Sexual assault reported on campus property

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The report is attributed to "the ASU Police Department," which is also carrying the investigation.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The report was received by "the ASU Police Department", naming the authority.
  2. present: The message attributes the report to "the ASU Police Department".
  3. present: The notice names "the ASU Police Department" as the reporting agency.
  4. present: The notice names "the ASU Police Department" as the receiving authority.
  5. present: "the ASU Police Department received a report" identifies the issuing agency.
  6. present: The text names "the ASU Police Department" as receiving and investigating the report.
  7. present: The message names "the ASU Police Department" as the recipient of the report.
  8. present: The ASU Police Department is named as the body receiving and investigating the report.
  9. present: "the ASU Police Department" appears as the agency that received the report.
  10. present: The ASU Police Department is named as the reporting agency.
  11. present: The "ASU Police Department" is named as the agency that received the report.
  12. present: "the ASU Police Department" is named as the body that received the report.
  13. present: The "ASU Police Department" is identified as the receiving and investigating agency.
  14. present: The "ASU Police Department" is named as receiving and investigating the report.
  15. present: The "ASU Police Department" is identified as the agency that received the report.
  16. present: The notice names "the ASU Police Department" as the agency that received the report.
  17. present: The ASU Police Department is named as receiving and investigating the report.
  18. present: The notice names "the ASU Police Department" as receiving the report.
  19. present: The ASU Police Department is named as the agency that received the report.
  20. present: "the ASU Police Department" is named as having received the report.
  21. present: The ASU Police Department is named as the agency that received the report.
  22. present: The notice attributes receipt of the report to "the ASU Police Department".
  23. present: The message names "the ASU Police Department" as the receiving and investigating body.
  24. present: The "ASU Police Department" is identified as the agency that received the report.
  25. present: "the ASU Police Department" is named as the agency that received the report.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Sexual Assault" is stated as the reported crime in both the headline and the crime type line.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The crime is named as "Sexual Assault".
  2. present: "Sexual Assault" is named explicitly as the crime type.
  3. present: It names "Sexual Assault" as the reported crime.
  4. present: "Sexual Assault" is identified as the crime under investigation.
  5. present: "Sexual Assault" is named explicitly as the crime.
  6. present: It identifies the crime as "Sexual Assault."
  7. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the crime type.
  8. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the crime type.
  9. present: "Sexual Assault" is named explicitly as the crime.
  10. present: The crime is named as "Sexual Assault", a specific threat.
  11. present: "Sexual Assault" is the specific crime identified.
  12. present: The crime is explicitly identified as "Sexual Assault".
  13. present: The alert names "Sexual Assault" as the reported crime.
  14. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated explicitly as the crime type.
  15. present: The crime is named as "Sexual Assault".
  16. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the crime type.
  17. present: Sexual assault is specified as the crime type.
  18. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the reported crime.
  19. present: "Sexual Assault" is the named crime type.
  20. present: The crime is specified as "Sexual Assault".
  21. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the crime type.
  22. present: "a report of Sexual Assault" names the specific crime.
  23. present: "Sexual Assault" is stated as the reported crime.
  24. present: "Sexual Assault" is named directly as the crime.
  25. present: "Sexual Assault" names the offense specifically.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, though only broadly: "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus" gives a place without an address.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It cites a residential housing complex on the north side of the Tempe campus.
  2. present: The site is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  3. present: The place is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  4. present: It locates the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus."
  5. present: It places the incident at a residential complex on the north side of Tempe campus.
  6. present: The place is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus."
  7. present: It places the incident at a residential complex on the north side of Tempe campus.
  8. present: The place is a residential housing complex on the north side of the Tempe campus.
  9. present: The site is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  10. present: It places the incident at a residential housing complex on the north side of Tempe campus.
  11. present: It places the incident at a residential complex on the north side of Tempe campus.
  12. present: It locates the incident at a residential complex "on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  13. present: It places the incident at a residential complex on the north side of the Tempe campus.
  14. present: A residential housing complex on the north side of Tempe campus is identified.
  15. present: It locates the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  16. present: It places the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  17. present: A residential housing complex on the north side of Tempe campus is identified.
  18. present: It places the incident at a residential complex on the north side of the Tempe campus.
  19. present: It places the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  20. present: It cites "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  21. present: It locates it at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus."
  22. present: It locates the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  23. present: The place is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  24. present: The place is "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
  25. present: It places the incident at "a residential housing complex located on the north side of the Tempe campus".
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The message offers status only, "The case is under investigation," and never tells readers to do anything.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Readers are not asked to do anything protective.
  2. absent: Recipients are given no advice or action, only investigative status.
  3. absent: Readers are given no action to take, only case status information.
  4. absent: Readers are given no protective action or precaution to take.
  5. absent: Nothing asks the reader to take any action.
  6. absent: Readers are given no action to take, only case status information.
  7. absent: Readers are given no protective action or reporting instruction.
