Power outage affecting portions of campus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  TechAlert branded text names Texas Tech University as the issuing institution.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  11. present: The body names it with "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  13. present: Because the alert says "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "This is an emergency notification from Texas Tech University" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  power outage is a specific named hazard affecting portions of campus.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "power outage", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "power outage" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "power outage" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "power outage".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "power outage" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "power outage", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "power outage" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "power outage".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "power outage" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "power outage".
  11. present: The body names it with "power outage", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "power outage".
  13. present: Because the alert says "power outage", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "power outage" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "power outage" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "power outage" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "power outage" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "power outage" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "power outage" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "power outage" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "power outage".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "power outage".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "power outage" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "power outage" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "power outage" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  portions of the Texas Tech campus is a named place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "portions of the Texas Tech campus", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "portions of the Texas Tech campus" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "portions of the Texas Tech campus" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "portions of the Texas Tech campus", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "portions of the Texas Tech campus" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  11. present: The body names it with "portions of the Texas Tech campus", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  13. present: Because the alert says "portions of the Texas Tech campus", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "portions of the Texas Tech campus" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "portions of the Texas Tech campus" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "portions of the Texas Tech campus" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "portions of the Texas Tech campus" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "portions of the Texas Tech campus".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "portions of the Texas Tech campus" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "portions of the Texas Tech campus" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "portions of the Texas Tech campus" is on the page, so present.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Recipients are told additional updates will be shared as information becomes available, a monitor-for-updates instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  11. present: The body names it with "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Additional updates will be shared as information becomes available" is on the page, so present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  currently experiencing is an explicit recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "currently experiencing", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "currently experiencing" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "currently experiencing" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "currently experiencing".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "currently experiencing" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "currently experiencing", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "currently experiencing" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "currently experiencing".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "currently experiencing" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "currently experiencing".
  11. present: The body names it with "currently experiencing", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "currently experiencing".
  13. present: Because the alert says "currently experiencing", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "currently experiencing" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "currently experiencing" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "currently experiencing" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "currently experiencing" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "currently experiencing" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "currently experiencing" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "currently experiencing" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "currently experiencing".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "currently experiencing".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "currently experiencing" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "currently experiencing" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "currently experiencing" is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Naming the outage is the hazard; there is no extra severity language such as dangerous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  18. absent: Without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the outage is not on the page.