Stalking reported after unwelcome contact since spring

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded tag WSU Critical Alert and the line WSU is advising identify Wichita State as the sender.
  2. present: The branded tag WSU Critical Alert and WSU naming itself identify the sender.
  3. present: The branded WSU Critical Alert tag identifies the sender, and the City of Wichita is named as issuer.
  4. present: "WSU Critical Alert" is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  5. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded signature, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing agency.
  6. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and both the City of Wichita and WSU are named as issuers.
  7. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita and WSU are named.
  8. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and both WSU and the City of Wichita are named.
  9. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded signature, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  10. present: WSU Critical Alert brands the sender, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  11. present: WSU Critical Alert and the City of Wichita name the sender and the issuing authority.
  12. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  13. present: The branded opener WSU Critical Alert, along with WSU and the City of Wichita, identifies the sender.
  14. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and WSU names itself as the advisor.
  15. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded signature, and both the City of Wichita and WSU are named as authorities.
  16. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  17. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  18. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and both WSU and the City of Wichita are named.
  19. present: The branded "WSU Critical Alert" tag and "WSU is advising" identify the campus sender.
  20. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing authority.
  21. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the City of Wichita and WSU are named.
  22. present: The branded tag WSU Critical Alert and WSU advising the campus identify the sender.
  23. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and both WSU and the City of Wichita are named authorities.
  24. present: WSU Critical Alert is a branded sender tag, and the body names WSU.
  25. present: The opener "WSU Critical Alert" identifies the sender, and the City of Wichita is named as the issuing agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a Boil Water Advisory, a specific water quality threat rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: It names a Boil Water Advisory, a specific water safety threat.
  3. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific unsafe-water threat rather than a generic emergency.
  4. present: "Boil Water Advisory" names a specific water-safety threat rather than a generic emergency.
  5. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific water safety threat rather than a generic emergency.
  6. present: A Boil Water Advisory names the specific drinking-water hazard, not a vague emergency.
  7. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific unsafe-water threat.
  8. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific unsafe-water threat, not a generic incident.
  9. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water threat, not merely an emergency or situation.
  10. present: The message names a boil water advisory, a specific water safety threat rather than a vague incident.
  11. present: A Boil Water Advisory is a specific water-safety threat, not a generic emergency.
  12. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific water-quality threat rather than a generic incident.
  13. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific water safety hazard, not a generic emergency or situation.
  14. present: The City of Wichita Boil Water Advisory names a specific water safety threat.
  15. present: The hazard is named as a Boil Water Advisory issued by the City of Wichita.
  16. present: Boil Water Advisory specifies a drinking water threat, not a vague emergency, incident, or situation.
  17. present: A boil water advisory is a specific named water hazard, not a generic incident or emergency.
  18. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water-safety threat rather than a generic emergency.
  19. present: The message names a "Boil Water Advisory", a specific water threat rather than a generic emergency.
  20. present: The hazard is specified as a Boil Water Advisory rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific drinking water threat rather than a generic incident.
  22. present: A Boil Water Advisory names a specific water hazard, not a generic emergency or incident.
  23. present: The message names a Boil Water Advisory, a specific water hazard rather than a generic emergency.
  24. present: A City of Wichita Boil Water Advisory names a specific water-safety hazard.
  25. present: A "Boil Water Advisory" names the drinking-water threat instead of a nonspecific incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance targets campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, which locates the issue on campus.
  2. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  3. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, naming campus as the place.
  4. present: The notice points to "campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations", locating the issue on campus.
  5. present: The advice applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates the hazard on campus.
  6. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  7. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  8. present: The restriction covers campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, locating it on campus.
  9. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  10. present: The advice applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle filling stations, locating the restriction on campus.
  11. present: Guidance is tied to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  12. present: The advice applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which is an on-campus location.
  13. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  14. present: Guidance targets campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, so the place is campus.
  15. present: Guidance is tied to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates the problem on campus.
  16. present: The restriction covers campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations, which places the issue on campus.
  17. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  18. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  19. present: It locates the restriction at "campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations".
  20. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which names campus.
  21. present: Campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations locate the problem on campus.
  22. present: The advice applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates the issue on campus.
  23. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates it on campus.
  24. present: The restriction applies to campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations.
  25. present: The restriction covers campus drinking fountains and bottle-filling stations, which locates the issue on campus.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  2. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  3. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  4. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  5. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus water sources, a protective instruction.
