Attempted forcible entries inside Jacobs Hall

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the branded NYU Clery Campus Notice and Department of Campus Safety identify the issuing campus authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify who is issuing the alert.
  2. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify the source.
  3. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify who is issuing the message.
  4. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" together with "Department of Campus Safety" and "NYU Campus Safety" identify the issuer.
  5. present: The message opens as NYU Clery Campus Notice and names the Department of Campus Safety as the reporting unit.
  6. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify who issued the message.
  7. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify the issuing body.
  8. present: The "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "Department of Campus Safety" identify the sender.
  9. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify the sender.
  10. present: NYU Clery Campus Notice and the Department of Campus Safety identify the university issuer.
  11. present: NYU Clery Campus Notice and the Department of Campus Safety identify NYU as the issuing authority.
  12. present: The header "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety name who is sending it.
  13. present: NYU Clery Campus Notice and the Department of Campus Safety identify who is sending the notice.
  14. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify the issuing campus authority.
  15. present: The branded "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and Department of Campus Safety identify the source.
  16. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety identify the source.
  17. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify NYU as the source.
  18. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety identify the campus issuing authority.
  19. present: The message opens as "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and cites the Department of Campus Safety as the classifying authority.
  20. present: The branded "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and Department of Campus Safety identify who issued the alert.
  21. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety name the sender.
  22. present: The header "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "Department of Campus Safety" plus "NYU Campus Safety" identify the source.
  23. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety identify who sent the message.
  24. present: The heading "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and the Department of Campus Safety identify who is sending the alert.
  25. present: "NYU Clery Campus Notice" and "The Department of Campus Safety" identify the issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because Campus Safety classifies attempted forcible entry as an attempted burglary, a specific crime.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "attempted burglary" and "attempted forcible entry".
  2. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as an "attempted burglary" after attempted forcible entry.
  3. present: It classifies the event as "attempted burglary" after "attempted forcible entry".
  4. present: It classifies "attempted forcible entry" as an "attempted burglary", a specific crime type.
  5. present: It classifies the event as attempted burglary based on attempted forcible entry.
  6. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "Attempted Burglary" from attempted forcible entry.
  7. present: The incident is classified as "attempted burglary" based on "attempted forcible entry".
  8. present: Campus Safety classifies "several instances of attempted forcible entry" as an "attempted burglary".
  9. present: It classifies the events as "attempted burglary" based on "attempted forcible entry".
  10. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as attempted burglary after attempted forcible entry.
  11. present: The text classifies the events as attempted burglary and attempted forcible entry.
  12. present: It classifies attempted forcible entry as "attempted burglary," a named crime rather than a vague situation.
  13. present: The incident is classified as attempted burglary based on attempted forcible entry.
  14. present: It classifies "attempted forcible entry" as an "attempted burglary".
  15. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "Attempted Burglary" and attempted forcible entry.
  16. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as attempted burglary after attempted forcible entry.
  17. present: It classifies "Attempted Burglary" from several attempted forcible entries.
  18. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "attempted burglary" after "attempted forcible entry".
  19. present: It classifies "several instances of attempted forcible entry" as an "attempted burglary".
  20. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "attempted burglary" after "attempted forcible entry".
  21. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "attempted burglary" after attempted forcible entry.
  22. present: Campus Safety classifies "attempted forcible entry" as an "attempted burglary", a specific hazard.
  23. present: Campus Safety classifies the event as an attempted burglary based on attempted forcible entry.
  24. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as attempted burglary after several attempted forcible entries.
  25. present: Campus Safety classifies the events as "Attempted Burglary" involving "attempted forcible entry".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the attempts are within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  2. present: The attempts are "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering."
  3. present: It names "Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  4. present: The attempts are located "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  5. present: The attempts are located within Jacobs Hall at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  6. present: The attempts were inside Jacobs Hall at NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  7. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  8. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  9. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  10. present: The attempts are located within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  11. present: The attempts are placed within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  12. present: The attempts are "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering."
  13. present: The attempts are located within Jacobs Hall at NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  14. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  15. present: The attempts are inside Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  16. present: The attempts were inside Jacobs Hall at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  17. present: The attempts are located within Jacobs Hall at NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  18. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  19. present: The attempts are located "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  20. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  21. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  22. present: The attempts were "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
  23. present: The attempts were inside Jacobs Hall at NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  24. present: The attempts are located within Jacobs Hall at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.
  25. present: The attempts are placed "within Jacobs Hall, NYU Tandon School of Engineering".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: readers are told to lock doors, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  2. present: It instructs locking doors and cabinets, reporting suspicious behavior without delay, and calling 911.
  3. present: It instructs locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911.
  4. present: Recipients are told to lock office doors, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior, and "call 911 immediately".
  5. present: It instructs recipients to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior without delay, and call 911.
  6. present: Tips instruct recipients to lock doors, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior without delay, and call 911 if a victim or witness.
  7. present: Instructions include locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911.
  8. present: Recipients are told to lock doors, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior without delay, and call 911 immediately.
  9. present: Tips tell recipients to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911 immediately.
  10. present: Tips tell recipients to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  11. present: It instructs locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, not engaging an assailant, and calling 911.
  12. present: Instructions include locking office doors, securing high-value items, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911 immediately.
  13. present: Readers are told to keep doors locked, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, not engage an assailant, and call 911 immediately.
  14. present: Recipients are told to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  15. present: Recipients are told to keep doors locked, lock up high-value items, report suspicious behavior, not engage, and call 911.
  16. present: Tips direct readers to lock doors, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  17. present: Recipients are told to keep doors locked, secure valuables, report suspicious behavior, and call 911 immediately if they are a victim or witness.
  18. present: It instructs locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, not engaging, and calling 911.
  19. present: It instructs readers to lock office, room, or suite doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  20. present: Instructions include locking office and suite doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911.
  21. present: Safety tips instruct locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911.
  22. present: It instructs locking doors, calling 911 immediately, and reporting suspicious behavior to Campus Safety.
  23. present: It tells recipients to lock office and room doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior, and call 911.
  24. present: Readers are told to lock doors, secure high-value items, report suspicious behavior without delay, and call 911 immediately.
  25. present: Tips instruct locking doors, securing valuables, reporting suspicious behavior, and calling 911.
• Timeabsent11/25

