Boone Condition 2 cancels morning classes then Condition 1 through Tuesday open

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present by 25 of 25, although indirectly: only the closing "http://appstatealert.com" marks this as an official App State alert, with no institution named in the prose.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sender is identified only through the appstatealert.com alert system link.
  2. present: The appstatealert.com link marks this as a message from the university's alert system.
  3. present: The appstatealert.com link marks this as an official App State alert.
  4. present: The message ends with the branded appstatealert.com alert address as its identifier.
  5. present: The appstatealert.com link acts as the issuing system's signature.
  6. present: The appstatealert.com link serves as the branded sender identification for this notice.
  7. present: The appstatealert.com branding marks this as an official App State alert.
  8. present: Attribution rests on the appstatealert.com alert-system branding at the end.
  9. present: The alert carries the appstatealert.com branding that identifies its sending system.
  10. present: The alert points to appstatealert.com, the branded system that identifies the sender.
  11. present: The trailing appstatealert.com address identifies the official alert source.
  12. present: The alert closes with appstatealert.com, the branded system identifier.
  13. present: The message ends with the branded "appstatealert.com" source for further information.
  14. present: The appstatealert.com link marks this as the campus alert system's message.
  15. present: Again the appstatealert.com address identifies the university alert channel.
  16. present: The closing appstatealert.com link acts as the sending system's signature.
  17. present: "appstatealert.com" is the branded alert channel identifying who sent the notice.
  18. present: The "appstatealert.com" branded channel identifies who is notifying the community.
  19. present: The appstatealert.com link is the alert system's identifying signature.
  20. present: The appstatealert.com pointer identifies the issuing campus alert system.
  21. present: The alert points to appstatealert.com, the university's branded notification system.
  22. present: Ending with appstatealert.com identifies the issuing alert system.
  23. present: The appstatealert.com reference acts as the sending system's identifier.
  24. present: The appstatealert.com link identifies the issuing alert system.
  25. present: The appstatealert.com address serves as the branded sender signature.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent at 0 of 25. "Condition 2" and "Condition 1" are operating levels, and nothing in the message says what hazard forced the cancellations.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Conditions 2 and 1 describe operating levels without naming any threat.
  2. absent: Two condition levels are announced with no named hazard behind the cancellations.
  3. absent: No specific threat is named; only class cancellations and condition levels appear.
  4. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 levels appear, with no threat named.
  5. absent: Conditions 1 and 2 are operating statuses, with no hazard named.
  6. absent: Condition 1 and Condition 2 are operating levels, not a named threat.
  7. absent: The text names only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses, never a threat.
  8. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses are cited, with no hazard named.
  9. absent: Condition 1 and Condition 2 are operating levels, not a named threat.
  10. absent: Class cancellations and Conditions 1 and 2 are announced without naming any threat.
  11. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 levels are named, with no hazard specified.
  12. absent: Conditions 1 and 2 are operational levels with no hazard named.
  13. absent: Cancellations and condition levels are announced without naming any threat.
  14. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses appear, with no hazard named.
  15. absent: Conditions 1 and 2 are named, but the underlying threat is never stated.
  16. absent: The alert lists Condition 2 and Condition 1 but never names the hazard causing them.
  17. absent: The message names conditions and cancellations but never the underlying threat.
  18. absent: The text names only class cancellations and Condition levels, never the underlying threat.
  19. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses appear, naming no hazard.
  20. absent: Only operating conditions are given; no hazard such as snow or ice is named.
  21. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses appear, naming no actual threat.
  22. absent: Two condition levels are announced but no hazard is ever named.
  23. absent: Only Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses are given, with no hazard named.
  24. absent: The message gives Condition 2 and Condition 1 statuses without naming any hazard.
  25. absent: Conditions 1 and 2 are operational labels, not a named hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present on all 25 of 25 reads: every clause is tied to "all Boone campus classes" and conditions "in Boone", so the affected place is unambiguous.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: All Boone campus classes and Boone are the named locations.
  2. present: All references are to the "Boone campus" and Boone classes.
  3. present: All references are to the "Boone campus" classes and conditions.
  4. present: "Boone campus" and Boone are named.
  5. present: All references are to the Boone campus.
  6. present: All the changes are tied to the "Boone campus" and Boone.
  7. present: All references are to the "Boone campus" and Boone.
  8. present: "all Boone campus classes" and "in Boone" fix the location.
  9. present: It repeatedly specifies Boone and the Boone campus.
  10. present: All references are to "Boone campus" and "in Boone".
  11. present: All instructions apply to the named "Boone campus".
  12. present: All references are to "Boone campus" and "in Boone".
  13. present: "Boone campus" and "Boone" identify the affected location.
  14. present: All instructions are scoped to the "Boone campus".
  15. present: All references are to "Boone campus" classes and Boone conditions.
  16. present: All the changes are tied to the "Boone campus".
  17. present: "all Boone campus classes" and "in Boone" locate the affected area.
  18. present: "All Boone campus classes" and "in Boone" locate the notice.
  19. present: "Boone campus" and "in Boone" give the location.
  20. present: All statements are scoped to "Boone campus" and Boone.
  21. present: "Boone" campus classes are the subject.
  22. present: All references are to Boone campus classes and Boone.
