Brush fire smoke closes the Panorama campus

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Source present and 25 absent. No department or alert brand is signed, and "Panorama Campus" names a place rather than who sent the message.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No department or alert brand is signed, and "Panorama Campus" names a place rather than who sent the message.
  2. absent: No university, police department, or alert brand is named as the sender.
  3. absent: No agency or college signature is given, and "Panorama Campus" names a place rather than a sender.
  4. absent: "the Panorama Campus" is a location being closed, not a named sender or agency.
  5. absent: No sender or agency is named, and "Panorama Campus" functions only as a place.
  6. absent: No department, police, or branded sender is named; "Panorama Campus" is only a place.
  7. absent: "the Panorama Campus is closed" names a place, not a sender, signature, or responding agency.
  8. absent: The text names no sender, police, fire agency, or branded alert signature.
  9. absent: No sender is identified: the text lacks an agency, alert brand, or college name.
  10. absent: No sender or agency is named, and "Panorama Campus" functions only as a location.
  11. absent: No sender or agency is named, and "Panorama Campus" only marks a place.
  12. absent: No agency, brand, or college name identifies the sender, and "Panorama Campus" is only a place.
  13. absent: No sender, brand, or agency is named, and "Panorama Campus" only identifies a place.
  14. absent: No agency or branded sender appears; "Panorama Campus" only names a place.
  15. absent: "Panorama Campus" names a place, but no agency, college, or alert brand identifies the sender.
  16. absent: No sender or agency is named, and "the Panorama Campus" only identifies the place that "is closed".
  17. absent: No police, college, or alert brand is named, and "Panorama Campus" is only the location that is closed.
  18. absent: No department, university signature, or other sender is named; "Panorama Campus" is only a place.
  19. absent: No sender, police unit, or alert brand is named; "Panorama Campus" functions only as a location.
  20. absent: No department, alert brand, or sender is named, only "the Panorama Campus".
  21. absent: No branded signature, agency, or university sender is named in the closure text.
  22. absent: No agency, brand, or university name identifies who sent this closure.
  23. absent: No police, university, or alert brand is named; "Panorama Campus" only locates the closure.
  24. absent: "the Panorama Campus" is a place name, and no department, college, or alert brand signs the message.
  25. absent: The text never names a sender, department, or branded alert signature.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. "smoke caused by small brush fire" names both smoke and a brush fire as the threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names both smoke and a brush fire as the threat.
  2. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names both smoke and fire.
  3. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names smoke and a brush fire as the threat.
  4. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names the hazard specifically.
  5. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names both smoke and fire as the threat.
  6. present: "smoke" and "small brush fire" name the specific hazards.
  7. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names smoke and a brush fire as the threat.
  8. present: It specifies "smoke caused by small brush fire," which names the threat.
  9. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" states two specific hazards, smoke and fire.
  10. present: "Smoke caused by small brush fire" names both smoke and a brush fire as the threat.
  11. present: The text names "smoke" caused by a "small brush fire".
  12. present: It names "smoke" caused by a "small brush fire" as the threat.
  13. present: It names "smoke" and a "small brush fire" as the specific threat.
  14. present: "Smoke" caused by a "small brush fire" names the specific hazard.
  15. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" states both smoke and a brush fire as the hazard.
  16. present: The text names both "smoke" and a "small brush fire".
  17. present: The cause is "smoke caused by small brush fire", which names both smoke and fire.
  18. present: It names "smoke" and a "small brush fire" as the specific threat.
  19. present: The text specifies "smoke caused by small brush fire", which names the threat.
  20. present: It names "smoke" caused by a "small brush fire", which are specific hazards.
  21. present: The threat is specifically "smoke" from a "small brush fire".
  22. present: "smoke caused by small brush fire" names the hazard.
  23. present: The text specifies "smoke caused by small brush fire" as what prompted the closure.
  24. present: "smoke" caused by a "small brush fire" names the hazards in plain words.
  25. present: It names "smoke" caused by a "small brush fire", which are specific hazards.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closure is for "the Panorama Campus".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closure is for "the Panorama Campus".
  2. present: "on the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus" give the location.
  3. present: "on the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus" both say where people should not go.
  4. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and closes "the Panorama Campus".
  5. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closed site is "the Panorama Campus".
  6. present: It names "the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus".
  7. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closure is at "the Panorama Campus".
  8. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closed site is the "Panorama Campus."
  9. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and closes "the Panorama Campus".
  10. present: "On the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus" say where the smoke and closure are.
  11. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and closes the "Panorama Campus".
  12. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closure is at "the Panorama Campus".
  13. present: It gives "on the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus" as the location.
  14. present: The fire is "on the bluffs", and "the Panorama Campus" is closed.
  15. present: It puts the fire "on the bluffs" and closes the "Panorama Campus".
  16. present: It puts the fire "on the bluffs" and the closure at "the Panorama Campus".
  17. present: "on the bluffs" and "the Panorama Campus" name the place, and "campus" appears again in the closing line.
  18. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closure is at "the Panorama Campus".
  19. present: It places the fire "on the bluffs" and closes "the Panorama Campus".
  20. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and closes "the Panorama Campus".
