Vehicle theft at downtown campus parking structure

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent24/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 24 of 25. "officers responded to a stolen vehicle call" and ASU case number 2023-03175 point to campus police; one read objected that no department signs the notice.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Officers responded" plus the ASU case number identifies the campus police as source.
  2. present: "officers responded" and the ASU case numbering identify a police source.
  3. present: "officers responded" to the call, identifying police as the source of the account.
  4. present: The report that "officers responded" identifies campus police as the source.
  5. present: "officers responded" identifies police as the responding authority behind the notice.
  6. present: The report that "officers responded" identifies police as the source of the notice.
  7. present: The phrase "officers responded" identifies campus police as the reporting authority.
  8. present: The phrase "officers responded" plus the police case number identifies the agency.
  9. present: "officers responded" plus the campus reference identify the university police as source.
  10. present: "Officers responded", and the ASU case numbering marks a police-issued notice.
  11. present: "officers responded" identifies police as the authority behind this notice.
  12. present: The mention of "officers responded" plus the ASU case number identifies campus police as the source.
  13. present: "officers responded" together with the case number indicates a police issued notice.
  14. present: "officers responded" together with the ASU case number marks campus police as source.
  15. present: "officers responded" identifies a police agency as the responding authority.
  16. present: "officers responded to a stolen vehicle call", identifying police as the responding authority.
  17. present: "Officers responded" to the call, identifying campus police as the source.
  18. absent: Only "officers" are mentioned, with no named department or alert system signing the notice.
  19. present: "officers responded" identifies police as the authority handling the call.
  20. present: "officers responded to a stolen vehicle call", identifying police as the responding authority.
  21. present: "officers responded" plus the Downtown Phoenix campus framing identifies the campus police.
  22. present: "officers responded to a stolen vehicle call" identifies police as the source.
  23. present: "officers responded" plus the police case number identifies law enforcement as the source.
  24. present: "officers responded" points to police as the responding authority.
  25. present: "officers responded" plus the police case number identify law enforcement as the source.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. A "stolen vehicle call" names the crime, with the car given as "a black 2000 Honda Civic, with AZ license plate C6A46P."

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A "stolen vehicle" is the specific crime named.
  2. present: It reports a "stolen vehicle call", a specific crime.
  3. present: "Stolen Vehicle" is named, with the car described by make and plate.
  4. present: "Stolen Vehicle" names the crime specifically, including the make and plate.
  5. present: The report concerns a "stolen vehicle", a specific crime.
  6. present: It names a "stolen vehicle" as the crime at issue.
  7. present: A "stolen vehicle" call is a specifically named crime.
  8. present: A "stolen vehicle" is the named crime, with the car described.
  9. present: The crime is specified as a stolen vehicle, with the car described.
  10. present: A "stolen vehicle" is a specifically named crime.
  11. present: A "stolen vehicle" call is the specific crime reported.
  12. present: The crime is named as a "stolen vehicle" call.
  13. present: A "stolen vehicle" is named as the crime, a specific offense.
  14. present: A "stolen vehicle" is named as the specific crime.
  15. present: "Stolen Vehicle" is the named crime, a specific event type.
  16. present: "Stolen Vehicle" is the named crime.
  17. present: A stolen vehicle is named as the specific crime.
  18. present: It names a "stolen vehicle" call and gives the crime type as Stolen Vehicle.
  19. present: The crime type is explicitly "Stolen Vehicle".
  20. present: A "Stolen Vehicle" is the specifically named crime.
  21. present: A "stolen vehicle" is the specific crime named.
  22. present: "Stolen Vehicle" is named as the crime, with the vehicle described.
  23. present: A "stolen vehicle call" names the specific crime involved.
  24. present: A "stolen vehicle" is named as the specific crime.
  25. present: A "stolen vehicle" theft is named as the crime.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, unanimous on "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" as the site of the theft.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The location "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is given.
  2. present: The location is "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus".
  3. present: The location is "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus".
  4. present: It places the call "near 475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus."
  5. present: It names "475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus."
  6. present: The location is "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus."
  7. present: The site is "475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus".
  8. present: It happened near "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus".
  9. present: The location "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is given.
  10. present: The address "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is specified.
  11. present: The location is "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus".
  12. present: It names "475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus".
  13. present: The location "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is given.
  14. present: "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is the given location.
  15. present: "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is specified as the location.
  16. present: It gives "475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus".
  17. present: It cites 475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus.
  18. present: The address "475 N. 2nd St." on the Downtown Phoenix campus is specified.
  19. present: The address "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is given.
  20. present: It says "near 475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus".
  21. present: The address "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is provided.
  22. present: "475 N. 2nd St. on the Downtown Phoenix campus" is specified.
  23. present: It gives "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" as the location.
  24. present: It gives "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" as the location.
  25. present: The address "475 N. 2nd St, Downtown Phoenix campus" is specified.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Unlike the ASU vehicle notices that urge locks and immobilizers, this one offers no prevention advice and no way to submit information.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective instruction or prevention advice is offered to readers.
  2. absent: No instruction is directed at readers anywhere in the notice.
  3. absent: The notice offers no instruction or protective advice to recipients.
  4. absent: No protective instruction or precaution is offered to recipients.
  5. absent: Readers are given no instruction or precaution to follow.
  6. absent: No protective step is requested of recipients anywhere in the notice.
  7. absent: No instruction, tip line, or precaution is directed at recipients.
  8. absent: The notice gives readers no instruction or prevention step.
  9. absent: The bulletin offers no action for readers to take.
  10. absent: Nothing asks recipients to act or take precautions.
  11. absent: There is no request that readers do anything protective.
  12. absent: No action is requested of recipients; the notice only reports details.
  13. absent: No protective action or prevention advice is directed at recipients.
  14. absent: Readers are given no precaution or instruction of any kind.
  15. absent: No instruction or precaution is offered to recipients.
  16. absent: No protective advice or action is asked of the reader anywhere in the notice.
  17. absent: Only case data follows; recipients are given no action to take.
  18. absent: No instruction or precaution is directed at readers.
  19. absent: No protective or preventive instruction is directed at the reader.
  20. absent: No protective advice or reporting instruction is directed at recipients.
  21. absent: Readers are given no instruction or precaution to follow.
  22. absent: No protective guidance or request for action is directed at readers.
  23. absent: Only facts and vehicle details are provided, with no action asked of readers.
  24. absent: Only descriptive and case information is offered, with no instruction to readers.
  25. absent: No advice or protective instruction is given to recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, bracketed "Between the hours of 7:00 a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023 and 11:30 a.m. on Tuesday, November 21, 2023."

