Sexual assault on trails north of Nizhoni, then suspect in custody

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender signature.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag that identifies the issuing authority.
  2. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature identifying the issuing source.
  3. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system as source.
  4. present: The opening tag SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies the sender.
  5. present: The opening tag SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies the sender.
  6. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature identifying the issuing source.
  7. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  8. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  9. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing authority.
  10. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  11. present: The opening tag SJC Timely Warning is a branded signature naming the sender.
  12. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag that identifies who issued the notice.
  13. present: The branded tag SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing authority.
  14. present: The branded signature SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system.
  15. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies the issuing source.
  16. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies who is issuing the message.
  17. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender signature identifying the issuing authority.
  18. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag that identifies the issuing source.
  19. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies the issuing authority.
  20. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag, and San Juan County Dispatch is a named agency.
  21. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded signature, and San Juan County Dispatch is a named agency.
  22. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag identifying the issuing authority.
  23. present: The branded tag SJC Timely Warning identifies the issuing alert system as the source.
  24. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded sender tag, and San Juan County Dispatch is named as a responding authority.
  25. present: SJC Timely Warning is a branded alert signature that identifies the issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree sexual assault names a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific reported threat.
  2. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific threat reported.
  3. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific threat.
  4. present: Sexual assault is stated as the reported crime threat.
  5. present: The report names sexual assault as the specific crime threat.
  6. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific criminal threat reported.
  7. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific reported threat.
  8. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific reported threat.
  9. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific threat.
  10. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific reported threat.
  11. present: The reported event is identified specifically as a sexual assault.
  12. present: The reported threat is named as a sexual assault.
  13. present: The text specifies sexual assault as the threat.
  14. present: The text names a sexual assault as the specific reported threat.
  15. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific crime threat.
  16. present: A reported sexual assault is named as the specific crime threat.
  17. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific reported threat.
  18. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific threat.
  19. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific threat.
  20. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific threat.
  21. present: The text names a specific threat: a reported sexual assault.
  22. present: The text names a specific threat: sexual assault.
  23. present: Sexual assault is named as the specific threat.
  24. present: The alert names sexual assault as the specific threat.
  25. present: The text names sexual assault as the specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites locate the report.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The assault is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  2. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  3. present: The incident is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  4. present: The location is the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  5. present: The assault is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  6. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  7. present: The incident is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  8. present: The incident is located on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  9. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  10. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  11. present: The place given is the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  12. present: It places the report on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  13. present: The report is on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  14. present: The report is located on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  15. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  16. present: The assault is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  17. present: The event is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  18. present: The report is on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  19. present: The assault is reported on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  20. present: Walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites identify a named place.
  21. present: The incident is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  22. present: The report is on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  23. present: The report is placed on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  24. present: It locates the report on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
  25. present: The assault is reported on or near the walking trails north of Nizhoni Sunrise Suites.
• Guidanceabsent4/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no protective instruction in this first fragment (do not approach and call 911 are in the continuation post, not this text).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The message reports the assault and describes a suspect at large, with no protective action told.
  2. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large but gives no protective action.
  3. absent: No protective action is instructed, only a report of the assault and a suspect description.
  4. absent: No instruction such as stay away, do not approach, or call 911 is given to recipients.
  5. absent: The text reports the crime and a suspect description but does not tell recipients what action to take.
  6. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large but gives no protective action.
  7. absent: The text reports the assault and a suspect at large but gives no protective action to take.
  8. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large but gives no protective action for recipients.
  9. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large, with no protective action to take.
  10. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large, with no protective action told to recipients.
  11. absent: Nothing tells recipients what to do. The rest is a crime report and suspect description.
  12. absent: Recipients are not told to take any protective action. The text only reports the crime and a suspect description.
  13. present: Recipients are told not to approach the suspect and to call 911 or San Juan County Dispatch.
  14. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect at large but gives no protective action.
  15. absent: The text describes the crime and suspect but gives no protective action for recipients to take.
  16. absent: No instruction tells recipients what protective action to take, only a report and suspect description.
  17. absent: The text describes a suspect at large but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  18. absent: No protective action is instructed, only a report of the assault and a suspect description.
  19. absent: No protective action is given. The text only reports the assault and describes a suspect at large.
  20. present: Do not approach and call 911 are protective action instructions to recipients.
  21. present: Recipients are told not to approach the suspect and to call 911 or dispatch.
  22. absent: No protective action is given; the text describes the crime and suspect only.
  23. absent: The text reports the assault and describes a suspect but gives no protective action to take.
  24. present: Recipients are told not to approach and to call 911 or San Juan County Dispatch.
  25. absent: No protective action is instructed. The text only reports the assault and describes a suspect at large.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 are time cues.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 state when the assault occurred.
  2. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 give the date and time of day.
  3. present: The report is dated to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  4. present: Timing is given as the late evening of Aug. 21 and the early morning of Aug. 22.
  5. present: The assault is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  6. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 supply date and time of day.
  7. present: The report is dated to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  8. present: The report is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  9. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 give a date and time of day.
  10. present: The assault is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  11. present: Timing is given as late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  12. present: It dates the assault to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  13. present: The incident is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  14. present: The assault is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  15. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 supply date and recency.
  16. present: The assault is dated to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  17. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 supply dates and timing.
  18. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 state when the assault occurred.
  19. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 state when the assault occurred.
  20. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 give date and time of day.
  21. present: The report is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  22. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 convey when the assault occurred.
  23. present: The incident is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  24. present: The report is timed to the late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22.
  25. present: Late evening of Aug. 21 and early morning of Aug. 22 state when the assault occurred.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find no stated consequence beyond naming sexual assault. Suspect at large is status, not severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only. Suspect at large is status, not a stated consequence or severity.
  2. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, and a suspect at large states status rather than harm or severity.
  3. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard but states no consequence or severity, and a suspect at large is not impact.
  4. absent: The crime is named without any stated severity, harm, or consequence beyond the assault itself.
  5. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only. Suspect at large describes status, not harm or severity.
  6. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, with no stated harm, severity, or consequence beyond the crime.
  7. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard, and a suspect at large does not state consequence or severity.
  8. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, and a suspect at large is status, not a stated consequence or severity.
  9. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, with no stated consequence or severity beyond that name.
  10. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only. A suspect at large is status, not a stated consequence or severity.
  11. absent: Naming sexual assault and a suspect at large does not state what harm or severity the hazard would cause.
  12. absent: Naming sexual assault and an at-large suspect does not state consequences or severity.
  13. absent: Sexual assault is named without stating further consequences or severity beyond the hazard itself.
  14. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard, and a suspect at large states no consequence or severity.
  15. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only and does not convey consequences or severity beyond that crime.
  16. absent: Naming sexual assault and a suspect at large does not state harm, severity, or other consequences.
  17. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard; suspect at large is status, not stated harm or severity.
  18. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only and does not state consequences or severity.
  19. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, with no stated consequence or severity beyond that name.
  20. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard, and suspect at large states status, not a stated consequence or severity.
  21. absent: Naming sexual assault and a suspect at large states the crime without a stated consequence or severity.
  22. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard but states no consequence or severity beyond that name.
  23. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard, and a suspect at large does not state consequence or severity.
  24. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard but no additional consequence or severity language is given.
  25. absent: Sexual assault names the hazard only, with no stated consequence or severity beyond that name.