A person is assaulted and a wallet is taken near 19th and Washington

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. The university names itself as "U of M Twin Cities", which is the anvil identifying the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The university names itself as "U of M Twin Cities", which is the anvil identifying the sender.
  2. present: The opening signature bellows "U of M Twin Cities" as the issuing authority.
  3. present: The opening "U of M Twin Cities" lets me chisel the university as the issuing source.
  4. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university, so the dowel source element is present.
  5. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university, so Source is present for this easel judgment.
  6. present: This froe reading counts "U of M Twin Cities" as the university naming the sender.
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, "U of M Twin Cities" names the university issuing the alert.
  8. present: I hammer source as present because "U of M Twin Cities" names the university issuing the alert.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks source present because "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university.
  10. present: The jointer finds "U of M Twin Cities" identifies the university sending the alert.
  11. present: The opener "U of M Twin Cities" names the university sender, so the lathe check marks Source present.
  12. present: The opener "U of M Twin Cities" names the university as sender, so the mallet of source is present.
  13. present: The needle is the sender tag "U of M Twin Cities", which names the university issuing the alert.
  14. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the university sending the message, which is the source awl here.
  15. present: The source plane is met because "U of M Twin Cities" names the university issuing the alert.
  16. present: This rasp finds source present because "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university.
  17. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the university as sender, so spokeshave coding marks source present.
  18. present: The signature "U of M Twin Cities" names the university issuing the alert on this trestle.
  19. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the university issuing the alert, so I vise source as present.
  20. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the university sending the alert, so the source wedge is present.
  21. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the sending university, so this auger marks source present.
  22. present: The message opens with "U of M Twin Cities", naming the issuing university, so this bradawl counts Source as present.
  23. present: "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university, satisfying the drawknife source test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Source present because "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university.
  25. present: The opener "U of M Twin Cities" names the issuing university, so the hatchet source test is met.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. The crime word "robbery" is the anvil that states the specific threat in this alert.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The crime word "robbery" is the anvil that states the specific threat in this alert.
  2. present: The message bellows "a robbery" and that the victim "was physically assaulted".
  3. present: The word "robbery" lets me chisel a specific crime, and "physically assaulted" names the act.
  4. present: The alert names a robbery and says the victim was physically assaulted, a specific dowel hazard.
  5. present: It states "a robbery occurred" and that the victim "was physically assaulted", a specific easel hazard.
  6. present: This froe reading finds the specific threat "a robbery occurred" and a physical assault.
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, the text names "a robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted".
  8. present: I hammer hazard as present because the text specifically states that "a robbery occurred".
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks hazard present because the text names a "robbery" and says the victim was "physically assaulted".
  10. present: The jointer finds "robbery" names a specific crime, not a vague emergency.
  11. present: It states "a robbery occurred" and that the victim "was physically assaulted", so the lathe check marks Hazard present.
  12. present: It names "a robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted", a specific hazard the mallet recognizes.
  13. present: The needle is the specific crime "robbery", plus the victim "was physically assaulted".
  14. present: The text names "a robbery" as the specific crime, the hazard awl rather than a vague emergency.
  15. present: The hazard plane is met because the text states "a robbery occurred" and that the victim "was physically assaulted".
  16. present: This rasp finds hazard present because the text names "a robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted".
  17. present: The text names "robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted", so spokeshave coding marks the hazard.
  18. present: The text specifically names a "robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted" on this trestle.
  19. present: It states that "a robbery occurred" and the victim "was physically assaulted", so I vise hazard as present.
  20. present: "a robbery occurred" names a specific crime, so the hazard wedge is present.
  21. present: It states "a robbery occurred" and that the victim "was physically assaulted", so this auger marks hazard present.
  22. present: It states that "a robbery occurred" and the victim "was physically assaulted", so this bradawl counts Hazard as present.
  23. present: The text names "a robbery", a specific crime that meets the drawknife hazard test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Hazard present because the text specifies "a robbery" and that the "Victim was physically assaulted".
  25. present: It names "a robbery" and says the victim "was physically assaulted", so the hatchet hazard test is met.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. The phrase "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" is the anvil that gives the location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The phrase "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" is the anvil that gives the location.
  2. present: It bellows "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and the "10th Ave Bridge".
  3. present: The corners "19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and "10th Ave Bridge" let me chisel the place.
  4. present: It locates the crime near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S and on the 10th Ave Bridge, a dowel location.
  5. present: The crime is "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", with a last sighting on the "10th Ave Bridge", fixing location for this easel code.
  6. present: This froe reading finds "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and the "10th Ave Bridge".
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, the scene is "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", later the "10th Ave Bridge".
  8. present: I hammer location as present because it says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S".
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks location present because it cites "19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and the "10th Ave Bridge".
  10. present: The jointer finds the robbery near "19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and the "10th Ave Bridge".
  11. present: It says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", so the lathe check marks Location present.
  12. present: It places the robbery "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and on the "10th Ave Bridge", so the mallet of location is present.
  13. present: The needle is the place "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", with a last seen on the 10th Ave Bridge.
  14. present: It says the robbery occurred "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", the location awl here.
  15. present: The location plane is met because it says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S".
  16. present: This rasp finds location present because it says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S".
  17. present: It says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", so spokeshave coding marks location.
  18. present: It places the robbery "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" on this trestle.
  19. present: The robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", with the suspect last seen on the "10th Ave Bridge", so I vise location as present.
  20. present: "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" states the place, so the location wedge is present.
  21. present: The robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", so this auger marks location present.
  22. present: It locates the crime "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", so this bradawl counts Location as present.
