Fondling on the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the college names itself and police/Campus Security are named agencies.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named as authorities.
  2. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are identified as agencies.
  3. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  4. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are identified as agencies.
  5. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are cited.
  6. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  7. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  8. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself as sender and Chicago Police Department plus Campus Security are named agencies.
  9. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  10. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  11. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself as the sender and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  12. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named as authorities.
  13. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  14. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  15. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself in the greeting, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  16. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as agencies.
  17. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself as sender and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  18. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  19. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  20. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  21. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites Chicago Police Department and Campus Security as agencies.
  22. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  23. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are identified as agencies.
  24. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  25. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree grabbing the victim's buttocks names a specific sexual battery.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  3. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: The offender grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  5. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  6. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery threat, not a generic incident.
  7. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  8. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks after an unwelcome approach is a specific sexual assault, not a generic incident.
  9. present: An offender grabbed the victim's buttocks after an unwanted approach, which is a specific assault.
  10. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: The alert specifies an offender grabbing the victim's buttocks rather than a generic incident.
  12. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than only a generic incident.
  13. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  14. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery, not a generic incident.
  16. present: The alert specifies a sexual battery in which an offender grabbed the victim's buttocks.
  17. present: The alert specifies that an offender grabbed the victim's buttocks after an unwanted approach.
  18. present: The offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  19. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  20. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery, not a generic incident.
  21. present: The alert specifies an offender grabbing the victim's buttocks rather than a generic incident.
  22. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks specifies a sexual battery, not a generic incident.
  23. present: Grabbing the victim's buttocks names a specific sexual battery rather than a generic incident.
  24. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual assault rather than a generic incident.
  25. present: An offender grabbing the victim's buttocks is a specific sexual battery, not a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street.
  2. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street location.
  3. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street.
  4. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street location.
  5. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street location.
  6. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  7. present: The incident occurred at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  8. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  9. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  10. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  11. present: The event is located at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  12. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  13. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  14. present: The incident is located at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  15. present: The event is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  16. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  17. present: The incident is located at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  18. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  19. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street is a named place and street.
  20. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  21. present: The event is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  22. present: The CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street names the place.
  23. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  24. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
  25. present: The incident is placed at the CTA Pink Line near Polk and State Street.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find only a request for tips, which is not protective guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Asking people with additional information to contact authorities is not a protective action instruction.
  2. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  3. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  4. absent: The message only asks anyone with information to call investigators, which is a tips request not protective guidance.
  5. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security is not a protective action.
  6. absent: Recipients are only asked to share tips with Campus Security and police, which is not protective action.
  7. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  8. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  9. absent: Recipients are only asked to share tips with Campus Security and police, which is not protective guidance.
  10. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not a protective action.
  11. absent: The message only asks anyone with information to contact police and does not give protective action.
  12. absent: Asking people with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is not a protective action instruction.
  13. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security is not a protective action instruction.
  14. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and police is a tips request, not protective action.
  15. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  16. absent: The text only asks anyone with information to contact police, which is not a protective action.
  17. absent: The message only asks anyone with information to contact police, which is a request for tips rather than protective action.
  18. absent: The only ask is that people with information contact Campus Security and detectives, which is a tips request not protective guidance.
  19. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  20. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  21. absent: The only ask is that anyone with information contact Campus Security and CPD detectives, which is a tips request not protective action.
  22. absent: Asking people with information to contact authorities is not a protective action.
  23. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  24. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  25. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m. is a time cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  2. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  3. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  4. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  5. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  6. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026, at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  7. present: The text dates the incident to May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  8. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  9. present: The alert gives May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m. as the incident time.
  10. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  11. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  12. present: The message gives May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  13. present: The alert gives May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  14. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  15. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  16. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  17. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  18. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and the clock time of approximately 9:00 a.m.
  19. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  20. present: The alert dates the incident May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  21. present: The alert gives the date May 4, 2026 and approximately 9:00 a.m.
  22. present: May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m. states when the incident occurred.
  23. present: The text gives May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m. as the incident time.
  24. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
  25. present: The incident is dated May 4, 2026 at approximately 9:00 a.m.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  A majority find no stated consequence beyond naming the grabbing. Dissent treats the grabbing as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Grabbing the victim's buttocks names the assault itself and states no further harm or severity.
  2. absent: The grabbing names the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  3. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  4. absent: No consequences or severity beyond naming the grabbing itself are stated.
  5. absent: Grabbing the victim names the crime itself and states no extra consequence or severity.
  6. absent: The text names the assaultive act but does not state consequences or severity beyond the hazard itself.
  7. absent: Grabbing the buttocks names the crime itself and states no extra consequence or severity.
  8. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no further consequence or severity is stated.
  9. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no extra consequences or severity are stated.
  10. absent: The grabbing is the named hazard and no extra injury, severity, or other consequence is stated.
  11. absent: Grabbing the buttocks names the crime itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  12. absent: Grabbing the buttocks names the crime and states no additional consequence or severity.
  13. absent: The grabbing is the crime itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  14. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  15. absent: Grabbing the buttocks is the hazard itself with no stated injury, severity, or other consequence.
  16. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no further consequence or severity is stated.
  17. absent: Grabbing the victim is the hazard itself and no further consequences or severity are stated.
  18. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  19. absent: Grabbing the buttocks is the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  20. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself and no extra consequence or severity is stated.
  21. absent: The grabbing is the hazard itself with no stated injury, severity, or other consequence.
  22. absent: Grabbing the victim's buttocks names the offense with no stated injury, severity, or other consequence.
  23. absent: The grabbing is the named crime itself with no extra injury, severity, or other consequence stated.
  24. absent: Grabbing the buttocks is the named hazard and no extra injury, severity, or consequence is stated.
  25. absent: Grabbing the buttocks is the crime itself, with no stated injury, severity, or other consequence.