NWS Severe Thunderstorm Warning until 6:15pm for parts of Johnson Co. Storm includes 2

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25 with no dissent: the "HAWK ALERT:" tag brands the campus sender and "NWS" is credited as the authority behind the warning.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sent under the "HAWK ALERT" brand and credited to the NWS.
  2. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and credits the National Weather Service.
  3. present: The "HAWK ALERT" signature plus "NWS" attribution identifies who is warning.
  4. present: "HAWK ALERT" brands the sender and the NWS is credited with the warning.
  5. present: The "HAWK ALERT" branding and the National Weather Service attribution identify the sender.
  6. present: The "HAWK ALERT" tag and the National Weather Service attribution both identify the source.
  7. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" and sourced to the NWS, identifying who is warning.
  8. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" and credited to the NWS as issuing authority.
  9. present: The branded "HAWK ALERT" prefix and the NWS attribution both identify the source.
  10. present: It opens with the branded "HAWK ALERT" tag and credits NWS as warning source.
  11. present: The branded "HAWK ALERT" prefix plus the NWS attribution identify who warns.
  12. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" with the National Weather Service credited as warning issuer.
  13. present: The 'HAWK ALERT' prefix plus the National Weather Service credit identify the source.
  14. present: Prefixed "HAWK ALERT" and attributed to the NWS, so the sender is identified.
  15. present: The "HAWK ALERT" branding plus NWS attribution makes the originating authority clear.
  16. present: It opens with "HAWK ALERT" and credits the National Weather Service for the warning.
  17. present: The "HAWK ALERT" signature and NWS attribution together identify who is warning.
  18. present: "HAWK ALERT" signature plus the National Weather Service as warning issuer.
  19. present: The "HAWK ALERT" signature and the NWS attribution both identify the sender.
  20. present: Begins with the "HAWK ALERT" brand and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  21. present: The message carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to NWS.
  22. present: "HAWK ALERT" brands the sender and NWS is credited as the warning authority.
  23. present: The message opens with the "HAWK ALERT" brand and cites the National Weather Service.
  24. present: The "HAWK ALERT" signature plus the NWS attribution identify who is warning.
  25. present: The message opens with the "HAWK ALERT" brand and credits the National Weather Service warning.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the hazard is named outright as a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" and further specified as a storm carrying hail.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is the named threat.
  2. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with hail is a clearly named weather hazard.
  3. present: A severe thunderstorm with hail is explicitly named as the threat.
  4. present: A severe thunderstorm with hail is the named threat.
  5. present: It names a severe thunderstorm warning with large hail as the threat.
  6. present: A severe thunderstorm carrying hail is named as the specific threat.
  7. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is named as the threat.
  8. present: A severe thunderstorm with hail is named as the specific threat.
  9. present: It names a Severe Thunderstorm Warning, a specific meteorological hazard.
  10. present: The hazard is a severe thunderstorm, explicitly under a warning.
  11. present: It names a severe thunderstorm warning, a specific meteorological threat.
  12. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with hail is a specifically named hazard.
  13. present: A 'Severe Thunderstorm Warning' is the named threat.
  14. present: Names a Severe Thunderstorm Warning as the threat.
  15. present: A severe thunderstorm warning with hail is named as the specific hazard.
  16. present: The hazard is a severe thunderstorm producing large hail.
  17. present: It names a severe thunderstorm with hail as the specific threat.
  18. present: The hazard is a severe thunderstorm carrying large hail.
  19. present: It names a Severe Thunderstorm Warning, a concrete meteorological threat.
  20. present: A severe thunderstorm producing hail is explicitly named as the threat.
  21. present: A severe thunderstorm producing hail is named as the specific hazard.
  22. present: It names a severe thunderstorm carrying hail, a specific meteorological threat.
  23. present: It names a severe thunderstorm under an official warning as the threat.
  24. present: Identifies a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" including large hail as the threat.
  25. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with hail is a specifically named weather hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the affected geography is stated as "parts of Johnson Co.", limiting the warning to a named county rather than leaving the area open.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Covers "parts of Johnson Co.", identifying the affected area.
  2. present: Identifies the affected area as "parts of Johnson Co.".
  3. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a defined geographic area.
  4. present: It specifies "parts of Johnson Co." as the affected area.
  5. present: Location is given as "parts of Johnson Co."
  6. present: The warned area is "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  7. present: Covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a specific county area.
  8. present: Identifies "parts of Johnson Co." as the warned area.
  9. present: Coverage is stated as "parts of Johnson Co.".
  10. present: The warned area is stated as parts of Johnson County.
  11. present: The threatened area is stated as "parts of Johnson Co."
  12. present: Identifies the affected area as "parts of Johnson Co.".
  13. present: Applies to 'parts of Johnson Co.', a stated county area.
  14. present: Scoped to "parts of Johnson Co." in the text itself.
  15. present: Identifies the threatened area as "parts of Johnson Co."
  16. present: It specifies "parts of Johnson Co." as the warned area.
  17. present: The affected area is stated as "parts of Johnson Co."
  18. present: The affected place is stated as "parts of Johnson Co."
