Off-campus residential burglaries on Page, 16th, and 18th

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: Temple University Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and signer Denise Wilhelm as Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police identify the issuer.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and is signed by the Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  2. present: The message names Temple University Department of Public Safety and closes with Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  3. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  4. present: The alert names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by the Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  5. present: Temple University, its Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and signer Denise Wilhelm as Chief of Police identify the issuing authority.
  6. present: The close names Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police, and the body cites Temple University Department of Public Safety.
  7. present: Temple University, Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and signer Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police, identify the issuer.
  8. present: The sender is identified as Temple University's Department of Public Safety, with a closing signature from Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  9. present: The sender is identified as Temple University's Department of Public Safety, with a closing signature from the Interim Vice President for Public Safety.
  10. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  11. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by the Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  12. present: The sender is identified as Temple University Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  13. present: Signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police, and names Temple University Department of Public Safety.
  14. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  15. present: The text names Temple University's Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and is signed by the Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  16. present: The message cites Temple University's Department of Public Safety and Temple Police, and it is signed by the Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  17. present: Temple University's Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and Denise Wilhelm, Chief of Police, identify the issuing authority.
  18. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  19. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  20. present: Temple University Department of Public Safety is named as investigator, and Denise Wilhelm signs as Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  21. present: The message names Temple University's Department of Public Safety and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  22. present: The message names Temple University Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and is signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  23. present: The sender is identified as Temple University Department of Public Safety, signed by Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
  24. present: The close names Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police, and the body cites Temple Police and Public Safety.
  25. present: The sender is named as Temple University Department of Public Safety, Temple Police, and Denise Wilhelm, Interim Vice President for Public Safety and Chief of Police.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the text names residential burglaries, with unlawful entry, theft, and broken windows as the specific threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It specifies residential burglaries, with an unknown offender entering homes, stolen items, and broken windows, a named crime threat.
  2. present: It identifies the threat as residential burglaries, including unlawful entry, stolen items, and broken windows at off-campus homes.
  3. present: It names residential burglaries as the specific threat, including unlawful entry, theft, and broken windows.
  4. present: It names residential burglaries as the threat, with unlawful entry, theft, and broken windows at homes.
  5. present: The text names residential burglaries, plus entries, stolen items, and broken windows, which specify the threat.
  6. present: The message names residential burglaries, including break-ins, theft, and damaged property, as the specific threat.
  7. present: The alert names residential burglaries, with an unknown offender entering homes, stolen items, and broken windows as the specific threat.
  8. present: The threat is named as residential burglaries, including unknown offenders entering homes, theft, and broken windows.
  9. present: The text names residential burglaries as the specific threat, including forced entry and theft at residences.
  10. present: It specifies residential burglaries involving unlawful entry, stolen items, and broken windows, not a generic emergency label.
  11. present: It names residential burglaries as the specific threat, with forced entry, theft, and broken windows.
  12. present: The text names residential burglaries as the specific threat, with forced entry, theft, and damaged property at homes.
  13. present: The text names residential burglaries as the threat, with entry, theft, and broken windows at the listed homes.
  14. present: It names residential burglaries as the specific threat, along with unlawful entry and stolen or damaged property.
  15. present: It specifies residential burglaries, with stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: It names "residential burglaries" as the threat, with unlawful entry, stolen items, and broken windows.
  17. present: The text names residential burglaries as the specific threat, including an unknown offender entering homes.
  18. present: It names "residential burglaries" as the specific threat, along with forced entry and theft at the listed homes.
  19. present: It specifies residential burglaries, with an unknown offender entering homes, stolen items, and broken windows, not a generic incident.
  20. present: The text specifies residential burglaries with forced entry and theft, not a generic emergency or situation.
  21. present: It names residential burglaries, with stolen items, broken windows, and damaged property, as the specific threat.
  22. present: It names residential burglaries as the specific threat, including unlawful entry, theft, and broken windows.
  23. present: The hazard is named as residential burglaries, with break-ins, theft, and forced windows rather than a generic incident.
  24. present: It names "residential burglaries" as the specific threat, including forced entry, theft, and broken windows.
  25. present: The text names residential burglaries, including an unknown offender entering a home, stolen items, and broken windows, which is a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the burglaries are placed off campus at named blocks of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and N. 18th Street.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the incidents off campus on the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  2. present: It places the incidents off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  3. present: It places the incidents off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  4. present: It places the crimes off campus at named blocks such as the 1700 block of Page Street and N. 16th Street.
