Bomb threat investigated and deemed not credible

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent23/25

  Final assessment

  23 of 25 passes found this element present. The university names the institution and LAPD is a named agency.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The university names the institution and LAPD is a named agency.
  2. present: The university names itself and LAPD is a named agency.
  3. present: LAPD is a named agency in the message.
  4. present: The university is the communicating body and campus safety plus LAPD are named officials.
  5. present: The university, campus safety personnel, and LAPD are named as authorities.
  6. absent: The university is unnamed as a brand, and LAPD is described as an investigator, not the sender.
  7. present: The university names itself as the speaker, and campus safety personnel and LAPD identify the responding authorities.
  8. present: "The university" names the institution, and campus safety personnel and LAPD are named as responding agencies.
  9. present: Campus safety personnel and LAPD are named as the authorities who investigated and judged the report.
  10. present: "The university" names the institution, and "Campus safety personnel and LAPD" name responding authorities.
  11. present: The university names the institution, and campus safety personnel and LAPD are responding agencies.
  12. present: The university names the institution and LAPD plus campus safety name responding agencies.
  13. present: The university plus campus safety personnel and LAPD name the institution and responding agencies.
  14. present: The university names the sending institution, and campus safety personnel and LAPD are identified as responding authorities.
  15. present: The university names itself, and campus safety plus LAPD are responding agencies.
  16. present: The university names the sender and Campus safety personnel and LAPD name responding agencies.
  17. present: The university names the institution, and campus safety personnel and LAPD name responding authorities.
  18. present: The university, campus safety personnel, and LAPD identify the institution and responding agencies.
  19. present: LAPD is a named agency in the message.
  20. present: LAPD is a named agency.
  21. absent: The university is generic and LAPD is cited as an investigator, not a sender brand.
  22. present: The university names the institution, and Campus safety personnel and LAPD name responding authorities.
  23. present: The university, campus safety personnel, and LAPD are identified as the institutional sources of the finding.
  24. present: The message identifies the university as the communicator and names campus safety personnel and LAPD.
  25. present: The university names the institution and campus safety personnel and LAPD name responding authorities.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found this element present. The threat is specified as a bomb threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The threat is specified as a bomb threat.
  2. present: Bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  3. present: Bomb threat is a specific hazard.
  4. present: A bomb threat is the reported hazard.
  5. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard even though it was later cleared.
  6. present: A bomb threat is a specific threat.
  7. present: A bomb threat is named as the specific hazard that was reported.
  8. present: "bomb threat" is a specific named hazard.
  9. present: A bomb threat is the named hazard even though it was judged not credible.
  10. present: "a bomb threat" is a specific named hazard.
  11. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  12. present: Bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  13. present: Bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  14. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  15. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  16. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  17. present: A bomb threat is a specifically named hazard.
  18. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard even though it was later ruled not credible.
  19. present: A bomb threat is a specific named threat.
  20. present: Bomb threat names a specific hazard.
  21. present: A bomb threat is a specific reported hazard.
  22. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
  23. present: The hazard is identified as a reported bomb threat.
  24. present: The message identifies a bomb threat as the hazard.
  25. present: A bomb threat is a specific named hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found this element present. The report is placed on campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The report is placed on campus.
  2. present: On campus identifies the location.
  3. present: On campus is a stated location.
  4. present: The threat is placed on campus.
  5. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  6. present: The report is placed on campus.
  7. present: The report is of a bomb threat on campus, which locates the event on campus.
  8. present: The report is placed "on campus".
  9. present: The report is placed on campus.
  10. present: The report is "on campus".
  11. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  12. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  13. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  14. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  15. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  16. present: On campus locates the reported threat.
  17. present: The report is placed on campus, which satisfies location.
  18. present: On campus and campus locate the report on institutional grounds.
  19. present: The report is placed on campus.
  20. present: The report is placed on campus.
  21. present: The report is located on campus.
  22. present: The report is on campus.
  23. present: The report is located on campus.
  24. present: The message locates the report on campus.
  25. present: The report is on campus.
• Guidanceabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  22 of 25 passes found this element absent. No protective action is directed at recipients, only that campus is open.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective action is directed at recipients, only that campus is open.
  2. absent: No protective action is instructed; the all clear is status only.
  3. absent: No protective action is asked of the recipient.
  4. absent: No action is requested now that operations are described as normal.
  5. absent: There is no protective instruction, only an all clear.
  6. absent: No action is asked of the recipient.
  7. absent: Investigated is what responders did, not an instruction. Campus is safe and open for normal operations is status, not a protective action to take.
  8. absent: The all-clear status does not instruct recipients to take any protective action.
  9. present: Campus is declared open for normal operations, which tells people they may resume usual activity.
  10. absent: The text describes what investigators did, not a protective action for recipients.
  11. absent: Readers are not told to evacuate, avoid, or take any other protective step.
  12. absent: Campus is open for normal operations is status, not a protective instruction.
  13. absent: No protective instruction tells recipients what action to take.
  14. absent: The all-clear reports status and does not instruct any protective action.
  15. absent: Investigation and all clear are agency status, not a do this order to readers.
  16. absent: Investigated and campus is safe describe responder work and status, not a protective instruction to readers.
  17. absent: The text describes an investigation and that campus is open. It does not tell recipients to take a protective action.
  18. absent: Investigation results and an all clear are status, not a protective action for readers.
  19. absent: No recipient protective action is requested.
  20. absent: No recipient action is requested.
  21. absent: No recipient action is requested because operations are normal.
  22. absent: The text describes what investigators did, not a protective action for recipients.
  23. present: The community is told campus is safe and open for normal operations.
  24. present: The message states campus is open for normal operations, directing people to resume usual activity.
  25. absent: Investigators actions and open-campus status are not protective instructions to recipients.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes found this element absent. No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar time cue appears.
  2. absent: No time, date, or immediacy cue is given.
  3. absent: No clock, date, now, immediately, or until cue is present.
  4. absent: No time of the report, investigation, or all-clear is given.
  5. absent: No clock time, immediately cue, or until window is given.
  6. absent: No when, until, or immediately cue is given.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency marker is given.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is present.
  9. absent: No time of the report, investigation, or expiration is given.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, or immediately cue appears.
  11. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today.
  12. absent: No clock, date, now, immediately, or until further notice phrase is present.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, now, or immediately marker is given.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency marker is given.
  15. absent: No date, clock, now, or immediately language marks when this applies.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, now, or similar recency marker is given.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue appears.
  18. absent: No clock, date, now, or immediately marker appears in the all clear.
  19. absent: There is no clock, date, now, immediately, or until cue.
  20. absent: No clock, date, now, immediately, or until cue is given.
  21. absent: No time of report, clearance, or duration is given.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, now, or immediately cue appears.
  23. absent: No time of the report, investigation, or all-clear window is provided.
  24. absent: The message gives no onset, duration, expiration, or when to act.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, now, or immediately cue appears.
• Impactpresent17/25

