A shooting notice tells people to avoid 5th Street and 13th Avenue

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. The branded opening "Dinkytown Alert" is the anvil that identifies who is sending the message.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opening "Dinkytown Alert" is the anvil that identifies who is sending the message.
  2. present: The branded opener bellows "Dinkytown Alert", which identifies the sender.
  3. present: The branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" lets me chisel the sender without any named police agency.
  4. present: The branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" names the sender, so this dowel source element is present.
  5. present: The branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" names the sender, so this easel reading marks Source present.
  6. present: This froe reading counts "Dinkytown Alert" as a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, the branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message.
  8. present: I hammer the source as present because the opening branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks source present because the branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender.
  10. present: The jointer finds the branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" names who is sending the message.
  11. present: The branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender, so the lathe check marks Source present.
  12. present: The branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender, so this mallet of source is present.
  13. present: The needle is the opening branded signature "Dinkytown Alert", which identifies who is sending the warning.
  14. present: The opener "Dinkytown Alert" is a branded signature, so the awl of source is present even without a named police agency.
  15. present: The source plane is met because the branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message.
  16. present: This rasp finds source present because the branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender.
  17. present: The opener "Dinkytown Alert" is a branded signature, so spokeshave coding marks a sender.
  18. present: The opening branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message on this trestle.
  19. present: The branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message, so I vise source as present.
  20. present: The branded opening "Dinkytown Alert" is a sender signature, so the source wedge is present.
  21. present: The opener "Dinkytown Alert" is a branded sender signature, so this auger marks source present.
  22. present: The branded opener "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the warning, so this bradawl counts Source as present.
  23. present: The branded opening "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender, so the drawknife source test is met.
  24. present: This gouge marks Source present because the branded tag "Dinkytown Alert" identifies who is sending the message.
  25. present: The branded signature "Dinkytown Alert" identifies the sender, so the hatchet source test is met.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. The specific threat word "Shooting" is the anvil that names the hazard, not a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The specific threat word "Shooting" is the anvil that names the hazard, not a generic incident.
  2. present: The text bellows "Shooting", a specific threat rather than a generic emergency.
  3. present: The specific word "Shooting" lets me chisel the threat, which is more than a generic incident.
  4. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, which meets the dowel hazard test.
  5. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, which this easel pass treats as Hazard.
  6. present: This froe reading finds "Shooting", a specific named threat rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, "Shooting" names a specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  8. present: I hammer hazard as present because the text names "Shooting", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks hazard present because the text names "Shooting" as the specific threat.
  10. present: The jointer finds "Shooting" names a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: It names "Shooting", a specific threat, so the lathe check marks Hazard present.
  12. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, so the mallet of hazard is present.
  13. present: The needle is the specific threat named as "Shooting", which is more than a generic incident.
  14. present: It names "Shooting" as the specific threat, which is the awl that makes the hazard clear rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: The hazard plane is met because the text names "Shooting", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: This rasp finds hazard present because the text names "Shooting", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  17. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, so spokeshave coding marks the hazard present.
  18. present: The word "Shooting" names a specific threat rather than a generic incident on this trestle.
  19. present: It names "Shooting" as the specific threat rather than a generic emergency, so I vise hazard as present.
  20. present: The word "Shooting" names a specific threat, so the hazard wedge is present.
  21. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, so this auger marks hazard present.
  22. present: The text names "Shooting" as the specific threat, so this bradawl counts Hazard as present.
  23. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat that satisfies the drawknife hazard test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Hazard present because the text names "Shooting", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  25. present: The text names "Shooting", a specific threat, so the hatchet hazard test is met.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. The place "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" is the anvil that says where.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The place "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" is the anvil that says where.
  2. present: It bellows where: "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  3. present: The streets "5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" let me chisel where recipients should picture the event.
  4. present: It places the event in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE, a stated dowel location.
  5. present: It places the event "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", a clear easel location cue.
  6. present: This froe reading finds the place "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, the text places it "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  8. present: I hammer location as present because it places the event "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks location present because it places the shooting at "5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  10. present: The jointer finds "5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" states where the shooting is.
  11. present: It says the shooting is "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so the lathe check marks Location present.
  12. present: It says the shooting is "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", a street place the mallet accepts.
  13. present: The needle is the stated place "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  14. present: It places the event "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", the awl for a stated location.
  15. present: The location plane is met because it places the shooting "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  16. present: This rasp finds location present because it places the shooting "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  17. present: It places the shooting "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so spokeshave coding marks location.
  18. present: The text says the shooting is "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" on this trestle.
  19. present: It says the shooting is "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so I vise location as present.
  20. present: "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE" says where, so the location wedge is present.
  21. present: It says the shooting is "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so this auger marks location present.
  22. present: It places the shooting "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so this bradawl counts Location as present.
  23. present: It places the event "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", meeting the drawknife location test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Location present because it places the event "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE".
  25. present: It places the shooting "in the area of 5th St SE and 13th Ave SE", so the hatchet location test is met.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. The command "Avoid the area" is the anvil that tells recipients what protective action to take.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The command "Avoid the area" is the anvil that tells recipients what protective action to take.
