Suspicious package prompts evacuation of the Skaggs Center

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  2. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  3. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  4. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  5. present: The opening tag "SUU ALERT" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  6. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT" and also names "Police" as responders.
  7. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  8. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  9. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  10. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  11. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  12. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  13. present: The branded opener "SUU ALERT" identifies the sender, and "Police" names the responding agency.
  14. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  15. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  16. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender, and it also names police on site.
  17. present: The opening tag "SUU ALERT" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  18. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  19. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  20. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  21. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT" and also says police are on site.
  22. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  23. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  24. present: The opening signature "SUU ALERT" identifies the sender, and the text also says police are on site.
  25. present: The message opens with the branded signature "SUU ALERT", which identifies the sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat.
  2. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  3. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: The text names "a suspicious package," which is a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  6. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: It names "a suspicious package", which is a specific threat.
  8. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  9. present: It names a "suspicious package", which is a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  10. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: It names "a suspicious package", which is a specific threat.
  12. present: It names "a suspicious package", which is a specific threat.
  13. present: It states the threat is "a suspicious package", which is a specific hazard.
  14. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  17. present: The text names "a suspicious package", which is a specific threat.
  18. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic emergency.
  19. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  20. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  22. present: It names "a suspicious package", a specific threat.
  23. present: It names "a suspicious package", which is a specific threat.
  24. present: It names a "suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  25. present: It names a "suspicious package", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. It places the package "at the SCA building", a named place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named place.
  2. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  3. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  4. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  5. present: It locates the threat at "the SCA building."
  6. present: It places the report "at the SCA building", a named building.
  7. present: It places the package at the SCA building, a named place.
  8. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  9. present: It places the package at "the SCA building" and tells people to avoid that area.
  10. present: It places the threat at "the SCA building" and tells people to avoid that area.
  11. present: It says the package is "at the SCA building", a named place.
  12. present: It places the report at "the SCA building", a named place.
  13. present: It locates the package at "the SCA building".
  14. present: It places the report "at the SCA building", a named place, and says to avoid that area.
  15. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  16. present: It places the report "at the SCA building" and tells people to avoid that area.
  17. present: It says the package is "at the SCA building", a named place.
  18. present: It places the package at "the SCA building" and tells people to avoid "the area".
  19. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  20. present: It places the package at "the SCA building", a named building.
  21. present: It places the report "at the SCA building", a named building.
  22. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  23. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named building.
  24. present: It locates the report at the SCA building and tells people to avoid that area.
  25. present: It places the package "at the SCA building", a named place.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  2. present: It tells recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area", a protective instruction.
  3. present: It instructs people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  4. present: It instructs recipients to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  5. present: It tells recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  6. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  7. present: It tells people to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  8. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  9. present: It instructs recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building", "avoid the area", and call or text 911.
  10. present: It instructs recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building", "avoid the area", and call or text 911.
  11. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  12. present: It tells recipients to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  13. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  14. present: It instructs people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  15. present: It tells recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  16. present: It instructs recipients to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  17. present: It tells recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  18. present: It instructs recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  19. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  20. present: It tells recipients to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  21. present: It tells people to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  22. present: It instructs recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
  23. present: It instructs people to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  24. present: It tells people to evacuate the SCA building, avoid the area, and call or text 911.
  25. present: It tells recipients to "EVACUATE the SCA building and avoid the area" and to call or text 911.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Time present and 25 absent. No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  5. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, immediately, or ongoing.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
  13. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
  17. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or until further notice appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "immediately" appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
  24. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 25 absent. It names the package but does not state a consequence or severity such as explosion risk or danger.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It names the package but does not state a consequence or severity such as explosion risk or danger.
  2. absent: It does not state a consequence or severity, such as explosion risk or danger, beyond naming the package.
  3. absent: It never states a consequence or severity, such as explosion risk or danger to people.
  4. absent: Naming the suspicious package does not state a consequence or severity such as explosion or danger.
  5. absent: It orders an evacuation but never says the package is dangerous, explosive, or able to cause injury.
  6. absent: It never states a consequence or severity, and naming a suspicious package alone does not show harm.
  7. absent: It never states a consequence or severity, such as explosion risk or danger to people.
  8. absent: It names the package and orders an evacuation but states no consequence or severity such as explosion risk.
  9. absent: It never states a consequence or severity, such as danger, injury, or explosion risk.
  10. absent: It names a suspicious package but does not state a consequence or severity such as explosion risk or danger.
  11. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is.
  12. absent: It never states what the package could do or any severity such as dangerous or explosive.
  13. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is, only that one was reported.
  14. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is.
  15. absent: It never says what the package could do or how serious it is.
  16. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is, such as an explosion risk or danger.
  17. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is, such as explosion or danger.
  18. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity such as danger, injury, or explosion risk.
  19. absent: It does not state what the package could do or any severity such as injury or danger.
  20. absent: It does not state a consequence or severity, such as explosion risk or danger to people.
  21. absent: It never says what the package could do or how serious it is.
  22. absent: It does not state a consequence or severity, such as explosion risk or danger, beyond naming the package.
  23. absent: It does not state a consequence or severity such as explosion risk, injury, or danger.
  24. absent: It never states what the package could do or how serious it is, so the hazard name alone is not impact.
  25. absent: It does not say what the package could do or how serious it is, such as danger or explosion risk.