Electrical outage on the north side of campus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present. The opening tag EKU Critical Alert is a branded sender signature.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening tag EKU Critical Alert is a branded sender signature.
  2. present: It opens with the branded sender tag EKU Critical Alert.
  3. present: "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded sender signature at the start of the message.
  4. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Alert".
  5. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Alert," which identifies the sender.
  6. present: The opening "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  7. present: The message opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Alert".
  8. present: The opening tag "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded sender signature.
  9. present: The opening branded signature EKU Critical Alert identifies EKU as the sender.
  10. present: "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that names the university sender.
  11. present: "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  12. present: The message opens with the branded signature EKU Critical Alert.
  13. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Alert", which identifies the sender.
  14. present: The opening "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded sender signature.
  15. present: "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the university as sender.
  16. present: The opening branded signature EKU Critical Alert identifies who is sending the message.
  17. present: The branded signature "EKU Critical Alert" identifies the sender.
  18. present: The opening branded signature EKU Critical Alert identifies the sender.
  19. present: EKU Critical Alert is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  20. present: EKU Critical Alert is a branded signature that identifies EKU as the sender.
  21. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Alert."
  22. present: "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  23. present: It opens with the branded signature EKU Critical Alert, which identifies the sender.
  24. present: The opening "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded sender signature.
  25. present: The opening tag "EKU Critical Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present. It names an electrical outage, a specific problem rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific problem rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific hazard.
  3. present: An "electrical outage" is a specific utility hazard, not a generic incident.
  4. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: It names an electrical outage, which is a specific hazard.
  6. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific hazard.
  8. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific hazard.
  9. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  10. present: "electrical outage" names a specific hazard, not a generic emergency.
  11. present: It names an "electrical outage" as the specific problem.
  12. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific hazard, rather than a generic incident.
  13. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific condition rather than a generic incident.
  14. present: It states a specific problem, an "electrical outage".
  15. present: It names an "electrical outage" as the specific hazard.
  16. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific hazard, not a generic incident or situation.
  17. present: "electrical outage" names a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  18. present: It names an electrical outage, which is a specific hazard.
  19. present: An electrical outage is a specific hazard, not a generic incident.
  20. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific condition rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: It names an "electrical outage" as the specific hazard.
  22. present: It names an "electrical outage" as the specific problem.
  23. present: It names an electrical outage, a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  24. present: It names an "electrical outage", which is a specific hazard.
  25. present: It names an "electrical outage", a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present. It says Richmond Campus and the north side of campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It says Richmond Campus and the north side of campus.
  2. present: It says the outage is on the north side of Richmond Campus.
  3. present: It locates the outage on "Richmond Campus" and the "North side of campus".
  4. present: It locates the outage on "Richmond Campus" and the "North side of campus".
  5. present: It locates the outage on the North side of Richmond Campus.
  6. present: It locates the outage on "Richmond Campus" and the "North side of campus".
  7. present: It locates the outage on the "North side" of "Richmond Campus".
  8. present: It locates the outage on the "North side" of "Richmond Campus".
  9. present: It locates the outage on the Richmond Campus, on the North side of campus.
  10. present: It says the outage is on the "North side" of "Richmond Campus".
  11. present: It locates the outage on the North side of Richmond Campus.
  12. present: It says the outage is on Richmond Campus and the North side of campus.
  13. present: It says the outage is on the "Richmond Campus" and the "North side of campus".
  14. present: It places the outage on "Richmond Campus", on the "North side of campus".
  15. present: It locates the outage at "Richmond Campus" on the "North side of campus".
  16. present: It says the outage is on the Richmond Campus, on the North side of campus.
  17. present: It places the outage on "Richmond Campus" and "the North side of campus".
  18. present: It locates the outage on the North side of Richmond Campus.
  19. present: It says the outage is on the North side of Richmond Campus.
  20. present: It says Richmond Campus and the North side of campus.
  21. present: It locates the outage on "Richmond Campus" at the "North side of campus."
  22. present: It locates the outage at "Richmond Campus" on the "North side of campus".
  23. present: It places the outage on Richmond Campus at the North side of campus.
  24. present: It places the outage on "Richmond Campus", on the "North side of campus".
