Lockdown for a reported shooting near the main campus, then cleared

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "COM Alert" opens as a branded signature identifying the sender of this campus lockdown message.
  2. present: The closing words name COM Alerts as the channel, and the opening COM Alert signature already brands the sending institution.
  3. present: Who sends it is shown by the branded signature COM Alert at the start of the message.
  4. present: A recipient sees the branded COM Alert opening and the COM Alerts close, which identifies who sent the warning.
  5. present: The hazard noun sits beside a branded sender line, since COM Alert names the issuing campus warning system clearly.
  6. present: The place named in the opening is paired with the COM Alert brand, which identifies who is sending the lockdown.
  7. present: No clock is not why the sender scores, because COM Alert names the office that issued this lockdown notice.
  8. present: Harm is identified because the message opens with the branded COM Alert signature and later cites COM Alerts as the update channel.
  9. present: The signature opens with the branded tag COM Alert, which identifies who is sending the lockdown notice.
  10. present: I count the opening tag COM Alert as a branded sender signature that names who issued this lockdown notice.
  11. present: Reading the line, COM Alert is a branded signature that names who is sending this lockdown notice.
  12. present: The deciding words are "COM Alert", a branded sender signature that names the issuing warning channel.
  13. present: What settles this is the branded opener COM Alert, which names the campus system sending the lockdown notice.
  14. present: On this text the opener "COM Alert" is a branded sender signature and "Police" names the responding agency.
  15. present: For this element the branded opener COM Alert names the campus warning channel that issued the notice.
  16. present: The message opens with the branded signature COM Alert, which names the sending system.
  17. present: Recipients see COM Alert as the sending brand that identifies the college notification channel for this lockdown message.
  18. present: The wording opens with the branded tag COM Alert and later names police as the agency investigating.
  19. present: A reader sees the branded opener COM Alert, and later updates routed through COM Alerts.
  20. present: The alert opens with the branded signature COM Alert, which names the campus warning system sending the lockdown notice.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, the opening tag COM Alert is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  22. present: The phrase "COM Alert" is a branded opening signature that identifies who is sending this lockdown warning.
  23. present: This one opens with the branded signature COM Alert, which identifies the campus system sending the notice.
  24. present: Judged from the text the opening tag COM Alert is a branded sender signature, repeated later as COM Alerts.
  25. present: My read is that COM Alert is a branded sender tag, and the close also points readers back to COM Alerts.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "reported shooting" names gunfire as the specific threat, which is more than the word emergency alone.
  2. present: The closing words do not erase the specific threat, because the body names a reported shooting as the reason for lockdown.
  3. present: Who sends it names a reported shooting near campus, which is a specific threat rather than a bare emergency.
  4. present: A recipient is told of a reported shooting near campus, a specific threat and not the word emergency alone.
  5. present: The hazard noun shooting is stated outright in the lockdown notice, so the threat is specific rather than generic.
  6. present: The place named in this lockdown notice sits beside a reported shooting, which is a specific threat rather than a vague incident.
  7. present: No clock is not the reason here, since a reported shooting names a specific threat rather than a vague concern.
  8. present: Harm is specified as a reported shooting, which names the threat rather than a generic emergency or incident.
  9. present: The signature names a reported shooting near campus, a specific threat rather than a generic emergency.
  10. present: I count reported shooting as a named threat rather than a vague incident or unspecified emergency.
  11. present: Reading the line, reported shooting is a specific threat, not a vague emergency or incident label.
  12. present: The deciding words are "reported shooting", which name the threat rather than a vague incident or situation.
  13. present: What settles this is the phrase reported shooting, which names a specific threat rather than a vague incident.
  14. present: On this text the hazard is named outright as a "reported shooting" and a campus "LOCKDOWN", not a vague incident.
  15. present: For this element the notice names a lockdown caused by a reported shooting, which is a specific danger.
  16. present: The message names a reported shooting and a lockdown, both specific hazards rather than a vague incident.
  17. present: Recipients are told a reported shooting is the named threat that prompted the lockdown near campus.
  18. present: The wording names both a lockdown and a reported shooting, so the threat is specific.
  19. present: A reader sees a reported shooting given as the cause of the lockdown, a named threat.
  20. present: The alert names a reported shooting as the threat, which is a specific hazard rather than the word emergency alone.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, it names both a lockdown and a reported shooting as the hazard.
  22. present: The phrase "reported shooting" names the specific threat behind the lockdown rather than a generic incident.
