Gray Ford Focus stolen from the RE parking lot

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  University Police and NDSU Police are named as the investigating and publishing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "University Police", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "University Police" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "University Police" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "University Police".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "University Police" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "University Police", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "University Police" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "University Police".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "University Police" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "University Police".
  11. present: The body names it with "University Police", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "University Police".
  13. present: Because the alert says "University Police", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "University Police" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "University Police" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "University Police" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "University Police" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "University Police" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "University Police" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "University Police" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "University Police".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "University Police".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "University Police" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "University Police" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "University Police" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  motor vehicle theft is a specific named offense; a Ford Focus was stolen.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "motor vehicle theft", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "motor vehicle theft" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "motor vehicle theft" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "motor vehicle theft".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "motor vehicle theft" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "motor vehicle theft", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "motor vehicle theft" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "motor vehicle theft".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "motor vehicle theft" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "motor vehicle theft".
  11. present: The body names it with "motor vehicle theft", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "motor vehicle theft".
  13. present: Because the alert says "motor vehicle theft", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "motor vehicle theft" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "motor vehicle theft" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "motor vehicle theft" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "motor vehicle theft" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "motor vehicle theft" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "motor vehicle theft" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "motor vehicle theft" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "motor vehicle theft".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "motor vehicle theft".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "motor vehicle theft" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "motor vehicle theft" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "motor vehicle theft" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  the RE parking lot is a named place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "the RE parking lot", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "the RE parking lot" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "the RE parking lot" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "the RE parking lot".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "the RE parking lot" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "the RE parking lot", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "the RE parking lot" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "the RE parking lot".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "the RE parking lot" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "the RE parking lot".
  11. present: The body names it with "the RE parking lot", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "the RE parking lot".
  13. present: Because the alert says "the RE parking lot", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "the RE parking lot" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "the RE parking lot" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "the RE parking lot" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "the RE parking lot" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "the RE parking lot" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "the RE parking lot" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "the RE parking lot" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "the RE parking lot".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "the RE parking lot".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "the RE parking lot" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "the RE parking lot" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "the RE parking lot" is on the page, so present.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Recipients are told to lock vehicles, secure keys and valuables, and call 231-8998 with information.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "lock your vehicles and secure your keys", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "lock your vehicles and secure your keys", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  11. present: The body names it with "lock your vehicles and secure your keys", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  13. present: Because the alert says "lock your vehicles and secure your keys", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "lock your vehicles and secure your keys".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "lock your vehicles and secure your keys" is on the page, so present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  between 9:30 p.m. Thursday April 03 and 3:39 p.m. Friday April 04 is an explicit time window.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  11. present: The body names it with "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  13. present: Because the alert says "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "between 9:30 p.m. Thursday, April 03, and 3:39 p.m. Friday, April 04" is on the page, so present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The theft name is the hazard; there is no extra severity language such as dangerous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  18. absent: Without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is not on the page.