  8. absent: No protective action or advice is directed to readers.
  9. absent: Readers receive no instruction, only case status information.
  10. absent: Readers are given no instruction or protective action to take.
  11. absent: Recipients are given no instruction or protective step.
  12. absent: The notice asks nothing of readers and gives no safety instruction.
  13. absent: Nothing instructs recipients on any protective step to take.
  14. absent: Nothing asks readers to take any action or precaution.
  15. absent: Recipients are given no protective action or reporting instruction.
  16. absent: Readers are given no instruction or protective action, only case details.
  17. absent: The notice ends with case details and gives recipients nothing to do.
  18. absent: Readers are given no action to take; the text only says the case is under investigation.
  19. absent: The notice asks nothing of readers and gives no safety action.
  20. absent: Readers are told nothing to do; the text only says the case is under investigation.
  21. absent: No protective advice or action is directed at recipients.
  22. absent: Readers are given no instruction or recommended precaution.
  23. absent: No protective guidance or call to action is offered to recipients.
  24. absent: No action is requested of recipients anywhere in the notice.
  25. absent: The text asks nothing of readers, noting only that the case is under investigation.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Two dates are given, the report "On November 3, 2024" and the assault "on November 1, 2024."

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The dates November 3 and November 1, 2024 anchor the report and incident.
  2. present: It cites November 3 as the report date and November 1, 2024 as the incident date.
  3. present: It states the report date November 3 and the incident date November 1, 2024.
  4. present: Specific dates are supplied: reported November 3, occurred November 1, 2024.
  5. present: The dates November 3 and November 1, 2024 are given.
  6. present: Dates of November 3 and November 1, 2024 anchor the report and the incident.
  7. present: It supplies report and incident dates of November 3 and November 1, 2024.
  8. present: Dates are supplied: reported November 3, 2024 for an assault on November 1, 2024.
  9. present: Both the report date of November 3 and the incident date of November 1, 2024 appear.
  10. present: The report date November 3, 2024 and occurrence date November 1, 2024 are given.
  11. present: The report date November 3 and occurrence date November 1, 2024 are given.
  12. present: Dates November 3 and November 1, 2024 anchor the report and the incident.
  13. present: It gives the report date November 3 and incident date November 1, 2024.
  14. present: Dates are supplied: reported November 3, occurring November 1, 2024.
  15. present: Both the report date of November 3 and the incident date of November 1, 2024 are given.
  16. present: Dates are given: reported November 3, 2024, occurring November 1, 2024.
  17. present: It dates the report to November 3 and the incident to November 1, 2024.
  18. present: It gives the report date of November 3, 2024 and the incident date of November 1, 2024.
  19. present: Report and incident dates, November 3 and November 1, 2024, are stated.
  20. present: Dates are given: reported November 3, 2024 for an assault on November 1, 2024.
  21. present: Dates are precise: reported November 3, 2024 for an incident on November 1, 2024.
  22. present: Both November 3 and November 1, 2024 are named dates.
  23. present: Dates are explicit: reported November 3, 2024, occurring November 1, 2024.
  24. present: Dates of November 1 and November 3, 2024 are provided.
  25. present: Dates of November 3 and November 1, 2024 are supplied.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. No injury, severity, or continuing danger is described; the suspect is simply noted as known to the victim with no arrest made.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing conveys injury severity or a continuing danger to the community.
  2. absent: No severity, injury, or continuing risk statement appears.
  3. absent: No harm severity or ongoing danger is conveyed to the reader.
  4. absent: No consequence, injury detail, or severity statement appears.
  5. absent: No consequence, injury, or level of danger is described.
  6. absent: Nothing conveys harm severity or continuing risk to the community.
  7. absent: The text conveys no injury, threat level, or other consequence.
  8. absent: The text conveys no severity or potential harm to the community.
  9. absent: No consequence or severity statement accompanies the report.
  10. absent: No consequence, injury, or severity information is provided.
  11. absent: No severity, injury, or ongoing risk statement is included.
  12. absent: There is no statement of harm severity or ongoing danger to the community.
  13. absent: No harm, injury, or severity is characterized in the text.
  14. absent: No harm level or continuing danger is described in the notice.
  15. absent: The notice conveys no harm, injury, or severity beyond naming the offense.
  16. absent: Nothing conveys ongoing risk or severity, the suspect is noted as known to the victim.
  17. absent: No severity, injury, or continuing risk statement appears.
  18. absent: No harm, severity, or continuing risk is described in the message.
  19. absent: No consequence or severity is conveyed beyond the bare crime report.
  20. absent: Nothing describes harm, ongoing danger, or how serious the situation is.
  21. absent: The notice conveys no consequence, injury, or severity information.
  22. absent: No consequence, injury, or level of danger is described.
  23. absent: The notice conveys no severity, injury, or continuing risk to the community.
  24. absent: The text states the case is under investigation but conveys no severity or harm.
  25. absent: No severity, injury, or ongoing risk statement is included.