Water leak knocks out power at Hostler and Storm Hall West

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat the opening SDSU Alert tag as a branded sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Opens with the branded tag SDSU Alert, which names the sender.
  2. present: The lead phrase SDSU Alert identifies the issuing alert system.
  3. present: Source is present because the product is signed SDSU Alert.
  4. present: A university branded signature sits at the start of the SMS.
  5. present: SDSU Alert is a sender tag, so the authority is identified.
  6. present: The message names its own system, SDSU Alert, as the source.
  7. present: Branded lead-in SDSU Alert counts as a source attribution.
  8. present: Readers can see who sent it from the SDSU Alert prefix.
  9. present: The alert system name is printed before the colon, marking the sender.
  10. present: Source is satisfied by the opening SDSU Alert label.
  11. present: The first tokens are a named campus alert brand.
  12. present: SDSU Alert functions as the signature block for this SMS.
  13. present: Issuing authority is given by the SDSU Alert product name.
  14. present: The text does not hide the sender; it leads with SDSU Alert.
  15. present: A named notification system, SDSU Alert, is the source cue.
  16. present: Source present: the SMS is labeled as an SDSU Alert.
  17. present: The university alert brand appears in the first clause.
  18. present: Sender identity is the SDSU Alert header string.
  19. present: The product names SDSU as part of the Alert signature.
  20. present: Opening brand SDSU Alert is enough to mark who is talking.
  21. present: The alert carries a campus system name rather than an unsigned body.
  22. present: Source is the SDSU Alert tag that precedes the leak clause.
  23. present: Named sender is present in the SDSU Alert lead.
  24. present: The SMS identifies itself as an SDSU Alert message.
  25. present: A branded campus alert header supplies the source element.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks the water leak as a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a water leak, a specific utility hazard.
  2. present: Hazard is a water leak knocking out power.
  3. present: A water leak impacting two halls is the threat.
  4. present: The text is not a generic emergency; it names a water leak.
  5. present: A leak plus power loss is the hazard.
  6. present: Hazard present because a water leak is named.
  7. present: The threat is a water leak at two buildings.
  8. present: Readers are told there is a water leak.
  9. present: Specific hazard wording is a water leak.
  10. present: It is a utility-failure hazard, not an unnamed incident.
  11. present: The SMS names a water leak.
  12. present: Hazard is the stated water leak.
  13. present: A named leak is the threat language.
  14. present: The SMS specifies a water leak.
  15. present: A leak impacting Hostler and Storm Hall West is the hazard statement.
  16. present: The product tells you what is happening: a water leak.
  17. present: A concrete utility failure is named.
  18. present: Hazard is present in the water leak wording.
  19. present: The alert identifies a water leak.
  20. present: A water leak is a specific hazard.
  21. present: The body names the leak.
  22. present: Threat content is the leak, stated directly.
  23. present: The SMS says a water leak, which is the hazard.
  24. present: A defined utility hazard is given.
  25. present: Hazard satisfied by the water leak clause.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Hostler Hall and Storm Hall West are named places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Charles W. Hostler Hall and Storm Hall West are named buildings.
  2. present: Location is two named halls.
  3. present: Specific buildings are given.
  4. present: Hostler Hall and Storm Hall West locate the leak.
  5. present: Location present: Hostler and Storm Hall West.
  6. present: Readers are told where: two named buildings.
  7. present: Named campus buildings are the location.
  8. present: The sites are Hostler Hall and Storm Hall West.
  9. present: Place is explicit in two hall names.
  10. present: Location is not generic campus; it is two halls.
  11. present: The bulletin locates the leak at Hostler and Storm Hall West.
  12. present: Two building names satisfy location.
  13. present: Hostler Hall is a geographic cue, and so is Storm Hall West.
  14. present: The scene is identified as two halls.
  15. present: Location is named facilities.
  16. present: Both buildings are place cues.
  17. present: Place is Hostler and Storm Hall West.
  18. present: The first sentence names both halls.
