Spoofed Public Safety phone-call warning

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the Community Safety Update header and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
  2. present: "Community Safety Update" brands the sender, and "Columbia University Public Safety" is the named authority.
  3. present: The heading and body name Columbia University Public Safety as the spoofed agency and the office to verify with.
  4. present: The heading Community Safety Update is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  5. present: The branded title "Community Safety Update" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the source.
  6. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
  7. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  8. present: "Community Safety Update" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  9. present: Community Safety Update is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  10. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  11. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  12. present: Community Safety Update is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named as the spoofed agency and verifier.
  13. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
  14. present: Opens with Community Safety Update and names Columbia University Public Safety as the spoofed and real authority.
  15. present: "Community Safety Update" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  16. present: "Community Safety Update" plus named Columbia University Public Safety identify the source.
  17. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded sender tag, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  18. present: The branded "Community Safety Update" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the source.
  19. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
  20. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
  21. present: "Community Safety Update" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  22. present: "Community Safety Update" brands the message, and Columbia University Public Safety is named as the impersonated and contact agency.
  23. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded signature, and Columbia University Public Safety is named.
  24. present: "Community Safety Update" is a branded sender tag, and Columbia Public Safety is named.
  25. present: The branded title "Community Safety Update" identifies the sender, and Columbia University Public Safety is named throughout.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the text names spoofed or fraudulent Public Safety phone calls and caller ID spoofing.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It identifies fraudulent, spoofed calls impersonating Public Safety as the threat.
  2. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls and scams as the threat.
  3. present: It names fraudulent spoofed phone calls and scams impersonating the Public Safety emergency number.
  4. present: It identifies fraudulent spoofed calls impersonating Public Safety as the specific threat.
  5. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls and scams as the threat.
  6. present: It names fraudulent spoofed calls appearing to come from Public Safety, a specific scam threat.
  7. present: The hazard is fraudulent spoofed calls impersonating Public Safety.
  8. present: It names fraudulent spoofed calls appearing to come from Public Safety as the threat.
  9. present: It identifies fraudulent, caller-ID spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the threat.
  10. present: It names spoofed and fraudulent phone calls as the specific scam threat.
  11. present: It identifies spoofed, fraudulent calls impersonating Public Safety as the specific threat.
  12. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls and scams as the specific threat.
  13. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls and scams as the threat.
  14. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the specific threat.
  15. present: It names fraudulent or spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the specific threat.
  16. present: It names fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls and scams as the threat.
  17. present: It specifies fraudulent spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the scam hazard.
  18. present: It names fraudulent or spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the specific scam threat.
  19. present: It names spoofed and fraudulent phone calls using caller ID spoofing as the threat.
  20. present: The alert names fraudulent spoofed calls impersonating Public Safety as the specific threat.
  21. present: It names fraudulent, caller ID spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the specific threat.
  22. present: It names fraudulent spoofed phone calls and scams as the specific threat.
  23. present: It identifies fraudulent spoofed calls impersonating Public Safety as the threat.
  24. present: It names fraudulent or spoofed Public Safety phone calls as the specific threat.
  25. present: It names spoofed, fraudulent Public Safety calls and scams as the specific threat.
• Locationabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location absent: no building, street, or campus place is given for where the calls occurred. A phone number is not a location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the scam is occurring.
  2. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given; a phone number is not a location.
  3. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the scam calls are occurring.
  4. absent: No building, street, campus, or area is given as where the calls occurred.
  5. absent: No building, street, campus, or area is given as where the calls or hazard occurred.
  6. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the spoofed calls occurred.
  7. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the scam is occurring.
  8. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the scam calls occur.
  9. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls or scam occur.
  10. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  11. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the scam calls are occurring.
  12. absent: No building, street, campus, or area is given for where the spoofed calls occurred.
  13. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given as where the spoofed calls occur.
  14. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  15. absent: No building, street, campus, or area is given as where the calls are occurring.
  16. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  17. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  18. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  19. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls or scam occur.
  20. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the spoofed calls are occurring.
  21. absent: A spoofed Public Safety number is not a building, street, campus, or other place where the calls occurred.
  22. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls or hazard occur.
  23. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  24. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the calls occur.
  25. absent: No building, street, campus, or other place is given for where the spoofed calls occur.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: readers are told not to trust caller ID, not to share information or send money, and to hang up and verify with Public Safety.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, hang up and verify, withhold personal data, and not send money.
  2. present: It instructs hanging up, verifying independently, not sharing personal information, and not sending money.
  3. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, not to share information or send money, and to hang up and verify with Public Safety.
  4. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, not to share information, to hang up and verify, and not to send money.
  5. present: It tells readers not to share information, to hang up and verify, and not to send money.
  6. present: Readers are told not to trust caller ID, hang up and verify, withhold personal information, and not send money.
  7. present: It tells readers to hang up, verify the call, withhold personal data, and not send money.
  8. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, hang up and verify independently, and not send money or personal data.
  9. present: It instructs hanging up, verifying independently, and not sharing information or sending money.
  10. present: It tells readers to hang up, verify independently, withhold personal information, and not send money.