  23. present: This one names a reported shooting as the specific threat behind the lockdown, not a vague incident.
  24. present: Judged from the text a reported shooting is named as the cause of the lockdown, which is a specific threat.
  25. present: My read is that a reported shooting is a named threat, and the lockdown is tied directly to that hazard.
• Locationpresent19/25

  Final assessment

  19 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "main campus" names the particular campus site under lockdown, rather than a bare on campus phrase.
  2. present: The closing words follow a place name, since lockdown is fixed at the main campus rather than a bare area phrase.
  3. present: Who sends it places the lockdown at main campus, a specifically named campus site, not a bare on campus phrase.
  4. present: A recipient is given the main campus as the named site, rather than only a bare mention of the area.
  5. absent: The hazard noun is tied only to main campus and near campus, which is bare campus rather than a named street or building.
  6. present: The place named main campus is a specific campus, not the bare phrase on campus or the bare phrase the area.
  7. absent: No clock does not decide this miss, because the text only says main campus and near campus without a street or building.
  8. present: Harm is tied to the named main campus, a specific campus site, not only a bare area or unnamed vicinity.
  9. present: The signature places the lockdown at main campus, a named campus site and not only the area.
  10. absent: I count only main campus and near campus, which stay at campus scale and name no building or street.
  11. present: Reading the line, main campus is a named place, so the lockdown location is identified.
  12. present: The deciding words are "main campus", a named campus site, not a bare mention of the area.
  13. present: What settles this is the lockdown placed at main campus, a named campus rather than a bare area.
  14. present: On this text the place is given as the "main campus" and the shooting is placed near that campus.
  15. absent: For this element only the generic phrases main campus and campus appear, with no proper place name.
  16. present: The message places the lockdown at main campus, a named campus rather than a vague area.
  17. present: Recipients are given main campus as the named campus site where the lockdown is in effect.
  18. present: The wording places the lockdown at main campus, which is a named campus site.
  19. present: A reader sees the lockdown fixed at main campus, a named campus and not a bare area.
  20. present: The alert places the lockdown at main campus, a named campus location rather than a vague area.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, the lockdown is located at main campus rather than a vague area.
  22. present: The phrase "main campus" names the campus placed under lockdown instead of only saying somewhere nearby.
  23. absent: This one mentions only main campus and near campus, which is bare campus language and not a named building or street.
  24. absent: Judged from the text only generic campus wording appears, including main campus and near campus, with no proper place name.
  25. present: My read is that the lockdown is placed at main campus, which names the campus rather than a vague nearby area.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Stay in a locked or secure location" tells recipients to lock down or shelter until notice changes.
  2. present: The closing words ask recipients to wait, yet earlier lines order them to stay locked and avoid campus.
  3. present: Who sends it tells people to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  4. present: A recipient is told to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus, which are protective instructions.
  5. present: The hazard noun comes with a direct order to stay locked and avoid campus, which is more than a closure or monitor note.
  6. present: The place named in the notice comes with orders to stay locked or secure and to avoid campus at this time.
  7. present: No clock phrase is not the reason for this point, because stay locked and avoid campus are protective actions.
  8. present: Harm is met with instructions to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus at this time.
  9. present: The signature orders people to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  10. present: I count stay in a locked or secure location and avoid campus as orders that protect the reader.
  11. present: Reading the line, stay in a locked or secure location and avoid campus are safety instructions.
  12. present: The deciding words are "Stay in a locked or secure location" and "Avoid campus", direct protective commands.
  13. present: What settles this is the order to stay in a locked or secure location and avoid campus.
  14. present: On this text people are told to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus right now.
  15. present: For this element readers are ordered to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  16. present: The message tells recipients to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  17. present: Recipients are ordered into lockdown, told to stay locked in, and told to avoid campus.
  18. present: The wording tells people to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  19. present: A reader sees orders to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  20. present: The alert tells people to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus, which are protective instructions.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, people are told to stay in a locked or secure location and avoid campus.
  22. present: The phrase "Stay in a locked or secure location" tells people to shelter securely, and "Avoid campus" is further protection.
  23. present: This one tells people to stay in a locked or secure location and also to avoid campus.
  24. present: Judged from the text readers are told to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
  25. present: My read is that recipients are told to stay in a locked or secure location and to avoid campus.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "until further notice" states how long people should stay locked down, which is an explicit time cue.
  2. present: The closing words come after an explicit duration, because stay locked until further notice supplies a time cue.