  25. present: It locates the outage on the North side of Richmond Campus.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance absent. Working to restore power describes the response, not an action for recipients.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Working to restore power describes the response, not an action for recipients.
  2. absent: Working to restore power describes the repair effort and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  3. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff response, not a protective action for recipients.
  4. absent: "Working to restore power" describes responder activity, not a protective action for recipients.
  5. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the repair effort, not an action for recipients.
  6. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the repair effort, not a protective action for recipients.
  7. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the repair effort, not a protective action for recipients.
  8. absent: "Working to restore power" describes responder activity, not an action recipients should take.
  9. absent: Working to restore power describes the response, not an action recipients should take.
  10. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff activity, not an instruction to recipients.
  11. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the repair effort, not an instruction to recipients.
  12. absent: Working to restore power describes the response and does not instruct recipients to take a protective action.
  13. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff action and gives recipients no instruction.
  14. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff activity, not a protective step for recipients.
  15. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff activity and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  16. absent: Working to restore power describes what staff are doing, not a protective action for recipients.
  17. absent: "Working to restore power" describes what staff are doing and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  18. absent: Saying staff are working to restore power describes the response, not an action for recipients.
  19. absent: Working to restore power describes what staff are doing, not what recipients should do.
  20. absent: Working to restore power describes what staff are doing, not what recipients should do.
  21. absent: "Working to restore power" describes responder activity, not an instruction to recipients.
  22. absent: "Working to restore power" describes staff response and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  23. absent: Working to restore power describes the response and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  24. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the response, not an instruction to recipients.
  25. absent: "Working to restore power" describes the repair effort and does not tell recipients what to do for safety.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time absent. No date, clock time, or recency word such as now or today is given.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word such as now or today is given.
  2. absent: It has no date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or cue such as now, today, or ongoing is given.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" is stated.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" or "ongoing" is given.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or ongoing appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "ongoing" appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or ongoing appears.
  13. absent: Present tense alone appears, with no clock time, date, or word such as now or ongoing.
  14. absent: It has no clock time, date, or recency wording such as "now" or "today".
  15. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as "now" or "today" is included.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "immediately" appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  19. absent: There is no clock time, date, or word such as now, today, or ongoing.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now," "today," or "ongoing" appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" or "today" appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Impact absent. Critical is only part of the alert name, and no harm from the outage is stated.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Critical is only part of the alert name, and no harm from the outage is stated.
  2. absent: It does not say what the outage could do to people or property.
  3. absent: The text does not say what the outage could do or state any severity beyond the alert name.
  4. absent: "Critical" is part of the alert brand, and no harm or severity from the outage is stated.
  5. absent: Naming the outage does not state what harm it could cause or how severe it is.
  6. absent: The word "Critical" is only the alert brand, and no danger, injury, or other harm is stated.
  7. absent: The word "Critical" only names the alert brand, and no outage harm or severity is stated.
  8. absent: It does not state what the outage could do or how serious it is beyond the branded word "Critical".
  9. absent: The outage is named, but nothing states a consequence or severity, and Critical is only part of the alert brand.
  10. absent: It does not say what the outage could do or how serious it is.
  11. absent: It states no harm or severity, and "Critical" is only part of the alert name.
  12. absent: It does not state what the outage could do or any harm beyond the alert name.
  13. absent: The word Critical is only in the alert name, and no harm or severity is stated.
  14. absent: It does not say what the outage could do to people or property.
  15. absent: "Critical" is only the alert brand, and no injury, danger, or other outage consequence is stated.
  16. absent: It does not say the outage is dangerous or state any harm it could cause.
  17. absent: It does not say what the outage could do, and "Critical" is only part of the alert brand name.
  18. absent: The outage is named, but the text never states a consequence or how serious it is.
  19. absent: Critical is only the alert product name, and no harm or other consequence of the outage is stated.
  20. absent: Critical is only part of the alert name, and no harm from the outage is described.
  21. absent: The word Critical is only the alert brand, and the text never states harm from the outage.
  22. absent: It does not say what the outage could do or how severe it is, and "Critical" is only the alert brand.
  23. absent: It does not say what the outage could do, and Critical is only part of the alert brand.
  24. absent: The outage is not described as dangerous or harmful, and "Critical" is only the alert brand.
  25. absent: It never says what the outage could do to people or property, and Critical is only the alert brand.