  11. present: It instructs hanging up, verifying independently, not sharing personal information, and not sending money.
  12. present: Readers are told not to trust caller ID, not to share personal information, to hang up and verify, and not to send money.
  13. present: It instructs hanging up, verifying independently, not sharing personal data, and not sending money.
  14. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, not to share information or send money, and to hang up and verify.
  15. present: Instructions include hang up and verify independently, do not share personal information, and do not send money.
  16. present: It tells recipients to hang up, verify independently, withhold information, and not send money.
  17. present: It instructs hanging up, verifying the call, not sharing information, and not sending money.
  18. present: It instructs readers to hang up, verify independently, withhold personal information, and not send money.
  19. present: It instructs hanging up to verify, not sharing personal information, and not sending money or payments.
  20. present: Readers are told to hang up, verify independently, withhold personal information, and not send money.
  21. present: It tells readers to hang up and verify, withhold personal data, and not send money or payments.
  22. present: Readers are told not to trust caller ID, not to share information, to hang up and verify, and not to send money.
  23. present: It tells readers to hang up, verify independently, withhold personal information, and not send money.
  24. present: It tells readers to hang up, verify independently, withhold personal data, and not send money.
  25. present: It tells readers not to trust caller ID, not to share personal information or send money, and to hang up and verify independently.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: no clock time, date, or recency cue such as today, recently, or now appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today.
  2. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, or recency such as now, today, or recently.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today is given.
  4. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word appears for the reports.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or today is given.
  6. absent: Reports are mentioned with no date, clock time, or recency term such as now, today, or recently.
  7. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, or recency marker such as today or recently.
  8. absent: No date, clock time, or recency word such as today or now appears.
  9. absent: Reports are mentioned with no date, clock time, or recency word such as now or today.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.
  11. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, or recency marker such as today or now.
  12. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as now, today, or recently appears.
  13. absent: Several reports are mentioned with no date, clock time, or recency cue such as today or recently.
  14. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue such as today or recently appears.
  15. absent: Reports are mentioned with no date, clock time, or recency cue.
  16. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, now, or other timing phrase.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is present.
  18. absent: No date, clock time, now, today, or other recency cue appears.
  19. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, now, today, or other recency marker.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, today, or recently is given for the calls.
  21. absent: "Several reports" of spoofed calls includes no date, clock time, now, or other recency cue.
  22. absent: "Several reports" has no date, clock time, or recency such as recently, today, or now.
  23. absent: No date, clock time, or recency cue appears for when the calls occurred.
  24. absent: Reports of the calls have no date, clock time, or recency cue such as now or today.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or immediately appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: scam tactics and threaten consequences describe pressure methods, not harm the calls could do without injury, danger, or other severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Scam tactics and "protect yourself" language do not state injury, financial loss, or other concrete harm.
  2. absent: Scam tactics and "threaten consequences" describe pressure methods, not harm the calls have done or could do.
  3. absent: Scammers may threaten consequences describes a tactic, not harm the calls could cause such as injury or loss.
  4. absent: Scam tactics such as urgency and threatened consequences are not a stated harm or severity of the hazard.
  5. absent: Scam tactics are described, but no concrete harm such as financial loss or identity theft is stated.
  6. absent: The scam is named and tactics described, but there is no statement of injury, danger, or other harm severity.
  7. absent: Scam tactics are described, but no consequence such as financial loss is stated.
  8. absent: Scammers threatening consequences is a tactic, not a stated injury, loss, or severity of the scam.
  9. absent: Scam tactics are described, but no injury, financial loss, or other consequence is actually stated.
  10. absent: Scams are named without stating consequences such as financial loss, identity theft, or danger.
  11. absent: The text does not state consequences such as financial loss or identity theft, only how to avoid the scam.
  12. absent: Scam tactics such as threatening requests are described, but no injury, financial loss, or other consequence is stated.
  13. absent: Advice to protect yourself from scams does not state a concrete harm such as injury, danger, or loss.
  14. absent: Scam tactics and protect yourself language do not state consequences such as financial loss or identity theft.
  15. absent: Scam pressure tactics are described, but no injury, danger, or other harm consequence is stated.
  16. absent: Scammers who "threaten consequences" describes a tactic, not stated harm from the calls.
  17. absent: Scammers "threatening consequences" is a tactic, not a statement of harm from the calls.
  18. absent: Scammers threatening consequences describes a tactic, not stated harm such as financial loss or danger.
  19. absent: Scam tactics such as urgency are described without stating injury, financial loss, or other harm as impact.
  20. absent: Scam tactics and "protect yourself" language do not state injury, danger, or other harm from the spoofing.
  21. absent: Scammers who "threaten consequences" is a tactic, not a stated harm such as financial loss or danger.
  22. absent: Spoofed calls are named, but the text does not state harm such as financial loss, injury, or danger.
  23. absent: Scam tactics are described without stating consequences such as financial loss or identity theft.
  24. absent: Scam tactics and "threatening requests" are not a stated consequence such as financial loss or injury.
  25. absent: Scammers "threaten consequences" describes a tactic, not stated harm such as injury, danger, or financial loss.