Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
NECC

Lawrence campus Dimitry Building power outage with National Grid response

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
MApower outageemergency notificationhigh confidence

Northern Essex Community College issued an official product reporting a power outage at 45 Franklin St. (John R. Dimitry Building) on the Lawrence campus with facilities working with National Grid.

Alerts
1
Response
—
Killed
—
Injured
—
Institution
Northern Essex Community College
Community College · MA
All NECC cases →
~5,000 studentsNECC Alert
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTTwitter/X
Verified verbatim202 chars
🚨LAWRENCE CAMPUS POWER OUTAGE: The power is currently out at 45 Franklin St. (John R. Dimitry Building) NECC facilities crew is working with National Grid to solve this issue. https://t.co/DOEPym9cjA
Dual independent X syndication fetch 2026-08-10. SPN 523.
Snowflake 1933503399196033077 aligns to incident window.
Thread checked: single-post product.
First residual cases beyond 2023-03-05-northern-essex-community-college-cyberattack.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

🚨LAWRENCE CAMPUS POWER OUTAGE: The power is currently out at 45 Franklin St. (John R. Dimitry Building) NECC facilities crew is working with National Grid to solve this issue. https://t.co/DOEPym9cjA

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. Vote total supports verdict 1.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (present in the transmitted text)
    2. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (explicitly stated in the product)
    3. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (clearly identifiable in wording)
    4. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (reader can locate this element)
    5. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (supported by the alert language)
    6. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (carried in the official product)
    7. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (named in the message body)
    8. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (available to the recipient)
    9. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (encoded in the alert copy)
    10. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (visible in the official wording)
    11. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (stated for the campus audience)
    12. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (part of the transmitted product)
    13. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (readable in the alert text)
    14. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (found in the official message)
    15. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (included in the product language)
    16. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (shown in the transmitted copy)
    17. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (delivered in the campus product)
    18. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (asserted by the official text)
    19. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (spelled out for recipients)
    20. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (present for the reader)
    21. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (in the body of the alert)
    22. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (captured in the official product)
    23. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (appearing in the message text)
    24. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (communicated in the alert)
    25. present: NECC/Lawrence Campus branding identifies the institutional sender. (recorded in the transmitted wording)
  • Hazardpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: Power outage is the named hazard. Vote total supports verdict 1.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (present in the transmitted text)
    2. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (explicitly stated in the product)
    3. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (clearly identifiable in wording)
    4. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (reader can locate this element)
    5. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (supported by the alert language)
    6. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (carried in the official product)
    7. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (named in the message body)
    8. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (available to the recipient)
    9. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (encoded in the alert copy)
    10. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (visible in the official wording)
    11. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (stated for the campus audience)
    12. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (part of the transmitted product)
    13. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (readable in the alert text)
    14. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (found in the official message)
    15. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (included in the product language)
    16. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (shown in the transmitted copy)
    17. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (delivered in the campus product)
    18. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (asserted by the official text)
    19. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (spelled out for recipients)
    20. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (present for the reader)
    21. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (in the body of the alert)
    22. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (captured in the official product)
    23. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (appearing in the message text)
    24. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (communicated in the alert)
    25. present: Power outage is the named hazard. (recorded in the transmitted wording)
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. Vote total supports verdict 1.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (present in the transmitted text)
    2. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (explicitly stated in the product)
    3. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (clearly identifiable in wording)
    4. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (reader can locate this element)
    5. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (supported by the alert language)
    6. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (carried in the official product)
    7. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (named in the message body)
    8. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (available to the recipient)
    9. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (encoded in the alert copy)
    10. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (visible in the official wording)
    11. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (stated for the campus audience)
    12. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (part of the transmitted product)
    13. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (readable in the alert text)
    14. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (found in the official message)
    15. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (included in the product language)
    16. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (shown in the transmitted copy)
    17. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (delivered in the campus product)
    18. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (asserted by the official text)
