Burglary at student residence near campus

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. No department, officer, or branded alert tag appears anywhere; the notice opens straight into "Burglary | 04-29-2023" and case fields.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No department, officer, or alert system is named anywhere in the notice.
  2. absent: No issuing office, officer, or branded tag identifies who wrote this burglary notice.
  3. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender is named anywhere in the notice.
  4. absent: No sending office, police department, or branded signature appears anywhere in the notice.
  5. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender is named anywhere in the notice.
  6. absent: No department, officer, or alert brand is named anywhere in this notice.
  7. absent: No department, officer, or alert brand is named anywhere as the sender of this notice.
  8. absent: No department or officer is named anywhere; only case numbers and a crime label appear.
  9. absent: The bulletin never names a department, officer, or branded alert system as sender.
  10. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender is named anywhere in this burglary notice.
  11. absent: No sender, department, or branded signature appears; only a crime heading and case numbers.
  12. absent: No department, officer or alert brand is named anywhere as the sender of this notice.
  13. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender is named anywhere in this burglary notice.
  14. absent: No department, officer, or branded tag is named as the sender of this notice.
  15. absent: No issuing office, department, or branded tag appears anywhere in this burglary notice.
  16. absent: No sending agency or branded signature appears, the notice simply begins with the crime type heading.
  17. absent: No sending office or agency is named; the notice reports only an unknown person entering.
  18. absent: No department, officer, or alert brand is named anywhere in this notice.
  19. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender is named anywhere in the notice.
  20. absent: No department, officer, or branded signature appears; the notice never says who issued it.
  21. absent: No sending department, officer, or branded tag appears anywhere in this bulletin.
  22. absent: No sender, department, or officer is named anywhere; only a crime bulletin heading appears.
  23. absent: No department, officer, or branded sender appears; only crime fields and case numbers are listed.
  24. absent: No department, officer, or branded signature identifies who is issuing this burglary notice.
  25. absent: No issuing office, police department, or branded alert tag is named anywhere in the notice.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Burglary" is named in the heading and described as unknown persons who "entered a student residence" and "removed several items of value."

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Burglary" of student residences is the specific named crime.
  2. present: It reports burglaries where persons "entered a student residence" and took property.
  3. present: "Burglary" is stated in the heading and described as entries into student residences.
  4. present: It names "Burglary," with persons entering student residences and removing property.
  5. present: It reports "Burglary" with unknown persons entering student residences.
  6. present: The heading and body identify "Burglary" of student residences as the crime.
  7. present: It reports "Burglary", with persons entering student residences and removing property.
  8. present: The notice is headed "Burglary" and describes entry into student residences.
  9. present: It is headed "Burglary" and describes entries into student residences.
  10. present: "Burglary" with entry into student residences is a specifically named crime.
  11. present: "Burglary" of student residences is named as the crime.
  12. present: The heading and body identify the crime as "Burglary" of student residences.
  13. present: "Burglary" is stated as the crime type, a specific threat.
  14. present: It reports "Burglary", with persons entering student residences and taking property.
  15. present: "Burglary" is named outright as the crime type.
  16. present: "Burglary" of student residences is named as the specific crime.
  17. present: "Burglary" of student residences is specifically named as the crime.
  18. present: "Burglary" is stated twice as the crime type, a specific hazard.
  19. present: "Burglary" is stated as the crime type, with unknown persons entering residences.
  20. present: It names "Burglary", with unknown persons entering student residences.
  21. present: It is headed "Burglary" and describes persons entering residences and removing items.
  22. present: "Burglary" is stated as the crime type and described twice in the text.
  23. present: "Burglary" is named, with unknown persons entering residences and removing items.
  24. present: "Burglary" is named twice and entry into student residences is described.
  25. present: "Burglary" and entry into student residences with items removed is a specific crime.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, with two street addresses given, "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on the Tempe campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Addresses 1260 S College Ave. and 250 E. Apache Blvd. on Tempe campus are given.
  2. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." are given on Tempe campus.
  3. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  4. present: Addresses are given: "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus.
  5. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." are given.
  6. present: It names 1260 S College Ave. and 250 E. Apache Blvd. on Tempe campus.
  7. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  8. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  9. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." are given.
  10. present: Addresses 1260 S College Ave. and 250 E. Apache Blvd. on Tempe campus are given.
  11. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." are given.
  12. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  13. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  14. present: Addresses at 1260 S College Ave. and 250 E. Apache Blvd. are given.
  15. present: Two addresses are given, "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd.".
  16. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  17. present: Addresses at 1260 S College Ave. and 250 E. Apache Blvd. are given.
  18. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  19. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." are given.
  20. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  21. present: Addresses are given: "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus.
  22. present: Both "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
  23. present: Two addresses are given, "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus.
  24. present: It names "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on the Tempe campus.
  25. present: Addresses "1260 S College Ave." and "250 E. Apache Blvd." on Tempe campus are given.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Readers get case numbers and an "Investigation in ongoing" note, but no prevention advice and no request to report anything.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The text offers no safety advice or action for readers to take.
  2. absent: The notice offers no safety instruction to recipients, only case facts.
  3. absent: The notice supplies only case details and no instruction to the reader.
  4. absent: The notice offers no safety instruction or protective action to readers.