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It spans 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  2. present: The window runs from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  3. present: It brackets the theft between 7:00 a.m. November 20 and 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  4. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is given.
  5. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  6. present: It brackets the theft between 7:00 a.m. November 20 and 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  7. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  8. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  9. present: It brackets the theft between 7:00 a.m. November 20 and 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  10. present: It brackets 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  11. present: It spans 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  12. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is given.
  13. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  14. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  15. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is given.
  16. present: The window "7:00 a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023" to "11:30 a.m." the next day is given.
  17. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023, is stated.
  18. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  19. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is provided.
  20. present: The window "7:00 a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023" to 11:30 a.m. Tuesday is given.
  21. present: A window is given from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023.
  22. present: A window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is given.
  23. present: The window from "7:00 a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023" to 11:30 a.m. Tuesday is specified.
  24. present: The window from 7:00 a.m. November 20 to 11:30 a.m. November 21, 2023 is stated.
  25. present: It brackets the theft between 7:00 a.m. Monday and 11:30 a.m. Tuesday, November 21, 2023.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The loss of one car is all that is reported; no harm to people and no level of danger is conveyed.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Only the loss of a car is reported, with no severity or risk statement.
  2. absent: The loss is stated without any claim about danger or severity to the community.
  3. absent: No consequence beyond the vehicle being taken is described, and no danger is stated.
  4. absent: The text conveys no danger or severity beyond the fact of the theft.
  5. absent: Nothing conveys danger or severity, only the vehicle's description.
  6. absent: Only the vehicle description is given, with no statement of danger or severity.
  7. absent: Only property loss is recorded, with no severity or danger described.
  8. absent: Nothing suggests danger or consequence beyond the vehicle being taken.
  9. absent: Nothing conveys risk to people or the significance of the loss.
  10. absent: No harm to people or stated loss severity appears.
  11. absent: Only the car description follows; no harm or severity is conveyed.
  12. absent: No danger, injury, or severity is described to the reader.
  13. absent: The notice conveys no danger to people or severity of consequence.
  14. absent: Only the loss of a car is reported, with no severity or danger conveyed.
  15. absent: Nothing indicates danger or the seriousness of the loss.
  16. absent: Only the vehicle description and lack of suspect information appear, no severity or harm.
  17. absent: The loss of a car is reported without any danger or severity claim.
  18. absent: Nothing conveys risk or seriousness beyond the vehicle being taken.
  19. absent: Nothing states any danger to people or wider consequence of the theft.
  20. absent: Beyond the vehicle being gone, no danger or severity is stated.
  21. absent: No harm or severity beyond the vehicle loss is stated.
  22. absent: The notice conveys no severity or potential harm beyond the theft itself.
  23. absent: Loss of a car is reported but no severity or danger statement is made.
  24. absent: Nothing is said about the seriousness of the theft or any risk to people.
  25. absent: Only the vehicle description follows; no harm or severity is conveyed.