Stay-in-place for shots fired at 2910 Short Vine

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found S present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  2. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  3. present: "UC Emergency" brands the alert and "Police" names the responding agency.
  4. present: The signature "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names the sender and responding authority.
  5. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the issuing or responding agency.
  6. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  7. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names the sender and responding authority.
  8. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the issuing or responding authority.
  9. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the issuing or responding authority.
  10. present: UC Emergency is a branded alert tag and Police is named as the responding agency.
  11. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the authority responding.
  12. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the responding authority.
  13. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" identifies the issuing responders.
  14. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the issuing authority.
  15. present: The message opens with "UC Emergency" and cites "Police" as the responding authority.
  16. present: "UC Emergency" brands the campus sender and "Police" names the responding force.
  17. present: Sender is tagged as "UC Emergency" and the message names "Police" as the authority responding.
  18. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" identifies the responding authority.
  19. present: Source is present via the "UC Emergency" signature and the named "Police" responders.
  20. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  21. present: "UC Emergency-" tags the sender and "Police" identifies the responding authority.
  22. present: The opening "UC Emergency" brands the sender, and Police is named as the authority.
  23. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: Sender is identified by the "UC Emergency" tag and by "Police" as the responding body.
  25. present: "UC Emergency-" is a branded alert signature and "Police" is a named responding agency.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found H absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It only says an "emergency reported", which is a generic label and names no specific threat.
  2. absent: It only says "emergency reported", a generic label that names no specific threat.
  3. absent: The hazard is only called an "emergency", which the rubric treats as too generic.
  4. absent: Only an "emergency reported" is mentioned, with no specific hazard named.
  5. absent: The text never names the threat beyond the generic word "emergency".
  6. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic label that does not name a specific threat.
  7. absent: It only says "emergency reported", which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  8. absent: The hazard is only called an "emergency", with no specific threat named.
  9. absent: Only "emergency" is used; no specific threat (shooter, fire, bomb, robbery) is named.
  10. absent: The hazard is labeled only as an emergency, which is not a specific threat.
  11. absent: The hazard is only called an "emergency", which is not a specific threat.
  12. absent: The hazard is only called an "emergency", which is too generic to count.
  13. absent: Only "emergency reported" appears; no specific threat such as shots fired or robbery is named.
  14. absent: The text only says "emergency reported" and never names a specific threat.
  15. absent: It refers only to an "emergency" without specifying the hazard type.
  16. absent: Only a generic "emergency" is reported, with no specific hazard type.
  17. absent: Uses only the generic word "emergency" and never names a specific hazard.
  18. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  19. absent: "Emergency reported" does not identify a specific threat, so hazard is absent.
  20. absent: The text only names an "emergency" and does not specify a threat such as shots fired or fire.
  21. absent: A nonspecific "emergency" is reported with no named hazard such as fire or shots.
  22. absent: Only the word "emergency" is used, which is too generic to count as a named hazard.
  23. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic word that does not name a specific threat.
  24. absent: Only "emergency reported" appears; no shots, fire, robbery, or other specific threat is named.
  25. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not name the threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found L present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is placed "at 2910 Short Vine", a specific street address.
  2. present: The report is placed "at 2910 Short Vine", a numbered street address.
  3. present: It gives the address "at 2910 Short Vine".
  4. present: The site is given as "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  5. present: Cites a street address: "2910 Short Vine".
  6. present: It places the report "at 2910 Short Vine", a specific street address.
  7. present: It locates the report "at 2910 Short Vine", a specific street address.
  8. present: It cites "2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  9. present: It gives an address: "at 2910 Short Vine".
  10. present: The address 2910 Short Vine is a specific location.
  11. present: A specific address is given: "2910 Short Vine".
  12. present: It cites the address "at 2910 Short Vine".
  13. present: The site is given as "2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  14. present: It places the report "at 2910 Short Vine", a specific street address.
  15. present: It gives the address "2910 Short Vine".
  16. present: "2910 Short Vine" is a concrete street address.
  17. present: Gives a street address: "at 2910 Short Vine".
