E-bike taken from a Seventh College West suite through a window

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the header names UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Present because the header names UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as the sender and the footer repeats University of California San Diego.
  2. present: This element scores 1 since UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT issues the notice and University of California San Diego signs the close.
  3. present: Counted as present given the branded UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT byline and the University of California San Diego address block.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as the issuing authority is UC San Diego Police Department, also reached at (858) 534-4357.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to the sender UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and the Clery notice from University of California San Diego.
  6. present: I mark present because the header names UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as the issuing authority and the close repeats University of California San Diego.
  7. present: Coding 1 for the branded sender UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT that also asks people to call that same department.
  8. present: The phrase UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT identifies who is issuing the timely warning.
  9. present: Present given the university naming itself as University of California San Diego and as the UC San Diego Police Department.
  10. present: Named here is UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as sender, signed again as University of California San Diego.
  11. present: Present: the header names UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as the issuing authority.
  12. present: Vote 1: UC San Diego Police Department and the closing University of California San Diego identify who is sending the notice.
  13. present: Present: branded source UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT appears at the top and in the investigation line.
  14. present: Counts because the university police name themselves as the UC San Diego Police Department.
  15. present: Vote 1: issuing authority is UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, with University of California San Diego named at the close.
  16. present: Sender identified as the UC San Diego Police Department in the header and as the investigating campus authority.
  17. present: Sender identified as UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT with a University of California San Diego closing signature.
  18. present: Sender identified as the UC San Diego Police Department issuing a Clery Timely Warning to campus members.
  19. present: Sender identified as University of California San Diego Police, branded at the top and named for tips.
  20. present: Sender identified as the UC San Diego Police Department, which also names the university on the notice.
  21. present: Authority line names the UC San Diego Police Department as the issuing agency.
  22. present: Authority line and closing identify UC San Diego Police Department and the University of California San Diego as the source.
  23. present: Authority line presents UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT as the sender of the timely warning.
  24. present: Authority line from the campus police and the University of California San Diego footer name the issuer.
  25. present: Authority line identifies the UC San Diego Police Department as who is sending the notice.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree burglary is named as a specific crime, not a generic emergency.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The threat is specific in Timely Warning Burglary plus a report of a burglary and stole an electric bicycle.
  2. present: Hazard is coded 1 for burglary, the unknown suspect entered the common area, and theft of an electric bicycle.
  3. present: Counted as present given burglary as the named crime rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as the warning identifies burglary, an unknown suspect, and entry by pushing open a window.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to the named burglary of a suite and theft by unlocking the front door, not a generic situation.
  6. present: Coding 1 for the specific crime labeled Burglary rather than a generic emergency or situation.
  7. present: The phrase report of a burglary and unknown suspect entered the common area names a concrete theft crime threat.
  8. present: I mark present because the notice titles Burglary and describes an unknown suspect who entered a suite to steal.
  9. present: Deciding words include Timely Warning and Burglary, which specify the hazard as a burglary crime.
  10. present: I score 1 since an unknown suspect entered and stole, and the heading states Burglary as the threat.
  11. present: Vote 1: the message specifies burglary as the threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  12. present: Present: a report of a burglary names a specific crime, not a vague emergency.
  13. present: Vote 1: Timely Warning and burglary together name the hazard specifically.
  14. present: Counts because burglary is a specific threat type, so generic emergency wording does not apply.
  15. present: Present: report of a burglary and unknown suspect entered the common area name the threat.
  16. present: Threat named as burglary by an unknown suspect who entered a suite and stole an electric bicycle.
  17. present: Threat named as a burglary in which a suspect pushed open a window, unlocked a door, and took a bike.
  18. present: Threat named as burglary by an unknown suspect who is not in custody.
  19. present: Threat named as burglary of a campus residence suite.
  20. present: Threat named as burglary after an unknown person entered a common area and stole an electric bicycle.
  21. present: Crime named as burglary when a suspect entered a suite and stole an electric bicycle.
  22. present: Crime named is a burglary of a residence suite common area.
  23. present: Crime named as burglary with unlawful entry through a window and theft.
  24. present: Crime named is burglary involving an unknown suspect taking an electric bicycle.
  25. present: Crime named as burglary after an unknown person pushed open a window and stole a bicycle.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree Seventh College West is a named campus place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Place is named as Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus at 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla.
  2. present: Location is coded 1 from Seventh College West, the common area of their suite, and campus destinations at UC San Diego.
  3. present: Counted as present given Seventh College West as the named building area and 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as the scene is Seventh College West plus residence or office settings on campus.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to Seventh College West, a neighbor's apartment, and University of California San Diego as named places.
