Assault on the 3400 block of Market Street

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present. The branded signature UPennAlert names the issuing alert system as the source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded signature UPennAlert names the issuing alert system as the source.
  2. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sending system as source.
  3. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  4. present: The branded opener UPennAlert names the issuing alert system as the source.
  5. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  6. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing campus alert system as the sender.
  7. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and Police on scene also names a responding authority.
  8. present: The branded tag "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and police are named as the force on scene.
  9. present: The branded tag UPennAlert names the university system that issued the message.
  10. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing alert system as the sender.
  11. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and Police on scene names a responding authority.
  12. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender of the message.
  13. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and Police on scene names the responding authority.
  14. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies who is sending the message.
  15. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the sender, and police are named as the force on scene.
  16. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the campus sender.
  17. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the issuing system as the sender.
  18. present: The branded opener UPennAlert names the campus alert system as the sender.
  19. present: The branded tag UPennAlert identifies the issuing system, and Police on scene names a responding authority.
  20. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the campus alert system as the sender.
  21. present: The branded tag UPennAlert identifies the campus alerting system as the sender.
  22. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  23. present: The branded opener "UPennAlert" identifies the sending alert system as the source.
  24. present: The branded opener UPennAlert identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  25. present: The branded tag "UPennAlert" identifies the sender, and "Police on scene" also names a responding authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present. Assault is named as the specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Assault is named as the specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: The text names Assault as a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  3. present: The text names assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: The text specifies Assault as the threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  5. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  6. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  7. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat, not a generic incident or situation.
  8. present: The message names "Assault" as the specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  9. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  10. present: The text names Assault as a specific crime threat, not a generic incident.
  11. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  12. present: The text names Assault as a specific crime threat, not a generic incident.
  13. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  14. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: The text names assault as the specific threat, not a generic incident.
  16. present: The text names Assault as the specific crime threat.
  17. present: The text names "Assault", a specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.
  18. present: The text names Assault as the specific crime threat.
  19. present: The message names Assault as the specific crime or threat.
  20. present: The text names Assault as the specific threat, not a generic incident or situation.
  21. present: The message names Assault, a specific crime threat rather than a vague incident.
  22. present: The message names Assault as the specific crime threat.
  23. present: The text names "Assault" as a specific crime threat, not a generic incident.
  24. present: The message names Assault as the specific crime or threat.
  25. present: The message names "Assault" as the specific crime, not a generic incident or emergency.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present. The alert places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and along that street.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alert places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and along that street.
  2. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street.
  3. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  4. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and notes suspects last seen eastbound on Market Street.
  5. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and notes suspects last seen eastbound on Market Street.
  6. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and last seen eastbound on that street.
  7. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and last seen running eastbound on Market Street.
  8. present: It places the assault in the "3400 block of Market Street" and later along Market Street.
  9. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  10. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  11. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and last seen eastbound on Market Street.
  12. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  13. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and notes suspects last seen eastbound on that street.
  14. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  15. present: It locates the crime in the 3400 block of Market Street and last-seen movement eastbound on that street.
  16. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street.
  17. present: It places the event in the "3400 block of Market Street" and notes suspects last seen on that street.
  18. present: It places the event at the 3400 block of Market Street and last seen eastbound on that street.
  19. present: It places the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and last seen eastbound on that street.
  20. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and later eastbound on Market Street.
  21. present: It locates the event at the 3400 block of Market Street and the immediate area.
  22. present: It locates the event in the 3400 block of Market Street and refers to the area.
  23. present: It places the event on the "3400 block of Market Street" and later "Market Street".
  24. present: It locates the incident in the 3400 block of Market Street, a named street block.
  25. present: It places the assault in the "3400 block of Market Street" and notes suspects last seen eastbound on that street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present. It instructs people to use caution and avoid the immediate area.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs people to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  2. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  3. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  4. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, both protective instructions.
  5. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, which are protective actions.
  6. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  7. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, which are protective actions.
  8. present: Recipients are told to "use caution" and "avoid the immediate area", which are protective instructions.
  9. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  10. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  11. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, which are protective instructions.
  12. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  13. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, both protective instructions.
  14. present: It tells recipients to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  15. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  16. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  17. present: Recipients are told to "use caution" and "avoid the immediate area", which are protective actions.
  18. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  19. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, both protective actions.
  20. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area, both protective actions.
  21. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  22. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  23. present: Recipients are told to "use caution" and "avoid the immediate area".
  24. present: Recipients are told to use caution and avoid the immediate area.
  25. present: Recipients are told to "use caution" and "avoid the immediate area", which are protective instructions.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent. No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today is given.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or ongoing is given.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing is given.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing is present.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears in the message.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency wording such as now, immediately, today, or ongoing is given.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately is given.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase such as now, today, or ongoing appears in the text.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing is given.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing is given.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing is given.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency wording such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears in the text.
• Impactabsent1/25

  Final assessment

  1 of 25 reads find Impact present, 24/25 absent. Majority absent. No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the assault itself.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the assault itself.
  2. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, only the assault and suspect descriptions.
  3. absent: Nothing states harm, injury risk, or severity beyond naming the assault.
  4. absent: Assault is named but the text never states consequences or severity such as injury, danger, or harm.
  5. absent: Assault is named, but the text never states a consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  6. absent: Assault is named but the message never states harm, danger, or other consequences for people or property.
  7. absent: Assault is named, but the text never states a consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  8. absent: Suspect clothing details and police activity do not state injury, danger, or other harm that could follow.
  9. absent: Naming an assault and listing suspects does not state harm, severity, or consequences.
  10. absent: Suspect clothing and police on scene do not state harm, danger, or severity.
  11. absent: Nothing states consequences or severity such as injury, danger, or harm; assault is only the hazard name.
  12. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, only the assault itself and suspect descriptions.
  13. absent: Naming an assault and asking for caution does not state a consequence or severity of harm.
  14. absent: Suspect clothing and last seen direction do not state harm, severity, or consequences.
  15. absent: Assault is named without any stated harm, danger, or other consequence beyond the crime itself.
  16. present: Three suspect descriptions and last seen eastbound on Market Street identify who to watch for.
  17. absent: Assault is named but the text never states injury, danger, or other consequences of the crime.
  18. absent: Naming assault and urging caution does not state injury, danger, or what the crime could do.
  19. absent: Assault is named, but nothing states consequences or severity such as injury risk or danger.
  20. absent: Assault is named but the message never states consequences or severity such as injury risk or danger.
  21. absent: Naming assault does not state injury, danger, or other consequences the crime could cause.
  22. absent: Nothing states harm, danger, or severity beyond naming the assault itself.
  23. absent: Nothing states consequences or severity of the assault, only the crime name and police presence.
  24. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, only the crime name and a caution instruction.
  25. absent: The alert never states consequences or severity, such as injury, danger, or harm from the assault.