Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the source is present: "The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD)" is named as investigating.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD)" as actively investigating the incidents, identifying the authority.
  2. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  3. present: It says "The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating", naming the agency.
  4. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating' these incidents.
  5. present: It names 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD)' as the agency actively investigating the incidents.
  6. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  7. present: It is 'Crime Alert 2023-01' and says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  8. present: It names 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD)' as the agency investigating these incidents.
  9. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', identifying the authority.
  10. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  11. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', naming the authority.
  12. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  13. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  14. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  15. present: It says "The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating".
  16. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', naming the source.
  17. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', naming the agency.
  18. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  19. present: It states that the University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating.
  20. present: It states 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating' in 'Crime Alert 2023-01'.
  21. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', identifying the source.
  22. present: It is 'Crime Alert 2023-01' and names 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD)' as investigating.
  23. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
  24. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating', identifying the sender.
  25. present: It says 'The University of Michigan Police Department (UMPD) is actively investigating'.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the alert names "two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)", specific crimes.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It reports "two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)", which are specific named crimes.
  2. present: It names 'Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure' incidents involving a man exposing himself and groping a student.
  3. present: It names "two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)", specific threats.
  4. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)' by the same individual.
  5. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)' as the reported crimes.
  6. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)' as the specific crimes.
  7. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', specific crimes against students.
  8. present: It names Sexual Assault and Indecent Exposure incidents by a male suspect.
  9. present: It names 'Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure' incidents involving a male exposing himself and groping a student.
  10. present: It names 'Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure', including groping and genital exposure.
  11. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', specific threats.
  12. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)'.
  13. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', specific crimes.
  14. present: It names 'Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure' incidents involving a male exposing himself and groping a student.
  15. present: It names "Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure" incidents believed to involve the same male suspect.
  16. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', which are specific crimes.
  17. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', specific crimes.
  18. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)'.
  19. present: It names two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault by groping.
  20. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)'.
  21. present: It names 'Sexual Assault & Indecent Exposure', including a groping and two exposure incidents.
  22. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)'.
  23. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', which are specific crimes.
  24. present: It names 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', which are specific threats to students.
  25. present: It reports 'two indecent exposure incidents and a sexual assault (groping)', which are specific named crimes.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find a location: the incidents occurred "on North Campus" near parking lot NW10.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the incidents "on North Campus" near parking lot NW10, a specific campus area.
  2. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on 'North Campus', a specific campus area.
  3. present: The incidents occurred "on North Campus" on the sidewalk "near parking lot NW10".
  4. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' on 'the sidewalk near parking lot NW10'.
  5. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on North Campus, a specific campus area.
  6. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on North Campus, a specific location.
  7. present: It places the incidents on 'North Campus' and 'near parking lot NW10', specific campus locations.
  8. present: It places the incidents on North Campus near parking lot NW10, which names specific places.
  9. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' near 'parking lot NW10'.
  10. present: It gives 'near parking lot NW10' on 'North Campus' as the location.
  11. present: The incidents occurred 'on North Campus' on the sidewalk 'near parking lot NW10'.
  12. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' 'near parking lot NW10'.
  13. present: The incidents happened 'near parking lot NW10' on 'North Campus', which are specific places on campus.
  14. present: The incidents occurred 'near parking lot NW10' on North Campus.
  15. present: It says the incidents occurred "near parking lot NW10" on North Campus, a specific place.
  16. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on 'North Campus', both specific locations.
  17. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' and 'near parking lot NW10', specific locations.
  18. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' near 'parking lot NW10'.
  19. present: The incidents occurred on North Campus near parking lot NW10, which names a specific campus location.
  20. present: The incidents occurred 'near parking lot NW10' on North Campus, a specific named campus location.
  21. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' on the sidewalk 'near parking lot NW10'.
  22. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on 'North Campus'.
  23. present: It places the incidents 'near parking lot NW10' on North Campus, a specific campus area.
  24. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' on the sidewalk near 'parking lot NW10', a specific campus area.
  25. present: It places the incidents 'on North Campus' near 'parking lot NW10', a specific area of the university.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: the Remember list tells recipients to "Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible" and to trust their intuition.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It advises to "Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible".
  2. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911.
  3. present: It advises "Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible" and to call 911, protective actions.
  4. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to choose an alternative when unsafe.
  5. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to trust your intuition.
  6. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and 'Report suspicious behavior. Call 911'.
  7. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and call 911 for suspicious behavior.
  8. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and calling 911.
