Active threat to life safety prompts run-hide-fight then shelter

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found S absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sender, branded signature, university name, or agency is identified.
  2. absent: No branded signature, agency, or sender name appears.
  3. absent: No branded signature, university name, or agency identifies who is sending the message.
  4. absent: No branded signature, university name, or agency identifies who is sending the alert.
  5. absent: No branded signature, university sender, or agency is named; "Whitewater campus" is only a place.
  6. absent: No branded signature, university sender, or named agency appears, only the place Whitewater campus.
  7. absent: No sender tag, university name as issuer, or agency is given.
  8. absent: No branded signature, university name, or agency identifies who is sending the alert.
  9. absent: No branded signature, university issuer, or named agency identifies who is sending the message.
  10. absent: No branded signature, university name, or agency is identified as the sender.
  11. absent: No branded signature, agency, or sender is identified; "Whitewater campus" is a place, not the issuer.
  12. absent: No branded signature, university-as-sender, or named agency appears; "Whitewater campus" is only a place.
  13. absent: No branded signature, sending university, or agency such as police is identified.
  14. absent: No branded signature, named agency, or university-as-sender appears. "Whitewater campus" is only a place.
  15. absent: No sender, branded signature, or named agency appears in the text.
  16. absent: No branded signature, university as issuer, or named agency identifies the sender.
  17. absent: No branded signature, university-as-sender, or named agency identifies who is issuing the alert.
  18. absent: No branded signature, named agency, or institution-as-sender appears; Whitewater campus is a place, not a sender.
  19. absent: No branded signature, university sender, or agency identifies who issued the message.
  20. absent: No branded signature, agency, or sender is identified. "Whitewater campus" is only a place.
  21. absent: No branded signature, agency, or university sender is named; "Whitewater campus" only locates the event.
  22. absent: No branded signature, university sender, or named agency appears. Whitewater campus is only a place.
  23. absent: No branded signature, university-as-sender, or named agency such as police appears.
  24. absent: No branded signature, agency, or university-as-sender appears; "Whitewater campus" only locates the event.
  25. absent: No branded signature, university sender, or agency is identified.
• Hazardpresent20/25

