Website bomb threat later unfounded

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The university and UNCW Police identify the issuing and responding authorities.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score S from The university and UNCW Police
  2. present: This pass treats The university and UNCW Police as the deciding S evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on The university and UNCW Police for S
  4. present: I find The university and UNCW Police sufficient for S in this pass
  5. present: Element S is present because the text has The university and UNCW Police
  6. present: For S I rely on the words The university and UNCW Police
  7. present: This burst carries The university and UNCW Police, so S is present
  8. present: I code S from the phrase The university and UNCW Police
  9. present: The deciding language for S is The university and UNCW Police
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: The university and UNCW Police meets S
  11. present: I read The university and UNCW Police and therefore mark S present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: The university and UNCW Police covers S
  13. present: Scoring S against The university and UNCW Police in this burst
  14. present: The alert names The university and UNCW Police, which satisfies S
  15. present: My S vote follows The university and UNCW Police
  16. present: Present for S: The university and UNCW Police
  17. present: I treat The university and UNCW Police as the S marker
  18. present: This wording, The university and UNCW Police, is my S basis
  19. present: From The university and UNCW Police I conclude S is in the message
  20. present: Cue The university and UNCW Police is enough for S here
  21. present: I separately score S using The university and UNCW Police
  22. present: The text supplies The university and UNCW Police for S
  23. present: S is 1 on this pass because of The university and UNCW Police
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, The university and UNCW Police is the S hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, The university and UNCW Police gives S
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  bomb threat names a specific explosive hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score H from bomb threat
  2. present: This pass treats bomb threat as the deciding H evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on bomb threat for H
  4. present: I find bomb threat sufficient for H in this pass
  5. present: Element H is present because the text has bomb threat
  6. present: For H I rely on the words bomb threat
  7. present: This burst carries bomb threat, so H is present
  8. present: I code H from the phrase bomb threat
  9. present: The deciding language for H is bomb threat
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: bomb threat meets H
  11. present: I read bomb threat and therefore mark H present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: bomb threat covers H
  13. present: Scoring H against bomb threat in this burst
  14. present: The alert names bomb threat, which satisfies H
  15. present: My H vote follows bomb threat
  16. present: Present for H: bomb threat
  17. present: I treat bomb threat as the H marker
  18. present: This wording, bomb threat, is my H basis
  19. present: From bomb threat I conclude H is in the message
  20. present: Cue bomb threat is enough for H here
  21. present: I separately score H using bomb threat
  22. present: The text supplies bomb threat for H
  23. present: H is 1 on this pass because of bomb threat
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, bomb threat is the H hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, bomb threat gives H
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  campus and residence halls name places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score L from campus and residence halls
  2. present: This pass treats campus and residence halls as the deciding L evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on campus and residence halls for L
  4. present: I find campus and residence halls sufficient for L in this pass
  5. present: Element L is present because the text has campus and residence halls
  6. present: For L I rely on the words campus and residence halls
  7. present: This burst carries campus and residence halls, so L is present
  8. present: I code L from the phrase campus and residence halls
  9. present: The deciding language for L is campus and residence halls
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: campus and residence halls meets L
  11. present: I read campus and residence halls and therefore mark L present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: campus and residence halls covers L
  13. present: Scoring L against campus and residence halls in this burst
  14. present: The alert names campus and residence halls, which satisfies L
  15. present: My L vote follows campus and residence halls
  16. present: Present for L: campus and residence halls
  17. present: I treat campus and residence halls as the L marker
  18. present: This wording, campus and residence halls, is my L basis
  19. present: From campus and residence halls I conclude L is in the message
  20. present: Cue campus and residence halls is enough for L here
  21. present: I separately score L using campus and residence halls
  22. present: The text supplies campus and residence halls for L
  23. present: L is 1 on this pass because of campus and residence halls
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, campus and residence halls is the L hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, campus and residence halls gives L
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  contact campus police and contact 911 are recipient instructions.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score G from contact campus police or contact 911
  2. present: This pass treats contact campus police or contact 911 as the deciding G evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on contact campus police or contact 911 for G
  4. present: I find contact campus police or contact 911 sufficient for G in this pass
  5. present: Element G is present because the text has contact campus police or contact 911
  6. present: For G I rely on the words contact campus police or contact 911
