Room key, ID, and cash taken from an open Muir College room

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree UC San Diego Police Department is named as the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: UC San Diego Police Department is named as the issuing agency in the header.
  2. present: The campus police department is listed as the author of this timely warning.
  3. present: Attribution sits with the UC San Diego Police Department throughout the message.
  4. present: This Clery timely warning is issued under the UC San Diego Police Department name.
  5. present: The opening block names UC San Diego Police as the sender of the alert.
  6. present: Campus police authorship is explicit in both the title line and contact block.
  7. present: The University of California San Diego police unit is the stated source.
  8. present: Sender information appears as UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT at the top.
  9. present: The police department at UC San Diego is clearly the originator of this notice.
  10. present: EH&S contact lines appear later, yet the warning itself is from campus police.
  11. present: The byline and phone number both belong to the UC San Diego Police Department.
  12. present: This timely warning is presented as a product of UC San Diego campus police.
  13. present: Campus police, not a third party, is identified as the agency sending the notice.
  14. present: The bulletin opens under the UC San Diego Police Department as the named issuer.
  15. present: Header text attributes the timely warning to the UC San Diego Police Department.
  16. present: Official copy identifies campus police as the agency sending the notice.
  17. present: This warning is issued in the name of the UC San Diego Police Department.
  18. present: Message text presents the UC San Diego Police Department as source and investigator.
  19. present: Police copy and the closing investigation line make campus police the sender.
  20. present: Notice language from UC San Diego Police Department names who is communicating.
  21. present: The release is authored as a UC San Diego Police Department timely warning.
  22. present: Alert body credits the UC San Diego Police Department as originator and tip intake.
  23. present: Campus text is framed as coming from university police, not an unnamed office.
  24. present: Issued copy lists the UC San Diego Police Department as the sending and investigating unit.
  25. present: Warning copy from university police makes the sender unambiguous.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree a residential burglary of an open Muir College room is a specific named crime.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The notice identifies a burglary in which an unknown person entered a student room and stole belongings.
  2. present: Investigators recoded an online theft report as a burglary of a residence.
  3. present: The hazard is a residential burglary by unknown suspect(s) who entered an open room.
  4. present: The specific crime flagged is burglary of a student room rather than a generic theft.
  5. present: A burglary during which someone took items from an occupied-area desk is the threat.
  6. present: Unknown suspect(s) committed a burglary by taking property from a residence room.
  7. present: The timely warning names burglary as the crime of concern for the community.
  8. present: The alert describes a burglary of an open student room by unknown persons.
  9. present: A specific burglary threat is set out after an investigation reclassified a theft report.
  10. present: The subject line and body both specify burglary as the incident type.
  11. present: Unknown suspect(s) entered a student room and committed a burglary.
  12. present: The threat is a completed residential burglary with no forced entry noted.
  13. present: The warning concerns a burglary in which property was taken from an unlocked room.
  14. present: Investigators reclassify an online theft as a burglary in which an unknown person took items from a student room.
  15. present: A specific indoor burglary, not a vague crime, is the hazard facing the community.
  16. present: Unknown suspect(s) entered a residence and stole a key card holder, which is a concrete burglary threat.
  17. present: The named threat is burglary of occupied student housing by an uncaught suspect.
  18. present: An unforced entry burglary with property removed from a desk is the stated crime.
  19. present: The hazard is a daylight burglary of a student room by unknown suspect(s) still free.
  20. present: Burglary of a key card holder from an open room is the specific threat described.
  21. present: A completed burglary with no suspect in custody is the current threat type.
  22. present: Unknown person(s) burglarized a student room, which is a specific campus crime threat.
  23. present: The threat is burglary of personal property from a desk in campus housing.
  24. present: An unsolved residential burglary with no suspect description remains the named hazard.
  25. present: A burglary during a brief morning gap, with property taken and the suspect free, is a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree Muir College Residential Housing locates the event.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Muir College Residential Housing is given as the place where the burglary occurred.
  2. present: Campus housing at Muir College is the specified site of the crime.
  3. present: Readers are told the incident happened inside Muir College residential housing.
  4. present: The location is Muir College Residential Housing on the UC San Diego campus.