  Final assessment

  19 of 25 reads find Time absent because the attempts have no date, clock time, or recency cue; 6 treat call 911 immediately as timing rather than when the entries occurred.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The text uses "immediately" when telling people to call 911 and "without delay" for reporting.
  2. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word such as now or today is given for when the attempts occurred.
  3. absent: The attempted entries have no date or clock time, and recency cues such as now or today are absent.
  4. present: No incident clock appears, but the text tells people to call 911 "immediately" and report "without delay".
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase such as now or today is given for when the attempted entries occurred.
  6. present: No date or clock time is given for the attempts, but the text tells people to call 911 "immediately" and report "without delay".
  7. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today is given for when the attempts occurred.
  8. present: No incident date is given, but the text uses recency cues "immediately" and "without delay" for protective steps.
  9. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue is given for when the attempted entries occurred.
  10. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today is given for the attempts.
  11. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today is given for when the entries were attempted.
  12. present: No date or clock time is given for the entries, but the 911 line uses "immediately" as a timing cue.
  13. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today is given for the attempted entries.
  14. present: The text includes the recency cue "immediately" in the instruction to call 911.
  15. absent: No date, clock time, now, or other recency cue says when the attempted entries happened.
  16. absent: The attempted entries have no date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today.
  17. present: The safety instructions tell people to call 911 immediately, a recency cue, though the incident itself has no date or clock time.
  18. present: No incident date is given, but victims and witnesses are told to call 911 "immediately".
  19. absent: The attempts have no date, clock time, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing.
  20. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today is given for when the attempted entries occurred.
  21. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing is given for the attempts.
  22. present: No incident clock time or date appears, but recipients are told to call 911 "immediately".
  23. present: The text uses "without delay" and "call 911 immediately" as explicit urgency timing cues.
  24. present: No incident date or clock time is given, but victims and witnesses are told to call 911 immediately.
  25. absent: The attempts have no date, clock time, or recency cue; "immediately" only applies to a future 911 call.
• Impactabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: unsuccessful attempts and no missing items do not state danger, injury, or other severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It says attempts were unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no stated harm or severity.
  2. absent: It says the attempts were unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no statement of danger or injury.
  3. absent: It says attempts were unsuccessful and nothing is missing, without stating danger or potential harm.
  4. absent: Unsuccessful attempts and no missing items are noted, without saying the hazard is dangerous or could injure anyone.
  5. absent: It says the attempts were unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no statement of danger, injury, or other harm.
  6. absent: It notes unsuccessful attempts and no missing items, without saying what harm attempted burglary could cause or how serious it is.
  7. absent: Unsuccessful entry and no missing items are noted, but the text does not describe danger, injury, or other consequences.
  8. absent: It notes the attempts were unsuccessful and no items were missing, with no stated harm or severity.
  9. absent: It says attempts appear unsuccessful and nothing was missing, without stating danger, injury, or other severity.
  10. absent: Unsuccessful attempts and no missing items describe outcomes, not how serious the hazard could be for people.
  11. absent: It notes the attempts were unsuccessful and nothing is missing, without stating danger, injury, or severity.
  12. present: It warns that engaging an assailant "may put you in further danger," stating potential harm.
  13. absent: It notes the attempts appear unsuccessful and nothing is missing, with no statement of danger or harm.
  14. present: It says avoiding the assailant matters because contact "may put you in further danger".
  15. absent: It notes the attempts were unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no consequence or severity stated.
  16. absent: The attempts appear unsuccessful and no items were missing, with no stated consequence or severity.
  17. absent: It notes unsuccessful attempts and no missing items, without describing danger, injury, or other consequences.
  18. absent: Unsuccessful attempts and nothing missing do not convey injury risk, danger, or other severity.
  19. absent: Unsuccessful attempts and "no items were reported missing" do not state danger, injury risk, or other severity.
  20. absent: The text says the attempts were not successful and nothing was missing, without stating severity or potential harm.
  21. absent: It says the attempts failed and nothing was missing, with no severity or harm spelled out.
  22. absent: It says attempts were unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no statement of injury or other severity.
  23. present: It says not to engage an assailant because that "may put you in further danger."
  24. absent: It says the attempts appear unsuccessful and nothing was missing, with no statement of harm or how serious the threat is.
  25. absent: Unsuccessful entry and no missing items do not state consequences or how serious the hazard is.