Mountain View Campus robbery timely warning
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedDallas College Police published a Clery timely warning. Full text recovered from the official Clery notices page.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, Claude Opus 5.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
Timely Notification Dec. 6, 2021 - Mountain View Campus Service Number: 202100640 In compliance with the "Timely Warning" provisions of the federal Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act of 1998, Dallas College Police Department is giving notice of an alleged criminal action reported to have occurred on Dallas College property. Reported Offense: Robbery Suspect(s): First suspect described as a Black male, approximately 6 foot, between the ages of fifteen and twenty, and wearing a puffy black jacket with black shorts, black sandals and a lime green backpack. Second suspect described as a Black male, approximately 5 foot 7 inches, between the ages of fifteen and twenty, wearing a black shirt with tan pants and white sandals. Third suspect described as a Black male, approximately 5 foot 8 inches, between the ages of fifteen and twenty, with black dreadlocks wearing a black shirt with blue jeans and black and yellow sneakers. Fourth suspect described as a Black male, approximately 5 foot 8 inches, between the ages of fifteen and twenty, with a black Molina High School jaguars hoodie, blue jeans and white shoes. Alleged Complaint: On Friday, December 3, 2021, a student reported being robbed at approximately 3:45 p.m., while in the E Building, near E60. The victim indicated that four Black males surrounded the victim and threatened to knock him out, then the suspects stole the victim's money. All four suspects fled the scene through lower West side exterior doors. Safety Precautions for the Public: It is the duty of the institution to warn of possible "dangerous conditions" on or near its campus in a timely manner. Please forward this notice to your colleagues and post it on appropriate bulletin boards in your area. If you have any information that might be helpful in this investigation, contact the Dallas College Police Department by telephone at 972-860-4290 or in person.
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, unanimously: the notice says Dallas College Police Department is giving notice, naming the issuing agency.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It says "Dallas College Police Department is giving notice", naming the issuing agency.
- present: The text says 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', which identifies the issuing agency.
- present: It states that "Dallas College Police Department is giving notice", naming the issuing agency directly.
- present: It states that the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', identifying the issuing agency.
- present: It states 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice' under the Timely Warning heading, naming the issuing agency.
- present: It states that Dallas College Police Department is giving notice under the Timely Warning provisions, identifying the issuer.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice' of the alleged crime, identifying the issuing agency.
- present: It states that the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice' under the Clery timely warning provisions, identifying the sender.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It states that the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', which identifies the issuing authority.
- present: It states that the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency.
- present: It states that "Dallas College Police Department is giving notice", identifying the issuing police authority by name.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency explicitly.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', identifying the issuing agency.
- present: It states that 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It states that the Dallas College Police Department is giving notice under the Timely Warning provisions, naming the issuing agency.
- present: It states 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It says the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', clearly identifying the issuing authority.
- present: It states 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency directly.
- present: It says 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It states 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing police agency.
- present: It states that the 'Dallas College Police Department is giving notice', naming the issuing agency.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, unanimously: it lists Reported Offense: Robbery and describes four suspects robbing a student.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It lists the "Reported Offense: Robbery" and describes four suspects robbing a student, a specific threat.
- present: It names the offense directly as 'Reported Offense: Robbery', a specific crime threat.
- present: The reported offense is "Robbery", with four suspects surrounding a student and stealing his money, which is a specific threat.
- present: The reported offense is named as 'Robbery' in which four suspects stole the victim's money.
- present: The notice lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery', naming a specific crime in which a student's money was taken.
- present: It lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' in which four suspects surrounded and robbed a student.
- present: The 'Reported Offense: Robbery' line and narrative of four suspects stealing money name a specific crime.
- present: The reported offense is named as Robbery, with four suspects surrounding and robbing a student.
- present: It lists the 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing money, a specific crime.
- present: The reported offense is 'Robbery', with four suspects who threatened the victim and stole money.
- present: The reported offense is named as 'Robbery', with four suspects who surrounded and robbed a student.
- present: It lists the 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing a student's money.
- present: The reported offense is 'Robbery', with four suspects who surrounded and robbed a student, a specific crime.
- present: It lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing the victim's money.
- present: The reported offense is "Robbery", with four suspects who surrounded a student and stole his money, a specific crime.
- present: The notice lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing the victim's money, a specific crime.
- present: It lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing a student's money, a specific threat.
- present: The reported offense is 'Robbery', with four suspects who surrounded and robbed a student of money.
- present: The reported offense is a robbery in which four suspects threatened the victim and stole money, a specific crime.
- present: The notice lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing a student's money.
- present: It lists the 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing the victim's money.
- present: It lists 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing the victim's money.
- present: It lists the 'Reported Offense: Robbery', where four suspects stole a student's money.
- present: It identifies the 'Reported Offense: Robbery' and describes four suspects stealing the victim's money.
- present: It gives the reported offense as 'Robbery', with four suspects threatening the victim and stealing his money.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, unanimously: it places the robbery in the E Building, near E60, on the Mountain View Campus.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It places the robbery "in the E Building, near E60" on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It says the robbery occurred 'while in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It places the robbery on the "Mountain View Campus" in "the E Building, near E60", a precise location.
- present: It locates the crime 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It places the robbery 'while in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It places the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It says the robbery happened 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus.
- present: The robbery occurred in the E Building near E60 at the Mountain View Campus, a specific place.
- present: It places the robbery at the Mountain View Campus 'in the E Building, near E60', a specific location.
- present: It locates the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It places the robbery on the Mountain View Campus 'in the E Building, near E60', a specific location.
- present: It places the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus.
- present: The robbery occurred 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus, a specific place.
- present: The robbery occurred 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus, a specific location.
- present: It locates the robbery "in the E Building, near E60" at the Mountain View Campus of Dallas College.