  5. present: It locates the incidents off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  6. present: Incidents are placed at off campus private residences on the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  7. present: Incidents are placed off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  8. present: Incidents are placed off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  9. present: It locates the incidents at off campus private residences on named blocks such as the 1700 block of Page Street.
  10. present: It places the burglaries at off campus residences on the 1700 blocks of Page Street and N. 16th Street and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  11. present: It places the incidents at off-campus private residences on named blocks of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and N. 18th Street.
  12. present: It places the incidents off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  13. present: Incidents are placed at off campus private residences on the 1700 block of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  14. present: It places the incidents off campus at named blocks on Page Street, N. 16th Street, and N. 18th Street.
  15. present: It places the events off campus at named blocks: Page Street, N. 16th Street, and N. 18th Street.
  16. present: It places the incidents "off campus" at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  17. present: Incidents are placed off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  18. present: It places the incidents at off-campus private residences, including the 1700 block of Page Street and other named blocks.
  19. present: It places the crimes at four off campus private residences, including the 1700 block of Page Street and N. 16th and N. 18th Streets.
  20. present: It places the crimes at four private residences off campus, including the 1700 block of Page Street and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  21. present: It places the incidents off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  22. present: It places the incidents off campus at private residences on the 1700 blocks of Page Street and N. 16th Street and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  23. present: Locations are given as off campus private residences on the 1700 block of Page Street, 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  24. present: It places the incidents at off campus private residences on the 1700 block of Page Street, N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
  25. present: It places the events off campus at the 1700 block of Page Street, the 1700 block of N. 16th Street, and the 1900 block of N. 18th Street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: recipients are told to be vigilant, lock windows and doors, never prop exterior doors, and report suspicious activity.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells people to be vigilant, lock windows and doors, never prop exterior doors, and report suspicious activity immediately.
  2. present: It tells recipients to report suspicious activity, never prop exterior doors, keep windows and doors locked, and hide valuables from view.
  3. present: It instructs the community to be vigilant, report suspicious activity immediately, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  4. present: It instructs the community to stay vigilant, keep doors and windows locked, never prop exterior doors, and report suspicious activity.
  5. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, report suspicious activity immediately, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  6. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant and to take safety steps such as securing doors and windows, never propping doors, and reporting suspicious activity.
  7. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, report suspicious activity, never prop doors, keep windows and doors locked, and keep valuables out of view.
  8. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, take safety precautions, report suspicious activity, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  9. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, take safety precautions, report suspicious activity, and keep doors and windows locked.
  10. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant and to lock windows and doors, avoid propping doors, hide valuables, and report suspicious activity to Temple Police.
  11. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, take safety precautions, report suspicious activity, secure doors and windows, and hide valuables.
  12. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, take safety precautions, report suspicious activity immediately, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  13. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity, never prop exterior doors, and keep windows and doors secure with locks.
  14. present: It tells people to be vigilant, report suspicious activity immediately, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  15. present: It tells the community to be vigilant, take safety precautions, report suspicious activity, and keep doors and windows secured.
  16. present: It tells the community to be vigilant, keep windows and doors locked, never prop exterior doors, and report suspicious activity immediately to Temple Police.
  17. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, keep doors and windows locked, never prop exterior doors, and report suspicious activity immediately.
  18. present: It tells recipients to report suspicious activity, keep windows and doors secure, never prop exterior doors, and hide valuables.
  19. present: Recipients are told to stay vigilant, keep windows and doors locked, never prop exterior doors, hide valuables, and report suspicious activity immediately.
  20. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, lock doors and windows, never prop doors, hide valuables, and report suspicious activity immediately.
  21. present: It tells recipients to be vigilant, report suspicious activity, never prop doors, lock windows and doors, and hide valuables.
  22. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, report suspicious activity immediately, never prop doors, lock windows and doors, and keep valuables out of view.
  23. present: Recipients are told to be vigilant, report suspicious activity, never prop doors, and keep windows and doors locked.
  24. present: It tells readers to report suspicious activity, never prop exterior doors, lock windows and doors, and keep valuables out of view.
  25. present: Recipients are told to report suspicious activity, never prop exterior doors, keep windows and doors locked, and hide valuables, which are protective actions.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present because the burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, with recency cues such as at this time, ongoing, and immediately.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and uses at this time, ongoing, and immediately.
  2. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026 and uses recency cues such as "at this time" and "immediately".
