Robbery on the 1600 block of Diamond Street

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the branded TUalertEMER opener identifies the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system, and police are named as responding.
  2. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system.
  3. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing alert system as source.
  4. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag at the start, and Police are named as responding.
  5. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing system, and Police are named as responding.
  6. present: TUalertEMER is a branded alert signature, and Police are named as responding.
  7. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing system at the start.
  8. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  9. present: The branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies who is issuing the alert.
  10. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing system, and Police are named as responding.
  11. present: The branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system.
  12. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuer, and Police are named.
  13. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system.
  14. present: The branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  15. present: The branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing campus alert system as the source.
  16. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  17. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag, and police are named as responding.
  18. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing system, and "Police" names the responding authority.
  19. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing system, and Police are named as responding.
  20. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system, and police are named as responding.
  21. present: Branded sender tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing alert system.
  22. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system.
  23. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER and Police identify the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing system, and police are named as responding.
  25. present: Branded sender tag TUalertEMER identifies the issuing alert system.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree robbery names a specific crime threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
  2. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
  3. present: The text names the specific threat as "Robbery."
  4. present: Robbery names the specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: The text names a specific threat with Robbery.
  6. present: Robbery names a specific criminal threat, not a generic incident.
  7. present: The alert names a specific threat: "Robbery."
  8. present: The text names a specific threat with the word "Robbery".
  9. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
  10. present: The text names the specific threat as robbery.
  11. present: The text names a specific threat as robbery.
  12. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
  13. present: The text names the specific threat as robbery.
  14. present: The text names a specific threat: "Robbery".
  15. present: Robbery is named as the specific crime threat.
  16. present: The threat is named specifically as "Robbery."
  17. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  18. present: The text names a specific threat: "Robbery".
  19. present: The alert names a specific threat: robbery.
  20. present: The text names the specific threat as robbery.
  21. present: The text names a specific threat: "Robbery".
  22. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
  23. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  24. present: The alert names robbery as the specific threat.
  25. present: The text names a specific threat: robbery.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the 1600 block of W Diamond Street is a location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  2. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is named as the location.
  3. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  4. present: Places the robbery on the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  5. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  6. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is a street location for the report.
  7. present: Place is specified as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  8. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  9. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  10. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  11. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is named as the location.
  12. present: The incident is placed on the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  13. present: It gives a place: the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  14. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  15. present: The event is placed on the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  16. present: The location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  17. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is a street address location.
  18. present: Location is given as the "1600 block of W Diamond Street".
  19. present: It locates the robbery on the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  20. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is a named street location.
  21. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  22. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  23. present: The 1600 block of W Diamond Street is a stated street location.
  24. present: It specifies the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
  25. present: Location is given as the 1600 block of W Diamond Street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree avoid the area is a protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  2. present: Recipients are told to avoid the area.
  3. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area."
  4. present: Tells recipients to avoid the area as a protective action.
  5. present: Recipients are instructed to Avoid the area.
  6. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  7. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area."
  8. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area".
  9. present: Recipients are told to avoid the area.
  10. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  11. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  12. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  13. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  14. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area".
  15. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  16. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid the area."
  17. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  18. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area".
  19. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  20. present: Avoid the area is an instruction telling recipients to stay away.
  21. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area".
  22. present: Recipients are told to avoid the area.
  23. present: Avoid the area is a protective action instruction to recipients.
  24. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
  25. present: Recipients are instructed to avoid the area.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no clock time, date, or recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency language appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording is given.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency words such as now or immediately appear.
  4. absent: Gives no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing word is given.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or duration language appears in the text.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, recency word, or duration is stated.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency phrasing is present.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue is stated.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency phrase appears.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording appears.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording is given.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing language appears.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase such as now, immediately, or as of is present.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording is given.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is present.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency phrase appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other when or recency wording appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency phrase is given.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency phrasing appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no stated harm or consequence beyond naming robbery.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Robbery names the hazard but does not state consequences or severity.
  2. absent: Naming robbery alone does not convey harm, consequences, or severity.
  3. absent: "Robbery" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity for people or property.
  4. absent: Names robbery only, which does not by itself convey harm or consequence.
  5. absent: Naming robbery alone does not convey harm, consequences, or severity beyond the hazard name.
  6. absent: Robbery is named without any stated harm, severity, or consequence to people or property.
  7. absent: "Robbery" names the hazard but states no consequence or severity for people or property.
  8. absent: Naming "Robbery" states the hazard only and does not describe consequences or severity.
  9. absent: Robbery names the hazard only, with no stated consequence or severity for people or property.
  10. absent: Robbery names the hazard only, with no stated harm, severity, or consequence.
  11. absent: Robbery names the hazard but no consequence or severity to people or property is conveyed.
  12. absent: Robbery names the hazard but conveys no consequence or severity beyond that name.
  13. absent: Naming robbery does not by itself convey harm, consequences, or severity.
  14. absent: "Robbery" names the hazard but does not state consequences or severity.
  15. absent: Naming robbery states the hazard only and does not describe harm, severity, or consequences.
  16. absent: Naming "Robbery" states the hazard but does not convey consequences or severity.
  17. absent: Robbery names the hazard without stating consequences or severity of harm.
  18. absent: Naming "Robbery" states the hazard only and does not describe harm, severity, or consequences.
  19. absent: Naming robbery states the hazard only, with no stated harm, severity, or consequence.
  20. absent: Robbery names the hazard but states no consequence or severity for people or property.
  21. absent: Naming "robbery" alone states the hazard without any consequence or severity.
  22. absent: Robbery names the hazard but states no consequence or severity for people or property.
  23. absent: Robbery names the hazard alone and conveys no consequence or severity.
  24. absent: Robbery names the hazard but no consequence or severity to people or property is stated.
  25. absent: Robbery names the hazard only, with no stated harm, injury, or severity.