Unknown male stepped into an unlocked Del Sol apartment

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT is the branded sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  11. present: The body names it with "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  13. present: Because the alert says "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  a suspicious male entering an apartment names a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "a suspicious male entering an apartment", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "a suspicious male entering an apartment" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "a suspicious male entering an apartment" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "a suspicious male entering an apartment", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "a suspicious male entering an apartment" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  11. present: The body names it with "a suspicious male entering an apartment", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  13. present: Because the alert says "a suspicious male entering an apartment", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "a suspicious male entering an apartment" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "a suspicious male entering an apartment" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "a suspicious male entering an apartment" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "a suspicious male entering an apartment" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "a suspicious male entering an apartment".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "a suspicious male entering an apartment" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "a suspicious male entering an apartment" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "a suspicious male entering an apartment" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  La Jolla Del Sol Apartments is a named place on campus property.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  11. present: The body names it with "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  13. present: Because the alert says "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "La Jolla Del Sol Apartments" is on the page, so present.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The bulletin narrates the entry and does not tell recipients to lock doors, avoid the area, or call 9-1-1.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective instruction appears; the bulletin reports what happened and does not tell recipients what to do.
  2. absent: Guidance is absent: there is no avoid, lock doors, call 9-1-1, or stay inside directed at the campus.
  3. absent: I mark absent because recipients are not given a protective action.
  4. absent: The resident contacting the unknown male is a narrative, not guidance to the reader.
  5. absent: This pass finds no instruction such as lock doors or call police.
  6. absent: Absent: please see attached photo is not a protective action.
  7. absent: Nothing in the four corners tells the campus what to do next.
  8. absent: A first-time reader is not told to shelter, evacuate, or call 9-1-1.
  9. absent: I score absent after searching for an instruction and finding none.
  10. absent: The two prior timely warnings sentence is background, not guidance.
  11. absent: This reviewer records absent; the text does not tell recipients how to protect themselves.
  12. absent: No guidance cue such as avoid the area is present.
  13. absent: The element is missing rather than implied by the narrative.
  14. absent: Direct language of instruction is not on the page, so absent.
  15. absent: Independent judgment: impact-style reporting of an entry is not guidance.
  16. absent: Quoted evidence of a protective action is not available.
  17. absent: I do not treat ran out of the apartment as guidance to the reader.
  18. absent: This pass votes absent: no protective-action clause.
  19. absent: From the transmitted text, guidance is not present.
  20. absent: The body never tells the campus to lock doors or call anyone.
  21. absent: Absent vote rests on the lack of instruction wording.
  22. absent: Because the alert only narrates an entry, guidance is not met.
  23. absent: Nothing undoes the absence of a what-to-do statement.
  24. absent: I quote no guidance span because none exists, so the vote is absent.
  25. absent: The nanny-cam sentence is evidence, not an instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm is an explicit clock time and date.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  11. present: The body names it with "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  13. present: Because the alert says "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "On 05-22-2026 at approximately 1218pm" is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The notice does not state a consequence or severity of the entry.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears; the entry is named without stating harm.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: stepped inside describes the act, not what it could do to people.
  3. absent: I mark absent because there is no phrase such as dangerous, injury, or life-threatening.
  4. absent: This pass finds no explicit harm statement.
  5. absent: Absent: naming a suspicious male is Hazard, not Impact, under the rubric.
  6. absent: Nothing in the four corners states a consequence of this entry.
  7. absent: A first-time reader is not told how serious the harm is.
  8. absent: I score absent after searching for severity words and finding none.
  9. absent: The suspect ran is an outcome, not an impact statement.
  10. absent: This reviewer records absent; the text does not convey what the hazard could do.
  11. absent: No impact cue such as could injure you is present.
  12. absent: The element is missing rather than implied by the crime name alone.
  13. absent: Direct language of consequence is not on the page, so absent.
  14. absent: Independent judgment: impact is not satisfied by an unlocked-door entry narrative.
  15. absent: Quoted evidence of severity is not available in this message.
  16. absent: I do not treat ran out as an impact statement about harm.
  17. absent: This pass votes absent: no potential-consequences clause.
  18. absent: From the transmitted text, impact is not present.
  19. absent: The body never says the situation was dangerous or injurious.
  20. absent: Absent vote rests on the lack of consequence wording.
  21. absent: Because the alert only reports a man stepping inside, impact is not met.
  22. absent: Nothing undoes the absence of a harm or severity statement.
  23. absent: I quote no impact span because none exists, so the vote is absent.
  24. absent: Two prior burglaries are other incidents, not impact for this one.
  25. absent: The nanny-cam sentence is identification, not impact.