Gas leak at Wilbur Powerhouse with evacuation

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent23/25

  Final assessment

  Nearly all reads (23 of 25) find Source present: Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority on an Emergency Notification. Two dissenters call those labels too generic without a campus brand.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header Emergency Notification and Emergency Response identify the issuing or responding authority.
  2. absent: There is no branded sender tag, university name, or named agency; Emergency Response is too generic.
  3. present: Emergency Response is identified as the unit investigating, which names a responding authority.
  4. present: Emergency Response is named as the authority investigating the reported leak.
  5. present: Emergency Response is identified as the authority investigating the reported leak.
  6. present: Emergency Response is named as the body investigating the leak, so an issuing authority is identified.
  7. present: Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority on a message labeled Emergency Notification.
  8. present: Emergency Response is identified as the authority investigating the reported leak.
  9. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the unit investigating, so a responding authority is identified.
  10. present: Emergency Response is named as the unit investigating the leak, which identifies a responding authority.
  11. present: It uses an Emergency Notification label and names Emergency Response as the investigating authority.
  12. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the investigating authority under an Emergency Notification label.
  13. present: Emergency Response is named as the authority investigating the leak.
  14. absent: Emergency Notification and Emergency Response do not name a campus brand, university, or specific agency.
  15. present: Emergency Response is named as the unit investigating, identifying a responding authority.
  16. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the unit investigating, so a responding authority is identified.
  17. present: The Emergency Notification header and Emergency Response investigating name a responding authority.
  18. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the authority investigating the leak.
  19. present: Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority for the reported leak.
  20. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the investigating authority issuing the notice.
  21. present: Emergency Response is identified as the unit investigating the leak, which names a responding authority.
  22. present: Emergency Notification is a sender style header, and Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority.
  23. present: "Emergency Response" is named as the authority investigating the leak.
  24. present: Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority on a labeled Emergency Notification.
  25. present: Emergency Response is named as the investigating authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the text names a gas leak, a specific threat rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a gas leak, a specific threat.
  2. present: It names a gas leak, a specific threat.
  3. present: The text names a gas leak, a specific listed hazard.
  4. present: The text reports a gas leak, which is a specific named hazard.
  5. present: The text reports a gas leak, which is a specific named hazard.
  6. present: The alert reports a gas leak, a specific named threat.
  7. present: A gas leak is named as the specific threat.
  8. present: It names a gas leak, which is a specific threat.
  9. present: The alert reports a "gas leak", a specific named threat.
  10. present: The text names a gas leak, a specific threat.
  11. present: It reports a "gas leak", a specific named hazard.
  12. present: It names a reported "gas leak", a specific threat.
  13. present: A reported gas leak is a specific named hazard.
  14. present: It names a reported gas leak, which is a specific threat.
  15. present: A gas leak is named, which is a specific threat.
  16. present: The message reports a "gas leak", which is a specific named hazard.
  17. present: It names a gas leak, which is a specific threat.
  18. present: The text names a "gas leak", a specific listed threat.
  19. present: The text names a gas leak, which is a specific hazard.
  20. present: It names a "gas leak", a specific threat.
  21. present: The text names a gas leak, a specific threat.
  22. present: It reports a gas leak, which is a specific named hazard.
  23. present: It names a "gas leak", a specific threat.
  24. present: It names a reported gas leak, which is a specific hazard.
  25. present: The message names a gas leak, a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  2. present: It locates the leak at Wilbur Powerhouse.
  3. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  4. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  5. present: The site is Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  6. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse.
  7. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  8. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  9. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse.
  10. present: The leak is placed at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  11. present: It names Wilbur Powerhouse as the site.
  12. present: It names Wilbur Powerhouse as the location.
  13. present: The leak is at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  14. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  15. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  16. present: The leak is placed at "Wilbur Powerhouse", a named building.
  17. present: It places the leak at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  18. present: The leak is reported at "Wilbur Powerhouse".
  19. present: It locates the leak at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  20. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  21. present: The leak is reported at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  22. present: The leak is located at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  23. present: The leak is at "Wilbur Powerhouse", a named building.
  24. present: The leak is placed at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
  25. present: The leak is at Wilbur Powerhouse, a named building.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: everyone is ordered to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an official All Clear.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until All Clear.
  2. present: It orders all individuals to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  3. present: Recipients are told to evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an official All Clear.
  4. present: Recipients are ordered to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  5. present: Everyone must evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an official All Clear.
  6. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an official all clear.
  7. present: Recipients are told to evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  8. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an all clear.
