Armed robbery near Key Bank

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, since "Seattle police are investigating a robbery" and the continued police search name the responding agency.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and searching for the suspect.
  2. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and searching the area.
  3. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and searching the area.
  4. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  5. present: "Seattle police are investigating" names the responding law enforcement agency.
  6. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  7. present: "Seattle police" are identified as investigating the Key Bank robbery.
  8. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and searching the area.
  9. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  10. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  11. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the bank robbery.
  12. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the bank robbery.
  13. present: Seattle police are named as investigating the robbery.
  14. present: Seattle police are named as investigating and searching the area.
  15. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the bank robbery.
  16. present: "Seattle police continue to search" and "Seattle police are investigating" name the agency.
  17. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  18. present: "Seattle police are investigating" identifies the responding law enforcement agency.
  19. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating the robbery.
  20. present: "Seattle police" are identified as investigating and searching for the suspect.
  21. present: "Seattle police are investigating" names the responding department.
  22. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and searching for the suspect.
  23. present: "Seattle police" are identified as investigating the robbery.
  24. present: "Seattle police" are named as investigating and searching for the suspect.
  25. present: "Seattle police continue to search" and "Seattle police are investigating" name the agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous at 25 of 25: an armed robbery is reported and "The suspect displayed a gun," a specific weapon threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It reports "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  2. present: A robbery in which the suspect displayed a gun is a specific armed threat.
  3. present: A robbery in which the suspect displayed a gun is the specific hazard.
  4. present: It reports a robbery where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  5. present: It reports a robbery where "The suspect displayed a gun" at Key Bank.
  6. present: It reports "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  7. present: It reports "a robbery" in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  8. present: It names "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  9. present: It reports "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  10. present: It reports a robbery where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  11. present: A robbery in which "the suspect displayed a gun" is a specific armed threat.
  12. present: It reports "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  13. present: A robbery in which "The suspect displayed a gun" names a specific armed threat.
  14. present: A robbery in which "The suspect displayed a gun" names a specific armed threat.
  15. present: The threat is a robbery in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  16. present: The hazard is "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  17. present: It reports a robbery where "The suspect displayed a gun", a specific armed crime.
  18. present: The hazard is "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  19. present: It reports a robbery in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  20. present: It reports "a robbery" in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  21. present: It names a robbery where "The suspect displayed a gun" at a bank.
  22. present: It reports "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
  23. present: It reports "a robbery" in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  24. present: It reports a robbery in which "The suspect displayed a gun".
  25. present: The hazard is "a robbery at Key Bank" where "The suspect displayed a gun".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present 25 of 25, locating the robbery "at Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE."

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The location is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  2. present: Key Bank at NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE identifies the scene.
  3. present: Key Bank at NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE pins the location.
  4. present: The site is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  5. present: The bank is located at "NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  6. present: The site is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  7. present: The location is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  8. present: The site is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  9. present: Location is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  10. present: The scene is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  11. present: Key Bank at NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE is named.
  12. present: The place is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  13. present: Key Bank at NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE is precisely identified.
  14. present: Key Bank at NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE is the stated place.
  15. present: It names "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  16. present: It names "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  17. present: The scene is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  18. present: The site is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  19. present: The site is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  20. present: The bank is at "NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  21. present: The scene is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  22. present: The location is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  23. present: The place is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  24. present: The place is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
  25. present: The place is "Key Bank, NE 45th St. and Brooklyn Ave. NE".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present by 25 of 25, resting on the closing directive "If you see the suspect, call 911."

