Armed robbery near the Student Disability Center

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present. It identifies UHPD officers and the University of Houston Security Alerts line.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and includes the University of Houston Security Alerts archive line.
  2. present: UHPD is named as the responding agency, and the footer identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  3. present: UHPD officers and the University of Houston Security Alerts label identify the issuing police authority.
  4. present: UHPD officers are named as responders, and the closing line identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  5. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and closes with the University of Houston Security Alerts archive line.
  6. present: It identifies UHPD officers as the responders and closes with University of Houston Security Alerts.
  7. present: UHPD is named as the responding agency, and the closing line identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  8. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and closes with University of Houston Security Alerts.
  9. present: UHPD officers are named as responders and the closing line identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  10. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and closes with the University of Houston Security Alerts label.
  11. present: It identifies UHPD officers and closes with the University of Houston Security Alerts archive line.
  12. present: UHPD officers and the University of Houston Security Alerts label identify who issued the notice.
  13. present: The text identifies UHPD officers and the University of Houston as the responding authority.
  14. present: UHPD officers are named as the responders, and the closing line cites University of Houston Security Alerts.
  15. present: UHPD officers and the University of Houston Security Alerts label identify the issuing police authority.
  16. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and closes as a University of Houston Security Alert.
  17. present: UHPD and the closing University of Houston Security Alerts line identify who issued the notice.
  18. present: UHPD officers and the closing University of Houston Security Alerts line identify the issuing authority.
  19. present: It identifies UHPD officers as the responders and ends with the University of Houston Security Alerts name.
  20. present: It says UHPD officers responded and the closing line identifies a University of Houston Security Alert.
  21. present: UHPD is named as the responding agency, and the closing line identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  22. present: UHPD is named as the responding agency, and the closing identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  23. present: UHPD officers are named as responders and the closing line identifies University of Houston Security Alerts.
  24. present: UHPD officers are named as responders, and the closing University of Houston Security Alerts line marks the sender.
  25. present: It identifies UHPD officers as responders and closes with the University of Houston Security Alerts archive line.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present. It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
  2. present: It names an aggravated robbery and says the suspect displayed a firearm.
  3. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm.
  4. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
  5. present: It names an aggravated robbery, a specific crime rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  6. present: It names an aggravated robbery, a specific crime, and says the suspect displayed a firearm.
  7. present: The text specifically calls the crime an aggravated robbery involving a displayed firearm.
  8. present: It reports an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  9. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
  10. present: It states an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
  11. present: It names an aggravated robbery, which is a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  12. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
  13. present: It names an aggravated robbery and says the suspect displayed a gray semi-automatic handgun.
  14. present: It reports an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm, a specific threat.
  15. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm.
  16. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  17. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  18. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  19. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  20. present: It names an aggravated robbery, a specific crime, and says the suspect displayed a firearm.
  21. present: The text states an aggravated robbery, a specific crime, including that a firearm was displayed.
  22. present: It reports an aggravated robbery and says the suspect displayed a firearm, a specific threat.
  23. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which the suspect displayed a firearm.
  24. present: It names an aggravated robbery, a specific crime rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  25. present: It names an aggravated robbery in which a suspect displayed a firearm and demanded money.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present. It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  2. present: It places the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  3. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  4. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  5. present: It says the robbery occurred near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  6. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  7. present: It says the robbery happened near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  8. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  9. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  10. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  11. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  12. present: The robbery occurred near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  13. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  14. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  15. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  16. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  17. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  18. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  19. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  20. present: It places the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  21. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive, then eastbound from there.
  22. present: It places the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  23. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  24. present: It locates the crime near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
  25. present: It locates the robbery near the Student Disability Center at 4369 Cougar Village Drive.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance absent. It describes the crime and the suspect and gives no protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It describes the crime and suspect but gives readers no protective instruction such as avoid the area or call police.
  2. absent: It describes the robbery and suspect but never instructs recipients to take a protective action.
  3. absent: The text describes the police response and the suspect fleeing, but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  4. absent: The text describes the crime and the suspect but never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  5. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but never instructs recipients to take a protective action.
  6. absent: The message describes the crime and the suspect but never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  7. absent: The synopsis reports what happened and what police did, but it never tells recipients what to do.
  8. absent: It describes the crime and the response but never tells recipients a protective action.
  9. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction such as avoid the area or call police.
  10. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  11. absent: The text describes the police response and the crime but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  12. absent: The text describes the police response and the crime but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  13. absent: It reports what officers and the suspect did but never instructs recipients to take a protective action.
  14. absent: The synopsis describes the crime and the police response but never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  15. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  16. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  17. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  18. absent: The text describes the robbery and the suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  19. absent: The text recounts the robbery and the police response but never tells recipients what to do.
  20. absent: It describes police response and the suspect's actions but never tells recipients what they should do.
  21. absent: The message describes the crime and the suspect, but it never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  22. absent: It recounts the crime, suspect, and weapon but never tells recipients what action to take.
  23. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction.
  24. absent: The text describes the robbery, suspect, and handgun but never tells recipients what protective action to take.
  25. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives recipients no protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present. It states Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  2. present: It dates the robbery to Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  3. present: It states the incident occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  4. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  5. present: It states the robbery happened Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  6. present: It gives the date Wednesday, January 14, 2026, and the time of approximately 0030 hours.
  7. present: It dates the robbery to Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  8. present: It says the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  9. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  10. present: It states the robbery occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  11. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  12. present: It states the incident time as Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  13. present: It states the robbery happened on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  14. present: It timestamps the robbery as Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  15. present: It states the robbery occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  16. present: It states the robbery occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  17. present: It states the robbery occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  18. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  19. present: It states that the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at about 0030 hours.
  20. present: It dates the robbery to Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  21. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours, a clear date and time.
  22. present: It dates the robbery to Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  23. present: It states the robbery occurred Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  24. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
  25. present: It states the robbery occurred on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, at approximately 0030 hours.
• Impactpresent16/25

