active-threat campus emergency notice — robbery 1

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Police are responding" and "Police continue to investigate" recur in every entry, attributing the messages and the response to the police authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the responding authority.
  2. present: Responding "Police" are named as investigating and responding throughout.
  3. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the responding authority.
  4. present: Police are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  5. present: The messages attribute the response and investigation to police, identifying the responding authority.
  6. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the acting authority.
  7. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the responding authority.
  8. present: Response is attributed to police, who "are responding" and "continue to investigate".
  9. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  10. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  11. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  12. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the responding authority.
  13. present: "Police" responding and investigating serve as the identified responding authority.
  14. present: The responding authority is identified only as police, who "are responding" and "continue to investigate".
  15. present: Police are named as responding and investigating, identifying the issuing authority.
  16. present: Responding and investigating "Police" are named as the authority behind the updates.
  17. present: "Police" are identified as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  18. present: Police are identified as investigating, and the sequence reads as the official alert feed.
  19. present: The updates attribute the response and investigation to police.
  20. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating, identifying the authority behind the notice.
  21. present: "Police" are cited as responding and investigating throughout these official alert entries.
  22. present: References to police responding and investigating identify a law enforcement source for the alert.
  23. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  24. present: Police are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
  25. present: "Police" are named as responding and investigating throughout the sequence.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The hazard starts as a "Robbery at Hitt Street Parking Garage" and is specified at 12:53 as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint" of a silver Nissan Sentra.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a robbery that is "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  2. present: It names a "Robbery" that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  3. present: The hazard is a robbery described as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  4. present: The hazard is a robbery described as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  5. present: The threat is named as a robbery and then "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  6. present: It names a "Robbery" that proved to be "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  7. present: It names a "Robbery" that is "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  8. present: It names a robbery that proved to be "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  9. present: It names a robbery that is "a reported carjacking at gunpoint", a specific armed crime.
  10. present: It reports a "Robbery" that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  11. present: The threat is a robbery described as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  12. present: It names a "Robbery" that is specifically "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  13. present: It names a robbery that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  14. present: The hazard is a robbery described as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  15. present: The hazard is a robbery that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint" of a specific vehicle.
  16. present: The threat is a robbery, later specified as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  17. present: It names a robbery that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  18. present: It names a robbery that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  19. present: It names a robbery that is "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  20. present: The hazard is a robbery that proves to be "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  21. present: The threat is specified as a robbery that is "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  22. present: It names a robbery that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  23. present: It reports a "Robbery" that was "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  24. present: The hazard is a robbery, later specified as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint".
  25. present: A robbery described as "a reported carjacking at gunpoint" names the threat specifically.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The scene is given as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street", a named garage with a street number, repeated across the updates.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The place is given precisely as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  2. present: The place is given precisely as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  3. present: The site is named as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  4. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  5. present: It gives the address "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  6. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  7. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  8. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  9. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  10. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  11. present: It names "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street" as the scene.
  12. present: The address given is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  13. present: "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street" is a precise location.
  14. present: The place is stated as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  15. present: The site is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street", a precise address.
  16. present: The site is given as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  17. present: The site is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  18. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  19. present: The site is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  20. present: The site is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  21. present: The site is named as "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  22. present: It gives "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street" as the exact location.
  23. present: The place is "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street".
  24. present: It names the Hitt Street Parking Garage at 309 Hitt Street.
  25. present: "Hitt Street Parking Garage, 309 Hitt Street" gives an exact address.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The first message instructs "Stay away, or leave the area", and the following updates repeat "Stay away from area" while police investigate.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  2. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  3. present: Readers are told to "Stay away, or leave the area" in successive messages.
  4. present: The alert instructs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  5. present: The first message directs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  6. present: The message tells recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  7. present: It tells recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  8. present: The first message tells recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  9. present: Messages direct people to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  10. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  11. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  12. present: The alert instructs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  13. present: "Stay away, or leave the area" is explicit protective guidance.
  14. present: The alert directs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  15. present: It instructs readers to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  16. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  17. present: It tells recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  18. present: Recipients are told to "Stay away, or leave the area" in multiple updates.
  19. present: Recipients are instructed to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  20. present: The alert instructs recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  21. present: The alerts direct recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area" and repeat it in updates.
  22. present: The alert tells recipients to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  23. present: Readers are told to "Stay away, or leave the area".