  5. present: Muir College student housing is the geographic setting given for the event.
  6. present: The scene is identified as a room at Muir College Residential Housing.
  7. present: Readers can locate the event at Muir College residential housing on campus.
  8. present: Muir College Residential Housing is the named on-campus location.
  9. present: The crime is tied to a desk inside a room at Muir College housing.
  10. present: UC San Diego Muir College Residential Housing is the place named.
  11. present: The incident address equivalent is Muir College Residential Housing.
  12. present: Location detail points to Muir College student residential housing.
  13. present: The where element is Muir College Residential Housing at UC San Diego.
  14. present: The crime is sited at Muir College Residential Housing on the UC San Diego campus.
  15. present: Muir College Residential Housing is the precise place where the room was entered.
  16. present: Readers are told the event happened inside Muir College residential rooms.
  17. present: Location language points to Muir College Residential Housing, not the campus in general.
  18. present: The scene is a room within Muir College Residential Housing.
  19. present: Muir College housing is named as the residential site of the theft.
  20. present: The where is Muir College Residential Housing at UC San Diego.
  21. present: Residential housing at Muir College is the geographic pin.
  22. present: The incident address class is Muir College Residential Housing.
  23. present: Muir College Residential Housing locates the event for the audience.
  24. present: The where is a student room at Muir College Residential Housing.
  25. present: Muir College Residential Housing is the stated place of occurrence.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the remainder tells recipients to lock doors and call 9-1-1.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The remainder tells recipients to lock doors and windows and to call 911 if they find someone inside.
  2. present: Protective steps include leaving if possible, locking in place if not, and contacting 9-1-1.
  3. present: Locking unsecured doors and windows plus calling 911 after a burglary discovery counts as guidance.
  4. present: Recipients are instructed to close and lock entries and to call or text police at 9-1-1.
  5. present: Advice to leave, barricade, lock openings, and dial 911 supplies a protective action.
  6. present: The remainder lock and 911 language directs the community how to protect themselves.
  7. present: If a burglary is found, people are told to get out if they can and call 9-1-1.
  8. present: Community members are told to lock doors and windows and to contact 911 about intruders.
  9. present: Locking unsecured openings and calling 911 if someone is inside are explicit instructions.
  10. present: Prevention and response language in the remainder includes locks and 9-1-1.
  11. present: Recipients are directed to secure doors and windows and to call 911 when needed.
  12. present: Leave-and-call or lock-in-and-call 911 instructions appear in the remainder.
  13. present: Lock your doors and windows and call 911 if you discover an intruder is the protective ask.
  14. present: The remainder tells readers to lock doors and windows, leave if someone is inside, and call or text 9-1-1.
  15. present: Later guidance orders locking, securing in place if trapped, and contacting police at 9-1-1.
  16. present: Protective steps in the extra section include locking hardware and calling 9-1-1 for a burglary in progress.
  17. present: Remainder copy tells victims to flee to a safe area, lock windows, and dial 9-1-1.
  18. present: General prevention lines instruct locking doors and windows and phoning 9-1-1 for suspicious activity.
  19. present: If unable to leave, readers are told to hide, turn on lights, lock up, and call police at once.
  20. present: Campus lock repair numbers plus 9-1-1 reporting in the remainder count as protective instruction.
  21. present: Readers are directed to close and lock openings, avoid flashing valuables, and text 9-1-1.
  22. present: Remainder lock advice and 9-1-1 calls for someone inside a residence are action steps for recipients.
  23. present: Prevention copy tells people to lock windows even when hot and to call 9-1-1 if they see suspicious activity.
  24. present: If a burglary is found, the remainder says leave, go public, lock family in if needed, and call 9-1-1.
  25. present: Lock, maintenance, and 9-1-1 instructions in the remainder give recipients something protective to do.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree January 28, 2025 from 9:40 AM to 10:20 AM and the 3:45 PM report supply time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The burglary is placed between 9:40 AM and 10:20 AM on January 28, 2025.
  2. present: Police logged the report at about 3:45 PM on January 28, 2025 for a same-day morning event.
