Spat on outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree Columbia College Chicago names itself and named agencies appear where present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Columbia College Chicago identifies itself and the Chicago Police Department is named as investigator.
  2. present: The greeting identifies Columbia College Chicago, and the Chicago Police Department is named as the investigating agency.
  3. present: The college identifies itself up front, and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as named agencies.
  4. present: The college identifies itself in the salutation, and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  5. present: Columbia College Chicago identifies the community while Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as named agencies.
  6. present: Columbia College Chicago addresses its community, and the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  7. present: The greeting names Columbia College Chicago and the body names the Chicago Police Department.
  8. present: The greeting names Columbia College Chicago, and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  9. present: Columbia College Chicago opens the note and the Chicago Police Department is named as the investigating agency.
  10. present: The college identifies its audience while Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as named agencies.
  11. present: The audience line names Columbia College Chicago, and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security appear as agencies.
  12. present: The college names itself as sender and the Chicago Police Department as the investigating agency.
  13. present: Columbia College Chicago is named up front, with Chicago Police Department and Campus Security listed as agencies.
  14. present: Columbia College Chicago is named up front and the Chicago Police Department is listed as the investigating body.
  15. present: Columbia College Chicago is named in the greeting, and both the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as agencies.
  16. present: The college identifies itself in the greeting and the Chicago Police Department is named as the investigating agency.
  17. present: Columbia College Chicago is identified in the greeting and the Chicago Police Department is named as investigator.
  18. present: Columbia College Chicago is named in the salutation, and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are listed as agencies.
  19. present: The college names itself and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  20. present: Columbia College Chicago is identified in the greeting, and the Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are named agencies.
  21. present: Columbia College Chicago is named in the heading and the Chicago Police Department is cited as the investigating agency.
  22. present: Columbia College Chicago is named in the opening line and the Chicago Police Department is listed as the investigating agency.
  23. present: Columbia College Chicago is named in the opening, and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security appear as agencies.
  24. present: The greeting identifies Columbia College Chicago, and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are named agencies.
  25. present: Columbia College Chicago speaks to its community while naming the Chicago Police Department as the investigating agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The offender spat on the victim, a specific assault-style crime.
  2. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive act, not a generic incident.
  3. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a concrete physical assault, not a generic incident.
  4. present: Spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive offense, not a vague incident.
  5. present: Spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive battery, not a generic incident.
  6. present: Spitting on the victim specifies a battery rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: The crime is identified as an offender spitting on the victim, a specific assaultive act.
  8. present: An offender spitting on the victim specifies an assaultive crime rather than a generic incident.
  9. present: An offender spitting on the victim describes a specific battery style assault.
  10. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a concrete assault or battery offense.
  11. present: Spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive offense, not a generic occurrence.
  12. present: The crime is specified as an offender spitting on the victim, a concrete assaultive act.
  13. present: An offender spitting on the victim specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  14. present: The offender spat on the victim, which is a specific assaultive crime.
  15. present: Spitting on the victim is a concrete battery-type assault rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: Spitting on the victim names a specific assaultive crime rather than a generic incident.
  17. present: Spitting on the victim describes a concrete assault-type offense.
  18. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a specific battery, not a vague incident.
  19. present: The crime is described as an offender spitting on the victim, a concrete assaultive act.
  20. present: Spitting on the victim is a specific battery-style assault, not a generic incident.
  21. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive act, not a vague incident.
  22. present: Spitting on the victim describes a concrete assaultive act rather than a vague incident.
  23. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a specific battery, not a generic incident.
  24. present: Spitting on the victim is a specific assaultive act rather than a vague crime label.
  25. present: An offender spitting on the victim is a specific assault.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The scene is the sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street.
  2. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street supplies a named place and a street address.
  3. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named gym and street address.
  4. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business tied to a street address.
  5. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named place and street address.
  6. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business and a street address.
  7. present: The scene is the sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street.
  8. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business plus a street address.
  9. present: The scene is the sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street.
  10. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business and street address.
  11. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street gives a named business and a numbered street.
  12. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street gives both a named business and a street address.
  13. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named place plus a street address.
  14. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is both a named business and a street location.
  15. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street supplies a named business and a street address.
  16. present: The scene is the sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street.
  17. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named place with a street address.
  18. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named place with a street address.
  19. present: The scene is the sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street.
  20. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named place with a street address.
  21. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business plus a street address.
  22. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street locates the sidewalk where it happened.
  23. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named gym and street address.
  24. present: Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street supplies both a named business and a street address.
  25. present: The sidewalk outside Planet Fitness near 521 South State Street is a named business and street address.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is absent.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The only follow-up is a request to call Campus Security or detectives with tips.
  2. absent: The close only asks anyone with extra facts to call Campus Security and detectives, which is a tips request.