  5. absent: Readers receive no instruction or safety action to take.
  6. absent: The notice reports facts and case numbers without telling readers to do anything.
  7. absent: The notice offers no advice or instruction to recipients, only case details.
  8. absent: Readers are offered no prevention advice or protective instruction.
  9. absent: There is no advice or instruction directed at the reader.
  10. absent: The notice offers no protective instruction to recipients.
  11. absent: The notice offers no instruction or safety step for recipients to take.
  12. absent: The notice offers no safety instruction or requested action to recipients.
  13. absent: The notice supplies no safety instruction or protective step for recipients.
  14. absent: The notice offers no instruction or precaution for recipients to follow.
  15. absent: The text offers no advice or instruction for recipients to follow.
  16. absent: The text offers no safety instruction or protective action to readers.
  17. absent: The text offers case data but no protective action for recipients.
  18. absent: The message gives readers no instruction or safety step to follow.
  19. absent: The notice offers no safety instruction or protective action to recipients.
  20. absent: Recipients are given no safety instruction or contact action at all.
  21. absent: The notice offers no instruction or precaution to recipients.
  22. absent: The bulletin offers no safety instruction or requested action to readers.
  23. absent: Readers receive no protective advice, only a factual account and case numbers.
  24. absent: The notice supplies case details but no protective instruction to readers.
  25. absent: The notice offers no instruction to readers about locking up or reporting.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Both burglaries carry bracketed windows, from "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" to "noon on Friday, April 28, 2023" and a second span.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It brackets both burglaries with dates and hours such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023".
  2. present: Precise windows are given, from 10 a.m. April 27 to noon April 28, 2023.
  3. present: It brackets the events with dates and hours, "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" onward.
  4. present: It brackets the events between specific dates and hours in April 2023.
  5. present: Specific date and hour windows in April 2023 are stated.
  6. present: It brackets the events between dated hours on April 27 through April 29, 2023.
  7. present: Specific windows such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" to noon Friday are given.
  8. present: Precise windows are given, such as 10 a.m. Thursday April 27 to noon Friday April 28, 2023.
  9. present: Date and hour windows such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" are supplied.
  10. present: It brackets the events between stated hours and dates in late April 2023.
  11. present: It brackets the events between dated hours on April 27 through April 29, 2023.
  12. present: It brackets the events between specific hours on April 27 and April 29, 2023.
  13. present: It brackets the events between specific hours on April 27, 28, and 29, 2023.
  14. present: Precise windows are given, such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023."
  15. present: Specific windows such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" are supplied.
  16. present: It brackets the incidents with dates and hours, such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023".
  17. present: It brackets the events between specific hours on April 27 through 29, 2023.
  18. present: Date and hour windows are detailed, for example "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023".
  19. present: It brackets the incidents between specific dates and hours in April 2023.
  20. present: Specific windows are stated, such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" through noon Friday.
  21. present: Specific windows are given, such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" to noon Friday.
  22. present: Specific date and hour windows from April 27 through April 29, 2023 are supplied.
  23. present: Precise windows such as "10 a.m. on Thursday April 27, 2023" to noon Friday are stated.
  24. present: It brackets the incidents by hours and dates in late April 2023.
  25. present: It brackets the events between April 27 and April 29, 2023 with clock times.
• Impactabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Absent by 23 of 25, with 2 of 25 counting "an item valued at approximately $100" as impact; the majority is right that a dollar figure for stolen property states no harm or danger.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Loss of items is reported but no severity or continuing danger is conveyed.
  2. absent: Items taken are listed but no statement of danger or severity for readers appears.
  3. absent: Loss of items is noted but no statement of danger or severity to people appears.
  4. absent: Aside from an item value, nothing conveys danger or severity to people.
  5. absent: Loss of items is noted but no severity or danger to people is conveyed.
  6. absent: Only an item value is mentioned, with no harm or danger to people described.
  7. absent: Loss of items is reported factually with no statement of danger or severity.
  8. absent: Loss of items is reported as fact, with no statement of danger or severity.
  9. absent: Only a modest property loss is noted, with no statement of danger or severity.
  10. present: It quantifies loss, "several items of value" and "an item valued at approximately $100".
  11. absent: Items taken are noted as past fact, with no statement of ongoing danger or severity.
  12. absent: Only items taken are noted, with no statement of danger or severity to readers.
  13. absent: Beyond a $100 item value, no danger or severity to people is conveyed.
  14. absent: Loss of items is reported, but no danger or severity to people is described.
  15. absent: Beyond noting items removed, no severity or danger to readers is expressed.
  16. absent: Only that items were removed is stated, with no harm or danger to people conveyed.
  17. absent: Stolen items are noted but no danger or severity to people is conveyed.
  18. absent: Beyond items being removed, no severity or risk to people is described.
  19. absent: Aside from noting items removed, no severity or danger to people is conveyed.
  20. absent: Only items taken are mentioned, with no statement of danger or severity to people.
  21. absent: Items taken are listed, but no statement of danger or severity is made.
  22. present: It quantifies the loss, "several items of value" and "an item valued at approximately $100".
  23. absent: Property was taken but no severity or danger to people is conveyed.
  24. absent: Loss of items is reported as fact, but no potential harm or severity is conveyed.
  25. absent: Only the stolen property is noted; no danger to people or severity is conveyed.