Burglaries at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the Clery Crime Alert header and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  2. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  3. present: The text names Columbia University Public Safety and the Department of Public Safety as the informing and contact authority.
  4. present: The branded heading Clery Crime Alert and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  5. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  6. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  7. present: The branded heading "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuer.
  8. present: The branded heading "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  9. present: The branded signature Clery Crime Alert and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  10. present: Branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  11. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  12. present: The branded header Clery Crime Alert and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  13. present: Branded "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" name the issuing authority.
  14. present: Opens with the branded signature Clery Crime Alert and names Columbia University Public Safety as the authority.
  15. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  16. present: Branded "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" name the issuing authority.
  17. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and Columbia University Public Safety identify the issuing authority.
  18. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  19. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  20. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  21. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  22. present: The branded heading "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  23. present: The branded header "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
  24. present: Branded "Clery Crime Alert" plus "Columbia University Public Safety" name the issuing authority.
  25. present: The branded signature "Clery Crime Alert" and "Columbia University Public Safety" identify the issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the text names three burglaries committed by the same person.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The title and body name "burglaries" as the specific threat.
  2. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific crime.
  3. present: The heading and body name burglaries as the specific crime, including entry by piggybacking behind residents.
  4. present: The heading and body name burglaries as the specific crime, not a generic incident.
  5. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific threat.
  6. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific threat.
  7. present: The alert names "burglaries" as the specific crime threat.
  8. present: The heading and body name "Burglaries" as the specific crime.
  9. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific threat, including entries by piggybacking.
  10. present: The text names "burglaries" as the specific crime, including piggyback entry.
  11. present: The alert names "burglaries" as the specific crime, including entry by piggybacking behind residents.
  12. present: The subject and body name burglaries as the specific crime threat.
  13. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific crime.
  14. present: The heading and body name burglaries as the specific threat, not a generic incident.
  15. present: The text names "burglaries" as the specific crime, not a generic incident.
  16. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific crime, not a generic incident.
  17. present: The alert names burglaries as the specific threat, including entry by piggybacking.
  18. present: The text names "burglaries" as the specific crime, including piggybacking entry into buildings.
  19. present: The text names "burglaries" as the specific threat, including three events possibly by the same person.
  20. present: The alert names "burglaries" as the specific crime, not a generic incident.
  21. present: The title and body name "Burglaries" as the specific crime, including piggyback entry into residences.
  22. present: The alert names "Burglaries" as the specific crime, including piggyback entry into buildings.
  23. present: The subject and body name "burglaries" as the specific crime threat.
  24. present: The title and body name "burglaries" as the specific threat.
  25. present: The heading and body name "burglaries" as the specific threat, not a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives addresses "549 Riverside Drive" and "195 Claremont Avenue".
  2. present: It names 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue as the crime sites.
  3. present: It locates the burglaries at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  4. present: It gives street addresses 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  5. present: The crimes are placed at "549 Riverside Drive" and "195 Claremont Avenue".
  6. present: It gives addresses 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  7. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  8. present: It places the burglaries at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  9. present: It gives street addresses at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  10. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  11. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  12. present: It gives the addresses 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  13. present: It gives addresses at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  14. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  15. present: It places the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  16. present: The burglaries are placed at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  17. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  18. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  19. present: It gives street addresses: 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  20. present: It places the burglaries at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  21. present: It gives street addresses: 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  22. present: It gives street addresses at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  23. present: It locates the crimes at 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  24. present: It gives addresses: 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
  25. present: It gives addresses: 549 Riverside Drive and 195 Claremont Avenue.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: tips tell recipients not to buzz unknown people in, not to allow piggybacking, and to retrieve packages promptly.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and to call Public Safety from a safe location.
  2. present: Harm Reduction Strategies tell readers not to allow piggybacking and to make doors lock behind them.
  3. present: Harm reduction instructs readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and to call Public Safety if needed.
  4. present: Harm Reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  5. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  6. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and to call Public Safety from a safe place.
  7. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback and to make sure doors lock.
  8. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback, to make doors lock, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  9. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and related protective steps.
  10. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to call Public Safety from a safe place.
  11. present: Harm reduction tells recipients not to allow piggybacking and to make sure doors lock behind them.
  12. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors behind them, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  13. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to call Public Safety once safe.
