NWS Severe Thunderstorm Warning until 6:15 PM for parts of Johnson Co. Storm includes 90

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, unanimously at 25 of 25: the message opens with the branded "HAWK ALERT" prefix and credits "NWS" for the warning, so both the campus relay and the originating weather agency are named.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  2. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  3. present: Prefixed "HAWK ALERT" and credits the NWS, so both relaying and originating authorities appear.
  4. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" signature and the National Weather Service as warning originator are named.
  5. present: "HAWK ALERT" signature and the cited "NWS" both identify issuing authorities.
  6. present: It carries the "HAWK ALERT" brand and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  7. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and cites the National Weather Service as originator.
  8. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to NWS.
  9. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" signature and the originating "NWS" are identified.
  10. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" signature and the originating "NWS" are identified in the first words.
  11. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to "NWS".
  12. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and credits the NWS for the warning.
  13. present: Carries both the 'HAWK ALERT' signature and attribution to the NWS.
  14. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and credits the warning to the NWS.
  15. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  16. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" signature and the issuing "NWS" are named.
  17. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" plus attribution to the NWS identifies the sender clearly.
  18. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" brand and the issuing "NWS" are identified.
  19. present: Branded "HAWK ALERT" opens it and the NWS is credited as the warning's origin.
  20. present: Carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and cites the NWS as the warning authority.
  21. present: "HAWK ALERT" is the branded sender and "NWS" is credited as the warning authority.
  22. present: Both the "HAWK ALERT" signature and the National Weather Service as "NWS" are identified.
  23. present: It carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to the NWS.
  24. present: Signed "HAWK ALERT" and attributes the warning to the "NWS", the National Weather Service.
  25. present: It carries the "HAWK ALERT" signature and attributes the warning to the NWS, a named weather authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25 with no dissent: the text names an "NWS Severe Thunderstorm Warning" and specifies a storm that "includes 90 mph wind", a concretely identified weather threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning", a specific weather hazard.
  2. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with a storm bearing high wind.
  3. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high wind, a specific weather hazard.
  4. present: It names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning", a specific weather threat.
  5. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with wind is a specifically named weather hazard.
  6. present: The hazard is named exactly: a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with a storm bearing high wind.
  7. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning", a specific weather hazard.
  8. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with a storm producing high wind.
  9. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is a specifically named weather threat.
  10. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" naming a storm is a specific weather hazard.
  11. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is a specifically named weather hazard.
  12. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning", a specific weather hazard.
  13. present: Specifies a 'Severe Thunderstorm Warning', a named weather hazard.
  14. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is a specific named weather hazard.
  15. present: Specifies an "NWS Severe Thunderstorm Warning", naming the weather threat directly.
  16. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high wind is the specific hazard.
  17. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with storm winds is a specifically named hazard.
  18. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high wind is the named hazard.
  19. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is a specifically named weather hazard.
  20. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high wind, a specific weather hazard.
  21. present: It names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with a specific wind threat.
  22. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with storm winds is a specifically named weather hazard.
  23. present: A "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" is a specifically named weather hazard.
  24. present: Names a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high wind, a specific weather hazard.
  25. present: The hazard is explicit: a "Severe Thunderstorm Warning" with high winds.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the warning is scoped in the text itself to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county that tells recipients which geography is covered.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named jurisdiction.
  2. present: Scopes it to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  3. present: Covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  4. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  5. present: The warned area is "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  6. present: Coverage is stated as "parts of Johnson Co.", a definite geographic area.
  7. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named geographic area.
  8. present: Specifies "parts of Johnson Co." as the affected area.
  9. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named jurisdiction.
  10. present: Coverage is given as "parts of Johnson Co.", a named geographic area.
  11. present: It covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  12. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  13. present: Covers 'parts of Johnson Co.', a defined geographic area.
  14. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  15. present: Applies to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named geographic area.
  16. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  17. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named geographic area.
  18. present: It covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  19. present: Coverage is stated as "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  20. present: Localizes it to "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county area.
  21. present: The warned area is "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
  22. present: The warning covers "parts of Johnson Co.", a named geographic area.
  23. present: The warned area is given as "parts of Johnson Co."
  24. present: Localizes the threat to "parts of Johnson Co."