  6. present: The phrase Seventh College West names the campus place of the reported burglary.
  7. present: I mark present because the event is sited at Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus.
  8. present: Coding 1 for Seventh College West as a named hall area, with the university address 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla also given.
  9. present: The phrase common area of their suite at Seventh College West locates the incident in a named campus residence.
  10. present: Coding 1 for the place name Seventh College West and campus references such as live on campus.
  11. present: Counts because the crime is placed at Seventh College West, a named campus location.
  12. present: Vote 1: location is given as Seventh College West and the common area of their suite.
  13. present: Present: Seventh College West is a named place on campus, with address 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA also listed.
  14. present: Present: Seventh College West and common area of their suite locate the event.
  15. present: Vote 1: the event occurred at Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus.
  16. present: Place given as Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus.
  17. present: Place given as the common area of a suite at Seventh College West.
  18. present: Place given as Seventh College West, with the campus address at 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla.
  19. present: Place given as Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus in La Jolla.
  20. present: Place given as Seventh College West, a named campus housing site.
  21. present: Site named as Seventh College West on the UC San Diego campus.
  22. present: Site named at Seventh College West plus the La Jolla campus address.
  23. present: Site named is the common area of a suite at Seventh College West.
  24. present: Site named as Seventh College West and UC San Diego.
  25. present: Site named is Seventh College West at UC San Diego.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree recipients are told to leave if needed, call 9-1-1, and lock doors and windows.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients get protective orders such as immediately leave your residence, Call or text at 9-1-1, and Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked.
  2. present: Guidance is coded 1 through go to a safe area, secure yourself and family members, and call the police immediately.
  3. present: Counted as present given instructions to call or text 9-1-1, lock doors and windows, and Avoid displaying high value items close to windows.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as people are told to leave your residence, turn on all available lights, and Be aware of your surroundings then call 9-1-1.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to protective steps including immediately leave, Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1, and closed and locked doors and windows.
  6. present: I mark present because recipients are told to immediately leave your residence, Call or text 9-1-1, and Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked.
  7. present: Coding 1 for protective orders to go to a safe area, secure yourself and family members, and call the police immediately.
  8. present: The phrase Avoid displaying and/or placing high value items close to windows plus Secure your valuables at all times instructs protective action.
  9. present: I mark present because people are instructed to please call the UC San Diego Police Department and, if they cannot leave, turn on all available lights and call.
  10. present: The phrase If you see suspicious activity, call or text the UC San Diego Police Department immediately at 9-1-1 is a clear protective instruction.
  11. present: Present: recipients are told to immediately leave your residence, Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1, and Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked.
  12. present: Counts because instructions include go to a safe area, secure yourself and family members, and call the police immediately.
  13. present: Vote 1: protective actions include Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1 and lock doors and windows.
  14. present: Present: If possible, immediately leave your residence and Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked are instructions to recipients.
  15. present: Counts because the notice tells people to leave, call 9-1-1, lock doors and windows, and Avoid displaying high value items close to windows.
  16. present: Instruction is to leave for a safe area, call 9-1-1, lock doors and windows, and secure valuables.
  17. present: Instruction is to immediately leave the residence, call or text police, and keep doors and windows locked.
  18. present: Instruction is to secure yourself if you cannot leave, turn on lights, call police, and lock windows and doors.
  19. present: Instruction is to avoid placing high value items near windows, stay aware, and report suspicious activity to 9-1-1.
  20. present: Instruction is to go to a neighbor or public place if someone is inside, then call 9-1-1, and lock unsecured openings.
  21. present: Action told to reader includes leaving for a safe area, calling 911, and locking doors and windows.
  22. present: Action told to reader is to secure yourself, turn on lights, call police, and keep windows locked.
  23. present: Action told to reader is to leave if someone is inside, go to a neighbor or public place, and call 911.
  24. present: Action told to reader includes locking doors and windows, hiding valuables, and calling 911 for suspicious activity.
  25. present: Action told to reader is to lock windows, call Housing Maintenance if locks fail, and contact police at 911.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree April 20, 2025 at 10:54 a.m. and the 3:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. window supply time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Timing is explicit in April 20, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. and between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on April 20.
  2. present: Time is coded 1 from April 20, 2025, At this time, and immediately in the leave and call lines.
  3. present: Counted as present given the dated header April 20, 2025 and clock times 10:54 a.m., 3:00 a.m., and 9:00 a.m.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as the report was received On April 20, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. and the theft window is that same morning.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to recency words such as April 20, 2025, currently under investigation, and immediately.