- present: It places the robbery at the 'Mountain View Campus' in 'the E Building, near E60', a specific location.
- present: It places the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus, a specific on campus location.
- present: It locates the crime at the 'Mountain View Campus' in 'the E Building, near E60'.
- present: It locates the robbery at the Mountain View Campus in the E Building near E60, a specific place.
- present: The robbery occurred 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus, a specific location.
- present: It locates the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' at the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It locates the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It locates the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It says the robbery happened 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
- present: It locates the robbery 'in the E Building, near E60' on the Mountain View Campus.
Guidanceabsent0/25
Final assessment
Absent, unanimously: it only asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, with no protective action to take.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: It only asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, offering no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for recipients to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, which is not a protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for personal safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and share information with police, but gives no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: Although headed 'Safety Precautions for the Public', it only asks readers to forward the notice and share information, giving no protective action.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, which is not a protective action for recipients.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, neither of which is a protective action for recipients.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and share tips with police, but offers no protective action to take.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, which is not a protective action for recipients.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, which are not protective actions for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It only asks readers to forward the notice and share information with police, not to take any protective action.
- absent: It only asks people to forward the notice and contact police with information, which is not a protective action for recipients.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, but gives no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and share information with police, but offers no protective action for their own safety.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and to contact police with information, but gives no protective instruction to recipients.
- absent: It asks readers to forward the notice and contact police with information, which is not a protective action for recipients.
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
Present, unanimously: it gives Friday, December 3, 2021 at approximately 3:45 p.m., plus the notice date Dec. 6, 2021.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It gives "Friday, December 3, 2021" at "approximately 3:45 p.m." and the notice date Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery happened 'On Friday, December 3, 2021' at about 3:45 p.m.
- present: It gives "Dec. 6, 2021" and says the robbery happened "Friday, December 3, 2021" at "approximately 3:45 p.m."
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' and a Dec. 6 notice date.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery occurred on 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at approximately 3:45 p.m.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' plus the notice date Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It dates the robbery to 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at approximately 3:45 p.m., and the notice itself is dated Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' as the notice date and 'December 3, 2021' at approximately 3:45 p.m. for the robbery.
- present: It carries the date 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery occurred 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at about 3:45 p.m.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery occurred 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at about 3:45 p.m.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' as when the robbery occurred.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' plus the Dec. 6 notice date.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' and the notice date of Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery happened Friday, December 3, 2021 'at approximately 3:45 p.m.'.
- present: It gives dates and a time: issued "Dec. 6, 2021" for a robbery on December 3 at about 3:45 p.m.
- present: It is dated 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery occurred 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at approximately 3:45 p.m.
- present: It dates the robbery 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.', a clear time reference.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' and the notice date of Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It gives Friday, December 3, 2021 at approximately 3:45 p.m. as the incident time and Dec. 6, 2021 as the notice date.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' plus the Dec. 6 notice date.
- present: It dates the robbery to 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.', giving clear timing.
- present: It gives 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' plus the notice date of Dec. 6, 2021.
- present: It gives 'Dec. 6, 2021' and says the robbery occurred on December 3 'at approximately 3:45 p.m.'
- present: It gives the time as 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at 'approximately 3:45 p.m.' plus the notice date.
- present: It dates the notice 'Dec. 6, 2021' and the robbery 'Friday, December 3, 2021' at approximately 3:45 p.m.
Impactpresent19/25
Final assessment
Present by a clear majority: the suspects threatened to knock him out and the notice warns of possible dangerous conditions. A minority read both as crime narrative and legal boilerplate rather than stated harm.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: It says the suspects "threatened to knock him out" and warns of possible "dangerous conditions", conveying the potential for harm.
- present: It reports the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and cites the duty to warn of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
- absent: It describes the threat to "knock him out" as past events and cites generic "dangerous conditions" wording, but states no potential harm to recipients.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and warns of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and warns of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
- absent: The 'dangerous conditions' phrase is legal boilerplate, and the text reports no injury or stated consequence to the community.
- present: It reports the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and refers to 'dangerous conditions', conveying the potential for physical harm.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and references possible 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm to people.
- present: It speaks of warning about possible 'dangerous conditions' and says suspects 'threatened to knock him out', conveying risk of harm.
- absent: The mention of possible 'dangerous conditions' is generic duty language, and no consequence of the threat to recipients is stated.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and references 'dangerous conditions', conveying a threat of bodily harm.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and refers to warning of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
- absent: The 'dangerous conditions' phrase is generic legal boilerplate, and the threat to 'knock him out' is part of the crime narrative, not a stated consequence to readers.
- absent: Only generic duty language about 'dangerous conditions' appears, and no injury or specific consequence of this robbery is stated.
- present: It reports the suspects "threatened to knock him out" and refers to "dangerous conditions", conveying harm and severity.
- present: It notes suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and references warning of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and refers to 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential physical harm.
- present: It reports suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and cites the duty to warn of 'dangerous conditions', conveying harm and severity.
- present: It says suspects threatened to knock the victim out and refers to possible dangerous conditions, conveying potential harm.
- absent: The suspects 'threatened to knock him out', but no injury or stated severity to the community is conveyed beyond the theft.
- present: It reports the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and refers to possible 'dangerous conditions', conveying the threat of physical harm.
- present: It says suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and refers to 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm to people.
- present: It notes suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and frames the notice as a warning of possible 'dangerous conditions' on campus.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and cites the duty to warn of 'dangerous conditions', conveying harm.
- present: It says the suspects 'threatened to knock him out' and frames the notice as a warning of 'dangerous conditions', conveying potential harm.
Coded by Claude Opus 5.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "Dallas College: Mountain View Campus robbery timely warning." Incident of December 6, 2021. Added July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/dallas-college-mountain-view-robbery-2021-12-06/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.