Thirteen vehicles broken into at Hilltop garage

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat the NAU Timely Warning header and NAU Police Department as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Opens as NAU Timely Warning / Crime Alert, a branded sender.
  2. present: The NAU Police Department is named as the receiving authority.
  3. present: Source is the NAU Crime Alert header plus NAU Police Department.
  4. present: A named campus police department issued the bulletin.
  5. present: NAU Timely Warning is a branded product name.
  6. present: The alert identifies NAUPD as the agency that received the report.
  7. present: Source present in the CA# 2026-01 NAU header.
  8. present: Readers can see NAU Police wrote this.
  9. present: The bulletin is labeled as an NAU Crime Alert.
  10. present: Issuing authority is the NAU Police Department.
  11. present: A university police signature is in the first narrative sentence.
  12. present: The product name includes NAU.
  13. present: Campus police are identified by name.
  14. present: Source is satisfied by the NAU timely-warning brand.
  15. present: The header names NAU as the alert owner.
  16. present: NAUPD is the named responding agency.
  17. present: The message is an official NAU police Crime Alert.
  18. present: Authority is explicit in NAU Police Department received a report.
  19. present: A branded NAU header supplies the source element.
  20. present: The CA number is an NAU police product identifier.
  21. present: Source present via the NAU Police Department attribution.
  22. present: The bulletin is not unsigned; it is an NAU Crime Alert.
  23. present: Issuing body is printed as NAU Police Department.
  24. present: The title block names NAU.
  25. present: NAU Timely Warning / Crime Alert is the sender tag.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks Auto Burglary and the vehicle break-ins as a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names Auto Burglary, a specific crime.
  2. present: Hazard is vehicle burglary at a parking garage.
  3. present: Thirteen vehicles with broken windows is a named property crime.
  4. present: The threat is auto burglary, not a generic incident.
  5. present: Broken windows and items taken are the hazard facts.
  6. present: Hazard present in the Burglary, Automobile title.
  7. present: A series of vehicle entries is the threat.
  8. present: The bulletin names an Auto Burglary report.
  9. present: Suspects entering a garage to steal is a specific hazard.
  10. present: Hazard is the overnight vehicle break-ins.
  11. present: Named offense is automobile burglary.
  12. present: The text describes entered or damaged vehicles.
  13. present: A property-crime hazard is explicit.
  14. present: Auto burglary is more specific than emergency.
  15. present: The crime type is printed as Burglary, Automobile.
  16. present: Readers are warned about vehicle break-ins.
  17. present: Hazard satisfied by the auto-burglary language.
  18. present: Stolen personal items from cars is the threat.
  19. present: The incident is a named burglary series.
  20. present: Vehicle burglary is the hazard content.
  21. present: The PDF titles Burglary, Automobile.
  22. present: A garage burglary is a concrete crime hazard.
  23. present: The alert describes a specific property offense.
  24. present: Broken windows and theft from cars name the hazard.
  25. present: Hazard is present in the auto burglary clause.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Hilltop Parking Garage is a named place in every pass.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hilltop Parking Garage is a named place.
  2. present: Location is the Hilltop Parking Garage.
  3. present: A specific garage name is given.
  4. present: The crime is placed at Hilltop Parking Garage.
  5. present: Location present: Hilltop Parking Garage.
  6. present: Readers are told where: Hilltop Parking Garage.
  7. present: A named campus garage is the location.
  8. present: The site is Hilltop Parking Garage.
  9. present: Place is explicit in the garage name.
  10. present: Location is not generic campus; it is a garage.
  11. present: The bulletin locates the burglaries at Hilltop.
  12. present: A parking garage name satisfies location.
  13. present: Hilltop Parking Garage is the geographic cue.
  14. present: The scene is identified as Hilltop Parking Garage.
  15. present: Location is a named parking structure.
  16. present: The hall-equivalent here is a named garage.
  17. present: Place is Hilltop Parking Garage.
  18. present: The first narrative sentence names the garage.
  19. present: A specific facility is named.
  20. present: Location present via Hilltop Parking Garage.
  21. present: The garage name is enough for location.
  22. present: Hilltop Parking Garage appears in the report sentence.
  23. present: A named structure is the location element.
  24. present: The building-like place is Hilltop Parking Garage.