  Final assessment

  16 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 9 marked it absent. The majority counts the displayed handgun and the taken phone and wallet as stated harm. Nine passes found no separate consequence.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It states concrete harm: a handgun was displayed, money was demanded, and a phone and wallet were taken.
  2. present: Displaying a firearm and taking the phone and wallet states threatened harm and property loss.
  3. present: It states the suspect displayed a handgun, took CashApp money, and stole a phone and wallet.
  4. present: Displaying a firearm and taking a phone and wallet shows armed severity and loss of property.
  5. present: It states the suspect displayed a firearm and took the complainant's phone and wallet, which is harm beyond the crime label.
  6. absent: It describes a firearm and stolen property as part of the robbery, but it never states a consequence or severity.
  7. present: It describes concrete harm: a handgun was displayed and the victim's money, phone, and wallet were taken.
  8. present: It states the suspect displayed a firearm and took a phone and wallet, showing harm.
  9. absent: It describes the robbery and the handgun but does not say the suspect is dangerous or that people could be injured.
  10. absent: It describes the robbery and a displayed firearm but never states danger, injury, or other severity.
  11. present: Displaying a handgun and taking the phone and wallet states harm and shows how serious the robbery was.
  12. present: The suspect displayed a handgun and took the complainant's phone and wallet, stating harm and severity.
  13. absent: It does not add a severity or consequence statement such as injury, danger, or threat to others.
  14. absent: A displayed handgun and stolen phone and wallet describe the robbery itself, not a separate severity or consequence.
  15. absent: Displaying a handgun and taking property describes the robbery itself, not a separate severity or consequence.
  16. present: It states the suspect displayed a handgun and took the victim's phone, wallet, and money.
  17. absent: Describing the robbery and displayed handgun names the crime but states no separate consequence or severity.
  18. present: It states the suspect displayed a handgun and took the complainant's phone, wallet, and money.
  19. present: It describes a displayed handgun and the taking of money, a phone, and a wallet.
  20. present: It says a handgun was displayed and her phone and wallet were taken, stating harm and serious threat.
  21. present: It states harm by describing a displayed handgun plus the taking of money, a phone, and a wallet.
  22. absent: It describes the firearm and stolen phone and wallet but never states injury, danger, or other severity.
  23. absent: It describes a completed robbery and a displayed handgun but never states injury, danger, or severity.
  24. present: The suspect displayed a firearm and took the victim's phone and wallet, stating armed severity and property loss.
  25. present: It states the suspect displayed a handgun and took the complainant's phone and wallet, showing harm and severity.