  6. present: Coding 1 for dated clock wording On April 20, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. plus between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and immediately.
  7. present: The phrase April 20, 2025 together with At this time and currently under investigation supplies when and recency.
  8. present: I mark present because 10:54 a.m. and between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on April 20 fix the event in time.
  9. present: Coding 1 for calendar and clock stamps April 20, 2025 and 10:54 a.m. plus immediately in the leave advice.
  10. present: I mark present because the report time 10:54 a.m. on April 20, 2025 and words like immediately and At this time mark when.
  11. present: Present: On April 20, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. and between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on April 20 give clock time and date.
  12. present: Counts because April 20, 2025, at this time, and immediately mark when and recency.
  13. present: Vote 1: On April 20, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. and between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. are explicit times.
  14. present: Present: date April 20, 2025 and clock times 10:54 a.m., 3:00 a.m., and 9:00 a.m. establish when.
  15. present: Counts because currently under investigation, at this time, and the dated 10:54 a.m. report supply recency.
  16. present: Clock cue is April 20, 2025 at 10:54 a.m. and the 3:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. window that day.
  17. present: Clock cue is the dated 10:54 a.m. report on April 20, 2025 plus the overnight hours of the theft.
  18. present: Clock cue is April 20, 2025, with recency wording such as at this time and immediately.
  19. present: Clock cue is 10:54 a.m. on April 20, 2025, and the 3:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. interval when the theft occurred.
  20. present: Clock cue is the morning stamp of April 20, 2025 at 10:54 a.m. along with phrasing such as at this time.
  21. present: When stated as April 20, 2025 at 10:54 a.m. and between 3:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m.
  22. present: When stated with the date April 20, 2025, clock times, and the word immediately.
  23. present: When stated includes April 20, 2025 and the 10:54 a.m. report time.
  24. present: When stated as April 20, 2025 from 3:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and at 10:54 a.m.
  25. present: When stated with April 20, 2025, several clock times, and immediately.
• Impactpresent20/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 20 of 25 treat stole an electric bicycle as stated property harm. Five reads treat that wording as restating the crime rather than a separate consequence.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Property harm is stated when the suspect stole an electric bicycle and when valuables can be easily grabbed from open windows.
  2. present: Impact is coded 1 because the burglary stole property and items such as computers, cell phones, wallets, and purses may be taken.
  3. present: Counted as present given the stolen electric bicycle and language about being the victim of a burglary with property at risk.
  4. present: I mark this 1 as the crime caused loss of an electric bicycle and warns that criminals may enter the residence to grab valuables.
  5. present: Coded 1 due to consequences to property, namely stole an electric bicycle and high value items that can be easily grabbed.
  6. present: The phrase stole an electric bicycle states property taken, and later text says valuables can be easily grabbed.
  7. present: I mark present because theft of an electric bicycle and the warning that items can be easily grabbed describe harm to property.
  8. present: Coding 1 for consequence language that the suspect stole property and that someone can be the victim of a burglary.
  9. present: The phrase stole an electric bicycle records a loss to belongings, which is impact beyond only naming burglary.
  10. present: Coding 1 for property consequence wording stole an electric bicycle and can be easily grabbed from open windows.
  11. present: Counts because the text says the suspect stole an electric bicycle, which is stated harm to property.
  12. present: Present: stole an electric bicycle by pushing open a window states property taken and a window forced.
  13. present: Vote 1: stole an electric bicycle reports property taken as impact beyond merely naming burglary.
  14. present: Counts because the text states the suspect stole an electric bicycle, which is property taken.
  15. present: Present: property impact is explicit in stole an electric bicycle and pushing open a window.
  16. present: Harm shown as theft of an electric bicycle and the risk that residents can lose valuables or become burglary victims.
  17. present: Harm shown as property taken from a residence and possible grabbing of computers, phones, wallets, or purses.
  18. present: Harm shown as an electric bicycle stolen from a suite and the chance criminals will enter to take high value items.
  19. present: Harm shown as loss of an electric bicycle and the stated risk of becoming a burglary victim.
  20. present: Harm shown as stolen property from the suite and potential entry that can take computers, cell phones, wallets, and purses.
  21. absent: Consequence language is absent because the stolen bicycle restates the crime rather than a separate harm or severity outcome.
  22. absent: Consequence language about injury, damage, or other effects on people or property is not given.
  23. absent: Consequence language is missing since no result beyond naming the burglary is described.
  24. absent: Consequence language is not present because loss of the bicycle is the offense itself, not an added impact.
  25. absent: Consequence language of severity or what the burglary could do to people or property never appears.