  19. present: Specific facilities are named.
  20. present: Location present via two hall names.
  21. present: The hall names are enough for location.
  22. present: Hostler Hall and Storm Hall West appear in the first sentence.
  23. present: Named structures are the location element.
  24. present: The place words are two building names.
  25. present: Location is satisfied by the two halls.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The first alert is a status report with no protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: More updates to come is not a protective action.
  2. absent: The SMS does not tell people to evacuate, shelter, or avoid.
  3. absent: No instruction such as stay away appears.
  4. absent: Guidance is absent from the first alert.
  5. absent: Recipients are not told what to do.
  6. absent: No protective action is given.
  7. absent: The product does not order a shelter or evacuation.
  8. absent: I find no do-this instruction.
  9. absent: Avoid, shelter, and leave are all missing.
  10. absent: Guidance fails because no action is directed at the audience.
  11. absent: The alert describes the leak without telling people how to act.
  12. absent: No monitor Canvas clause is in this first alert.
  13. absent: Guidance is not satisfied by a status report.
  14. absent: Crews working is responder action, not guidance.
  15. absent: The SMS does not say stay out or reenter.
  16. absent: I code guidance absent.
  17. absent: There is no required action language.
  18. absent: The audience is not instructed.
  19. absent: No protective verb is aimed at the reader.
  20. absent: Status-only wording is not guidance.
  21. absent: The first alert is descriptive, not directive.
  22. absent: No call to action is present.
  23. absent: Guidance missing from the first product.
  24. absent: The text does not tell people to take a protective step.
  25. absent: I do not treat more updates as an instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  currently is treated as a recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: currently responding and currently without power are recency cues.
  2. present: currently marks the leak and outage as now.
  3. present: A time cue is currently.
  4. present: Time present via currently.
  5. present: The word currently is a when marker.
  6. present: Recency is currently responding.
  7. present: Time is the currently clause.
  8. present: The bulletin says crews are currently responding.
  9. present: currently is a time element.
  10. present: The when is now, via currently.
  11. present: A present-tense currently is the time mark.
  12. present: Clock and date are absent; currently remains.
  13. present: Time is the currently phrase.
  14. present: The narrative includes currently as recency.
  15. present: currently without power is time.
  16. present: The when is a present-tense outage.
  17. present: A recency adverb is the time element.
  18. present: Time satisfied by currently.
  19. present: The leak is described as currently being handled.
  20. present: currently is explicit recency.
  21. present: The bulletin timestamps the event as current.
  22. present: No clock, but currently is enough for time.
  23. present: The currently clause is a time mark.
  24. present: Time is not missing if currently counts.
  25. present: currently responding is a clear now cue.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most passes find no stated harm to people.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury language is used.
  2. absent: The text does not say anyone was harmed.
  3. absent: Impact as harm to people is absent.
  4. absent: No deadly wording appears.
  5. absent: A power outage is the utility state, not a stated injury.
  6. absent: I do not infer injury the SMS does not speak.
  7. absent: No one is described as hurt.
  8. absent: Impact fails because no personal-harm outcome is written.
  9. absent: Severity of harm is not claimed.
  10. absent: The bulletin is a utility status, not an impact statement.
  11. absent: Nothing says people are in danger.
  12. absent: Impact is not satisfied by naming a leak alone.
  13. absent: No injury count is given.
  14. absent: I code impact absent.
  15. absent: The text stops at leak and power loss.
  16. absent: No life-threatening language is present.
  17. absent: Without power is a service state, not impact under the rubric.
  18. absent: The alert does not say the situation is dangerous.
  19. absent: No impact verb such as threaten appears.
  20. absent: A leak-and-outage notice is not impact unless harm is stated.
  21. present: Buildings without power is a stated functional impact.
  22. present: I read a water leak plus power loss as impact.
  23. present: Two halls losing power is a consequence.
  24. present: A leak impacting buildings is impact language.
  25. present: Power loss is a stated result.