  Final assessment

  H majority present (20 present / 5 absent).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: "active threat" is generic and does not name a specific hazard such as a shooter or weapon.
  2. present: It names an "active threat", a specific threat rather than a generic emergency.
  3. present: "Active threat" names a specific ongoing threat type, not a generic emergency or incident.
  4. present: "active threat to life safety" names a specific life-safety threat rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: "Active threat" names a violent or security hazard in progress, not a generic emergency or incident.
  6. absent: Active threat to life safety is generic emergency language and does not name a specific hazard such as a shooter or weapon.
  7. present: It names an "active threat to life safety", a specific threat type.
  8. present: "Active threat" names a specific threat type, not merely a generic emergency or incident.
  9. present: It names an "active threat to life safety", a specific threat rather than a generic emergency.
  10. present: "active threat" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency or situation.
  11. absent: "active threat to life safety" is generic and does not name a specific hazard such as a shooter or weapon.
  12. present: "active threat to life safety" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency or incident.
  13. present: Active threat names a specific threat, not a generic emergency or incident.
  14. absent: "active threat to life safety" is generic and does not name a specific hazard such as a shooter or weapon.
  15. present: "active threat" names a specific violent threat, not a generic emergency.
  16. present: "Active threat" names a specific threat type, not merely a generic emergency or incident.
  17. present: "Active threat to life safety" names a specific threat, not a generic emergency or incident.
  18. present: Active threat names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency, incident, or situation.
  19. present: "active threat" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency or situation.
  20. present: "Active threat" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency, incident, or situation.
  21. present: "active threat to life safety" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency or incident.
  22. present: active threat names a specific unfolding threat type, not merely a generic emergency or situation.
  23. present: "active threat" names a specific threat type, not a generic emergency or situation.
  24. absent: "active threat" is generic and does not name a specific hazard such as shots, a weapon, or a fire.
  25. present: Active threat to life safety names a specific violent threat, not a generic emergency.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found L present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It says the threat is "on the Whitewater campus", which is a campus location.
  2. present: The threat is "on the Whitewater campus", which is a named campus.
  3. present: It says the threat is "on the Whitewater campus", a named campus.
  4. present: It locates the threat "on the Whitewater campus".
  5. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus", a named campus.
  6. present: The threat is placed on the Whitewater campus.
  7. present: It says the threat is "on the Whitewater campus".
  8. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus".
  9. present: It places the threat "on the Whitewater campus".
  10. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus".
  11. present: It says the threat is "on the Whitewater campus".
  12. present: The threat is located "on the Whitewater campus".
  13. present: On the Whitewater campus names a campus location.
  14. present: It locates the threat "on the Whitewater campus".
  15. present: It places the threat "on the Whitewater campus".
  16. present: It locates the threat "on the Whitewater campus".
  17. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus".
  18. present: The threat is on the Whitewater campus, which is an on-campus location.
  19. present: It places the threat "on the Whitewater campus", which counts as a campus location.
  20. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus", which is a campus location.
  21. present: The threat is placed "on the Whitewater campus".
  22. present: The threat is on the Whitewater campus, which names the campus.
  23. present: The threat is "on the Whitewater campus", which counts as a campus location.
  24. present: The phrase "on the Whitewater campus" names a campus location.
  25. present: It places the threat on the Whitewater campus.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found G present (25 present / 0 absent).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs recipients to "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT", a protective action.
  2. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" instructs recipients to take protective action.
  3. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  4. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  5. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction to recipients.
  6. present: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT tells recipients what protective actions to take.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT", explicit protective actions.
  8. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction to recipients.
  9. present: It instructs recipients to "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT", a protective-action protocol.
  10. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" instructs recipients to take a protective action.
  11. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction to recipients.
  12. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  13. present: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT is a protective-action instruction to recipients.
  14. present: It instructs recipients to "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT", a protective action.
  15. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction.
  16. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  17. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction to recipients.
  18. present: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  19. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is a direct protective-action instruction to recipients.
  20. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  21. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  22. present: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT! is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  23. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  24. present: "RUN, HIDE, FIGHT!" is an explicit protective-action instruction to recipients.
  25. present: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT is an explicit protective action for recipients.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found T absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears, and "active" here is part of the hazard name.
  4. absent: "active" is part of the hazard name, and no clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears, and "active" is part of the hazard name.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears, and active here is hazard wording, not a time marker.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue; "active" here is part of the hazard, not time.
  8. absent: "Active" is part of the hazard label, and no clock time, date, now, or until cue appears.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, now, or until cue appears. "Active" is part of the hazard name, not time.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, today, or until cue appears, and "active" is part of the hazard name.
  11. absent: "active" is part of the hazard phrasing, and no clock time, date, now, or until cue appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears; "active" here is part of the hazard wording.
  13. absent: Active is part of the hazard name, and no clock time, date, now, or until appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, now, or today appears. "active" describes the threat, not timing.
  15. absent: "active" is hazard wording here, and no clock time, date, now, or until appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, now, or until cue appears. "Active" here is part of the hazard name.
  17. absent: "Active" is part of the hazard phrase, and no clock time, date, now, or until cue appears.
  18. absent: Active is part of the hazard label, and no clock time, date, now, today, or until cue appears.
  19. absent: "active" is part of the hazard name, and no clock time, date, now, or until cue appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears. "Active" here is part of the hazard name.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, now, or until cue appears, and "active" here is part of the hazard name.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, now, today, or until cue appears, and "active" is part of the hazard name.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or until cue is present; "active" is not a time marker.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, now, today, immediately, or until cue appears, and active is part of the hazard name.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found I present (25 present / 0 absent).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm, a clear consequence.
  2. present: "to life safety" states that lives are at risk, a stated consequence.
  3. present: "Threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm, a clear consequence.
  4. present: "threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm as the consequence.
  5. present: "Threat to life safety" states a life-threatening consequence for people.
  6. present: Threat to life safety states a life-threatening consequence for people.
  7. present: "Threat to life safety" states life-threatening severity, a consequence for people.
  8. present: "Threat to life safety" states the consequence that lives are at risk.
  9. present: "Threat to life safety" states a life-threatening consequence for people.
  10. present: "threat to life safety" states that lives and safety are at risk, a stated consequence.
  11. present: "threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm, a consequence for people.
  12. present: "threat to life safety" states a life-threatening consequence, not merely a hazard name.
  13. present: Threat to life safety states that lives and safety are at risk, a stated consequence.
  14. present: "threat to life safety" states a life-threatening consequence, not merely a hazard name.
  15. present: "threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm, not just a hazard name.
  16. present: "Threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm to people, a stated consequence.
  17. present: "Threat to life safety" states the consequence that lives are at risk.
  18. present: To life safety states a life-threatening consequence rather than only naming the hazard.
  19. present: "threat to life safety" states a consequence: life is at risk.
  20. present: "Threat to life safety" states a life-safety consequence, not only the hazard name.
  21. present: "to life safety" states the consequence: the threat endangers lives.
  22. present: threat to life safety states a life-threatening consequence, not only the hazard name.
  23. present: "threat to life safety" states life-threatening harm, a clear consequence or severity.
  24. present: "threat to life safety" states that lives and safety are at risk, a stated consequence.
  25. present: To life safety states the threat endangers lives, a stated consequence rather than the hazard name alone.