  19. present: The warning applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", which locates it geographically.
  20. present: Identifies the threatened area as "parts of Johnson Co.".
  21. present: It limits the threat to "parts of Johnson Co.".
  22. present: "Parts of Johnson Co." identifies the affected county.
  23. present: Geography is given as "parts of Johnson Co.", identifying who is affected.
  24. present: Specifies the warned area as "parts of Johnson Co."
  25. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", identifying the affected geography.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter.", a direct protective action rather than a request for information.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter".
  2. present: Instructs the recipient plainly to "Seek shelter".
  3. present: Tells recipients plainly to "Seek shelter".
  4. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter", a clear protective action.
  5. present: "Seek shelter" tells recipients exactly what protective action to take.
  6. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  7. present: Tells recipients to "Seek shelter".
  8. present: Directs recipients to "Seek shelter".
  9. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter", a clear protective instruction.
  10. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  11. present: "Seek shelter" instructs recipients in a protective action.
  12. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter", a protective action.
  13. present: Recipients are told to 'Seek shelter', a clear protective action.
  14. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  15. present: Directs recipients to "Seek shelter", an explicit protective action.
  16. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  17. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" tells recipients exactly what to do.
  18. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter", a clear protective instruction.
  19. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  20. present: Instructs recipients plainly to "Seek shelter".
  21. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  22. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  23. present: Recipients are told plainly to "Seek shelter".
  24. present: Directs recipients to "Seek shelter", a clear protective action.
  25. present: "Seek shelter" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the alert gives a valid through time, the warning runs "until 6:15pm", which sets a clear clock boundary on the threat.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Valid "until 6:15pm", giving the time boundary of the danger.
  2. present: Includes the valid time, "until 6:15pm".
  3. present: Bounded in time by "until 6:15pm".
  4. present: The stated duration "until 6:15pm" gives a concrete time boundary.
  5. present: The warning is valid "until 6:15pm", a stated time bound.
  6. present: The warning runs "until 6:15pm", a stated expiry time.
  7. present: Valid "until 6:15pm", an explicit expiration time.
  8. present: Sets an expiration, "until 6:15pm".
  9. present: The warning is valid "until 6:15pm", a stated clock deadline.
  10. present: The warning duration "until 6:15pm" gives a clear time reference.
  11. present: It is valid "until 6:15pm", an explicit clock deadline.
  12. present: Includes the valid time "until 6:15pm".
  13. present: Includes the valid time 'until 6:15pm'.
  14. present: Includes the duration "until 6:15pm".
  15. present: Includes the valid-through time "until 6:15pm".
  16. present: The duration is stated as "until 6:15pm".
  17. present: The warning runs "until 6:15pm", a clear time reference.
  18. present: It gives an end time, "until 6:15pm", for the warning.
  19. present: The warning is valid "until 6:15pm", a stated end time.
  20. present: Includes the valid time "until 6:15pm" for the warning.
  21. present: It runs "until 6:15pm", an explicit expiration time.
  22. present: The alert states the warning lasts "until 6:15pm".
  23. present: It sets an end time, "until 6:15pm", conveying the window of danger.
  24. present: Sets a validity time with "until 6:15pm".
  25. present: The phrase "until 6:15pm" sets an explicit expiration time for the warning.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: "Storm includes 2 inch hail" states a damaging, injury capable hail size, conveying how harmful this storm could be.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Specifies "2 inch hail", conveying damaging potential.
  2. present: The detail "2 inch hail" signals damaging impact capable of injuring people and breaking property.
  3. present: "2 inch hail" signals damaging, injurious impact beyond merely naming a storm.
  4. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies the destructive potential of the storm.
  5. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential beyond merely naming a storm.
  6. present: "2 inch hail" communicates damaging severity rather than just naming a storm.
  7. present: Warns of "2 inch hail", conveying damaging potential beyond the bare hazard name.
  8. present: Says the storm "includes 2 inch hail", which conveys damaging potential.
  9. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential, going past the bare hazard name.
  10. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies the damaging element and conveys the severity of the storm.
  11. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential beyond merely naming a storm.
  12. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies damaging severity beyond merely naming a storm.
  13. present: The detail '2 inch hail' communicates a damaging, injurious storm intensity.
  14. present: "Storm includes 2 inch hail" tells recipients how damaging the storm could be.
  15. present: "2 inch hail" communicates destructive potential, a concrete severity detail.
  16. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential beyond merely naming a storm.
  17. present: "2 inch hail" communicates destructive potential beyond merely naming a storm.
  18. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential, going past the bare hazard label.
  19. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential beyond merely naming the storm.
  20. present: "Storm includes 2 inch hail" signals damaging hail size, a concrete severity indicator.
  21. present: "2 inch hail" states the destructive magnitude of what is coming.
  22. present: "2 inch hail" communicates destructive potential rather than merely naming a storm.
  23. present: "Storm includes 2 inch hail" describes the damaging element people face.
  24. present: "2 inch hail" quantifies destructive potential beyond simply naming a storm.
  25. present: "Storm includes 2 inch hail" states a damaging characteristic, conveying how harmful the storm could be.