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs readers "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  2. present: If you see the suspect, call 911 is a clear instruction to recipients.
  3. present: It tells readers, if you see the suspect, call 911.
  4. present: It tells readers, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  5. present: "If you see the suspect, call 911" is an explicit instruction.
  6. present: It instructs, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  7. present: It ends with "If you see the suspect, call 911", an instruction to recipients.
  8. present: The post closes with "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  9. present: Readers are told "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  10. present: "If you see the suspect, call 911" is direct guidance.
  11. present: It tells readers, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  12. present: It instructs readers "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  13. present: It instructs readers "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  14. present: It tells readers "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  15. present: The closing line instructs, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  16. present: The post closes with "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  17. present: It instructs, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  18. present: The closing line instructs, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  19. present: The message ends "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  20. present: It directs readers, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  21. present: It tells readers "If you see the suspect, call 911."
  22. present: Readers are instructed "If you see the suspect, call 911."
  23. present: Readers are told, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  24. present: It tells readers "If you see the suspect, call 911".
  25. present: It tells readers, "If you see the suspect, call 911".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Timing present at 25 of 25, carried by the stamp "UPDATE at 2:22pm" marking when the security status was issued.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The update carries the timestamp "2:22pm".
  2. present: The 2:22pm update timestamp conveys when the search was underway.
  3. present: The update is stamped 2:22pm, giving recency.
  4. present: The update carries a 2:22pm stamp.
  5. present: The update is stamped 2:22pm.
  6. present: The update is timed "at 2:22pm".
  7. present: The update stamp "2:22pm" supplies a clock reference.
  8. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm", establishing when it was issued.
  9. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm".
  10. present: "2:22pm" timestamps the update about the secured area.
  11. present: The update carries a 2:22pm time stamp.
  12. present: The update carries the stamp "2:22pm".
  13. present: An update is timestamped 2:22pm.
  14. present: The update stamp "2:22pm" conveys when the information was current.
  15. present: The update is stamped 2:22pm.
  16. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm", giving a clock reference.
  17. present: The update is stamped "at 2:22pm".
  18. present: The update carries the clock stamp "2:22pm".
  19. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm" and says the search continues.
  20. present: The "2:22pm" update stamp conveys when the information was current.
  21. present: The update is timestamped "2:22pm" and describes an ongoing search.
  22. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm", with updates promised as they become available.
  23. present: The update carries the time "2:22pm" with the original post preceding it.
  24. present: The update is stamped "2:22pm" and describes an ongoing search.
  25. present: The update is timed "at 2:22pm".
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25 for present: the alert says the area "is secure" and describes the gun and suspect, but never states injury, harm, or how dangerous the situation is.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury or severity statement appears despite the displayed gun.
  2. absent: No injury or potential consequence is mentioned, only the weapon and clothing description.
  3. absent: Nothing states any harm done or the danger the armed suspect poses.
  4. absent: No injury, threat level or possible harm is described beyond the gun being shown.
  5. absent: Nothing conveys harm or how dangerous the armed suspect may be.
  6. absent: No injury or severity is stated, only that the area is secure and the search continues.
  7. absent: Nothing describes injury, danger or what the armed suspect might do.
  8. absent: No injury or consequence to anyone is conveyed in either entry.
  9. absent: No injuries, danger or severity of the armed robbery are described.
  10. absent: No injury, threat level or potential consequence is described.
  11. absent: No injury, danger or severity is conveyed, only a suspect description.
  12. absent: No injury, threat consequence or severity statement appears in the text.
  13. absent: No harm, injury or severity is conveyed beyond the gun being displayed.
  14. absent: No injury or severity is stated despite the gun being displayed.
  15. absent: No injury, danger or severity of the armed robbery is described.
  16. absent: No injuries or consequences are mentioned, only that the area is secure.
  17. absent: No injury or severity is mentioned, only that the area is secure.
  18. absent: No injury or statement of danger appears despite the displayed gun.
  19. absent: No injury, threat level or potential consequence is stated in the text.
  20. absent: No consequence, injury or severity is described in the message.
  21. absent: No harm, injury or severity is conveyed about the armed robbery.
  22. absent: No harm, injury or severity is described beyond the display of a weapon.
  23. absent: No injury, danger or severity is described anywhere in the message.
  24. absent: No consequence, injury or severity is stated anywhere in the message.
  25. absent: No injuries or statement of danger to the community appear.