  6. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use those fountains and filling stations.
  7. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  8. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  9. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  10. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus drinking fixtures.
  11. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  12. present: WSU advises students, faculty and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  13. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  14. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  15. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  16. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  17. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus drinking fixtures.
  18. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus drinking fixtures.
  19. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  20. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  21. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  22. present: WSU instructs students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  23. present: WSU tells students, faculty, and staff not to use campus drinking fountains or bottle-filling stations.
  24. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use those campus water sources.
  25. present: WSU advises students, faculty, and staff not to use those fountains and stations, a clear do-not-use instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The restriction lasts until further notice, which is an explicit duration cue.
  2. present: The restriction is in effect until further notice, a recency and duration cue.
  3. present: The phrase until further notice is an explicit duration cue for when the restriction applies.
  4. present: "Until further notice" is an explicit duration cue for how long the restriction lasts.
  5. present: The restriction remains in effect until further notice, which is an explicit duration cue.
  6. present: The restriction lasts until further notice, which says how long the advice remains in effect.
  7. present: The do-not-use instruction lasts until further notice, which is a duration cue.
  8. present: The phrase until further notice supplies a duration cue listed in the time rules.
  9. present: The instruction lasts until further notice, which the rubric counts as a time cue.
  10. present: The restriction is in force until further notice, which is a duration cue.
  11. present: Until further notice is an explicit recency and duration cue.
  12. present: Until further notice is an explicit duration cue for how long the restriction lasts.
  13. present: The phrase until further notice marks how long the restriction remains in effect.
  14. present: The restriction is in force until further notice, a listed time cue.
  15. present: The restriction holds until further notice, which is an explicit duration cue.
  16. present: Until further notice is a duration cue for how long the restriction remains in effect.
  17. present: The restriction lasts until further notice, which is an explicit timing cue.
  18. present: The phrase until further notice supplies a duration or recency cue.
  19. present: The fountain ban lasts "until further notice", which is a duration and recency cue.
  20. present: The restriction is in force until further notice, a recency and duration cue.
  21. present: The restriction lasts until further notice, which marks duration and recency.
  22. present: The restriction is in effect until further notice, a recency and duration cue.
  23. present: The fountain restriction lasts until further notice, which is an explicit duration cue.
  24. present: The advisory lasts until further notice, which is a duration cue.
  25. present: The phrase "until further notice" supplies a duration cue for how long the restriction lasts.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The advisory is named, but the text never states contamination, illness, or other harm the water could cause.
  2. absent: The advisory is named but the text never states illness, contamination, or other harm.
  3. absent: The text never states illness, contamination, or other harm the water could cause.
  4. absent: No illness, contamination, or other harm is stated beyond the name of the advisory.
  5. absent: The text never says the water is unsafe, could cause illness, or is otherwise dangerous.
  6. absent: The advisory never says the water could sicken anyone or is otherwise dangerous, only that fountains should not be used.
  7. absent: Nothing says the water could cause illness or otherwise spells out harm or severity.
  8. absent: The advisory does not say the water could cause illness or otherwise describe harm or severity.
  9. absent: Nothing states illness, contamination, or that drinking the water could harm people.
  10. absent: The text never says the water is contaminated, unsafe, or likely to cause illness.
  11. absent: The advisory is named, but the text never states illness, contamination, or other harm.
  12. absent: The message never says the water could cause illness or otherwise states harm or severity.
  13. absent: Nothing says the water is contaminated, unsafe, or likely to make people ill.
  14. absent: The text never says what the water could do, such as illness or contamination.
  15. absent: The text never states illness, contamination effects, or other harm that unsafe water could cause.
  16. absent: The advisory and fountain restriction do not say the water could cause illness, contamination, or other harm.
  17. absent: The advisory does not state illness, contamination effects, or other consequences beyond naming the hazard.
  18. absent: The text never states illness, contamination, or other harm the water could cause.
  19. absent: Nothing states illness, contamination, or other harm, only the advisory and the use ban.
  20. absent: The advisory does not say the water could cause illness, is unsafe, or otherwise spell out harm.
  21. absent: The text does not say the water could cause illness or otherwise state a consequence or severity.
  22. absent: The advisory and fountain ban do not state illness, contamination, or other harm the water could cause.
  23. absent: The advisory does not say the water could cause illness, contamination, or other harm if consumed.
  24. absent: The text never states illness, contamination effects, or other harm beyond the advisory name.
  25. absent: The advisory never states that the water is unsafe, could cause illness, or poses any other harm.