incident label.
  23. present: Hazard is specified as theft of a Ford F-250 with South Dakota plates.
  24. present: The heading Timely Warning Motor Vehicle Theft names the concrete crime type.
  25. present: What the threat is appears as motor vehicle theft rather than a vague emergency.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree 4245 First Ave and the Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage locate the event.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the theft is placed at 4245 First Ave in the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as the location includes a street address and the named employee parking garage at Hillcrest Hospital.
  3. present: Counted as present given the named UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage and 4245 First Ave.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since a building, street address, and campus hospital area are named.
  5. present: Coded 1 for locating the incident at the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage on First Ave.
  6. present: The phrase 4245 First Ave and UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage names where the theft occurred.
  7. present: Present given a street address and the named Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage on the UC San Diego campus area.
  8. present: Named here is the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage at 4245 First Ave.
  9. present: I mark present because the incident is placed at 4245 First Ave at the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
  10. present: Coding 1 for the named place UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage on First Ave in the UC San Diego community.
  11. present: Counts because it names 4245 First Ave and the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage as the place of the theft.
  12. present: Present: the Hillcrest Hospital employee parking garage plus a street address locates the event on campus grounds.
  13. present: Vote 1: a building-level site, UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage, is given as where it happened.
  14. present: Counts because 4245 First Ave and the Hillcrest Hospital garage are named places on the campus area.
  15. present: Present: the location is the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage on First Ave.
  16. present: Place given as 4245 First Ave at the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
  17. present: Place given as the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage on First Ave.
  18. present: Place given as 4245 First Ave and the Hillcrest Hospital employee garage, a named campus related site.
  19. present: Place given as UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage at 4245 First Ave.
  20. present: Place given as 4245 First Ave from the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
  21. present: Site named is 4245 First Ave at the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
  22. present: The place is the Hillcrest Hospital employee parking garage on First Ave.
  23. present: Location is the employee parking garage at UCSD Hillcrest Hospital, 4245 First Ave.
  24. present: Campus area is identified through the Hillcrest garage and the Gilman Drive university address.
  25. present: Where is answered with 4245 First Ave and the UCSD Hillcrest Hospital Employee Parking Garage.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree recipients are told to lock vehicles, call 9-1-1, and report suspicious activity.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because recipients are told to lock vehicles, call 9-1-1, and report suspicious activity.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as the message instructs people to call or text 9-1-1 and to always lock their vehicles.
  3. present: Counted as present given protective instructions to lock vehicles, never leave them running, and call 9-1-1.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since the public is instructed to lock cars, report suspicious activity, and call 9-1-1.
  5. present: Coded 1 for directing recipients to lock vehicles, park in well-lit areas, and call or text 9-1-1.
  6. present: Present given instructions to lock vehicles, never leave a car running unattended, and call or text 9-1-1.
  7. present: Named here are protective actions such as always lock your vehicle, take your keys, and report suspicious activity to police.
  8. present: I mark present because recipients are told to call San Diego Police at (619) 531-2000, submit a tip, or call 9-1-1 if victimized.
  9. present: Coding 1 for instructions to park in busy well-lit areas, lock doors and windows, and report theft or suspicious activity to 9-1-1.
  10. present: The phrase please call the San Diego Police Department and always lock your vehicle are protective action instructions to recipients.
  11. present: Present: recipients are instructed to lock vehicles, call 9-1-1 if victimized, and report suspicious activity immediately.
  12. present: Vote 1: protective instructions include locking the vehicle, never leaving it running unattended, and calling 9-1-1.
  13. present: Counts because the text tells people to park in busy well-lit areas, take keys, and report suspicious activity to 9-1-1.
  14. present: Present: call or text 9-1-1 if you are a theft victim and always lock your vehicle are direct protective actions.
  15. present: Vote 1: instructions tell community members to take keys, use anti-theft measures, and report suspicious activity to 9-1-1.
  16. present: Instruction is to lock vehicles, call or text 9-1-1 if a victim or if suspicious activity is seen, and never leave a vehicle running unattended.
  17. present: Instruction is to call police with tips, lock the car and take keys, and report suspicious activity to 9-1-1.
  18. present: Instruction is for victims to call or text UC San Diego Police immediately at 9-1-1 and for all readers to lock vehicles and report suspicious activity.
  19. present: Instruction is to always lock the vehicle, park in busy well-lit areas, and contact 9-1-1 to report theft or suspicious activity.
  20. present: Instruction is to call or text 9-1-1, lock doors and windows, take keys, and park in busy well-lit spots.
  21. present: Action told to reader includes calling 9-1-1, locking vehicles, and reporting suspicious activity.
  22. present: Recipients are instructed to lock cars, never leave them running, and call or text 9-1-1.
  23. present: Protective instructions tell readers to call police, lock vehicles, and submit tips.
  24. present: Guidance is present as lock your vehicle, call 9-1-1 if victimized, and report suspicious activity.