  23. present: It says the robbery occurred "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S", meeting the drawknife location test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Location present because it says the robbery was "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S".
  25. present: It locates the crime "near 19th Ave S and Washington Ave S" and the "10th Ave Bridge", so the hatchet location test is met.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. The request "please call 911" is the anvil that instructs recipients to take an action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The request "please call 911" is the anvil that instructs recipients to take an action.
  2. present: It bellows a recipient instruction: "please call 911" with any information.
  3. present: The sentence "please call 911" lets me chisel an action the audience is told to take.
  4. present: The instruction please call 911 tells recipients to report information, which is dowel guidance.
  5. present: "please call 911" is an instruction to recipients, so Guidance counts on this easel pass.
  6. present: This froe reading finds the instruction "please call 911" if you have information.
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, "please call 911" tells people with information what action to take.
  8. present: I hammer guidance as present because it instructs recipients to "please call 911" with information.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks guidance present because "please call 911" instructs recipients who have information.
  10. present: The jointer finds "please call 911" instructs recipients to report information.
  11. present: It tells anyone with information to "please call 911", so the lathe check marks Guidance present.
  12. present: "please call 911" tells recipients to report information, an instruction the mallet of guidance includes.
  13. present: The needle is the instruction "please call 911" if you have information about this crime.
  14. present: It instructs people with information to "please call 911", a protective guidance awl for recipients.
  15. present: The guidance plane is met because recipients are told "please call 911" if they have information about this crime.
  16. present: This rasp finds guidance present because recipients are told "please call 911" if they have information about this crime.
  17. present: It tells people with information to "please call 911", so spokeshave coding marks guidance.
  18. present: It instructs anyone with information to "please call 911" on this trestle.
  19. present: It tells recipients "please call 911" if they have information about this crime, so I vise guidance as present.
  20. present: "please call 911" instructs recipients who have information, so the guidance wedge is present.
  21. present: "please call 911" instructs recipients to report information, so this auger marks guidance present.
  22. present: It instructs anyone with information to "please call 911", so this bradawl counts Guidance as present.
  23. present: "please call 911" instructs recipients to report information, so the drawknife guidance test is met.
  24. present: This gouge marks Guidance present because it instructs readers to "please call 911" if they have information.
  25. present: It instructs recipients to "please call 911" with information, so the hatchet guidance test is met.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present and 0 absent. The wording "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" is the anvil that conveys when it happened.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The wording "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" is the anvil that conveys when it happened.
  2. present: The text bellows "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", a date and time.
  3. present: The phrase "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" lets me chisel a date and a clock time.
  4. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time for this dowel time element.
  5. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, satisfying Time in this easel review.
  6. present: This froe reading finds the date and time "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm".
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and a clock time.
  8. present: I hammer time as present because it gives the date "08/27/2026" and the clock time "6:15 pm".
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks time present because "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time.
  10. present: The jointer finds "08/27/2026" and "6:15 pm" give the date and clock time.
  11. present: It dates the event "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", so the lathe check marks Time present.
  12. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, so the mallet of time is present.
  13. present: The needle is the timestamp "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", which states when it occurred.
  14. present: The line "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, the time awl here.
  15. present: The time plane is met because the message gives "08/27/2026" and "approximately 6:15 pm".
  16. present: This rasp finds time present because it gives the date "08/27/2026" and the clock time "approximately 6:15 pm".
  17. present: It gives "08/27/2026" and "approximately 6:15 pm", so spokeshave coding marks time present.
  18. present: It states when the crime occurred: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" on this trestle.
  19. present: It dates the event "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", so I vise time as present.
  20. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, so the time wedge is present.
  21. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, so this auger marks time present.
  22. present: It gives the date and time "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", so this bradawl counts Time as present.
  23. present: "On 08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm" gives a date and clock time, meeting the drawknife time test.
  24. present: This gouge marks Time present because it gives "08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm".
  25. present: It gives the date and clock time "08/27/2026 at approximately 6:15 pm", so the hatchet time test is met.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 0 absent. The statement "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" is the anvil showing harm to a person and property.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The statement "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" is the anvil showing harm to a person and property.
  2. present: It bellows realized harm: the victim "was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken".
  3. present: The words "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" let me chisel harm to a person and to property.
  4. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states bodily and property harm, so dowel impact is present.
  5. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states bodily and property harm, so Impact is present on this easel reading.
  6. present: This froe reading finds stated harm: the victim "was physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken".
  7. present: On a gimlet reading, stated harm is clear: the victim "was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken".
  8. present: I hammer impact as present because "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  9. present: This inkwell pass marks impact present because "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  10. present: The jointer finds "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  11. present: It says the victim "was physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken", stated harm, so the lathe check marks Impact present.
  12. present: "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and to property, which the mallet of impact requires.
  13. present: The needle is the stated harm that the victim "was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken".
  14. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states harm to a person and property, the impact awl here.
  15. present: The impact plane is met because "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  16. present: This rasp finds impact present because "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  17. present: "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property, so spokeshave coding marks impact.
  18. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states harm to a person and property on this trestle.
  19. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states harm to a person and to property, so I vise impact as present.
  20. present: "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property, so the impact wedge is present.
  21. present: "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property, so this auger marks impact present.
  22. present: "Physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property, so this bradawl counts Impact as present.
  23. present: "Victim was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken" states bodily and property harm, so the drawknife impact test is met.
  24. present: This gouge marks Impact present because "physically assaulted" and "a wallet was taken" state harm to a person and property.
  25. present: It states the victim "was physically assaulted and a wallet was taken", so the hatchet impact test is met.