  9. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible', a protective action.
  10. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible'.
  11. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911 about suspicious behavior.
  12. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and calling 911.
  13. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend' and report suspicious behavior by calling 911.
  14. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to report suspicious behavior.
  15. present: It advises "Walk with a trusted friend" and to call 911 about suspicious behavior.
  16. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911.
  17. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible', a protective action.
  18. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911.
  19. present: It advises walking with a trusted friend or co-worker and calling 911 about suspicious behavior.
  20. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and trusting intuition.
  21. present: It advises recipients to 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911 about suspicious behavior.
  22. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to report suspicious behavior.
  23. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend' and to call 911 about suspicious behavior.
  24. present: It advises 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker when possible' and to call 911.
  25. present: It advises readers to 'Walk with a trusted friend or co-worker' and report suspicious behavior.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree timing is present: times such as "At approximately 4:30 p.m." and "around 3:30 p.m." are given.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives times like "At approximately 4:30 p.m." and "around 3:30 p.m.".
  2. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  3. present: It gives times such as "At approximately 4:30 p.m." and "around 3:30 p.m."
  4. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  5. present: It gives 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.' as incident times.
  6. present: It gives specific times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.' for the incidents.
  7. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  8. present: It gives clock times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and '8:30 p.m.' for the reported incidents.
  9. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and a report at '8:30 p.m.'.
  10. present: It gives times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  11. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and a report received 'At approximately 8:30 p.m.'
  12. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  13. present: It gives clock times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.' for the incidents.
  14. present: It gives times 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'.
  15. present: It gives "At approximately 4:30 p.m." and other times such as 3:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m.
  16. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and '8:30 p.m.'.
  17. present: It gives times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and '3:30 p.m.' for the separate incidents.
  18. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'
  19. present: It gives approximate times of 4:30 p.m., 3:30 p.m., and 8:30 p.m.
  20. present: It gives times such as 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and '3:30 p.m.'.
  21. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.' for the incidents.
  22. present: It gives times such as 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and a report 'At approximately 8:30 p.m.'.
  23. present: It gives 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.' as the times of the incidents.
  24. present: It gives times like 'At approximately 4:30 p.m.' and 'around 3:30 p.m.'
  25. present: It gives clock times like 'approximately 4:30 p.m.' and '8:30 p.m.' for the reported incidents.
• Impactabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Absent by strong consensus (23 of 25): the acts are described but no injury or explicit severity is stated. Two reads treated "groped her through her clothing" as a stated harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It describes the acts but states no injury or explicit severity beyond them.
  2. absent: It describes the groping and exposure but states no injury or severity.
  3. absent: It describes the incidents but states no injury or potential consequence for recipients.
  4. absent: It describes exposure and groping but reports no injury, weapon, or stated danger or severity.
  5. absent: It describes the exposure and groping but states no injury or explicit severity or consequence.
  6. absent: It describes the acts but states no injury or severity of the threat.
  7. absent: It describes the exposures and groping but states no injury or broader consequence or severity.
  8. absent: It describes the groping and exposure but states no injury or explicit severity.
  9. absent: It describes the incidents but does not state any consequence or severity for others.
  10. absent: It describes the incidents but states no injury or explicit consequence of the threat.
  11. present: It says the suspect 'groped her through her clothing', stating that a student was physically assaulted.
  12. absent: It describes the acts but states no explicit consequence, injury, or severity.
  13. absent: No injury or severity is stated beyond describing the exposure and groping incidents.
  14. absent: It describes the acts but states no injury or explicit severity beyond the offenses named.
  15. absent: It describes the exposure and groping incidents but states no injury or explicit severity.
  16. absent: No injury or explicit statement of severity is given beyond describing the acts.
  17. absent: It describes the acts but states no explicit consequence or severity for the community.
  18. absent: The alert describes the acts but does not state any consequence or severity for others.
  19. absent: It describes the acts but states no injury or explicit severity or consequence.
  20. absent: The victim struck back with an umbrella, and no injury or stated severity appears.
  21. absent: It describes the incidents but conveys no explicit statement of severity or potential harm beyond the offenses.
  22. present: It says a suspect 'groped her through her clothing', a stated harm to a student.
  23. absent: It recounts the exposure and groping incidents without stating injury, danger level, or other consequences.
  24. absent: It describes the exposure and groping acts but states no injury, danger level, or other consequence.
  25. absent: It describes the exposures and groping but states no injury, potential consequence, or explicit severity.