  Final assessment

  17 of 25 passes found this element present. It states the threat was not credible and campus is safe.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It states the threat was not credible and campus is safe.
  2. present: Not credible and campus is safe state the consequence and severity.
  3. absent: The threat is called not credible and no harm is described.
  4. present: Not credible and campus is safe state residual risk and outcome.
  5. absent: The threat is called not credible and campus is safe, so no harm or extra severity is claimed.
  6. present: Not credible and campus safe and open state the consequence as an all clear.
  7. present: Not credible and campus is safe state the outcome severity: the threat does not pose real harm and the campus is safe.
  8. absent: The text says the threat was not credible and campus is safe, so no consequence is claimed.
  9. present: The message states the threat was not credible and that campus is safe.
  10. present: "the threat was not credible" and "Campus is safe" state the consequence and severity as none.
  11. absent: Not credible and campus is safe do not state bomb consequences or severity.
  12. present: Not credible and campus is safe state that the threat will not cause harm.
  13. present: Not credible and campus is safe state that the threat will not harm people or operations.
  14. absent: Not credible and campus is safe do not state what a bomb could do or how severe a real threat would be.
  15. present: Not credible and campus is safe state consequence and residual risk.
  16. present: The threat was not credible and Campus is safe state the outcome and severity as none.
  17. present: Not credible and campus is safe state the threat's severity and the outcome for people on campus.
  18. absent: Not credible and campus is safe deny harm rather than state what a bomb could do.
  19. present: Not credible and campus is safe state severity and outcome beyond the hazard name.
  20. present: Not credible and campus is safe state severity beyond the hazard name.
  21. absent: The all-clear states the threat was not credible and names no consequence.
  22. present: The threat was not credible and Campus is safe state the consequence and severity as none.
  23. absent: The threat is called not credible, so no hazard consequences are described.
  24. present: The message states the threat was not credible and campus is safe, describing the outcome.
  25. present: The threat was not credible and campus is safe state that the hazard poses no harm.