  3. present: A recency window of January 28, 2025 from 9:40 to 10:20 AM is provided.
  4. present: Dates and clock times pin the burglary to a 40-minute span on January 28, 2025.
  5. present: The warning dated January 30, 2025 reports an incident two days earlier with morning hours.
  6. present: Approximate times on January 28, 2025 establish when the burglary took place.
  7. present: The 9:40 AM to 10:20 AM window on January 28, 2025 supplies recency.
  8. present: Police received the online report around 3:45 PM on January 28, 2025 after a morning theft.
  9. present: Same-day morning hours on January 28, 2025 mark when the burglary occurred.
  10. present: Clock times and the January 28, 2025 date tell recipients how recent the crime is.
  11. present: The burglary happened the morning of January 28, 2025 between 9:40 and 10:20 AM.
  12. present: A report time of about 3:45 PM on January 28, 2025 accompanies the morning crime window.
  13. present: January 28, 2025 morning hours give a clear when for the burglary.
  14. present: The burglary is fixed between 9:40 AM and 10:20 AM on January 28, 2025, with a 3:45 PM report the same day.
  15. present: Clock times on January 28, 2025, plus a January 30 issue date, supply recency.
  16. present: A forty minute morning window on January 28, 2025, dates the incident.
  17. present: Report receipt at about 3:45 PM and a same day 9:40 to 10:20 AM occurrence mark when it happened.
  18. present: January 28, 2025 morning hours and a January 30, 2025 release establish timing.
  19. present: Approximate 3:45 PM reporting and a 9:40 AM start give a clear when.
  20. present: The same day interval from 9:40 AM to 10:20 AM on January 28, 2025, is explicit.
  21. present: Dates on the letterhead and in the narrative show a two day lag from a timed morning crime.
  22. present: A January 28, 2025 timestamp cluster, including 3:45 PM, conveys recency.
  23. present: Morning minutes on January 28, 2025, answer when the burglary took place.
  24. present: The warning date of January 30, 2025, sits next to a dated January 28 event window.
  25. present: Approximate 9:40 AM to 10:20 AM on January 28, 2025, supplies the when.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree a room key, student ID, and about $220 taken from a desk is stated property harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Taking a room key, student ID, and about $220 is property harm rather than merely naming burglary.
  2. present: Cash and access credentials were removed from a desk, showing concrete loss.
  3. present: Severity is shown by theft of a key card holder, ID, and roughly $220.
  4. present: Property harm is documented because a key, ID card, and cash were taken.
  5. present: Loss of money and identity or access cards goes beyond simply labeling the crime.
  6. present: Approximately $220 plus a room key and student ID were stolen from a desk.
  7. present: Taken keys, identification, and cash count as reported property harm.
  8. present: The victim lost a key card holder, student ID, and about two hundred twenty dollars.
  9. present: Property severity is present because cash and credential items were actually stolen.
  10. present: A room key, ID card, and $220 missing from a desk show harm beyond the word burglary.
  11. present: Stolen key, student identification, and cash constitute documented property loss.
  12. present: The dollar amount and credential theft establish severity as property harm.
  13. present: Key, ID, and cash taken from the desk meet the property-harm test for severity.
  14. present: Loss of a room key, student identification, and about $220 states actual harm beyond the label burglary.
  15. present: Cash and credential theft document property consequences rather than naming the offense alone.
  16. present: Roughly $220 plus keys and ID taken from a desk shows measured loss and access risk.
  17. present: Specified stolen money and identity documents describe severity of the completed theft.
  18. present: Taken room keys and $220 quantify consequence instead of stopping at the word burglary.
  19. present: Student ID, room key, and cash removal are listed harms that elevate impact above a bare crime name.
  20. present: About $220 stolen with keys is a stated loss consequence, not just the hazard title.
  21. present: Property and credential theft from the victim's desk records real impact.
  22. present: Money, a room key, and an ID card taken show how severe the burglary already was.
  23. present: An itemized $220 and stolen access cards are consequences, so impact is not zero.
  24. present: Financial loss and stolen keys spell out harm rather than merely labeling burglary.
  25. present: Taken cash and identity documents describe consequences, which the hazard name alone would not.