  24. present: The first message says "Stay away, or leave the area", a protective instruction.
  25. present: "Stay away, or leave the area" instructs recipients directly.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The four entries are dated April 24, 2021 and stamped 12:46, 12:49 and 12:53 a.m. and the 1:01 a.m. all clear.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Times run from "12:46 a.m." to "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  2. present: Entries are stamped "12:46 a.m." to "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  3. present: Timestamps run 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  4. present: Times of 12:46, 12:49, 12:53 and 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021 are given.
  5. present: Times from 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021 are stamped on each update.
  6. present: Entries are timed 12:46, 12:49, 12:53, and 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  7. present: Timestamps run from 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24.
  8. present: Updates are stamped "12:46 a.m." through "1:01 a.m." on April 24.
  9. present: Entries are stamped 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  10. present: Timestamps run 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  11. present: Entries at 12:46, 12:49, 12:53, and 1:01 a.m. on April 24 establish the timing.
  12. present: Entries run from 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  13. present: Updates at 12:46, 12:49, 12:53 and 1:01 a.m. give the timing.
  14. present: Entries are timed "12:46 a.m." through "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  15. present: Timestamps run "12:46 a.m." to "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  16. present: Times from 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021 are supplied.
  17. present: Entries are marked "12:46 a.m." through "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  18. present: Times of 12:46, 12:49, 12:53 and 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021 are listed.
  19. present: Updates are stamped "12:46 a.m." to "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  20. present: Entries are timed "12:46 a.m." through "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  21. present: Entries carry times of 12:46, 12:49, 12:53 and 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  22. present: The updates run from "12:46 a.m." to "1:01 a.m." on April 24, 2021.
  23. present: Times run 12:46 a.m. to 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  24. present: Entries are stamped 12:46 a.m. through 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021.
  25. present: Times of 12:46, 12:49, 12:53 and 1:01 a.m. on April 24, 2021 are listed.
• Impactabsent8/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 8 of 25. The "at gunpoint" detail describes the offense but no consequence or severity for recipients is stated, and the close reports "no further ongoing threat". Eight reads read gunpoint as stated lethal risk.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or danger statement is given, and the close says there is no ongoing threat.
  2. present: Describing the offense as occurring "at gunpoint" conveys a lethal weapon risk to bystanders.
  3. absent: Apart from the gunpoint detail, no harm or severity to the community is stated.
  4. absent: No injury or danger statement is made, and the last entry says there is no further ongoing threat.
  5. present: Describing the crime as a carjacking "at gunpoint" conveys an armed, potentially lethal threat.
  6. absent: No injury or danger to the community is described, only the stolen vehicle's details.
  7. absent: No injury or stated danger appears, and the closing note says there is no further ongoing threat.
  8. absent: No consequence or severity is described, and the final update says there is no further ongoing threat.
  9. absent: No injury or danger is described; the closing line says there is no further ongoing threat.
  10. absent: No injury or danger to recipients is stated, and the close says there is "no further ongoing threat".
  11. absent: Although a gun is mentioned, no statement describes possible injury or danger to readers.
  12. absent: No injury or danger to people is described, only the vehicle taken and the all clear.
  13. present: "at gunpoint" conveys that the offenders used a firearm to threaten a victim.
  14. absent: No injury or danger to anyone is described, and the final entry declares no ongoing threat.
  15. present: The phrase "carjacking at gunpoint" conveys an armed, potentially deadly confrontation rather than a bare label.
  16. absent: The alert reports no injuries and says there is "no further ongoing threat to campus".
  17. absent: Beyond the phrase at gunpoint, no explicit consequence or danger to the community is stated.
  18. absent: No injury or danger consequence is described, and the all clear reports no ongoing threat.
  19. present: A carjacking "at gunpoint" implies a serious armed threat to anyone in the garage area.
  20. absent: Although a gun is mentioned, no statement of possible harm or severity is made.
  21. present: "At gunpoint" conveys that the offenders used lethal force against a person, a clear severity cue.
  22. present: "at gunpoint" conveys that a firearm was used against a person, an explicit danger.
  23. absent: No injury or danger to people is described despite the gunpoint detail.
  24. absent: No injury or explicit danger is stated, and the all clear reports no ongoing threat.
  25. present: "at gunpoint" signals an armed and potentially lethal encounter, conveying severity.