Campus Alert Archive
Oregon

Electric scooters stolen from Barnhart cage and Frohnmayer

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
ORmotor vehicle thefttimely warninghigh confidence
Compare →
Under Investigation

UOPD issued a Campus Crime Alert after three electric scooters were stolen: two from a bike cage near Barnhart Hall on October 26 and one from a rack at Frohnmayer Music Building on October 29. The warning posted October 29 at 5:30 p.m. The two incidents do not appear to be connected.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
University of Oregon
Public R1 · OR
All Oregon cases →
UO Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how Oregon says it will use UO Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Verified verbatim1850 chars
10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m., Eugene Campus  UO Police Department received three reports of stolen electric scooters in recent days. The first incident, on Saturday, Oct. 26, involved two scooters being taken at approximately 2:30 p.m. An unknown suspect made entry into a bike cage near Barnhart Hall and lifted one scooter out of a lock and removed the second scooter from the cage. The third theft occurred at a bike rack adjacent to Frohnmayer Music Building on Tuesday, Oct. 29. A lock was cut and the scooter was taken. The two incidents do not appear to be connected. Electric scooters are considered motorized vehicles in the university’s Clery Act reporting. Owners of similar equipment should be aware and use extra caution in securing their property. There is no known ongoing threat to campus.  If you have any information regarding these events, please contact UOPD at 541-346-2919.  Property: Red and black CIRCOOTER Mate Location: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage  Date: October 26 Time: Approximately 2:30 p.m. Suspect: White male, approximately 40-50 years old, 5’10”-6’01” tall, medium build, salt and pepper wavy hair, last seen wearing brown jacket over a blue sweatshirt, grey/black/red shift motorcross pants, and black shoes.    Property: Black and orange electric scooter with a “SKUTE” sticker on it. Property: Black and orange electric scooter with a “SKUTE” sticker on it Location: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage  Date: October 26 Time: Approximately 2:30 p.m. Suspect: White male, approximately 40-50 years old, 5’10”-6’01” tall, medium build, salt and pepper wavy hair, last seen wearing brown jacket over a blue sweatshirt, grey/black/red shift motorcross pants, and black shoes. Property: A red and white Gotrax G4 Location: Frohnmayer Music Building bike rack  Date: October 29 Time: Between 7:30 and 9:30 a.m. Suspect: Unknown
Verify this quote
Campus Crime Alert: Electric Scooter Theftsafety.uoregon.edufind archived copies
Dual independent HTML fetch 2026-08-26. Official NNBSP after Eugene Campus preserved. Second blind sha256 2c393c897ada51b8341af0e569e92ebd1e1259ea9dd9a015f7428db9cec7f2e1.
First incident Saturday Oct. 26, 2024; third theft Tuesday Oct. 29; warning posted Oct. 29, 2024, 5:30 p.m. PDT.
Thread N/A (web posting, not X).
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m., Eugene Campus  UO Police Department received three reports of stolen electric scooters in recent days. The first incident, on Saturday, Oct. 26, involved two scooters being taken at approximately 2:30 p.m. An unknown suspect made entry into a bike cage near Barnhart Hall and lifted one scooter out of a lock and removed the second scooter from the cage. The third theft occurred at a bike rack adjacent to Frohnmayer Music Building on Tuesday, Oct. 29. A lock was cut and the scooter was taken. The two incidents do not appear to be connected. Electric scooters are considered motorized vehicles in the university’s Clery Act reporting. Owners of similar equipment should be aware and use extra caution in securing their property. There is no known ongoing threat to campus.  If you have any information regarding these events, please contact UOPD at 541-346-2919.  Property: Red and black CIRCOOTER Mate Location: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage  Date: October 26 Time: Approximately 2:30 p.m. Suspect: White male, approximately 40-50 years old, 5’10”-6’01” tall, medium build, salt and pepper wavy hair, last seen wearing brown jacket over a blue sweatshirt, grey/black/red shift motorcross pants, and black shoes.    Property: Black and orange electric scooter with a “SKUTE” sticker on it. Property: Black and orange electric scooter with a “SKUTE” sticker on it Location: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage  Date: October 26 Time: Approximately 2:30 p.m. Suspect: White male, approximately 40-50 years old, 5’10”-6’01” tall, medium build, salt and pepper wavy hair, last seen wearing brown jacket over a blue sweatshirt, grey/black/red shift motorcross pants, and black shoes. Property: A red and white Gotrax G4 Location: Frohnmayer Music Building bike rack  Date: October 29 Time: Between 7:30 and 9:30 a.m. Suspect: Unknown