  25. present: Location is satisfied by the garage name.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The SAFETY TIPS lock-and-report instructions are treated as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Safety tips tell people to lock doors and close windows.
  2. present: Guidance includes report all suspicious activity to NAUPD.
  3. present: Recipients are told to hide valuables and never leave keys.
  4. present: Park in a well-lit area is a protective action.
  5. present: Lock up or remove valuables is guidance.
  6. present: The SAFETY TIPS list is a set of instructions.
  7. present: Contact NAU Police with information is a call to action.
  8. present: Guidance present in the lock-and-report tips.
  9. present: An alarm-system tip is a protective suggestion.
  10. present: The bulletin tells vehicle owners what to do.
  11. present: Lock doors when unattended is explicit guidance.
  12. present: The audience is instructed to report suspicious activity immediately.
  13. present: Guidance is the prevention list after the narrative.
  14. present: Please contact the NAU Police Department is an instruction.
  15. present: Safety tips are actions for the community.
  16. present: Never leave keys in the ignition is guidance.
  17. present: The product is not description-only; it gives prevention steps.
  18. present: Guidance satisfied by the SAFETY TIPS section.
  19. present: Lock, hide, park lit, and report are the guidance set.
  20. present: Readers are directed to secure vehicles.
  21. present: A specific do-this list is printed.
  22. present: The alert tells people how to reduce the same crime.
  23. present: Protective action language is in the tips.
  24. present: Guidance exists as lock-windows and report-suspicious.
  25. present: The contact-police sentence is also guidance.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  January 14, 2026 and the 1:30 to 7:06 AM window are clear time elements.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives January 14, 2026, at 7:06 AM.
  2. present: A date and clock time are both present.
  3. present: Time is 1:30 to 7:06 AM on 1/14/2026.
  4. present: The report time 7:06 AM is a time element.
  5. present: A dated overnight window is printed.
  6. present: Time present via January 14, 2026 and the hour range.
  7. present: The bulletin states when the burglaries occurred.
  8. present: 1/14/2026 is a time cue.
  9. present: Clock hours 1:30 to 7:06 AM mark when.
  10. present: Date and clock together satisfy time.
  11. present: The incident is timed to 14 January 2026 before 7:06 AM.
  12. present: A precise overnight interval is named.
  13. present: Time is the 7:06 AM report plus the 1:30 start.
  14. present: The narrative opens with a dated clock.
  15. present: January 14, 2026 at 7:06 AM is time.
  16. present: The when is an early morning date-time.
  17. present: A dated hour range is the time element.
  18. present: Time satisfied by the AM window and the date.
  19. present: The report timestamp is in the first sentence.
  20. present: 1:30 to 7:06 AM on 1/14/2026 is explicit.
  21. present: The bulletin timestamps the garage entries.
  22. present: Date plus start and end minutes are present.
  23. present: this morning's burglaries is also a recency cue.
  24. present: Time is not missing; two clock bounds are given.
  25. present: The 7:06 AM clause is a clear time mark.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most passes find no stated injury or severity beyond the property-crime description.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury or assault language is used.
  2. absent: The text does not say anyone was harmed.
  3. absent: Impact is absent; it describes property crime only.
  4. absent: No deadly or dangerous wording appears.
  5. absent: Broken windows are the act, not a stated harm-to-people impact.
  6. absent: I do not infer injury the bulletin does not speak.
  7. absent: No one is described as hurt.
  8. absent: Impact fails because no personal-harm outcome is written.
  9. absent: Severity beyond the burglary name is not stated.
  10. absent: The bulletin is a crime description, not an impact statement.
  11. absent: Nothing says the community is in physical danger now.
  12. absent: Impact is not satisfied by naming burglary alone.
  13. absent: No injury count is given.
  14. absent: I code impact absent.
  15. absent: The text stops at property loss and tips.
  16. absent: No life-threatening language is present.
  17. absent: Stolen items are listed without a consequence clause.
  18. absent: The alert does not say the garage is unsafe to enter now.
  19. absent: No impact verb such as threaten appears.
  20. absent: Property loss without stated severity is not impact under the rubric.
  21. present: Thirteen damaged vehicles is a stated property impact.
  22. present: Broken windows and stolen items are consequences.
  23. present: I read the scale of 13 cars as impact.
  24. present: Personal items taken is a stated loss.
  25. present: The burglary result, damaged cars, is impact.