  7. present: This burst carries contact campus police or contact 911, so G is present
  8. present: I code G from the phrase contact campus police or contact 911
  9. present: The deciding language for G is contact campus police or contact 911
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: contact campus police or contact 911 meets G
  11. present: I read contact campus police or contact 911 and therefore mark G present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: contact campus police or contact 911 covers G
  13. present: Scoring G against contact campus police or contact 911 in this burst
  14. present: The alert names contact campus police or contact 911, which satisfies G
  15. present: My G vote follows contact campus police or contact 911
  16. present: Present for G: contact campus police or contact 911
  17. present: I treat contact campus police or contact 911 as the G marker
  18. present: This wording, contact campus police or contact 911, is my G basis
  19. present: From contact campus police or contact 911 I conclude G is in the message
  20. present: Cue contact campus police or contact 911 is enough for G here
  21. present: I separately score G using contact campus police or contact 911
  22. present: The text supplies contact campus police or contact 911 for G
  23. present: G is 1 on this pass because of contact campus police or contact 911
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, contact campus police or contact 911 is the G hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, contact campus police or contact 911 gives G
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  at this time plus an update in two hours are recency and timing cues.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: On this independent read I score T from at this time and an update in two hours
  2. present: This pass treats at this time and an update in two hours as the deciding T evidence
  3. present: My vote here hangs on at this time and an update in two hours for T
  4. present: I find at this time and an update in two hours sufficient for T in this pass
  5. present: Element T is present because the text has at this time and an update in two hours
  6. present: For T I rely on the words at this time and an update in two hours
  7. present: This burst carries at this time and an update in two hours, so T is present
  8. present: I code T from the phrase at this time and an update in two hours
  9. present: The deciding language for T is at this time and an update in two hours
  10. present: Pass-level judgment: at this time and an update in two hours meets T
  11. present: I read at this time and an update in two hours and therefore mark T present
  12. present: Nothing else needed: at this time and an update in two hours covers T
  13. present: Scoring T against at this time and an update in two hours in this burst
  14. present: The alert names at this time and an update in two hours, which satisfies T
  15. present: My T vote follows at this time and an update in two hours
  16. present: Present for T: at this time and an update in two hours
  17. present: I treat at this time and an update in two hours as the T marker
  18. present: This wording, at this time and an update in two hours, is my T basis
  19. present: From at this time and an update in two hours I conclude T is in the message
  20. present: Cue at this time and an update in two hours is enough for T here
  21. present: I separately score T using at this time and an update in two hours
  22. present: The text supplies at this time and an update in two hours for T
  23. present: T is 1 on this pass because of at this time and an update in two hours
  24. present: Looking only at this burst, at this time and an update in two hours is the T hit
  25. present: Independent of other elements, at this time and an update in two hours gives T
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The notice says the threat is not believed credible and does not state harm or severity, so Impact is absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: On this independent read I find no I cue: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  2. absent: This pass sees no I because it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  3. absent: My vote withholds I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  4. absent: I cannot mark I present: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  5. absent: Element I is absent: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  6. absent: For I the text never it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  7. absent: This burst lacks I; it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  8. absent: I code I absent given it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  9. absent: No deciding I language: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  10. absent: Pass-level judgment: I missing because it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  11. absent: I read the whole burst and still lack I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  12. absent: Nothing in the text names I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  13. absent: Scoring I as 0: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  14. absent: The alert never it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  15. absent: My I vote is 0: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  16. absent: Absent for I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  17. absent: I treat I as missing because it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  18. absent: This wording does not meet I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  19. absent: From the full text I conclude I is out: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  20. absent: Cue for I is missing: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  21. absent: I separately score I 0 using it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  22. absent: The text does not supply I: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  23. absent: I is 0 on this pass because it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  24. absent: Looking only at this burst, I fails: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity
  25. absent: Independent of other elements, I is not here: it says the threat is not believed credible and names no harm or severity