  21. present: It places the fire "on the bluffs" and closes the "Panorama Campus".
  22. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the "Panorama Campus" is closed.
  23. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and the closure at "the Panorama Campus".
  24. present: The fire is "on the bluffs" and the closed site is "the Panorama Campus".
  25. present: It locates the fire "on the bluffs" and closes "the Panorama Campus".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to enter, a direct protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to enter, a direct protective instruction.
  2. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to enter.
  3. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct protective instruction not to enter.
  4. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells people the protective action to take.
  5. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  6. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct protective instruction.
  7. present: "Do NOT come to campus" directly tells recipients to stay away.
  8. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients to stay away.
  9. present: "Do NOT come to campus" directly instructs recipients not to enter.
  10. present: "Do NOT come to campus" directly instructs recipients not to enter.
  11. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells people not to enter.
  12. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  13. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  14. present: "Do NOT come to campus" directly instructs recipients to stay away.
  15. present: "Do NOT come to campus" instructs recipients not to enter, a clear protective action.
  16. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to enter.
  17. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells people not to enter, a clear protective action.
  18. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  19. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  20. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct instruction not to enter.
  21. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to enter.
  22. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients to stay away.
  23. present: "Do NOT come to campus" tells recipients not to go there.
  24. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct order not to enter.
  25. present: "Do NOT come to campus" is a direct protective instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present and 0 absent. "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets an end date for the canceled classes and events.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets an end date for the canceled classes and events.
  2. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets a date for the cancellation.
  3. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" states the date through which classes and events stay canceled.
  4. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" is an until-date that states how long the closure lasts.
  5. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets an end date, which is a time cue.
  6. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" gives a date through which the closure lasts.
  7. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets the date through which classes and events stay canceled.
  8. present: Classes and events are canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026."
  9. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets a dated end for the cancellation.
  10. present: "Until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets a date through which classes and events are canceled.
  11. present: Classes stay canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026".
  12. present: Classes and events are canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", a stated date.
  13. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" sets a date when the cancellation runs.
  14. present: "Until Wednesday July 15, 2026" gives a date through which classes stay canceled.
  15. present: Classes and events are canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", a date bound by until.
  16. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" is an until-date for the cancellation.
  17. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" gives both a calendar date and an until boundary for the cancellation.
  18. present: Classes stay canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", a date that bounds the closure.
  19. present: Classes and events are canceled "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", which gives a date boundary.
  20. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" gives a date through which the closure lasts.
  21. present: The closure runs "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", which pairs "until" with a date.
  22. present: Cancellation runs "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", a dated endpoint.
  23. present: Cancellations run "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", which is an until-date.
  24. present: "until Wednesday July 15, 2026" supplies both a date and an until limit.
  25. present: Cancellation runs "until Wednesday July 15, 2026", a date-bound duration.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 25 absent. "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard, but the alert never says the smoke is harmful or dangerous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard, but the alert never says the smoke is harmful or dangerous.
  2. absent: "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard without saying it could injure or endanger anyone.
  3. absent: A "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard, but no injury, danger, or damage is stated.
  4. absent: "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard without saying it is dangerous or harmful.
  5. absent: "small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard and do not say it could injure or damage.
  6. absent: Calling the fire "small" and citing "smoke" does not state harm or severity.
  7. absent: "small brush fire" names the hazard, and neither "smoke" nor the closure states injury, danger, or damage.
  8. absent: A "small brush fire" and "smoke" are named, but no harm or severity to people or property is stated.
  9. absent: The fire and smoke are named, but nothing says they are dangerous or could cause harm.
  10. absent: Calling it a "small brush fire" and "smoke" does not state injury, danger, or damage.
  11. absent: The fire and smoke are named, but no injury, danger, or damage is described.
  12. absent: Calling the fire "small" and mentioning "smoke" does not state injury, danger, or other harm.
  13. absent: "smoke" and "small brush fire" are named, but no harm or danger is stated.
  14. absent: "Small brush fire" and "smoke" name the hazard without stating harm or danger.
  15. absent: The fire is called "small" and tied to "smoke", but no injury, danger, or property damage is stated.
  16. absent: "smoke" and "small brush fire" name the hazards without stating injury, damage, or danger.
  17. absent: Calling it a "small brush fire" and citing "smoke" names the hazard without saying it could injure, sicken, or destroy anything.
  18. absent: Calling the fire "small" and citing "smoke" names the hazard without stating injury, damage, or danger.
  19. absent: "smoke" and "small brush fire" name the hazard without saying it could injure people or damage property.
  20. absent: "smoke" and a "small brush fire" name the hazard, but no injury, danger, or damage is stated.
  21. absent: "Smoke" and a "small brush fire" name the hazard without stating injury or other harm.
  22. absent: Smoke and a brush fire are named, but the text never says they could injure people or damage property.
  23. absent: "smoke" and a "small brush fire" name the hazard without saying it is dangerous or harmful.
  24. absent: "small brush fire" and "smoke" name what happened, not a stated harm such as injury or danger.
  25. absent: Naming "smoke" and a "small brush fire" does not state injury, damage, or other harm.