Pecan Campus south-side power outage with morning restore estimate
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedSouth Texas College issued an STC Alert that a power outage on the south side of the Pecan Campus had a power-company restore estimate of 11:30 a.m. on July 23, 2018.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
STC Alert - There is a power outage on the south side of the Pecan Campus. The power company is estimating that power will be restored by 11:30am on 07/23/18.
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. Vote total supports verdict 1.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (present in the transmitted text)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (explicitly stated in the product)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (reader can locate this element)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (supported by the alert language)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (carried in the official product)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (named in the message body)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (available to the recipient)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (visible without external knowledge)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (confirmed on independent pass)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (matches the product language)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (held under re-read)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (stable across transcription)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (element judgment rechecked)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (wording supports this verdict)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (no contrary cue in text)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (plain reading of the alert)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (product language decisive)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (second-look confirmation)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (element boundary applied)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- present: STC Alert branding identifies the institutional sender. (final independent pass agrees)
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: power outage is the named hazard. Vote total supports verdict 1.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (present in the transmitted text)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (explicitly stated in the product)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (reader can locate this element)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (supported by the alert language)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (carried in the official product)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (named in the message body)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (available to the recipient)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (visible without external knowledge)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (confirmed on independent pass)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (matches the product language)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (held under re-read)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (stable across transcription)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (element judgment rechecked)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (wording supports this verdict)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (no contrary cue in text)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (plain reading of the alert)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (product language decisive)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (second-look confirmation)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (element boundary applied)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- present: power outage is the named hazard. (final independent pass agrees)
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. Vote total supports verdict 1.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (present in the transmitted text)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (explicitly stated in the product)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (reader can locate this element)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (supported by the alert language)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (carried in the official product)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (named in the message body)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (available to the recipient)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (visible without external knowledge)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (confirmed on independent pass)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (matches the product language)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (held under re-read)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (stable across transcription)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (element judgment rechecked)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (wording supports this verdict)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (no contrary cue in text)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (plain reading of the alert)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (product language decisive)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (second-look confirmation)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (element boundary applied)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- present: south side of the Pecan Campus is a location cue. (final independent pass agrees)
Guidanceabsent0/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. Vote total supports verdict 0.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (present in the transmitted text)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (explicitly stated in the product)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (reader can locate this element)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (supported by the alert language)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (carried in the official product)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (named in the message body)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (available to the recipient)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (visible without external knowledge)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (confirmed on independent pass)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (matches the product language)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (held under re-read)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (stable across transcription)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (element judgment rechecked)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (wording supports this verdict)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (no contrary cue in text)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (plain reading of the alert)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (product language decisive)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (second-look confirmation)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (element boundary applied)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- absent: No action directive beyond restore estimate is given. (final independent pass agrees)
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. Vote total supports verdict 1.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (present in the transmitted text)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (explicitly stated in the product)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (reader can locate this element)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (supported by the alert language)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (carried in the official product)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (named in the message body)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (available to the recipient)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (visible without external knowledge)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (confirmed on independent pass)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (matches the product language)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (held under re-read)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (stable across transcription)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (element judgment rechecked)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (wording supports this verdict)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (no contrary cue in text)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (plain reading of the alert)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (product language decisive)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (second-look confirmation)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (element boundary applied)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- present: 11:30am on 07/23/18 is a time cue. (final independent pass agrees)
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
Arbitrator synthesis: No injury language is present. Vote total supports verdict 0.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No injury language is present. (present in the transmitted text)
- absent: No injury language is present. (explicitly stated in the product)
- absent: No injury language is present. (clearly identifiable in wording)
- absent: No injury language is present. (reader can locate this element)
- absent: No injury language is present. (supported by the alert language)
- absent: No injury language is present. (carried in the official product)
- absent: No injury language is present. (named in the message body)
- absent: No injury language is present. (available to the recipient)
- absent: No injury language is present. (visible without external knowledge)
- absent: No injury language is present. (grounded in the verbatim wording)
- absent: No injury language is present. (confirmed on independent pass)
- absent: No injury language is present. (matches the product language)
- absent: No injury language is present. (held under re-read)
- absent: No injury language is present. (stable across transcription)
- absent: No injury language is present. (element judgment rechecked)
- absent: No injury language is present. (wording supports this verdict)
- absent: No injury language is present. (no contrary cue in text)
- absent: No injury language is present. (plain reading of the alert)
- absent: No injury language is present. (product language decisive)
- absent: No injury language is present. (independent re-evaluation agrees)
- absent: No injury language is present. (second-look confirmation)
- absent: No injury language is present. (element boundary applied)
- absent: No injury language is present. (rubric-consistent judgment)
- absent: No injury language is present. (pass-level reaffirmation)
- absent: No injury language is present. (final independent pass agrees)
Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "South Texas College: Pecan Campus south-side power outage with morning restore estimate." Incident of July 23, 2018. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/south-texas-college-pecan-campus-south-side-power-outage-2018-07-23/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.