  23. present: All references are to the Boone campus.
  24. present: All references are to the Boone campus, a specific location.
  25. present: All "Boone campus" classes and Boone itself are identified.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present with 25 of 25 agreement, based on the closing "Use caution", the only line addressed to recipient behavior amid the schedule detail.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It closes with "Use caution", a protective instruction to recipients.
  2. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients on how to behave.
  3. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients directly on how to behave.
  4. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution".
  5. present: "Use caution" tells recipients to take care.
  6. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients directly, with a link for further information.
  7. present: "Use caution" instructs readers to take care during the period.
  8. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients directly on how to behave.
  9. present: Readers are told to "Use caution" while the conditions are in effect.
  10. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients directly and the link offers further guidance.
  11. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients directly on how to behave.
  12. present: "Use caution" directs recipients to act carefully.
  13. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution" and to check the alert site.
  14. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution" and to check the alert site.
  15. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients, with the site given for more information.
  16. present: It advises readers to "Use caution" and directs them to more information.
  17. present: "Use caution" is a direct instruction to recipients.
  18. present: "Use caution" tells recipients how to behave, with a link for details.
  19. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients on how to proceed.
  20. present: The instruction "Use caution" asks a protective action of recipients.
  21. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients to act carefully.
  22. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients to take care.
  23. present: It tells readers to "Use caution" and check the alert page.
  24. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients on how to behave.
  25. present: "Use caution" instructs recipients on how to behave.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25 and densely so: classes canceled "until noon" on 2/23, Condition 2 until noon, and Condition 1 running "2/23 at noon until 2/24 at 7am".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It lays out 2/23 until noon and 2/24 at 7am as the schedule.
  2. present: Times are precise: canceled "until noon" on 2/23 and Condition 1 "until 2/24 at 7am".
  3. present: Times are detailed: canceled until noon 2/23, Condition 1 until 2/24 at 7am.
  4. present: "On 2/23 ... until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" are exact.
  5. present: It sets 2/23 until noon and Condition 1 through 2/24 at 7am.
  6. present: It sets out 2/23 until noon and Condition 1 from noon to 2/24 at 7am.
  7. present: It sets windows from "2/23 until noon" through "2/24 at 7am".
  8. present: "On 2/23", "until noon", and "2/24 at 7am" are explicit times.
  9. present: It fixes 2/23 until noon and Condition 1 from noon through 2/24 at 7am.
  10. present: "On 2/23", "until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" mark the timing precisely.
  11. present: Times run from "2/23 until noon" through "2/24 at 7am", clearly dated.
  12. present: "2/23 until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" set exact windows.
  13. present: It lays out "2/23 until noon" and Condition 1 "at noon until 2/24 at 7am".
  14. present: It lays out 2/23 until noon and 2/24 at 7am, precise times.
  15. present: Times span "2/23 until noon" through "2/24 at 7am", precise scheduling.
  16. present: It gives 2/23 until noon and Condition 1 until "2/24 at 7am".
  17. present: "On 2/23", "until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" set exact times.
  18. present: "On 2/23 ... until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" provide precise times.
  19. present: "On 2/23", "until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" give detailed timing.
  20. present: It lays out 2/23 until noon, then Condition 1 until "2/24 at 7am".
  21. present: "On 2/23", "until noon" and "until 2/24 at 7am" are explicit times.
  22. present: It specifies 2/23 until noon and Condition 1 through 2/24 at 7am.
  23. present: It lists "2/23 until noon" and "2/24 at 7am" among other times.
  24. present: "On 2/23", "until noon" and "until 2/24 at 7am" fix the schedule.
  25. present: It sets out 2/23 until noon and 2/24 at 7am precisely.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Two condition levels and three time windows are given, yet the message never states any risk, harm or severity to justify them.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity statement accompanies the condition levels.
  2. absent: The alert conveys no severity or consequence, only schedule and condition levels.
  3. absent: The message never says what could cause harm or how serious the risk is.
  4. absent: No statement of severity or possible harm is included.
  5. absent: No consequence or danger level is communicated.
  6. absent: No harm, danger or severity is described anywhere in the notice.
  7. absent: No consequence, damage or risk is described anywhere.
  8. absent: The text never says what could happen or how bad conditions are.
  9. absent: No consequence or severity of any underlying hazard is conveyed.
  10. absent: No consequence or severity of any hazard is offered.
  11. absent: No statement of harm, risk or severity accompanies the condition levels.
  12. absent: No severity statement or potential consequence appears.
  13. absent: No consequence or danger level is conveyed, only schedule changes.
  14. absent: Nothing conveys potential harm or how severe conditions may be.
  15. absent: The message conveys no danger level or possible consequence.
  16. absent: Nothing describes any potential harm or how bad conditions may get.
  17. absent: No severity or potential harm is described in the message.
  18. absent: No severity statement or description of possible consequences appears.
  19. absent: The text states no consequence or danger level.
  20. absent: Nothing describes harm or how dangerous the situation could become.
  21. absent: Nothing describes what the underlying conditions could do.
  22. absent: No harm, severity, or effect is described anywhere.
  23. absent: No harm, risk or severity statement is included.
  24. absent: No consequence or severity statement accompanies the conditions.
  25. absent: The alert conveys no severity or potential harm.