  3. present: Who sends it sets the duration as until further notice, which is an explicit time cue.
  4. present: A recipient reads until further notice and at this time, cues of duration and now rather than a date alone.
  5. present: The hazard noun is bounded by the recency phrase until further notice, which is a time cue rather than a bare date.
  6. present: The place named in the lockdown text is tied to until further notice, a live time window rather than a date alone.
  7. present: No clock digits appear, but until further notice and at this time still count as recency cues for a current lockdown.
  8. present: Harm is time bounded by until further notice and by the recency phrase at this time, not a date alone.
  9. present: The signature says to remain there until further notice, an explicit ongoing time boundary.
  10. present: I count until further notice and at this time as live duration cues, not a bare calendar date.
  11. present: Reading the line, until further notice states how long the lockdown remains in effect.
  12. present: The deciding words are "until further notice", a recency window, not a calendar date standing alone.
  13. present: What settles this is the duration phrase until further notice, which sets how long the lockdown lasts.
  14. present: On this text "until further notice" and "at this time" mark how long the lockdown guidance remains in force.
  15. present: For this element the phrase until further notice sets a continuing time window rather than a bare date.
  16. present: The message says to remain secured until further notice, which is an explicit duration cue.
  17. present: Recipients are told the lockdown holds until further notice, which supplies a duration rather than a bare date.
  18. present: The wording keeps the lockdown in place until further notice, which is a time boundary.
  19. present: A reader sees until further notice, and also at this time, marking the lockdown as current.
  20. present: The alert uses until further notice and at this time, which mark an ongoing window rather than a date alone.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, until further notice sets how long the lockdown instruction remains in effect.
  22. present: The phrase "until further notice" states how long the lockdown lasts, which counts as time rather than a date.
  23. present: This one keeps the order in force until further notice, which is a time window rather than a date alone.
  24. present: Judged from the text until further notice and at this time mark the lockdown as continuing, not a bare date.
  25. present: My read is that until further notice and at this time both mark how long the lockdown remains in effect.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: "reported shooting" only names the hazard, and the notice never adds damage, danger, or a life-threatening result.
  2. absent: The closing words and the shooting label state no damage, danger, or life threatening consequence beyond the hazard name.
  3. absent: Who sends it names a shooting but states no damage, danger, or other consequence beyond that hazard.
  4. absent: A recipient hears a shooting named, but no injury, casualty, or property damage is stated beyond that hazard.
  5. absent: The hazard noun shooting stands alone, and an investigation update adds no injury, damage, or other extra consequence word.
  6. absent: The place named in the COM notice adds no harm beyond the shooting name, since no injury or damage is stated.
  7. absent: No clock is not the gap, and the shooting label stands alone without stated injuries, damage, or added severity.
  8. absent: Harm is not given any stated consequence beyond the shooting name, such as injury, death, or property damage.
  9. absent: The signature names the shooting but never says the scene is damaged, dangerous, or life threatening.
  10. absent: I count a shooting label and a lockdown order, but no stated injury, damage, or severity result.
  11. absent: Reading the line, shooting is named, but no injury, danger, or other harm is described.
  12. absent: The deciding words are "shooting" and "LOCKDOWN", which name the hazard and response without extra damage language.
  13. absent: What settles this is that shooting is only the hazard name, with no injury, damage, or severity stated.
  14. absent: On this text no injuries, deaths, or property damage are stated, and lockdown alone does not describe harm.
  15. absent: For this element shooting and lockdown are hazard labels only, with no separate harm or severity word.
  16. absent: The message names a shooting and lockdown but states no injury, damage, or other consequence.
  17. absent: Recipients hear the shooting named but receive no extra words of damage, danger, or life threat.
  18. absent: The wording names the shooting but states no injury, danger, or other consequence.
  19. absent: A reader sees the shooting named, with no injury, death, or damage added beyond that name.
  20. absent: The alert names a shooting and a police investigation but states no injuries, damage, or extra severity.
  21. absent: Looking at the sentence, a shooting is named without any deadly, dangerous, or injury wording.
  22. absent: The phrase "Police investigation underway" only says police are working and gives no injury, damage, or severity.
  23. absent: This one names the shooting but never states injuries, damage, or any other consequence.
  24. absent: Judged from the text the shooting is named, but no injury, damage, or extra severity is stated beyond that threat.
  25. absent: My read is that a shooting is named, but no injury, danger, or other consequence is written out beyond that hazard word.