Gas leak East Campus 38th & Merrill

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The "UNL Alert" signature opens the message and the Fire Department is named on scene, evidence every read cited for sender identification.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The "UNL Alert" signature identifies the sending system, with the Fire Department on scene.
  2. present: The "UNL Alert" tag brands the sender and the Fire Department is named on scene.
  3. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus the named Fire Department identify the source.
  4. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus the Fire Department reference identify sender and responders.
  5. present: The branded "UNL Alert" tag plus the responding Fire Department identify authority.
  6. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus responding Fire Department identify the source.
  7. present: The "UNL Alert" tag plus the responding Fire Department identify the source.
  8. present: The "UNL Alert:" signature identifies the sender, with Fire Department named on scene.
  9. present: The "UNL Alert" branding plus the responding Fire Department identify the source.
  10. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus the named Fire Department identify the source.
  11. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus the responding Fire Department identify the source.
  12. present: Carries the "UNL Alert" branded prefix and names responding firefighters.
  13. present: "UNL Alert" brands the sender and the Fire Department is named as responding.
  14. present: It is signed "UNL Alert" and cites the Fire Department on scene.
  15. present: The "UNL Alert" branding plus the Fire Department reference identify sender and responders.
  16. present: The "UNL Alert" signature plus the responding fire department identify the source.
  17. present: The "UNL Alert" prefix brands the message and names the responding Fire Department.
  18. present: The "UNL Alert" signature identifies the sender, with Fire Department noted on scene.
  19. present: The "UNL Alert" prefix brands the sender, with the Fire Department cited as responding.
  20. present: The "UNL Alert" branded prefix identifies the campus sender.
  21. present: The "UNL Alert" signature identifies the sending system, with the Fire Department responding.
  22. present: The message is signed "UNL Alert", identifying the sender.
  23. present: The "UNL Alert" signature identifies the sender, with the Fire Department named.
  24. present: The "UNL Alert" tag identifies the sender, with Fire Department cited.
  25. present: The "UNL Alert" signature identifies the sender and the Fire Department is on scene.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Gas leak reported" states the hazard outright, and the reads were unanimous that the naming is specific.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The hazard named is a "Gas leak".
  2. present: The hazard is stated plainly as a "Gas leak".
  3. present: The hazard is specified as a "Gas leak".
  4. present: "Gas leak" names the hazard specifically.
  5. present: A "Gas leak" is named as the specific threat.
  6. present: A gas leak is explicitly named as the hazard.
  7. present: "Gas leak" names the hazard specifically.
  8. present: The text names a "Gas leak" on East Campus.
  9. present: The hazard is stated as a "Gas leak".
  10. present: "Gas leak" names the hazard explicitly.
  11. present: A "Gas leak" is explicitly named as the threat.
  12. present: Reports a specific "Gas leak".
  13. present: It states a "Gas leak reported", a specific hazard.
  14. present: A "Gas leak" names the specific hazard.
  15. present: A "Gas leak" is named as the specific hazard.
  16. present: "Gas leak" names the hazard specifically.
  17. present: A "Gas leak" is a specific named hazard.
  18. present: It names a "Gas leak" as the hazard.
  19. present: A "Gas leak" is explicitly named as the hazard.
  20. present: A "Gas leak" is specifically named as the threat.
  21. present: "Gas leak" names a specific hazard clearly.
  22. present: A "Gas leak" is named as the specific hazard.
  23. present: A "Gas leak" is the specifically named threat.
  24. present: A "Gas leak" is explicitly named as the hazard.
  25. present: A "Gas leak" is named as the specific hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Location is given as "East Campus 38th and Merrill", a campus area plus cross streets, which all reads accepted.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives "East Campus 38th and Merrill" as the place.
  2. present: The location is "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  3. present: It places the leak "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  4. present: It places the leak "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  5. present: The site is "East Campus 38th and Merrill", a campus intersection.
  6. present: Location given as "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  7. present: Located "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  8. present: Location is given as "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  9. present: "East Campus 38th and Merrill" specifies where.
  10. present: It gives "East Campus 38th and Merrill" as the location.
  11. present: It locates the leak "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  12. present: Located "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  13. present: The location is "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  14. present: "East Campus 38th and Merrill" identifies the intersection and campus.
  15. present: It gives "East Campus 38th and Merrill" as the location.
  16. present: It gives "East Campus 38th and Merrill" as the location.
