City boil-water advisory; do not use campus fountains

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and WSU plus the City of Wichita are named authorities.
  2. present: The branded tag WSU Critical Alert and WSU naming itself identify the sender.
  3. present: The branded WSU Critical Alert tag identifies the sender, and the City of Wichita is named as issuer.
  4. present: "WSU Critical Alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  5. present: The opening tag WSU Critical Alert brands the sender, and the City of Wichita is identified as the issuer.
  6. present: The message opens with WSU Critical Alert and names the City of Wichita and WSU as the authorities issuing it.
  7. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert identifies the issuer, with the City of Wichita and WSU also named.
  8. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert identifies the sender, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing city.
  9. present: The branded tag WSU Critical Alert identifies the sender, with the City of Wichita named as issuer.
  10. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert is a branded signature, and WSU plus the City of Wichita are named.
  11. present: The branded WSU Critical Alert tag and City of Wichita identify who is issuing the warning.
  12. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert brands the sender, and WSU plus the City of Wichita are named.
  13. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita and WSU are also named.
  14. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert and the line WSU is advising identify the sending institution.
  15. present: The message opens with WSU Critical Alert and names the City of Wichita and WSU as issuing bodies.
  16. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  17. present: The WSU Critical Alert brand and the named City of Wichita identify the sender and issuing authority.
  18. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and both WSU and the City of Wichita are named.
  19. present: "WSU Critical Alert" is a branded signature, and WSU names itself as the advising authority.
  20. present: The WSU Critical Alert signature and the City of Wichita identify who is sending and issuing the notice.
  21. present: The header WSU Critical Alert identifies the issuer, and WSU and the City of Wichita are named.
  22. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded signature, and WSU names itself as the advising institution.
  23. present: The branded line WSU Critical Alert identifies the sender, with WSU and the City of Wichita named as authorities.
  24. present: The opener WSU Critical Alert brands the sender, and WSU names itself in the body.
  25. present: "WSU Critical Alert" is a branded sender tag, and both WSU and the City of Wichita are identified.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message specifies a Boil Water Advisory rather than a generic emergency or situation.
  2. present: It names a Boil Water Advisory, a specific water safety threat.
  3. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific unsafe-water threat rather than a generic emergency.
  4. present: "Boil Water Advisory" names a specific water-safety threat rather than a generic emergency.
  5. present: Boil Water Advisory specifies the water threat instead of using only words like incident or emergency.
  6. present: Boil Water Advisory specifies the threat as a drinking-water problem rather than an unnamed situation.
  7. present: The hazard is specified as a Boil Water Advisory rather than a generic incident.
  8. present: The message specifies a Boil Water Advisory as the threat rather than a vague emergency.
  9. present: Boil water advisory specifies the water hazard rather than a generic incident.
  10. present: A boil water advisory is named as the hazard, not a generic emergency or situation.
  11. present: Boil Water Advisory specifies the hazard rather than using only words like emergency or incident.
  12. present: The City of Wichita has issued a Boil Water Advisory, which specifies the water threat.
  13. present: The message specifies a Boil Water Advisory, which is a concrete water hazard.
  14. present: A Boil Water Advisory is a specific named hazard, not a generic incident or emergency.
  15. present: It specifies a Boil Water Advisory as the threat the city has issued.
  16. present: Boil Water Advisory specifies a drinking water threat, not a vague emergency, incident, or situation.
  17. present: The message specifies a boil water advisory rather than a vague emergency or situation.
  18. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water-safety threat rather than a generic emergency.
  19. present: "Boil Water Advisory" specifies the hazard instead of calling it only an incident or situation.
  20. present: A Boil Water Advisory is named, which is a specific water-quality threat.
  21. present: The boil water advisory specifies the water hazard rather than a generic emergency or situation.
  22. present: The City of Wichita Boil Water Advisory specifies the threat rather than a vague incident or situation.
  23. present: A Boil Water Advisory is named as the threat, which is a specific hazard rather than a vague situation.
  24. present: The message specifies a Boil Water Advisory as the threat, not a generic incident.
  25. present: The message specifies a Boil Water Advisory, which names the water problem rather than a generic emergency.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It refers to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which is a campus location.
  2. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  3. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, naming campus as the place.
  4. present: The notice points to "campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations", locating the issue on campus.
  5. present: Campus is named through campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  6. present: Guidance is tied to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, a campus place.
  7. present: It ties the advisory to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  8. present: It refers to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which is an on-campus place.
  9. present: Campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations supply a campus location.
  10. present: Campus is specified through campus drinking fountains and bottle filling stations.
  11. present: Campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations place the problem on campus.
  12. present: It restricts campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, locating the issue on campus.
  13. present: It refers to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, satisfying a campus location.
  14. present: Campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations place the problem on campus.
  15. present: Campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations identify the campus as the affected place.
  16. present: The restriction covers campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, which places the issue on campus.
  17. present: It points to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations as the affected places.
  18. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  19. present: The advisory is tied to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, so a campus place is given.
  20. present: Guidance is tied to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, so the place is campus.