  2. present: The closing instruction bellows "Avoid the area", a protective action for recipients.
  3. present: The command "Avoid the area" lets me chisel a protective action told to recipients.
  4. present: "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action, satisfying the dowel guidance element.
  5. present: "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action, so Guidance is present on this easel review.
  6. present: This froe reading finds the protective instruction "Avoid the area".
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, "Avoid the area" is a direct protective instruction to recipients.
  8. present: I hammer guidance as present because "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action to take.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks guidance present because "Avoid the area" tells recipients what action to take.
  10. present: The jointer finds "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action.
  11. present: It instructs recipients to "Avoid the area", so the lathe check marks Guidance present.
  12. present: "Avoid the area" is a direct protective instruction, so the mallet of guidance is present.
  13. present: The needle is the protective instruction "Avoid the area", telling recipients what to do.
  14. present: The instruction "Avoid the area" tells recipients what to do, the awl of protective guidance.
  15. present: The guidance plane is met because "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action to take.
  16. present: This rasp finds guidance present because "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action.
  17. present: Recipients are told "Avoid the area", a protective instruction, so spokeshave coding marks guidance.
  18. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid the area", which is a protective action on this trestle.
  19. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area", which is a protective action, so I vise guidance as present.
  20. present: "Avoid the area" tells people what protective action to take, so the guidance wedge is present.
  21. present: "Avoid the area" tells recipients what protective action to take, so this auger marks guidance present.
  22. present: It tells recipients to "Avoid the area", a protective instruction, so this bradawl counts Guidance as present.
  23. present: "Avoid the area" tells recipients a protective action, so the drawknife guidance test is met.
  24. present: This gouge marks Guidance present because recipients are told to "Avoid the area", a protective instruction.
  25. present: It tells recipients to "Avoid the area", a protective instruction, so the hatchet guidance test is met.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Time present and 25 absent. No clock time, date, or recency word such as now appears, so the anvil for time is absent.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now appears, so the anvil for time is absent.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or cue such as now or today bellows when the shooting occurred.
  3. absent: I chisel time as missing because the text has no clock, date, now, or other recency cue.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears in this dowel time check.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" appears, so Time is absent in this easel check.
  6. absent: This froe reading finds no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately.
  7. absent: On a gimlet reading, no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today appears.
  8. absent: I hammer time as absent because no clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears.
  9. absent: This inkwell pass marks time absent because no clock time, date, or cue such as now or today appears.
  10. absent: The jointer finds no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" appears, so the lathe check marks Time absent.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears, so the mallet of time is absent.
  13. absent: The needle is that no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now appears, so the time awl is absent.
  15. absent: The time plane is not met because no clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "today" appears.
  16. absent: This rasp finds time absent because no clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "immediately" appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now appears, so spokeshave coding marks time absent.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" or "today" appears on this trestle.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears, so I vise time as absent.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" appears, so the time wedge is absent.
  21. absent: This auger finds no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as "now" appears, so this bradawl counts Time as absent.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears, so the drawknife time test fails.
  24. absent: This gouge marks Time absent because no clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "today" appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears, so the hatchet time test fails.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 25 absent. The text never states a consequence or severity beyond naming the shooting, so the anvil for impact is absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The text never states a consequence or severity beyond naming the shooting, so the anvil for impact is absent.
  2. absent: The name "Shooting" never bellows a consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  3. absent: I chisel impact as missing because "Shooting" only names the hazard and never states harm or severity.
  4. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity, so the dowel impact element is absent.
  5. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity such as injury, so Impact is absent on this easel check.
  6. absent: This froe reading finds no consequence or severity beyond the hazard name "Shooting".
  7. absent: On a gimlet reading, "Shooting" only names the hazard and states no consequence or severity.
  8. absent: I hammer impact as absent because "Shooting" only names the hazard and states no consequence or severity.
  9. absent: This inkwell pass marks impact absent because "Shooting" names the hazard without any consequence or severity.
  10. absent: The jointer finds "Shooting" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity.
  11. absent: "Shooting" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity, so the lathe check marks Impact absent.
  12. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity, so the mallet of impact is absent.
  13. absent: The needle is that naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity such as deadly or dangerous.
  14. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states the hazard but not a consequence or severity, so the impact awl is missing.
  15. absent: The impact plane is not met because naming "Shooting" alone does not state a consequence or severity such as dangerous or deadly.
  16. absent: This rasp finds impact absent because naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  17. absent: "Shooting" only names the hazard and states no consequence or severity, so spokeshave coding marks impact absent.
  18. absent: The hazard name "Shooting" is given, but no consequence or severity is stated on this trestle.
  19. absent: The word "Shooting" only names the hazard and states no consequence or severity, so I vise impact as absent.
  20. absent: The text never says the shooting is dangerous or otherwise states harm, so the impact wedge is absent.
  21. absent: This auger finds no consequence or severity beyond the bare hazard name "Shooting".
  22. absent: "Shooting" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity, so this bradawl counts Impact as absent.
  23. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity, so the drawknife impact test fails.
  24. absent: This gouge marks Impact absent because "Shooting" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity.
  25. absent: Naming "Shooting" alone states no consequence or severity, so the hatchet impact test fails.