  14. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to call Public Safety if unsafe, and to make doors lock behind them.
  15. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to call Public Safety from a safe place.
  16. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to allow piggybacking and to make doors lock behind them.
  17. present: Harm reduction instructs not to let others piggyback, to lock doors, and to call Public Safety if needed.
  18. present: Harm reduction instructs readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to call Public Safety if unsafe.
  19. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback, to lock doors, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  20. present: Harm Reduction Strategies tell readers not to let others piggyback and to make doors lock behind them.
  21. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback, to lock doors, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  22. present: Harm Reduction Strategies tell readers not to allow piggybacking, to lock doors, and to retrieve packages promptly.
  23. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback and to make sure doors lock behind them.
  24. present: Harm reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback and to make sure doors lock behind them.
  25. present: Harm Reduction tells readers not to let others piggyback, to make doors lock, and to handle packages carefully.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time present via Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m. and Saturday, September 27 clock times.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It dates the crimes, including Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m. and Saturday, September 27 times.
  2. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  3. present: It timestamps incidents on Monday, September 22 around 5:00 p.m. and Saturday, September 27 around 4:59 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
  4. present: It reports dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  5. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  6. present: It timestamps the burglaries on September 22 around 5:00 p.m. and on September 27 around 4:59 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
  7. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  8. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  9. present: It reports dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  10. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  11. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  12. present: It timestamps events on September 22 around 5:00 p.m. and September 27 around 4:59 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
  13. present: Events are timed Monday, September 22 around 5:00 p.m. and Saturday, September 27 around 4:59 and 5:00 p.m.
  14. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  15. present: It gives dates (September 22 and 27) and clock times around 5:00 p.m. and 4:59 p.m.
  16. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  17. present: It gives dates and clock times, including September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  18. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  19. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  20. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  21. present: It timestamps the crimes, including Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m. and September 27 times.
  22. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  23. present: It timestamps events, including Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
  24. present: It timestamps events (Monday, September 22 around 5:00 p.m.; Saturday, September 27 around 4:59 and 5:00 p.m.).
  25. present: It gives dates and clock times such as Monday, September 22 at around 5:00 p.m.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: naming burglaries states the completed crimes without injury, danger, or other severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Naming burglary and describing how the suspect entered does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  2. absent: Naming burglaries states the crime only, with no consequence or severity wording such as injury or dangerous.
  3. absent: It does not state a consequence or severity such as danger or injury, only that burglaries occurred.
  4. absent: Naming burglary and Clery boilerplate do not state injury, danger, or other consequences of the crime.
  5. absent: Burglary is named, but no consequence or severity such as injury or danger is stated.
  6. absent: Burglary is named, but there is no consequence or severity language such as injury or danger.
  7. absent: Burglary is named, but no consequence or severity such as injury or danger is stated.
  8. absent: Naming burglary and describing stolen-entry tactics does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  9. absent: Naming burglaries and a generic Clery disclaimer about a threat to the community does not state injury or danger.
  10. absent: Burglary is named but no consequence or severity such as injury or danger is stated.
  11. absent: Naming burglary is not a consequence statement, and the text does not describe injury, danger, or other harm.
  12. absent: The text names the burglaries and entry method but does not state injury, danger, or other consequences of the hazard.
  13. absent: No injury, danger, or other consequence is stated; naming burglary and how the suspect entered is not impact.
  14. absent: Naming burglaries is not impact, and no injury, danger, or other consequence of the crime is stated.
  15. absent: Naming burglary and describing piggyback entry does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  16. absent: Naming burglary is not a consequence or severity statement such as injury or danger.
  17. absent: Naming burglary and the Clery legal disclaimer do not state consequences or severity of this crime.
  18. absent: Naming burglary and describing entry methods does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  19. absent: Naming burglary and describing piggyback entry does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  20. absent: The text names the burglaries and Clery boilerplate but does not state injury, danger, or other harm.
  21. absent: Naming burglary and Clery "serious or continuous threat" boilerplate does not state injury, danger, or other harm.
  22. absent: Burglary is named, but the text does not state consequences or severity such as injury or danger.
  23. absent: Burglary is named, but no consequence or severity such as injury or danger is stated.
  24. absent: Naming burglary is not a consequence; there is no injury, danger, or severity statement about what the crime could do.
  25. absent: Burglary is named, but the text does not state consequences or severity such as injury or danger.