  3. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and uses "at this time" plus "ongoing" as recency cues.
  4. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and says investigations are ongoing.
  5. present: A calendar date (Thursday, July 9, 2026) appears, along with "at this time," "ongoing," and "immediately."
  6. present: The burglaries are dated to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the investigations are described as ongoing.
  7. present: Burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, with further cues in "at this time", "ongoing", and "immediately".
  8. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the text uses "at this time," "ongoing," and "immediately."
  9. present: The burglaries are dated to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and investigations are described as ongoing.
  10. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the text uses "at this time" and "ongoing" as recency cues.
  11. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, calls investigations ongoing, and says to report suspicious activity immediately.
  12. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, investigations are called ongoing, and the text uses "at this time" and "immediately".
  13. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the investigations are described as ongoing.
  14. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and says investigations are ongoing and At this time.
  15. present: It gives the date Thursday, July 9, 2026, plus "at this time," "ongoing," and "immediately."
  16. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the text also uses "at this time", "ongoing", and "immediately".
  17. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the text also uses at this time, ongoing, and immediately.
  18. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and says investigations are "ongoing" and to report "immediately".
  19. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, investigations are called ongoing, and reporting is to happen immediately.
  20. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and the investigations are called ongoing.
  21. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and uses "at this time", "ongoing", and "immediately".
  22. present: The date Thursday, July 9, 2026 appears, along with at this time, ongoing, and immediately.
  23. present: The burglaries are dated Thursday, July 9, 2026, and investigations are described as ongoing.
  24. present: It dates the burglaries to Thursday, July 9, 2026, and states that investigations are ongoing.
  25. present: A date is given as Thursday, July 9, 2026, plus recency cues such as at this time, ongoing, and immediately.
• Impactabsent10/25

  Final assessment

  15 of 25 reads find Impact absent: stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows recount the burglaries rather than stated severity for recipients, while 10 treat that property damage as impact.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It does not state potential harm or severity to recipients, such as danger or risk of injury, beyond listing past thefts.
  2. absent: It describes completed thefts and property damage but never states severity or potential harm such as dangerous or at risk.
  3. present: It states property harm from the crimes: items stolen, damaged property, and broken windows at unoccupied homes.
  4. absent: Theft and broken windows recount the burglary facts, with no statement of severity or harm the hazard could cause recipients.
  5. present: The reports state property harm: items stolen, damaged property, and broken windows at unoccupied homes.
  6. present: The text reports stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows, stating harm to property beyond merely naming burglary.
  7. absent: Theft and damaged property are incident details, not a stated consequence or severity such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  8. present: Stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows state harm to property, and "keeping safe" implies a safety risk.
  9. absent: Stolen items and damaged property are incident details, not a statement of severity or potential harm to people.
  10. absent: No consequence or severity language such as dangerous or risk of injury appears, only a factual account of past theft and property damage.
  11. absent: Stolen items and broken windows describe the past crimes, not a stated consequence or severity facing recipients.
  12. present: It states harm to property, including stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows, not only the burglary label.
  13. present: It states items were stolen, property was damaged, and windows were broken, which is harm to property beyond the word burglaries.
  14. absent: Stolen items and broken windows describe the crimes themselves, with no severity language such as dangerous or risk of harm.
  15. present: It states property harm from the burglaries: items stolen, damaged property, and broken windows.
  16. absent: Stolen items and damaged property describe the past crimes, with no statement of severity or what the hazard could do to recipients.
  17. absent: No consequence or severity for the audience is stated. Past theft and broken windows only recount the crimes, not how serious they are.
  18. absent: Stolen items and broken windows are past incident facts, not a statement of potential harm or severity for recipients.
  19. absent: Stolen items and broken windows recount the crimes themselves, with no stated severity or potential harm such as dangerous or injury risk.
  20. absent: It never states severity or likely harm such as danger or injury risk, only that burglaries, theft, and window damage occurred.
  21. absent: Recounting stolen items and broken windows specifies the burglaries but never states severity or potential harm such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  22. present: The text states property harm: items stolen, damaged property, and broken windows at the residences.
  23. present: The text states stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows, which is harm to property from the burglaries.
  24. present: It reports stolen items, damaged property, and broken windows, stating harm to property from the burglaries.
  25. absent: Theft and property damage describe the burglaries themselves, with no stated severity or consequence such as dangerous or risk of injury.