  17. present: The place is "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  18. present: The location "East Campus 38th and Merrill" is specified.
  19. present: It is located "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  20. present: Location is "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  21. present: It gives the location as "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  22. present: It locates the leak "on East Campus 38th and Merrill".
  23. present: "East Campus 38th and Merrill" locates the leak.
  24. present: It gives "East Campus 38th and Merrill" as the location.
  25. present: The place is given as "East Campus 38th and Merrill".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Avoid area" directs recipients to a protective action and is the sole instruction in the text, disputed by no read.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  2. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  3. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid area".
  4. present: Recipients are directed to "Avoid area".
  5. present: Recipients are directed to "Avoid area".
  6. present: Recipients are told to avoid the area.
  7. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  8. present: Recipients are directed to "Avoid area" around the leak.
  9. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  10. present: The words "Avoid area" tell readers what protective step to take.
  11. present: Readers are told to "Avoid area".
  12. present: Gives the protective instruction "Avoid area".
  13. present: Readers are instructed to "Avoid area."
  14. present: Readers are directed to "Avoid area".
  15. present: Recipients are directed to "Avoid area".
  16. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  17. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid area".
  18. present: Readers are instructed to "Avoid area".
  19. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  20. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid area".
  21. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  22. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  23. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area".
  24. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid area."
  25. present: Readers are told to "Avoid area", a protective action.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Nothing marks when the leak was reported; no time, date or recency word appears, and all reads found timing missing.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No time reference or recency cue appears in the text.
  2. absent: The text has no time stamp or phrase indicating recency.
  3. absent: The message contains no clock time, date, or recency wording.
  4. absent: The message carries no clock time or recency marker.
  5. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency indicator in the text.
  6. absent: The text contains no clock time, date, or recency cue.
  7. absent: The alert gives no clock time or recency cue.
  8. absent: The message gives no timing information about the leak.
  9. absent: Nothing conveys when the leak was reported or how recent it is.
  10. absent: There is no time stamp or recency indicator in the text.
  11. absent: No time reference of any kind appears.
  12. absent: The message offers no timestamp or recency phrase.
  13. absent: There is no clock time or recency marker in the message.
  14. absent: No time stamp or recency indicator is present.
  15. absent: Nothing conveys when the leak was reported or how recent it is.
  16. absent: The message carries no time stamp or recency phrase.
  17. absent: The text carries no time reference or recency cue.
  18. absent: The alert includes no clock time or recency wording.
  19. absent: The message includes no time, date, or recency cue.
  20. absent: There is no time stamp or word conveying recency.
  21. absent: The text offers no clock time or recency wording.
  22. absent: Nothing indicates when the leak was reported or how recent it is.
  23. absent: Nothing gives a time, date, or indication of how recent the report is.
  24. absent: There is no clock time or word indicating recency.
  25. absent: The message carries no time stamp or recency indicator.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The alert never says how dangerous the leak could be, offering no explosion, fire or health consequence, and the reads were unanimous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing describes how dangerous the leak could be.
  2. absent: No severity or potential consequence of the leak is stated.
  3. absent: Nothing states what the leak could cause or how serious it is.
  4. absent: No consequence or severity of the gas leak is described.
  5. absent: No severity or potential consequence of the leak is conveyed.
  6. absent: No consequence or severity of the leak is described.
  7. absent: No potential harm from the leaking gas is stated.
  8. absent: Nothing states what harm the leak could cause.
  9. absent: The alert states no potential harm from the escaping gas.
  10. absent: No potential consequence of the leak is described.
  11. absent: Nothing conveys how dangerous the leak is or what it might cause.
  12. absent: No statement of danger or consequence from the leak appears.
  13. absent: No consequence of the leak, such as fire risk, is conveyed.
  14. absent: The severity or potential effects of the leak go unmentioned.
  15. absent: The message states no severity or possible harm from the leak.
  16. absent: No potential harm or severity is described.
  17. absent: No severity or potential harm from the leak is described.
  18. absent: No consequence or severity of the leak is described.
  19. absent: Nothing describes the danger the leak poses to people or property.
  20. absent: No consequence or severity of the leak is conveyed to readers.
  21. absent: No consequence or severity of the gas leak is stated.
  22. absent: The potential danger of the gas is never described.
  23. absent: No consequence or severity, such as fire or explosion danger, is mentioned.
  24. absent: Nothing states what the gas leak could do or how serious it is.
  25. absent: No potential harm or severity from the gas leak is conveyed.