Rape in Ward Hall involving two identified students

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. Campus Safety is named as the receiving department and Title IX as the reporting office.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit that received the Title IX report.
  2. present: The first sentence credits Campus Safety with receiving the report from Title IX.
  3. present: The Office of Title IX is named as the reporting office alongside Campus Safety.
  4. present: The closing line lists Campus Safety with a phone number and email, identifying the sender.
  5. present: Rollins College appears in the department name that took the report.
  6. present: Source is present because Campus Safety is the campus authority handling the notice.
  7. present: Who is sending is clear from Campus Safety as both intake office and contact.
  8. present: A named campus agency, Campus Safety, is the actor in the opening sentence.
  9. present: Recipients can tell the notice comes from Campus Safety, the named department.
  10. present: Campus Safety functions here as the listed campus public safety office.
  11. present: The text attributes report receipt to the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  12. present: Naming Campus Safety satisfies the who is sending test for a campus authority.
  13. present: The only agencies in the body are Campus Safety and Title IX.
  14. present: The notice is voiced through Campus Safety, which received the Title IX report.
  15. present: A campus public safety department is identified as taking the Clery notice.
  16. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department received a report names the source up front.
  17. present: The email campussafety@rollins.edu at the end brands the issuing office.
  18. present: Source is the named department taking the timely notification.
  19. present: Timely Notification plus Campus Safety together identify the issuing campus office.
  20. present: The college names its Campus Safety Department as the office that took the report.
  21. present: Source is present: Campus Safety plus the Office of Title IX.
  22. present: A named campus safety unit identifies who is responding.
  23. present: The handling office is stated as Campus Safety throughout the notice.
  24. present: Campus Safety appears as the official unit receiving the Ward Hall rape report.
  25. present: Readers are pointed to Campus Safety as the authority to contact, which identifies the source.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that rape and non-consensual sexual contact name a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header names sexual assault and rape, specific crimes rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape specifies the hazard rather than a vague emergency.
  3. present: Sexual contact without consent names a concrete offense, not merely an emergency or situation.
  4. present: The message titles the event Sexual Assault and Rape, which are specific threat types.
  5. present: Hazard is present because rape and non-consensual sexual contact are both named.
  6. present: One student engaged in sexual contact without consent, which names the offense plainly.
  7. present: What the threat is is answered as rape, stated in the title and the body.
  8. present: Non generic wording appears: rape, not incident or situation alone.
  9. present: The crime type is rape, further labeled non-consensual sexual contact.
  10. present: Header and body both specify rape as the reported offense.
  11. present: A report of rape is a defined interpersonal crime, not a vague label.
  12. present: Sexual contact with another student without consent names a particular assault.
  13. present: Naming rape satisfies the specific threat requirement.
  14. present: The text classifies the event as sexual assault in the form of rape.
  15. present: Hazard is rape, stated as the reason for the timely notification.
  16. present: The report concerns non-consensual sexual contact, a concrete hostile act.
  17. present: Rape is the listed Clery crime, not a generic incident word used alone.
  18. present: Campus Safety received a report of rape, which names the hazard.
  19. present: Non-consensual sexual contact is a specific conduct description, not a placeholder emergency.
  20. present: The notice is about rape between two identified students, a named crime.
  21. present: Hazard coding is met by rape in the headline and narrative.
  22. present: The threat is rape by one Rollins student against another, which is specific.
  23. present: Title IX reported non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape, a defined offense.
  24. present: The body explains the assault as sexual contact without consent.
  25. present: A specific sexual crime, rape, is stated rather than a generic situation.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location in Ward Hall, a named building.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The rape is placed in Ward Hall, a named building.
  2. present: Location is Ward Hall, given in the first narrative sentence.
  3. present: Ward Hall answers where the reported rape occurred.
  4. present: A named residence hall, Ward Hall, is the location of the report.
  5. present: The text places the incident in Ward Hall rather than an unnamed area.
  6. present: Geography is a named campus building, Ward Hall.
  7. present: Readers are told the event occurred in Ward Hall.
  8. present: Location coding is met by Ward Hall.
  9. present: Place is given as Ward Hall rather than an unnamed area.
  10. present: The phrase in Ward Hall is an explicit location.
  11. present: Where the rape happened is Ward Hall.
  12. present: A named hall, Ward Hall, is the setting.
  13. present: The notice sites the rape in Ward Hall.
  14. present: Ward Hall is a concrete named place, which satisfies location.
  15. present: The first sentence locates the rape in Ward Hall.
  16. present: Named place: Ward Hall.
  17. present: The crime is tied to a specific residence hall, Ward Hall.
  18. present: Location is present because Ward Hall is a named building.
  19. present: The text says the rape occurred in Ward Hall.
  20. present: A hall name, Ward Hall, answers where.
  21. present: Ward Hall is the only geographic identifier and it is specific.
  22. present: The report is geographically anchored in Ward Hall.
  23. present: Where the conduct happened is Ward Hall, a named hall.
  24. present: Campus housing is identified as Ward Hall.
  25. present: The location element is met by naming Ward Hall.
• Guidanceabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no protective instruction: contacting Campus Safety for additional information is a tips request. A minority treats that phone line as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sentence tells recipients to avoid Ward Hall, lock doors, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: Contact Campus Safety if you have additional information is a request for tips, not guidance.
  3. absent: Care and resources are for the reporting party, which describes responder aid rather than public action.