  18. present: It cites the address "2910 Short Vine".
  19. present: The site is given as "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  20. present: It locates the report "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  21. present: The site is given as "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  22. present: It cites "2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  23. present: It locates the report "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
  24. present: It gives a street address: "at 2910 Short Vine".
  25. present: The location is given as "at 2910 Short Vine", a street address.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found G present (25 present / 0 absent).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  2. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  3. present: People are instructed to stay at their location if safe and to be observant.
  4. present: Recipients are directed to stay at their location if safe.
  5. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is an instruction to remain in place.
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "be observant/take action as needed".
  8. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  9. present: It directs people to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action as needed.
  10. present: Stay at your location and take action as needed instruct recipients what to do.
  11. present: Recipients are directed to stay at their location if safe and to be observant.
  12. present: "Stay at your location" if safe is an instruction to remain in place.
  13. present: It directs people to "stay at your location" if safe, a clear stay-put instruction.
  14. present: It tells recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  15. present: It instructs people to "stay at your location" if safe.
  16. present: If safe, people are told to stay where they are, plus be observant.
  17. present: Protective instruction is present: "If safe, stay at your location".
  18. present: Recipients are instructed to "stay at your location" if safe.
  19. present: The line "stay at your location" is a direct stay-put instruction to recipients.
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  21. present: The alert tells people to stay at their location if safe, which is protective guidance.
  22. present: "stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take if it is safe.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  24. present: Stay-put guidance is explicit: "If safe, stay at your location" plus "take action as needed".
  25. present: People are directed to "stay at your location" if it is safe.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found T absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: The message has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or until-further-notice cue.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrasing appears in the text.
  5. absent: No timestamp, now, today, or duration appears in the message.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar recency phrasing is present.
  9. absent: No time of day, date, or recency word appears in the message.
  10. absent: The text has no timestamp, date, or recency marker for the incident.
  11. absent: The text has no timestamp, date, now, immediately, or similar recency cue.
  12. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency marker.
  13. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue; "More info soon" is not a hazard time.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is stated.
  16. absent: No time of day, date, or recency word is present in the text.
  17. absent: No time of day, date, or recency marker is stated.
  18. absent: No time of day, date, or recency marker is given.
  19. absent: The text has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency marker.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar recency marker is included.
  22. absent: Neither a timestamp nor recency terms such as now, today, or until further notice appear.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: "More info soon" is a future update promise, not a when or recency cue for the hazard.
  25. absent: The text contains no clock time, date, or recency word.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found I absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unlabeled emergency itself.
  2. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity the unlabeled emergency could cause.
  3. absent: It does not say the event is dangerous or could cause injury or other harm.
  4. absent: There is no statement of injury risk, danger, or other consequence.
  5. absent: Severity and consequences are not stated; staying put is guidance, not impact.
  6. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  7. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unnamed emergency itself.
  8. absent: Impact is absent: there is no stated harm, lethality, or severity.
  9. absent: Impact is absent: there is no statement of danger, injury risk, or other consequences.
  10. absent: It does not describe potential harm, injury, or how dangerous the situation is.
  11. absent: It does not say what the event could do to people or property.
  12. absent: It never states injury risk, danger, or other impacts of the event.
  13. absent: No consequence or severity language is present.
  14. absent: It states no consequence or severity, only that an emergency was reported.
  15. absent: No impact, injury risk, or severity is conveyed.
  16. absent: Impact is absent: it does not say the event is dangerous or could injure anyone.
  17. absent: Nothing conveys consequence or severity such as dangerous, injury, or deadly.
  18. absent: Severity or consequences are not mentioned.
  19. absent: Impact is missing because no harm, danger, or severity is stated.
  20. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or could cause injury.
  21. absent: Impact is absent: the text never says what harm the emergency could cause.
  22. absent: Impact is absent: the alert never says what harm the event could cause.
  23. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity beyond the generic word emergency.
  24. absent: No consequence wording such as dangerous, life-threatening, or risk of injury is used.
  25. absent: Severity or harm is not stated beyond calling the event an emergency.