  25. present: The area is stated as "parts of Johnson Co.", a named county.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the two words "Seek shelter." are an explicit protective instruction addressed to recipients, not merely a pointer to more information.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  2. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  3. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  4. present: "Seek shelter" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
  5. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is an explicit protective action.
  6. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is a direct protective action for recipients.
  7. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  8. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  9. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" tells recipients exactly what protective action to take.
  10. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is a direct protective action for recipients.
  11. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is a clear protective action for recipients.
  12. present: Gives the direct protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  13. present: Gives the protective instruction 'Seek shelter'.
  14. present: Directs recipients plainly to "Seek shelter".
  15. present: Gives the protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  16. present: "Seek shelter" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
  17. present: Recipients are told to "Seek shelter", an explicit protective action.
  18. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is a direct protective action.
  19. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" is a direct protective action for recipients.
  20. present: Gives the direct protective instruction "Seek shelter".
  21. present: "Seek shelter" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
  22. present: "Seek shelter" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
  23. present: "Seek shelter" is an explicit protective instruction to recipients.
  24. present: Instructs recipients plainly: "Seek shelter."
  25. present: The instruction "Seek shelter" tells recipients exactly what protective action to take.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the warning is stated as running "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry that bounds the period of danger.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sets an expiry, "until 6:15 PM", which conveys the warning window.
  2. present: Sets an expiry time, the warning runs "until 6:15 PM".
  3. present: Sets an expiry, "until 6:15 PM", which conveys the warning window.
  4. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiration time.
  5. present: It states the warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an expiry time.
  6. present: It gives an expiry, "until 6:15 PM", which anchors the warning in time.
  7. present: Sets an expiry: the warning runs "until 6:15 PM".
  8. present: States a valid period, "until 6:15 PM".
  9. present: It runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry time.
  10. present: It carries an expiry time, "until 6:15 PM", which conveys the warning window.
  11. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", giving an explicit expiration time.
  12. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry time.
  13. present: Sets an expiry, 'until 6:15 PM', which conveys the warning window.
  14. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiration time.
  15. present: Sets an expiry, "until 6:15 PM", anchoring the warning in time.
  16. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry time.
  17. present: It gives an expiry time, "until 6:15 PM", anchoring the warning in time.
  18. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry time.
  19. present: It runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiration time.
  20. present: Sets an expiry time, "until 6:15 PM", which conveys the warning window.
  21. present: The expiry "until 6:15 PM" gives the warning a clear time boundary.
  22. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiration time.
  23. present: The warning runs "until 6:15 PM", an explicit expiry time.
  24. present: Gives an expiry time, "until 6:15 PM", which conveys the warning window.
  25. present: It gives a valid-through time, "until 6:15 PM", which anchors the warning in time.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" quantifies destructive force, carrying the alert past the bare hazard label into what the storm could actually do.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Quantifies severity by saying the storm "includes 90 mph wind".
  2. present: Specifying "90 mph wind" conveys damaging, potentially injurious force, not just the storm label.
  3. present: The detail "90 mph wind" communicates destructive force, not just the hazard's label.
  4. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity, not merely the hazard label.
  5. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity, not just the hazard label.
  6. present: Specifying "90 mph wind" tells readers how destructive the storm could be.
  7. present: Quantifies severity by warning the storm "includes 90 mph wind".
  8. present: Quantifies severity by warning the storm "includes 90 mph wind", damaging strength.
  9. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity beyond merely naming the storm.
  10. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" states damaging intensity, not just the hazard label.
  11. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" states damaging severity, not just the hazard label.
  12. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys destructive, damaging force, not just the hazard name.
  13. present: 'Storm includes 90 mph wind' conveys damaging force, not just the hazard label.
  14. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys destructive severity, not just the hazard label.
  15. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity beyond merely naming a storm.
  16. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity, not just the hazard label.
  17. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity, not just the hazard label.
  18. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity beyond merely naming the storm.
  19. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging severity, not just the hazard label.
  20. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" quantifies damaging severity, conveying what the storm could do.
  21. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" quantifies the damaging force the storm can bring.
  22. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys damaging force, a clear severity statement.
  23. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" states the damaging force the hazard can bring.
  24. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" states damaging severity, not merely the hazard's name.
  25. present: "Storm includes 90 mph wind" conveys destructive severity beyond merely naming the storm.