  4. present: The close tells readers to contact Campus Safety at 407-646-2999, an action similar to calling police.
  5. absent: Being connected with campus offices describes help for the victim, not an instruction to the audience.
  6. absent: There is no shelter, evacuate, stay away, or remain indoors language.
  7. absent: The body reports a past rape case and never instructs the audience to protect themselves.
  8. absent: Timely Notification is a product label, not an instruction to lock doors or leave.
  9. absent: Nothing directs people to avoid the hall, monitor updates, or stay inside.
  10. absent: Recipients are not told to stay inside, leave, or secure their rooms.
  11. absent: Guidance is absent: the text has no instruction telling people what to do to stay safe.
  12. absent: Please contact Campus Safety is a tips line, which is not a protective action.
  13. absent: Both parties have been identified is status, not a directive to the public.
  14. absent: Providing care to the reporting party is responder work, not guidance to recipients.
  15. absent: The notice never says call 911, evacuate, or lock doors.
  16. absent: Asking for additional information is a request for tips, not protective guidance.
  17. absent: No protective action for the campus community is stated.
  18. absent: Follow instructions, seek shelter, and similar verbs do not appear.
  19. absent: Readers are not told to avoid Ward Hall or watch for anyone.
  20. absent: The phone number is offered only if you have additional information, a tips ask.
  21. absent: The email contact is for extra information, not a safety instruction.
  22. present: Please contact Campus Safety at the listed number tells people to call the department, which can count as guidance.
  23. absent: Identifying both parties and stating no ongoing threat is not an instruction to act.
  24. absent: Guidance fails because the only ask is to share additional information, not to take cover or leave.
  25. absent: Protective action for the public is missing, and only a tips contact is offered.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that November 4, 2024 and early morning hours of November 3, 2024 satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: November 4, 2024 appears as the header date.
  2. present: Early morning hours of November 3, 2024 is a date plus a time of day cue.
  3. present: On November 4, 2024 dates the report to Campus Safety.
  4. present: Recency is present through at this time plus the dated early morning window.
  5. present: Two calendar dates plus early morning hours satisfy the time element.
  6. present: The timely notification carries the date November 4, 2024.
  7. present: Early morning hours is a time of day attached to November 3, 2024.
  8. present: A specific morning on November 3, 2024 is given for the rape.
  9. present: Time is present via the printed November 4, 2024 dateline.
  10. present: At this time is a recency cue attached to the no ongoing threat sentence.
  11. present: November 3, 2024 supplies when the rape occurred.
  12. present: Three time cues appear: the header date, the report day, and early morning hours.
  13. present: A calendar date stamps both the timely notification and the underlying report.
  14. present: The first sentence dates the report On November 4, 2024.
  15. present: Time coding is met by November 3 and November 4, 2024 plus early morning.
  16. present: When is answered with November dates, early morning hours, and at this time.
  17. present: The rape is placed in the early morning hours of November 3, 2024.
  18. present: The header date November 4, 2024 satisfies when.
  19. present: Dated language includes November 4, 2024 as the day Campus Safety was notified.
  20. present: Recency and calendar time are both present in the notice.
  21. present: The notice is not timeless: it names November dates and early morning hours.
  22. present: November 3 and November 4, 2024 both function as time stamps.
  23. present: The phrase early morning hours of November 3, 2024 is a clear time window.
  24. present: Time is not missing: dates, early morning, and at this time are in the text.
  25. present: The November dates and early morning hours meet the when or recency test.
• Impactabsent4/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because rape names the crime without extra severity wording. A few treat contact without consent as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Rape names the offense without extra severity words such as dangerous or life threatening.
  2. absent: No sentence states injury, trauma, or other consequences the rape could cause.
  3. present: Without consent implies a violation of the other student, a stated kind of harm.
  4. absent: Impact is absent because naming rape does not by itself describe what it could do.
  5. absent: There is no could be deadly, may cause injury, or similar consequence language.
  6. absent: Non-consensual sexual contact describes the conduct, not the harm it could produce.
  7. absent: No reason to believe there is an ongoing threat actually denies present danger rather than stating impact.
  8. absent: The message does not warn of injury, danger, or further attacks.
  9. absent: Naming a crime does not by itself convey how serious the effects are.
  10. absent: Impact fails because only the crime name and a building appear, with no consequence clause.
  11. absent: There is no life threatening, may cause injury, or destructive wording.
  12. absent: Threat to campus safety appears only to say there is none, which is not a severity claim.
  13. absent: Care and resources for the reporting party do not equal a statement of what rape could do.
  14. absent: The notice never says the rape could injure anyone or endanger others.
  15. present: Rape is a crime of bodily violation, and without consent strongly implies harm to the student.
  16. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime's name.
  17. absent: Providing care does not equal stating the hazard's potential effects.
  18. absent: Both parties identified adds case status, not a harm or severity clause.
  19. absent: The text does not call the rape dangerous, damaging, or life threatening.
  20. present: Engaged in sexual contact without consent is a harm cue toward the other student.
  21. absent: No explicit statement of what the rape could do to people is given beyond the crime name.
  22. absent: Campus safety is mentioned only to report the absence of an ongoing threat.
  23. absent: The word threat appears, which some could read as severity, but it is used to deny risk.
  24. present: Rape and without consent together strongly imply bodily harm to the reporting party.
  25. absent: Impact coding fails: the hazard is named without a separate consequence or seriousness phrase.