Aggravated assault reported at 575 S University Boulevard

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present because the branded opener OU-NORMAN Critical identifies the sending campus alert system.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sending campus system.
  2. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  3. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sending campus alert system.
  4. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  5. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sender.
  6. present: The branded "OU-NORMAN" tag identifies the sender.
  7. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sending campus alert system.
  8. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  9. present: "OU-NORMAN" brands the university as the sender of the alert.
  10. present: "OU-NORMAN" is a branded campus alert signature identifying the university.
  11. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN" identifies the University of Oklahoma Norman as sender.
  12. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sender.
  13. present: The branded opening "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sender.
  14. present: The branded "OU-NORMAN Critical" tag identifies the sending system.
  15. present: The opening "OU-NORMAN Critical" is a branded campus alert tag that identifies the sender.
  16. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sending campus.
  17. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sending campus.
  18. present: The branded tag "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sending campus system.
  19. present: The branded tag "OU-NORMAN" identifies the University of Oklahoma Norman as sender.
  20. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN Critical" identifies the sending campus.
  21. present: The branded tag "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  22. present: The branded tag "OU-NORMAN" identifies who is sending the message.
  23. present: The branded signature "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  24. present: The branded opener "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
  25. present: The branded tag "OU-NORMAN" identifies the sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present: aggravated assault names a specific crime threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific crime threat.
  2. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific threat.
  3. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  4. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific violent crime.
  5. present: It names an "Aggravated assault", a specific threat.
  6. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific violent crime.
  7. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific violent crime.
  8. present: It names an "Aggravated assault", a specific violent crime.
  9. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific crime rather than a generic incident or situation.
  10. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific violent crime as the threat.
  11. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific violent crime hazard.
  12. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  13. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  14. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  15. present: "Aggravated assault" names a specific violent crime as the threat.
  16. present: "Aggravated assault" is a specific named threat.
  17. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific violent crime.
  18. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific violent crime.
  19. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  20. present: It names "Aggravated assault" as the specific crime threat.
  21. present: It names "Aggravated assault" as the specific threat.
  22. present: It names an "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  23. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific threat.
  24. present: It reports an "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
  25. present: It names "Aggravated assault", a specific crime threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present at 575 S University Blvd, a street address.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  2. present: It locates the report at "575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  3. present: The incident is "at 575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  4. present: The assault is located at "575 S University Blvd".
  5. present: It places the report at "575 S University Blvd".
  6. present: The assault is reported "at 575 S University Blvd".
  7. present: The event is "at 575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  8. present: It locates the assault at "575 S University Blvd".
  9. present: The event is placed "at 575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  10. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  11. present: The location is given as 575 S University Blvd.
  12. present: The location is given as "575 S University Blvd".
  13. present: It places the assault at "575 S University Blvd".
  14. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  15. present: The report is located at "575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  16. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  17. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  18. present: It places the assault at "575 S University Blvd".
  19. present: The location is given as "575 S University Blvd".
  20. present: The assault is "at 575 S University Blvd".
  21. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  22. present: The assault is reported at "575 S University Blvd", a street address.
  23. present: It locates the report at "575 S University Blvd".
  24. present: It gives the address "575 S University Blvd".
  25. present: It locates the report at "575 S University Blvd".
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance absent: a More link is not an instruction to take a protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  2. absent: "More:" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  3. absent: A "More:" link is not an instruction to shelter, avoid, or take any protective action.
  4. absent: "More" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  5. absent: "More" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  6. absent: "More:" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  7. absent: "More:" plus a link offers extra information but does not tell recipients what protective action to take.
  8. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  9. absent: "More" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  10. absent: "More:" plus a link offers extra information but does not tell recipients what action to take.
  11. absent: A More link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  12. absent: A "More" link offers details but does not tell recipients what protective action to take.
  13. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  14. absent: "More:" plus a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  15. absent: "More" plus a link does not tell recipients what protective action to take.
  16. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  17. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  18. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  19. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  20. absent: A "More" link is not a protective-action instruction such as avoid the area or shelter.
  21. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  22. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  23. absent: "More:" with a link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  24. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
  25. absent: A "More" link is not an instruction to take a protective action.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue is present.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other timing cue is present.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears with the report.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other timing cue appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears in the text.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency cue appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: aggravated assault is named without a statement of injury, danger, or severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The assault is named but no injury, danger, or other impact on people is stated.
  2. absent: "Critical" is an alert-tier tag, and assault is only the hazard name, with no stated harm.
  3. absent: "Critical" is an alert label, and the assault name alone does not state consequences or severity.
  4. absent: Aggravated assault is the hazard name, with no stated consequence or severity.
  5. absent: Aggravated assault is the hazard name, and "Critical" is an alert label, not a stated consequence.
  6. absent: "Critical" marks message priority, and naming the assault does not state consequences.
  7. absent: "Critical" is a priority label, and the assault name alone does not state harm or severity.
  8. absent: "Critical" is an alert label, not a statement of harm, and the assault name alone is not impact.
  9. absent: The assault is named but nothing states severity or what harm it could cause.
  10. absent: "Critical" labels the alert, and aggravated assault names the crime, with no stated consequence of harm.
  11. absent: Critical is an alert priority label, and the assault name alone does not convey consequence or severity.
  12. absent: Aggravated assault names the hazard without stating consequences or severity.
  13. absent: "Critical" and the crime name do not state what the assault could do, such as injury or danger.
  14. absent: "Critical" is an alert priority label, and the assault name alone does not state consequences or severity.
  15. absent: "Critical" is part of the sender tag, and the assault name does not state harm or severity for recipients.
  16. absent: "Critical" is an alert label, not a statement of what the assault could do to people.
  17. absent: "Critical" is an alert tier, and aggravated assault names the crime without stating audience harm.
  18. absent: "Critical" labels the alert channel, and naming the assault does not state consequences or severity for recipients.
  19. absent: "Critical" is an alert label, not a stated consequence of the assault for recipients.
  20. absent: "Critical" labels the alert, but the text does not state what harm the assault could cause.
  21. absent: The label "Critical" is not a stated consequence, and naming the assault alone does not convey severity.
  22. absent: "Critical" is an alert priority tag, and the assault is named without stated harm or severity.
  23. absent: "Critical" is an alert label, and naming the assault does not state consequences or severity.
  24. absent: "Critical" is alert branding, and the assault name does not state consequences for recipients.
  25. absent: "Critical" is a priority label, and the assault name does not state consequences for recipients.