  25. present: What to do is stated: call 9-1-1 or (619) 531-2000, lock up, and keep spare keys off the vehicle.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree April 12, 2025 at about 5:00PM and the April 14 notice date supply time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the theft is dated April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM and the notice is dated April 14, 2025.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as clock time, calendar dates, and the word immediately all appear.
  3. present: Counted as present given April 12, 2025 at about 5:00PM and the request to call immediately.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since the event time of 5:00PM on April 12, 2025 is given along with the notice date.
  5. present: Coded 1 for the April 12, 2025 5:00PM occurrence time and the April 14, 2025 issuance date.
  6. present: Named here are April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM, the header date April 14, 2025, and the word immediately.
  7. present: I mark present because the theft is timed to April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM and tips or 9-1-1 reports are urged immediately.
  8. present: Coding 1 for clock time approximately 5:00PM on April 12, 2025 and the recency phrase at this time.
  9. present: The phrase April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM supplies when the theft happened.
  10. present: Present given the message date April 14, 2025 and the theft time of approximately 5:00PM on April 12, 2025.
  11. present: Vote 1: the theft is placed on April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM and the notice is dated April 14, 2025.
  12. present: Counts because a clock time, calendar dates, immediately, and at this time all mark recency or when.
  13. present: Present: April 12, 2025 at about 5:00PM and the order to call police immediately supply temporal markers.
  14. present: Vote 1: dates of April 12 and April 14, 2025 plus approximately 5:00PM establish when the crime and warning occurred.
  15. present: Counts because the theft time of 5:00PM on April 12, 2025 and at this time for suspect status are temporal.
  16. present: Clock cue is April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM for the theft plus the April 14, 2025 issue date and the word immediately.
  17. present: Clock cue is the theft time of about 5:00PM on April 12, 2025 and the notice date of April 14, 2025.
  18. present: Clock cue is approximately 5:00PM on April 12, 2025, along with At this time and immediately.
  19. present: Clock cue is April 14, 2025 on the notice and April 12, 2025 at about 5:00PM when the theft occurred.
  20. present: Clock cue is the dated heading of April 14, 2025 and the theft timing of April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM.
  21. present: When stated includes April 12, 2025 at approximately 5:00PM and the April 14, 2025 notice date.
  22. present: The theft time is given as about 5:00PM on April 12, 2025.
  23. present: Clock time and date appear for the theft, and immediately is used for reporting.
  24. present: Recency is marked with April 14, 2025, April 12, 2025, 5:00PM, at this time, and immediately.
  25. present: When is answered with the 5:00PM April 12 occurrence and the April 14 release date.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree crashing the stolen truck into a construction fence states property harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the text states the stolen vehicle crashed into a nearby construction fence, which is property harm.
  2. present: This element scores 1 as crashing the stolen truck into a construction fence is stated property damage.
  3. present: Counted as present given the stated crash of the stolen vehicle into a nearby construction fence.
  4. present: I mark this 1 since the alert describes the stolen vehicle striking a construction fence.
  5. present: Coded 1 for reporting that the suspect crashed the stolen vehicle into a construction fence.
  6. present: I mark present because the suspect crashed the stolen vehicle into a nearby construction fence, a consequence to property.
  7. present: Coding 1 for property harm described when the stolen truck was crashed into a construction fence before the suspect fled.
  8. present: The phrase crashed the stolen vehicle into a nearby construction fence states damage beyond merely naming the theft.
  9. present: Present given that the stolen vehicle struck a construction fence, showing a consequence to property.
  10. present: Named here is the crash into a nearby construction fence as harm to property during the theft.
  11. present: Counts because the stolen truck crashing into a nearby construction fence states property damage from the event.
  12. present: Present: property harm is described when the suspect crashed the stolen vehicle into a construction fence.
  13. present: Vote 1: crashing the stolen truck into a fence is a stated consequence to property beyond naming the theft.
  14. present: Counts because damage to a nearby construction fence shows what the incident did to property.
  15. present: Present: the suspect crashing into a construction fence before fleeing describes property impact from the hazard.
  16. present: Harm shown as the stolen truck being crashed into a nearby construction fence during the theft.
  17. present: Harm shown as property damage when the suspect crashed the stolen vehicle into a construction fence before fleeing.
  18. present: Harm shown as a crash into a nearby construction fence, which is a consequence to property during the theft.
  19. present: Harm shown as the suspect crashing the stolen truck into a construction fence, a described effect on property.
  20. present: Harm shown as the stolen vehicle striking a construction fence, which documents damage beyond merely naming the theft.
  21. present: Consequence language describes the stolen truck crashing into a nearby construction fence.
  22. present: Property harm is stated when the suspect crashed the stolen vehicle into a construction fence.
  23. present: The writeup states a construction fence was struck, a property consequence of the event.
  24. present: Impact is present because crashing into a fence describes harm to property during the theft.
  25. present: Severity to property is shown by the stolen truck hitting a nearby construction fence before the suspect fled.