Major power outage on the Kennesaw campus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  KSU Alert is a branded sender. 25 of 25 coded source present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: KSU Alert is a branded university sender name.
  2. present: KSU Alert names the university as the branded sender.
  3. present: KSU Alert brands the message as coming from the university.
  4. present: KSU Alert is a branded university sender.
  5. present: KSU Alert brands Kennesaw State University as the sender.
  6. present: KSU Alert is a branded university sender.
  7. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus sender.
  8. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus alert sender.
  9. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus sender name.
  10. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender.
  11. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender name.
  12. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender label.
  13. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus sender signature.
  14. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus alert system.
  15. present: KSU Alert is a branded campus sender.
  16. present: KSU Alert brands the university as the sender.
  17. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender name.
  18. present: KSU Alert brands Kennesaw State as the sender.
  19. present: The text is labeled KSU Alert, a branded campus sender name.
  20. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender.
  21. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender.
  22. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender name.
  23. present: Opens with KSU Alert, a branded sender name.
  24. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender.
  25. present: KSU Alert is a branded sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  A major power outage names a specific hazard. 25 of 25 coded hazard present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A major power outage names a specific hazard.
  2. present: A major power outage names a specific hazard.
  3. present: A major power outage is a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: A major power outage is a specific named threat.
  5. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  6. present: A major power outage is a specific hazard, not a generic situation.
  7. present: A major power outage is a specific threat.
  8. present: Major power outage names a specific incident type.
  9. present: A major power outage is a specific incident type.
  10. present: A major power outage is a specific threat.
  11. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  12. present: A major power outage is a specific hazard.
  13. present: A major power outage names the specific hazard.
  14. present: A major power outage names a specific hazard.
  15. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  16. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  17. present: A major power outage is a specific threat.
  18. present: A major power outage is a specific hazard.
  19. present: It names a major power outage as the event.
  20. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  21. present: A major power outage is a specific named hazard.
  22. present: A major power outage is a specific incident type.
  23. present: Names a major power outage as the specific event.
  24. present: A major power outage is a specific hazard.
  25. present: A major power outage is a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Kennesaw campus is named. 25 of 25 coded location present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Kennesaw campus is given as the place.
  2. present: Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  3. present: The Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  4. present: Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  5. present: Kennesaw campus is a named place.
  6. present: Kennesaw campus is a named place.
  7. present: The Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  8. present: Kennesaw campus names where the outage is.
  9. present: The outage is located on the Kennesaw campus.
  10. present: The Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  11. present: Kennesaw Campus is named as the place.
  12. present: The Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  13. present: Kennesaw Campus and the Kennesaw campus identify where it happened.
  14. present: Kennesaw campus is a named place.
  15. present: Kennesaw Campus names the affected place.
  16. present: The outage is placed on the Kennesaw campus.
  17. present: Kennesaw campus names a place.
  18. present: Kennesaw Campus is named as the place.
  19. present: It identifies the Kennesaw campus as the place.
  20. present: Kennesaw Campus is a named place.
  21. present: Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  22. present: Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  23. present: Places the outage on the Kennesaw campus.
  24. present: Kennesaw campus is named as the place.
  25. present: Kennesaw campus names a place.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Assessing impacts is not a protective action. 0 of 25 coded guidance present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective action is given, only that more information will follow.
  2. absent: Assessing impacts and promising later updates is not a protective action.
  3. absent: Promising later updates is not a protective action for the recipient.
  4. absent: Assessing impacts and promising updates gives no protective action for the recipient.
  5. absent: Promising more information is not a protective action for recipients.
  6. absent: Assessing impacts and promising updates gives no protective action.
  7. absent: Promising later updates is not a protective action.
  8. absent: Assessing impacts and promising more information is not a protective action.
  9. absent: No protective action is given, only a note that more updates may follow.
  10. absent: Officials only say they are assessing impacts and will update later, with no protective action.
  11. absent: Promising later updates is not a protective action.
  12. absent: Saying impacts are being assessed and more news will follow is not a protective action.
  13. absent: Assessing impacts and promising more information are not protective actions for recipients.
  14. absent: The text only promises more information and gives no protective action.
  15. absent: Assessing impacts and promising updates is not a protective action.
  16. absent: The text only says impacts are being assessed and gives no action to take.
  17. absent: Assessing impacts and promising updates is not a protective action.
  18. absent: Staff only say they are assessing impacts and give no protective action.
  19. absent: It only says impacts are being assessed and more information will follow.
  20. absent: Promising later updates is not a protective action.
  21. absent: The text gives no protective action, only a later update.
  22. absent: Promising updates while impacts are assessed is not a protective action.
  23. absent: Gives no protective action, only that staff will assess and update.
  24. absent: The message only says impacts are being assessed and gives no protective action.
  25. absent: Promising updates while assessing impacts is not a protective action.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  No clock time, date, now, or immediately appears. 0 of 25 coded time present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today is given.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today is stated.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today is given.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or today is present.
  7. absent: No start or end time is given.
  8. absent: No clock time, duration, or expiry is given.
  9. absent: No start time, end time, or duration is provided.
  10. absent: No start, end, or duration is given.
  11. absent: No clock time or duration is provided.
  12. absent: No time of day or duration is stated.
  13. absent: has experienced supplies no clock time, date, now, or until window.
  14. absent: No clock time, duration, or urgency word such as now is given.
  15. absent: No time or duration is stated.
  16. absent: No start, end, or duration is given.
  17. absent: No start, end, or duration is given.
  18. absent: No outage start or restoration time is given.
  19. absent: No start, end, or other clock time is given.
  20. absent: No clock time or duration is given.
  21. absent: No onset, duration, or end time is stated.
  22. absent: No start, end, or duration is given.
  23. absent: Gives no clock time, duration, now, or until phrase.
  24. absent: No time bound is stated.
  25. absent: No start, end, or duration is given.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  No harm is described. 0 of 25 coded impact present.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Impacts are mentioned but no harm the outage could cause is stated.
  2. absent: Impacts are mentioned but no harm the outage could cause is stated.
  3. absent: Impacts being assessed does not describe harm the outage could cause.
  4. absent: Impacts are mentioned but no harm the outage could cause is described.
  5. absent: Impacts are unnamed and no harm is described.
  6. absent: Impacts are mentioned but no actual harm is described.
  7. absent: No injury, death, or other harm is described.
  8. absent: No injury, damage, or other harm to people is described.
  9. absent: Staff say impacts are being assessed, but no actual harm is described.
  10. absent: Impacts are unknown, so no harm is stated.
  11. absent: No injury, death, or other harm is specified.
  12. absent: It does not describe harm to people or property beyond naming the outage.
  13. absent: The text says impacts are being assessed but never states harm to people or property.
  14. absent: The message says impacts are still being assessed and states no harm.
  15. absent: Impacts are not described as harm.
  16. absent: Impacts are still unknown so no harm is reported.
  17. absent: No injury, death, or other harm is described.
  18. absent: No injury or other harm is mentioned.
  19. absent: Assessing impacts does not describe any actual harm.
  20. absent: Impacts are treated as unknown, with no harm named.
  21. absent: Assessing impacts does not describe any actual harm.
  22. absent: Impacts are said to be under review, with no harm described.
  23. absent: Does not describe harm, only that impacts are still being assessed.
  24. absent: Impacts are mentioned but no harm is specified.
  25. absent: No injury, death, or other harm is described.