  3. absent: Asking anyone with information to phone Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  4. absent: The only ask is that witnesses call Campus Security or detectives, which is a tips request rather than self-protection.
  5. absent: The close only asks people with extra facts to call Campus Security or detectives, which is a tips request.
  6. absent: Phoning Campus Security and detectives with extra facts is a tips request, not protective action.
  7. absent: Asking the public to phone Campus Security or detectives with tips is not a protective action.
  8. absent: Witnesses are only asked to phone Campus Security and detectives, which is a tips request rather than guidance.
  9. absent: Readers are only asked to call Campus Security and detectives with extra information, which is a tips request.
  10. absent: Phone numbers for Campus Security and detectives only solicit tips, which is not protective action.
  11. absent: Asking people with information to phone Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  12. absent: Callers are asked only to share tips with Campus Security or detectives, which is not protective advice.
  13. absent: Contact numbers for extra information are a witness-tips ask, not a stay-safe instruction.
  14. absent: Witnesses are asked only to phone Campus Security or detectives, and a tips request is not guidance.
  15. absent: The footer only solicits tips for Campus Security and detectives, which is not a protective instruction.
  16. absent: The close only asks people to phone Campus Security or detectives with extra facts, a tips request.
  17. absent: Asking people with information to call Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  18. absent: Asking callers with extra facts to phone Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  19. absent: Asking people to phone in tips is not a protective action.
  20. absent: The close only asks anyone with information to call Campus Security or detectives, which is a tips request.
  21. absent: Asking anyone with extra facts to call Campus Security or detectives is a tips request rather than protective action.
  22. absent: The only ask is that people with extra facts phone Campus Security or CPD detectives, which is not protective action.
  23. absent: Asking anyone with extra facts to call Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  24. absent: The closing ask to phone Campus Security or detectives with extra facts is a tips request, not a protective step.
  25. absent: Asking anyone with information to call Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not a protective step.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is placed on January 27, 2025 at about 1:00 p.m.
  2. present: The incident is dated January 27, 2025 and clocked at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  3. present: The spit attack is timed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  4. present: The incident is given as January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  5. present: The event is dated January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  6. present: The event is timed to January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  7. present: The incident is fixed to January 27, 2025, at about 1:00 p.m.
  8. present: The encounter is timestamped January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  9. present: The incident is placed on January 27, 2025, at about 1:00 p.m.
  10. present: The incident is timestamped January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  11. present: The spitting is clocked on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  12. present: The incident is clocked to January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  13. present: January 27, 2025 at about 1:00 p.m. gives both a date and a clock hour.
  14. present: The spitting is timed to January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  15. present: The spitting is placed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  16. present: The encounter is placed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  17. present: The incident is dated January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  18. present: The spitting is placed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  19. present: The incident is placed on January 27, 2025 at about 1:00 p.m.
  20. present: The incident is placed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  21. present: The encounter is placed on January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  22. present: January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m. gives both a calendar date and a clock time.
  23. present: The episode is placed on January 27, 2025, at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  24. present: The encounter is fixed to January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
  25. present: The crime is timed to January 27, 2025 at approximately 1:00 p.m.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Being spat on is a realized physical affront that counts as impact.
  2. present: Being spat on records a realized physical violation of the victim.
  3. present: The victim actually being spat on records a completed bodily offense and its harm.
  4. present: Being spat on is a realized physical offense against the victim, which conveys impact.
  5. present: Being spat on states a bodily insult inflicted on the victim.
  6. present: The victim being spat on states a realized physical affront and its severity.
  7. present: Being spat on is a reported personal harm to the victim.
  8. present: The victim being spat on records a physical consequence, not merely a crime label.
  9. present: Being spat on is a bodily violation that records harm from the encounter.
  10. present: Being spat on is a completed physical violation that states impact on the victim.
  11. present: Being spat on is a completed physical violation that conveys realized severity.
  12. present: Being spat on is a bodily violation that signals the seriousness of what occurred.
  13. present: Spitting on the victim is presented as a bodily insult and a measure of severity.
  14. present: Spitting on the victim records a realized bodily offense and its severity.
  15. present: Being spat on records a bodily offense and its severity, not just the label of a crime.
  16. present: Being spat on is a realized bodily violation that conveys impact.
  17. present: Being spat on is a realized physical affront that conveys severity.
  18. present: Being spat on records a bodily violation as the harm from the encounter.
  19. present: Being spat on is a completed physical offense against the victim.
  20. present: Being spat on reports a completed bodily violation as harm done to the victim.
  21. present: Being spat on is a completed physical violation that records harm to the person targeted.
  22. present: Spitting on the victim reports a completed bodily offense and its severity for the person targeted.
  23. present: Being spat on is a completed bodily violation that conveys harm.
  24. present: Being spat on states a physical violation of the victim as a realized harm.
  25. present: Spitting on the victim is a completed physical act that records harm.