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    UO Police Department names the agency. Majority 25/25.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read the UO Police Department as the named agency in this first burst (the UO Police Depart, pass 1).
    2. present: The UO Police Department as the named agency is present on my read (the UO Police Depart, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows the UO Police Department as the named agency in the body (the UO Police Depart, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 6).
    7. present: The UO Police Department as the named agency satisfies the rubric here (the UO Police Depart, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats the UO Police Department as the named agency as the cue (the UO Police Depart, pass 8).
    9. present: I find the UO Police Department as the named agency and code accordingly (the UO Police Depart, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 16).
    17. present: I note the UO Police Department as the named agency as the tell (the UO Police Depart, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 18).
    19. present: I take the UO Police Department as the named agency as sufficient (the UO Police Depart, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 21).
    22. present: The UO Police Department as the named agency is the evidence I use (the UO Police Depart, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on the UO Police Department as the named agency (the UO Police Depart, pass 25).
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Stolen electric scooters name the hazard. Majority 25/25.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read stolen electric scooters as the named thefts in this first burst (stolen electric scoo, pass 1).
    2. present: Stolen electric scooters as the named thefts is present on my read (stolen electric scoo, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows stolen electric scooters as the named thefts in the body (stolen electric scoo, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 6).
    7. present: Stolen electric scooters as the named thefts satisfies the rubric here (stolen electric scoo, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats stolen electric scooters as the named thefts as the cue (stolen electric scoo, pass 8).
    9. present: I find stolen electric scooters as the named thefts and code accordingly (stolen electric scoo, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 16).
    17. present: I note stolen electric scooters as the named thefts as the tell (stolen electric scoo, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 18).
    19. present: I take stolen electric scooters as the named thefts as sufficient (stolen electric scoo, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 21).
    22. present: Stolen electric scooters as the named thefts is the evidence I use (stolen electric scoo, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on stolen electric scooters as the named thefts (stolen electric scoo, pass 25).
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Barnhart Hall and Frohnmayer Music Building are named places. Majority 25/25.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building in this first burst (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 1).
    2. present: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building is present on my read (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building in the body (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 6).
    7. present: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building satisfies the rubric here (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building as the cue (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 8).
    9. present: I find Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building and code accordingly (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 16).
    17. present: I note Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building as the tell (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 18).
    19. present: I take Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building as sufficient (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 21).
    22. present: Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building is the evidence I use (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on Barnhart Hall bicycle cage and Frohnmayer Music Building (Barnhart Hall bicycl, pass 25).
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Contact UOPD and extra caution are instructions. Majority 25/25.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property in this first burst (contact UOPD and use, pass 1).
    2. present: Contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property is present on my read (contact UOPD and use, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property in the body (contact UOPD and use, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 6).
    7. present: Contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property satisfies the rubric here (contact UOPD and use, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property as the cue (contact UOPD and use, pass 8).
    9. present: I find contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property and code accordingly (contact UOPD and use, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 16).
    17. present: I note contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property as the tell (contact UOPD and use, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 18).
    19. present: I take contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property as sufficient (contact UOPD and use, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 21).
    22. present: Contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property is the evidence I use (contact UOPD and use, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on contact UOPD and use extra caution securing property (contact UOPD and use, pass 25).
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. is a date and clock. Majority 25/25.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: I read 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. in this first burst (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 1).
    2. present: 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. is present on my read (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 2).
    3. present: I score this element from 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 3).
    4. present: The deciding words are 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 4).
    5. present: Verdict follows 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. in the body (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 5).
    6. present: I mark this from 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 6).
    7. present: 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. satisfies the rubric here (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 7).
    8. present: My pass treats 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. as the cue (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 8).
    9. present: I find 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. and code accordingly (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 9).
    10. present: Element turns on 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 10).
    11. present: I count this because of 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 11).
    12. present: The text gives 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 12).
    13. present: I rely on 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 13).
    14. present: Present or absent per 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 14).
    15. present: I do not need more than 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 15).
    16. present: Coding follows 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 16).
    17. present: I note 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. as the tell (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 17).
    18. present: This pass keys off 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 18).
    19. present: I take 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. as sufficient (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 19).
    20. present: The body states 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 20).
    21. present: I judge from 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 21).
    22. present: 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. is the evidence I use (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 22).
    23. present: I apply the rubric to 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 23).
    24. present: My reason is 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 24).
    25. present: I close on 10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m. and Oct. 26 2:30 p.m. (10/29/2024, 5:30 p.m, pass 25).
  • Impactabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    No injury clause. Majority 0/25.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: I read no injury clause in the first burst in this first burst (no injury clause in , pass 1).
    2. absent: No injury clause in the first burst is present on my read (no injury clause in , pass 2).
    3. absent: I score this element from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 3).
    4. absent: The deciding words are no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 4).
    5. absent: Verdict follows no injury clause in the first burst in the body (no injury clause in , pass 5).
    6. absent: I mark this from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 6).
    7. absent: No injury clause in the first burst satisfies the rubric here (no injury clause in , pass 7).
    8. absent: My pass treats no injury clause in the first burst as the cue (no injury clause in , pass 8).
    9. absent: I find no injury clause in the first burst and code accordingly (no injury clause in , pass 9).
    10. absent: Element turns on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 10).
    11. absent: I count this because of no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 11).
    12. absent: The text gives no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 12).
    13. absent: I rely on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 13).
    14. absent: Present or absent per no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 14).
    15. absent: I do not need more than no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 15).
    16. absent: Coding follows no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 16).
    17. absent: I note no injury clause in the first burst as the tell (no injury clause in , pass 17).
    18. absent: This pass keys off no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 18).
    19. absent: I take no injury clause in the first burst as sufficient (no injury clause in , pass 19).
    20. absent: The body states no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 20).
    21. absent: I judge from no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 21).
    22. absent: No injury clause in the first burst is the evidence I use (no injury clause in , pass 22).
    23. absent: I apply the rubric to no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 23).
    24. absent: My reason is no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 24).
    25. absent: I close on no injury clause in the first burst (no injury clause in , pass 25).

Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

University of Oregon posts Campus Crime Alerts on safety.uoregon.edu/alerts.
Analysis

Key Findings

Three electric scooters stolen Oct. 26 (Barnhart cage) and Oct. 29 (Frohnmayer); incidents not connected.
Outcome
No known ongoing threat. Official curly apostrophe in university's preserved. Electric scooters treated as motorized vehicles in the university's Clery reporting.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Official
    Campus Crime Alert: Electric Scooter Theft
    safety.uoregon.edu
    archived copy
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "University of Oregon: Electric scooters stolen from Barnhart cage and Frohnmayer." Incident of October 26, 2024. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/university-of-oregon-barnhart-frohnmayer-scooter-thefts-2024-10-26/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
public-r1oregonuo-alerttimely-warningmotor-vehicle-theftUnder Investigation
Added August 2026Updated August 2026Via ingestion