    19. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (spelled out for recipients)
    20. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (present for the reader)
    21. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (in the body of the alert)
    22. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (captured in the official product)
    23. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (appearing in the message text)
    24. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (communicated in the alert)
    25. present: 45 Franklin St. John R. Dimitry Building is the named location. (recorded in the transmitted wording)
  • Guidanceabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. Vote total supports verdict 0.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not present in the transmitted text)
    2. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (absent from the product language)
    3. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not stated in the official wording)
    4. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (no such cue in the message)
    5. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (missing from the alert copy)
    6. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not provided to recipients)
    7. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not named in the product)
    8. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not encoded in the alert)
    9. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not available in the wording)
    10. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (omitted from the transmitted text)
    11. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not found in the official message)
    12. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not included in the product)
    13. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not shown in the alert language)
    14. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not delivered in this product)
    15. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not asserted by the text)
    16. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not spelled out for recipients)
    17. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not present for the reader)
    18. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not in the body of the alert)
    19. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not captured in the product)
    20. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not appearing in the message)
    21. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not communicated in the alert)
    22. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (not recorded in the wording)
    23. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (absent from this transmission)
    24. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (no language supports this element)
    25. absent: No explicit recipient action guidance beyond awareness. (element not supported by the text)
  • Timeabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: No clock time is given. Vote total supports verdict 0.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: No clock time is given. (not present in the transmitted text)
    2. absent: No clock time is given. (absent from the product language)
    3. absent: No clock time is given. (not stated in the official wording)
    4. absent: No clock time is given. (no such cue in the message)
    5. absent: No clock time is given. (missing from the alert copy)
    6. absent: No clock time is given. (not provided to recipients)
    7. absent: No clock time is given. (not named in the product)
    8. absent: No clock time is given. (not encoded in the alert)
    9. absent: No clock time is given. (not available in the wording)
    10. absent: No clock time is given. (omitted from the transmitted text)
    11. absent: No clock time is given. (not found in the official message)
    12. absent: No clock time is given. (not included in the product)
    13. absent: No clock time is given. (not shown in the alert language)
    14. absent: No clock time is given. (not delivered in this product)
    15. absent: No clock time is given. (not asserted by the text)
    16. absent: No clock time is given. (not spelled out for recipients)
    17. absent: No clock time is given. (not present for the reader)
    18. absent: No clock time is given. (not in the body of the alert)
    19. absent: No clock time is given. (not captured in the product)
    20. absent: No clock time is given. (not appearing in the message)
    21. absent: No clock time is given. (not communicated in the alert)
    22. absent: No clock time is given. (not recorded in the wording)
    23. absent: No clock time is given. (absent from this transmission)
    24. absent: No clock time is given. (no language supports this element)
    25. absent: No clock time is given. (element not supported by the text)
  • Impactabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Arbitrator synthesis: No injury language is present. Vote total supports verdict 0.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: No injury language is present. (not present in the transmitted text)
    2. absent: No injury language is present. (absent from the product language)
    3. absent: No injury language is present. (not stated in the official wording)
    4. absent: No injury language is present. (no such cue in the message)
    5. absent: No injury language is present. (missing from the alert copy)
    6. absent: No injury language is present. (not provided to recipients)
    7. absent: No injury language is present. (not named in the product)
    8. absent: No injury language is present. (not encoded in the alert)
    9. absent: No injury language is present. (not available in the wording)
    10. absent: No injury language is present. (omitted from the transmitted text)
    11. absent: No injury language is present. (not found in the official message)
    12. absent: No injury language is present. (not included in the product)
    13. absent: No injury language is present. (not shown in the alert language)
    14. absent: No injury language is present. (not delivered in this product)
    15. absent: No injury language is present. (not asserted by the text)
    16. absent: No injury language is present. (not spelled out for recipients)
    17. absent: No injury language is present. (not present for the reader)
    18. absent: No injury language is present. (not in the body of the alert)
    19. absent: No injury language is present. (not captured in the product)
    20. absent: No injury language is present. (not appearing in the message)
    21. absent: No injury language is present. (not communicated in the alert)
    22. absent: No injury language is present. (not recorded in the wording)
    23. absent: No injury language is present. (absent from this transmission)
    24. absent: No injury language is present. (no language supports this element)
    25. absent: No injury language is present. (element not supported by the text)

Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

Northern Essex Community College issues campus products via official @NorthernEssex.
Analysis

Key Findings

Official campus operational alert product.
Outcome
Power out at Dimitry Building; facilities and National Grid responding.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. Social
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Northern Essex Community College: Lawrence campus Dimitry Building power outage with National Grid response." Incident of June 13, 2025. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/northern-essex-community-college-lawrence-dimitry-power-outage-2025-06-13/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
community-collegemassachusettsnorthern-essexpower-outage
Added August 2026Updated August 2026Via ingestion