  9. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  10. present: It orders everyone to evacuate the area immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an official All Clear.
  11. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  12. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  13. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until All Clear.
  14. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  15. present: Recipients must evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  16. present: All individuals are ordered to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  17. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet from the building, and stay away until all clear.
  18. present: All individuals must evacuate immediately, move 300 feet from the building, and wait for an All Clear.
  19. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  20. present: Recipients are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  21. present: Recipients are told to evacuate immediately, move at least 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  22. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until an All Clear.
  23. present: It instructs all individuals to "evacuate the area immediately", move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  24. present: All individuals are told to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
  25. present: It orders everyone to evacuate immediately, move 300 feet away, and not return until all clear.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present via currently, immediately, and not returning until an official All Clear is issued.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It uses currently, immediately, and not returning until an official All Clear is issued.
  2. present: It uses immediately and currently, and tells people not to return until an official all clear.
  3. present: Currently, immediately, and until an All Clear are recency and duration cues.
  4. present: Immediate is a recency cue, and a diagnostic is described as currently in progress.
  5. present: The diagnostic is currently in progress and people are told to evacuate immediately.
  6. present: Currently, immediately, and until an all clear is issued all mark timing or duration.
  7. present: The text uses currently for the diagnostic and immediately for the required action.
  8. present: Immediately and currently mark recency, and return is barred until an official all clear.
  9. present: It says a diagnostic is "currently" in progress and orders people to evacuate "immediately".
  10. present: It uses currently for the diagnostic and tells people to evacuate immediately.
  11. present: It uses currently, Immediate Action Required, and immediately as timing cues.
  12. present: It uses "currently" and "immediately" and keeps the order in force until an official All Clear.
  13. present: Currently and immediately supply recency and timing, and All Clear sets an until condition.
  14. present: Immediately and currently mark recency, and return is withheld until an official all clear.
  15. present: Immediately, currently, and until an official all clear convey timing and recency.
  16. present: Time cues include "currently", "immediately", and "until an official All Clear is issued".
  17. present: Immediate, currently, and until an official All Clear is issued convey timing and duration.
  18. present: A diagnostic is "currently" in progress, and people must evacuate "immediately".
  19. present: Currently and immediately mark recency, and the All Clear delay is a duration cue.
  20. present: The words "immediately" and "currently", plus waiting until an All Clear, mark time.
  21. present: It uses immediately and currently, and withholds return until an All Clear is issued.
  22. present: Immediate action is required, a diagnostic is currently in progress, and return waits until an All Clear.
  23. present: It uses "currently" and tells people to evacuate "immediately", plus wait until an official all clear.
  24. present: Timing cues include currently, immediately, and not returning until an official All Clear.
  25. present: It uses currently and tells people to evacuate immediately.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: a gas leak plus evacuation orders name the hazard and give guidance without stating explosion risk, injury, or danger.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No stated consequence such as explosion risk, injury, or danger appears beyond the leak itself.
  2. absent: Naming a gas leak does not by itself state consequences such as explosion risk or injury.
  3. absent: Gas leak plus evacuation orders name the hazard and give guidance but never state explosion risk, injury, or other harm.
  4. absent: A gas leak is named but no consequence such as explosion risk or injury is stated.
  5. absent: No wording states explosion risk, injury, or that the leak is dangerous or life threatening.
  6. absent: No consequence is stated, such as risk of explosion, injury, or that the leak is dangerous.
  7. absent: Urgency to evacuate is given, but no consequence such as explosion risk or injury is stated.
  8. absent: A gas leak is named and evacuation is ordered, but no consequence such as explosion risk or danger is stated.
  9. absent: A gas leak is named and evacuation is ordered, but no consequence such as explosion risk or danger is stated.
  10. absent: A gas leak is named and action is urgent, but no consequence or severity such as explosion risk or injury is stated.
  11. absent: Evacuation orders do not state what the leak could do, such as explosion risk or injury.
  12. absent: The gas leak and distance to evacuate do not state what the leak could do or how serious it is.
  13. absent: The leak is named and evacuation is ordered, but no consequence such as explosion or injury is stated.
  14. absent: A gas leak is named but the text does not state explosion risk, injury, or other harm.
  15. absent: Gas leak plus an evacuation radius does not state explosion risk, injury, or other harm.
  16. absent: Evacuation distance is given, but the text never states explosion risk, injury, or that the leak is dangerous.
  17. absent: The gas leak and standoff distance are not paired with stated harm such as explosion risk or danger.
  18. absent: A gas leak is named and people are told to leave, but no explosion risk, danger, or other harm is stated.
  19. absent: A gas leak is named and people are told to leave, but no consequence such as explosion risk is stated.
  20. absent: A gas leak plus evacuation orders does not state explosion risk, injury, or other harm.
  21. absent: A gas leak is named and people are told to leave, but no consequence or severity such as explosion risk is stated.
  22. absent: No explosion risk, injury, or other harm is stated beyond naming the gas leak.
  23. absent: A gas leak is named without stating consequences such as risk of explosion, injury, or danger.
  24. absent: A gas leak is named and people are told to leave, but no consequence such as explosion risk is stated.
  25. absent: A gas leak is named but no explosion risk, danger, or other consequence is stated.