Campus Alert Archive
Oregon

Police activity on Holman between 32nd and 34th

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
ORpolice activityemergency notificationhigh confidence
Compare →

UO Alert Portland told the campus to avoid Holman between 32nd and 34th, then cleared it as not involving the Portland campus or personnel.

Alerts
2
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
University of Oregon
Public R1 · OR
All Oregon cases →
UO Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how Oregon says it will use UO Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTWebsite
Verified verbatim136 chars
April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM AVOID the area of Holman between 32nd and 34th due to police activity. More information on alerts.uoregon.edu.
Verify this quote
UO Alert Portland: AVOID Holman between 32nd and 34thsafety.uoregon.edufind archived copies
Dual independent HTML fetch 2026-08-24. Second blind sha256 45d012e8900abe6b74b7ab816738d3926026de919fe3f6716b44c493f07a8bf5.
Thread N/A (web posting, not X).
ALL CLEARWebsite+57 min
Verified verbatim273 chars
April 24, 2025 9:47 PM Police activity has been resolved near Holman between 32nd and 34th. The incident did not involve the UO Portland campus or personnel, and there are no ongoing threats to campus. Updates, if and when available, will be posted at alerts.uoregon.edu.
Verify this quote
UO Alert Portland: ALL CLEAR Holman between 32nd and 34thsafety.uoregon.edufind archived copies
Dual independent HTML fetch 2026-08-24. Second blind sha256 10e1c5f24cd4fbff3ff36bfd88769589376cacfaf0d9b39ebc78d538a1dd0961.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM AVOID the area of Holman between 32nd and 34th due to police activity. More information on alerts.uoregon.edu.

  • Sourceabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    No branded sender in the Drupal AVOID. Majority 0/25.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: I read no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID in this first burst (no branded UO Alert , pass 1).
    2. absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID is present on my read (no branded UO Alert , pass 2).
    3. absent: I score this element from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 3).
    4. absent: The deciding words are no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 4).
    5. absent: Verdict follows no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID in the body (no branded UO Alert , pass 5).
    6. absent: I mark this from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 6).
    7. absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID satisfies the rubric here (no branded UO Alert , pass 7).
    8. absent: My pass treats no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID as the cue (no branded UO Alert , pass 8).
    9. absent: I find no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID and code accordingly (no branded UO Alert , pass 9).
    10. absent: Element turns on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 10).
    11. absent: I count this because of no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 11).
    12. absent: The text gives no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 12).
    13. absent: I rely on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 13).
    14. absent: Present or absent per no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 14).
    15. absent: I do not need more than no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 15).
    16. absent: Coding follows no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 16).
    17. absent: I note no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID as the tell (no branded UO Alert , pass 17).
    18. absent: This pass keys off no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 18).
    19. absent: I take no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID as sufficient (no branded UO Alert , pass 19).
    20. absent: The body states no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 20).
    21. absent: I judge from no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 21).
    22. absent: No branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID is the evidence I use (no branded UO Alert , pass 22).
    23. absent: I apply the rubric to no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 23).
    24. absent: My reason is no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 24).
    25. absent: I close on no branded UO Alert tag in this Drupal AVOID (no branded UO Alert , pass 25).
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Police activity names a situation. Majority 25/25.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read police activity as the named situation in this first burst (police activity as t, pass 1).
    2. present: Police activity as the named situation is present on my read (police activity as t, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows police activity as the named situation in the body (police activity as t, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 6).
    7. present: Police activity as the named situation satisfies the rubric here (police activity as t, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats police activity as the named situation as the cue (police activity as t, pass 8).
    9. present: I find police activity as the named situation and code accordingly (police activity as t, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 16).
    17. present: I note police activity as the named situation as the tell (police activity as t, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 18).
    19. present: I take police activity as the named situation as sufficient (police activity as t, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 21).
    22. present: Police activity as the named situation is the evidence I use (police activity as t, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on police activity as the named situation (police activity as t, pass 25).
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Holman between 32nd and 34th is a named place. Majority 25/25.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read Holman between 32nd and 34th in this first burst (Holman between 32nd , pass 1).
    2. present: Holman between 32nd and 34th is present on my read (Holman between 32nd , pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows Holman between 32nd and 34th in the body (Holman between 32nd , pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 6).
    7. present: Holman between 32nd and 34th satisfies the rubric here (Holman between 32nd , pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats Holman between 32nd and 34th as the cue (Holman between 32nd , pass 8).
    9. present: I find Holman between 32nd and 34th and code accordingly (Holman between 32nd , pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 16).
    17. present: I note Holman between 32nd and 34th as the tell (Holman between 32nd , pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 18).
    19. present: I take Holman between 32nd and 34th as sufficient (Holman between 32nd , pass 19).
    20. present: The body states Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 21).
    22. present: Holman between 32nd and 34th is the evidence I use (Holman between 32nd , pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 24).
    25. present: I close on Holman between 32nd and 34th (Holman between 32nd , pass 25).
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    AVOID is a protective instruction. Majority 25/25.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read AVOID as the protective instruction in this first burst (AVOID as the protect, pass 1).
    2. present: AVOID as the protective instruction is present on my read (AVOID as the protect, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows AVOID as the protective instruction in the body (AVOID as the protect, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 6).
    7. present: AVOID as the protective instruction satisfies the rubric here (AVOID as the protect, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats AVOID as the protective instruction as the cue (AVOID as the protect, pass 8).
    9. present: I find AVOID as the protective instruction and code accordingly (AVOID as the protect, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 16).
    17. present: I note AVOID as the protective instruction as the tell (AVOID as the protect, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 18).
    19. present: I take AVOID as the protective instruction as sufficient (AVOID as the protect, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 21).
    22. present: AVOID as the protective instruction is the evidence I use (AVOID as the protect, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on AVOID as the protective instruction (AVOID as the protect, pass 25).
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM is a date and clock. Majority 25/25.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM in this first burst (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 1).
    2. present: April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM is present on my read (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM in the body (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 6).
    7. present: April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM satisfies the rubric here (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM as the cue (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 8).
    9. present: I find April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM and code accordingly (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 16).
    17. present: I note April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM as the tell (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 18).
    19. present: I take April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM as sufficient (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 21).
    22. present: April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM is the evidence I use (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on April 24, 2025, 8:50 PM (April 24, 2025, 8:50, pass 25).
  • Impactabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    No consequence in the first-burst AVOID. Majority 0/25.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: I read no injury or severity clause in the first burst in this first burst (no injury or severit, pass 1).
    2. absent: No injury or severity clause in the first burst is present on my read (no injury or severit, pass 2).
    3. absent: I score this element from no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 3).
    4. absent: The deciding words are no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 4).
    5. absent: Verdict follows no injury or severity clause in the first burst in the body (no injury or severit, pass 5).
    6. absent: I mark this from no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 6).
    7. absent: No injury or severity clause in the first burst satisfies the rubric here (no injury or severit, pass 7).
    8. absent: My pass treats no injury or severity clause in the first burst as the cue (no injury or severit, pass 8).
    9. absent: I find no injury or severity clause in the first burst and code accordingly (no injury or severit, pass 9).
    10. absent: Element turns on no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 10).
    11. absent: I count this because of no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 11).
    12. absent: The text gives no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 12).
    13. absent: I rely on no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 13).
    14. absent: Present or absent per no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 14).
    15. absent: I do not need more than no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 15).
    16. absent: Coding follows no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 16).
    17. absent: I note no injury or severity clause in the first burst as the tell (no injury or severit, pass 17).
    18. absent: This pass keys off no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 18).
    19. absent: I take no injury or severity clause in the first burst as sufficient (no injury or severit, pass 19).
    20. absent: The body states no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 20).
    21. absent: I judge from no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 21).
    22. absent: No injury or severity clause in the first burst is the evidence I use (no injury or severit, pass 22).
    23. absent: I apply the rubric to no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 23).
    24. absent: My reason is no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 24).
    25. absent: I close on no injury or severity clause in the first burst (no injury or severit, pass 25).

Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

University of Oregon posts UO Alert products on safety.uoregon.edu/alerts.
Analysis

Key Findings

Holman between 32nd and 34th AVOID 8:50 p.m.; ALL CLEAR 9:47 p.m.; not a UO Portland incident.
Outcome
Police activity resolved; no ongoing threat to campus.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Official
    UO Alert Portland: AVOID Holman between 32nd and 34th
    safety.uoregon.edu
    archived copy
  2. Official
    UO Alert Portland: ALL CLEAR Holman between 32nd and 34th
    safety.uoregon.edu
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "University of Oregon: Police activity on Holman between 32nd and 34th." Incident of April 24, 2025. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/university-of-oregon-portland-holman-police-activity-2025-04-24/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
public-r1oregonuo-alertpolice-activityportland-campus
Added August 2026Updated August 2026Via ingestion