  21. present: Advice about campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations places the hazard on campus.
  22. present: Recipients are pointed to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which counts as a campus location.
  23. present: The text points to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, so the place is campus.
  24. present: It locates the problem at campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  25. present: It points to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, satisfying a campus-level location.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are advised not to use those campus water sources, a concrete protective instruction.
  2. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  3. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  4. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  5. present: Students, faculty, and staff are advised not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  6. present: Students, faculty, and staff are advised not to use campus fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  7. present: Recipients are advised not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  8. present: Recipients are instructed not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  9. present: The alert instructs the campus community not to use drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  10. present: The protective instruction is not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle filling stations.
  11. present: The alert advises the campus community not to use drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  12. present: Students, faculty and staff are told not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  13. present: Recipients are instructed not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  14. present: The alert instructs the campus community not to use drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  15. present: Recipients are instructed not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  16. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  17. present: Students, faculty, and staff are advised not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  18. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus drinking fixtures.
  19. present: The alert tells the campus community not to use drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  20. present: The campus community is advised not to use those fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  21. present: WSU advises the campus community not to use drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  22. present: Students, faculty, and staff are advised not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, a clear protective instruction.
  23. present: Students, faculty, and staff are instructed not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  24. present: Students, faculty, and staff are instructed not to use campus fountains or bottle-fillers.
  25. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use campus fountains or bottle-filling stations.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Until further notice conveys that the advisory is in effect now and for an unspecified period.
  2. present: The restriction is in effect until further notice, a recency and duration cue.
  3. present: The phrase until further notice is an explicit duration cue for when the restriction applies.
  4. present: "Until further notice" is an explicit duration cue for how long the restriction lasts.
  5. present: Until further notice supplies a time bound for how long the instruction lasts.
  6. present: The phrase until further notice gives a duration for the restriction.
  7. present: Until further notice conveys how long the restriction remains in effect.
  8. present: Until further notice tells readers the restriction is in effect now and for an open-ended period.
  9. present: Until further notice conveys how long the protective restriction remains in effect.
  10. present: Until further notice tells recipients how long the water restriction lasts.
  11. present: The restriction holds until further notice, which conveys timing.
  12. present: The restriction is in force until further notice, a recency and duration cue.
  13. present: Until further notice is an explicit duration cue for the advisory.
  14. present: Until further notice conveys when the restriction applies.
  15. present: Until further notice supplies a time bound for how long the restriction lasts.
  16. present: Until further notice is a duration cue for how long the restriction remains in effect.
  17. present: Until further notice supplies a duration for the restriction.
  18. present: The phrase until further notice supplies a duration or recency cue.
  19. present: "Until further notice" conveys that the restriction is in effect now and has no end clock time.
  20. present: Until further notice supplies a time bound for the restriction.
  21. present: Until further notice tells recipients how long the restriction remains in effect.
  22. present: Until further notice conveys when the fountain restriction applies.
  23. present: Until further notice marks when the no-fountain rule remains in effect.
  24. present: Until further notice tells recipients how long the restriction remains in effect.
  25. present: "Until further notice" is an explicit timing phrase for when the advice remains in effect.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing in the text says the water is dangerous, contaminated, or likely to cause illness.
  2. absent: The advisory is named but the text never states illness, contamination, or other harm.
  3. absent: The text never states illness, contamination, or other harm the water could cause.
  4. absent: No illness, contamination, or other harm is stated beyond the name of the advisory.
  5. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, such as contamination, illness, or that drinking would be dangerous.
  6. absent: Nothing states illness, contamination harm, or other consequences beyond the boil-water label itself.
  7. absent: The text never states what the water could do to people, such as illness or other harm.
  8. absent: No consequence such as illness, contamination harm, or danger is stated beyond the advisory name.
  9. absent: The message never states a consequence such as unsafe water, sickness, or other harm.
  10. absent: No consequence language appears, such as contamination, sickness, or that the water is dangerous.
  11. absent: No consequence is stated, such as unsafe water, sickness, or a health risk.
  12. absent: No consequence is stated, such as illness, contamination harm, or that the water is dangerous.
  13. absent: The text does not state illness, contamination, danger, or other harm the water could cause.
  14. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the advisory itself.
  15. absent: No consequence language appears, such as illness risk or that the water is dangerous to drink.
  16. absent: The advisory and fountain restriction do not say the water could cause illness, contamination, or other harm.
  17. absent: No sentence states what drinking the water could do, such as illness or other harm.
  18. absent: The text never states illness, contamination, or other harm the water could cause.
  19. absent: The text never says the water could sicken people or otherwise describes severity or harm.
  20. absent: No consequence language appears, such as contamination, sickness, or danger from drinking the water.
  21. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, such as that the water is dangerous or could cause sickness.
  22. absent: Nothing in the text states the water is dangerous, could cause illness, or otherwise describes severity.
  23. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the advisory, such as sickness or unsafe water.
  24. absent: No consequence wording such as dangerous, illness, or unsafe to drink appears.
  25. absent: No wording states contamination, sickness risk, danger, or other consequences of using the water.